Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sarcasm Detection: A Comparative Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.02276 v2 pith:QML2MSUS submitted 2021-07-05 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords sarcasmdetectionarticleironysentimenttasktextaffective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Sarcasm detection is the task of identifying irony containing utterances in sentiment-bearing text. However, the figurative and creative nature of sarcasm poses a great challenge for affective computing systems performing sentiment analysis. This article compiles and reviews the salient work in the literature of automatic sarcasm detection. Thus far, three main paradigm shifts have occurred in the way researchers have approached this task: 1) semi-supervised pattern extraction to identify implicit sentiment, 2) use of hashtag-based supervision, and 3) incorporation of context beyond target text. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the datasets, approaches, trends, and issues in sarcasm and irony detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Token-free Models for Sarcasm Detection

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    ByT5-small reaches 89.87% and CANINE reaches 72.88% on news-headline and Twitter sarcasm detection, each edging a T5 baseline by less than one accuracy point.

Pith tools