Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Taking the Heat Off of Plasmonic Chemistry

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read How to settle whether plasmonic chemistry is really driven by hot electrons, not heat.

desk verdict A clear, useful viewpoint on photothermal controls and a thermodynamic taxonomy of plasmonic chemistry; the 'ultimate test' claim holds only under the closed, well-mixed, uniform-T conditions the author himself flags. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09415 v3 pith:QMUNAFRE submitted 2019-08-26 physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Prashant K. Jain This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 78.67.Bf82.50.-m
keywords plasmonicphotocatalysisphotosynthesishotcarriersphotothermaleffectlocalizedsurfaceplasmonresonancethermochemicalclassificationcarbondioxidereduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This Viewpoint argues that the long-running dispute over whether plasmonic nanoparticles accelerate chemical reactions by heating the catalyst or by generating energetic charge carriers can be resolved, and it identifies the experiment that resolves it. The decisive case is a reaction that is thermodynamically nonspontaneous at every temperature—positive enthalpy, negative entropy—because no amount of heating can drive such a reaction forward. If continuous-wave plasmon excitation produces product from such a reaction, the free energy of light must be doing nonthermal chemical work; photothermal heating can be only ancillary. The paper therefore proposes a classification into plasmonic photocatalysis (rate enhancement of spontaneous, $\Delta G < 0$ reactions) and plasmonic photosynthesis (use of light free energy to drive uphill, $\Delta G > 0$ reactions), and it specifies colloidal, stirred conditions under which the unavoidable photothermal heating is small enough that a matched dark control becomes feasible.

What carries the argument

The ultimate-test criterion is the thermodynamic row $\Delta H > 0$, $\Delta S < 0$, which makes $\Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S > 0$ for every $T$ and therefore impossible to drive by heat alone. The paper combines this with the heat-balance picture for a single nanoparticle, $\dot{q} = \sigma I$ for absorbed power and the steady-state rise $\Delta T = \sigma I / (4\pi\kappa r)$ in a colloidal medium, to show when surface and bulk temperatures coincide. These equations, plus the sign table for $\Delta H$ and $\Delta S$, carry the argument: the table defines which reactions belong to photocatalysis versus photosynthesis, and the heat-transfer equations define when a matched-temperature dark control is experimentally realizable.

What would settle it

Measure the forward rate of a $\Delta H > 0$, $\Delta S < 0$ reaction, such as CO2 + 2H2O $\rightarrow$ CH4 + 2O2, on Au nanoparticles in a vigorously stirred water colloid under continuous-wave visible light while monitoring the bulk temperature; the claim is supported if product appears at a measurable rate at a temperature where an identically prepared dark control, heated to the same surface temperature, produces no detectable product. The claim would be falsified if the same rate can be obtained in the dark by reproducing the same spatial temperature profile around the particles.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that thermochemistry, not mechanism dispute, tells us when a plasmonic rate enhancement is unambiguously nonthermal. Reactions with $\Delta H > 0$ and $\Delta S < 0$ have $\Delta G > 0$ at all temperatures, so they are nonspontaneous no matter how hot the catalyst gets; driving one of these under continuous-wave illumination would be an ultimate test of the photochemical action of plasmon excitation. Alongside this criterion, the paper offers a practical framework for dealing with the photothermal contribution to ordinary exergonic catalysis: use dilute stirred colloidal dispersions in high-conductivity liquids, keep the absorbed power density low, and take the measurable bulk temperature as the nanoparticle surface temperature, so that a dark reaction run at the same surface temperature is a valid control. Published systems that follow these practices, the paper contends, already provide unambiguous evidence of nonthermal plasmonic roles, and the classification into photocatalytic versus photosynthetic plasmonic chemistry organizes when thermal and nonthermal effects matter.

Load-bearing premise

The classification and the ultimate-test argument assume a closed system at a single uniform temperature, as the paper itself notes; if temperature or concentration gradients couple to the reaction, an uphill net reaction could conceivably be sustained without nonthermal carriers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A measured rate for any $\Delta H > 0$, $\Delta S < 0$ reaction under continuous-wave plasmon excitation would be decisive evidence that hot carriers perform real photochemical work beyond heating.
  • Thermally driven rate enhancement cannot substitute for plasmonic excitation in fuel-forming reactions such as carbon dioxide reduction to hydrocarbons, because those reactions require free energy input, not just higher temperature.
  • In stirred colloidal dispersions with small nanoparticles in liquid water, photothermal temperature rises can be kept below $10^{-2}$ K even at kW cm$^{-2}$ intensities, making bulk-temperature-matched dark controls a practical standard.
  • Reaction selectivity switching and multi-electron redox steps are categories where the plasmon must act as a chemical reagent, so their development depends on the nonthermal action the paper seeks to demonstrate.
  • The photocatalysis/photosynthesis split reorganizes how experimental claims should be reported: rate enhancements of spontaneous reactions need thermal controls, while uphill reactions provide their own internal test of nonthermal action.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same $\Delta H > 0$, $\Delta S < 0$ criterion could be applied to photoelectrochemical and molecular photochemistry, not just plasmonic systems, as a general signature of genuine photochemical work.
  • Because the classification depends on activities, not just standard states, a practical extension is to compute $\Delta G$ at the actual reactant and product concentrations before assigning a reaction to the photosynthesis category.
  • If hot carriers are responsible, uphill plasmonic reactions should show an action spectrum that tracks the localized surface plasmon resonance, a testable difference from a purely thermal response.
  • The paper's mention that rate suppression under light would also signal nonthermal action suggests an underexplored application: using plasmonic excitation to selectively suppress a side reaction in a thermal process.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This Viewpoint addresses the long-standing ambiguity between photothermal and nonthermal (hot-carrier) mechanisms in plasmonic chemistry. It argues that while photothermal heating is unavoidable under continuous-wave plasmon excitation, careful experimental design (especially stirred colloidal suspensions where the nanoparticle surface temperature can be inferred from the bulk temperature) and properly matched dark controls can resolve the mechanistic question. The paper then proposes a thermochemical classification of plasmon-driven reactions: exergonic reactions fall under 'plasmonic photocatalysis,' while endergonic reactions—particularly those with positive enthalpy and negative entropy, which are nonspontaneous at all temperatures—are termed 'plasmonic photosynthesis.' The central claim is that driving such intrinsically uphill reactions constitutes an 'ultimate test' of nonthermal, photochemical action of plasmon excitation, since purely thermal energy cannot supply the required free energy.

Significance. If the central claim is accepted with its necessary qualifications, the paper provides a useful and physically motivated criterion for designing decisive experiments in a controversial field. The thermodynamic reasoning is standard and the heat-transfer estimates are based on published models, giving the proposed classification a concrete, falsifiable character. The paper also offers practical best practices—stirred colloidal systems, dark controls at matched surface temperature, and caution about packed-bed reactors—that are actionable for experimentalists. As a Viewpoint, it makes no new experimental claims but delivers a clear conceptual framework that could sharpen future work. The explicit discussion of system openness, nonstandard conditions, and temperature-dependent thermodynamics is a strength, but these caveats are not consistently carried through to the paper's strongest claim, which needs tightening.

major comments (1)
  1. [Plasmonic Photocatalysis vs. Plasmonic Photosynthesis (final row of Table 1)] The sentence "Driving such reactions constitutes an ultimate test of the nonthermal, photochemical action of plasmon excitation" is too strong as stated. The paper's own preceding complications paragraph notes that the treatment assumes a closed system, that nonstandard concentrations must be considered, and that temperature-dependent thermodynamic parameters can alter the classification. In an open flow reactor with continuous product removal, the actual free energy of reaction can be negative even when the standard free energy is positive, so the forward reaction could proceed without any nonthermal carriers. Similarly, in an unstirred or packed-bed reactor, photothermal gradients can drive thermophoretic transport or thermochemical cycling that a uniformly heated dark control does not reproduce. The ultimate-test claim should be explicitly restricted to closed, well-mixed, uniform-temperature systems where ΔG_actual > 0 has been verified under the actual reaction conditions; otherwise the central message is overbroad.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Plasmonic Photocatalysis vs. Plasmonic Photosynthesis, complications paragraph] The statement that a +ΔH/−ΔS reaction is "nonspontaneous at any temperature" in Table 1 omits the qualifier that this holds under the stated assumption of constant ΔH and ΔS. Since the text immediately acknowledges the possibility of temperature-dependent thermodynamic parameters, it would be clearer to put this qualifier directly in the table row or its footnote.
  2. [The Elusive Control Experiment] The argument that R/Rdark > 1 indicates a nonthermal effect is valid only when the dark control is measured at exactly the same surface temperature and all other conditions are identical. The paper states this requirement, but it would help to explicitly mention that any mismatch in surface temperature or mass-transport characteristics between the light and dark runs invalidates the comparison, rather than merely saying such a difference 'will result in a spurious enhancement factor.'
  3. [Basics of Photothermal Heating, Eq. (3)] Equation (3) is presented as the temperature rise for a single nanoparticle in a medium; it should be explicitly noted that this expression is the steady-state solution for a point heat source in an infinite quiescent medium and is not applicable to dense suspensions or to systems with significant interparticle thermal interaction. The text hints at this by referencing the volumetric density, but a clarifying remark at the equation would prevent misapplication.
  4. [General] There are minor typographical issues throughout the manuscript, including 'Unites States' in the affiliation, 'Gibb's free energy' instead of 'Gibbs free energy,' and inconsistent use of spaces before parenthetical references. These do not affect the scientific content but should be corrected in proof.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the classification and ultimate-test argument are self-contained thermodynamic reasoning, with self-citations only as illustrative examples.

full rationale

This Viewpoint makes no quantitative prediction that is fitted to data and then re-presented as a result. Its central argument is a textbook thermochemical classification: reactions with ΔH > 0 and ΔS < 0 have ΔG > 0 at all temperatures (when ΔH and ΔS are taken as temperature-independent), so driving such reactions requires a free-energy input rather than mere heating. The inference that such a reaction constitutes an ultimate test of nonthermal plasmonic action follows directly from that thermodynamic statement, not from any parameter fitted in the paper. Self-citations (e.g., refs 24, 33, 34, 38) are used to illustrate experimental systems or prior mechanistic analyses, not to define or prove the thermochemical categories. The paper explicitly acknowledges limitations of its simplified classification, including the closed-system assumption, nonstandard concentrations/pressures, phase changes, and temperature dependence of thermodynamic parameters; these qualifications weaken the breadth of the 'ultimate test' claim but do not make the reasoning circular. The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and no fitted parameters. It relies on standard thermodynamics and previously published heat transfer formulas. The illustrative calculation uses literature values such as a 6 nm radius and 50 nm squared absorption cross section to show an order of magnitude estimate, not to fit anything.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The reaction system can be treated as a closed system at a uniform temperature without significant spatial gradients.
    The classification and ultimate test claim assume that temperature is uniform. The paper explicitly acknowledges the treatment assumes a closed system, which is often not the case.
  • domain assumption The steady-state surface temperature of plasmonic nanoparticles in a well-dispersed, stirred colloidal solution is close to the bulk medium temperature, as described by Equation 3.
    The best practices recommendation rests on the validity of Equation 3, taken from Keblinski et al., and the associated heat transfer model.
  • standard math Standard equilibrium thermodynamics, specifically the Gibbs free energy criterion, applies to the overall reaction at the nanoscale catalytic site.
    The classification uses textbook Gibbs free energy rules to argue that positive enthalpy and negative entropy reactions cannot be driven by heating alone.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Taking the Heat Off of Plasmonic Chemistry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QMUNAFRE

@misc{pith2026190809415,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Taking the Heat Off of Plasmonic Chemistry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QMUNAFRE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09415}
}
read the original abstract

Several chemical reactions catalyzed by plasmonic nanoparticles show enhanced rates under visible-light-excitation of the localized surface plasmon resonance of the nanoparticles. But it has been argued that there is an associated photothermal effect that can complicate the analysis and/or interpretation of the nature of the role played by plasmon excitation. This Viewpoint discusses this dilemma and provides some best practices for accounting for photothermal contributions in plasmon-excitation-driven chemistry. A classification of plasmonic chemistry into plasmonic photocatalysis and plasmonic photosynthesis is also proposed. It is argued that photosynthetic reactions, which require a Gibb's free energy input, constitute an ultimate test of the non-thermal, photochemical action of plasmon excitation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Photochemical Transformations on Plasmonic Metal Nanoparticles

    Linic, S.; Aslam, U.; Boerigter, C.; Morabito, M. Photochemical Transformations on Plasmonic Metal Nanoparticles. Nat Mater. 2015, 14,567–576

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Hou, W.; Cronin, S. B. A Review of Surface Plasmon Resonance‐Enhanced Photocatalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 1612–1619

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Direct Photocatalysis by Plasmonic Nanostructures

    Kale, M.J.; Avanesian, T.; Christopher, P. Direct Photocatalysis by Plasmonic Nanostructures. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 116–128

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    G.; Faucheaux, J

    Smith, J. G.; Faucheaux, J. A.; Jain, P. K. Plasmon Resonances for Solar Energy Harvesting: A Mechanistic Outlook. Nano Today 2015, 10, 67–80

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    A.; Kelly, K

    Jin, R; Cao, Y; Mirkin, C. A.; Kelly, K. L.; Schatz, G. C.; Zheng, J. G. Photoinduced Conversion of Silver Nanospheres to Nanoprisms. Science. 2001, 294, 1901–1903

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Silver Nanodisk Growth by Surface Plasmon Enhanced Photoreduction of Adsorbed [Ag+]

    Maillard, M; Huang, P.; Brus, L. Silver Nanodisk Growth by Surface Plasmon Enhanced Photoreduction of Adsorbed [Ag+]. Nano Lett. 2003, 311, 1611–1615

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Jain, P.K.; Qian, W.; El -Sayed, M. A. Ultrafast Cooling of Photoexcited Electrons in Gold Nanoparticle-Thiolated DNA Conjugates Involves the Dissociation of the Gold−Thiol Bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2426–2433

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Visible -Light-Enhanced Catalytic Oxidation Reactions on Plasmonic Silver Nanostructures

    Christopher, P.; Xin, H.; Linic, S. Visible -Light-Enhanced Catalytic Oxidation Reactions on Plasmonic Silver Nanostructures. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 467–472

    work page 2011

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Singular Characteristics and Unique Chemical Bond Activation Mechanisms of Photocatalytic Reactions on Plasmonic Nanostructures

    Christopher, P.; Xin, H.; Marimuthu, A.; Linic, S. Singular Characteristics and Unique Chemical Bond Activation Mechanisms of Photocatalytic Reactions on Plasmonic Nanostructures. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 1044–1050

    2012

  2. [10]

    V.; Cheng, J.; Lassiter, J

    Mukherjee, S.; Libisch, F.; Large, N.; Neumann, O.; Brown, L. V.; Cheng, J.; Lassiter, J. B.; Carter, E. A.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J. Hot Electrons Do the Impossible: Plasmon -Induced Dissociation of H2 on Au. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 240–247

    2013

  3. [11]

    M.; Large, N.; Ayala -Orozco, C.; Zhang, Y.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N

    Mukherjee, S.; Zhou, L.; Goodman, A. M.; Large, N.; Ayala -Orozco, C.; Zhang, Y.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J. Hot-Electron-Induced Dissociation of H 2 on Gold Nanoparticles Supported on SiO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 64–67

    2014

  4. [12]

    S.; Goddard III, W

    Sundararaman, R.; Narang, P.; Jermyn, A. S.; Goddard III, W. A.; Atwater, H. A. Theoretical Predictions for Hot -Carrier Generation from Surface Plasmon Decay. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5788

    2014

  5. [13]

    Persson, B. N. J. Polarizability of Small Spherical Metal Particles: Influenc e of The Matrix Environment. Surf. Sci. 1993, 281, 153–162. 10

    1993

  6. [14]

    Kumari, G.; Zhang, X.; Devasia, D.; Heo, J.; Jain, P. K. Watching Visible Light -Driven CO2 Reduction on a Plasmonic Nanoparticle Catalyst. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 8330–8340

    2018

  7. [15]

    A.; Carter, E

    Foerster, B.; Spata, V. A.; Carter, E. A.; Sönnichsen, C.; Link, S. Plasmon Damping Depends on The Chemical Nature of The Nanoparticle Interface, Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav0704

    2019

  8. [16]

    J.; Lou, M.; Li, K.; Finzel, J

    Seemala, B.; Therrien, A. J.; Lou, M.; Li, K.; Finzel, J. P.; Qi, J.; Nordlander, P.; Christopher, P. Plasmon -Mediated Catalytic O 2 Dissociation on Ag Nanostructures: Hot Electrons or Near Fields? ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 1803–1809

    2019

  9. [17]

    C.; Shalaev, V

    Ndukaife, J. C.; Shalaev, V. M.; Boltasseva, A. Plasmonics—Turning Loss into Gain. Science, 2016, 351, 334–335

    2016

  10. [18]

    Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A. Spectral Properties and Relaxation Dynamics of Surface Plasmon Electronic Oscillations in Gold and Silver Nanodots and Nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8410–8426

    1999

  11. [19]

    H.; Martini, I.; Hartland, G

    Hodak, J. H.; Martini, I.; Hartland, G. V. Spectroscopy and Dynamics of Nanometer -Sized Noble Metal Particles. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 6958–6967

    1998

  12. [20]

    O.; Richardson, H

    Govorov, A. O.; Richardson, H. H. Generating Heat With Metal Nanoparticles. Nano Today 2007, 2, 30–38

    2007

  13. [21]

    R.; Stafford, R

    Hirsch, L. R.; Stafford, R. J.; Bankson, J. A.; Sershen, S. R.; Rivera, B.; Price, R. E.; Hazle, J. D.; Halas, N. J.; West, J. L. Nanoshell-Mediated Near-Infrared Thermal Therapy of Tumors Under Magnetic Resonance Guidance. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100, 13549–13554

    2003

  14. [22]

    A.; Peng, C.; Itagi, A

    Challener, W. A.; Peng, C.; Itagi, A. V.; Karns, D.; Peng, W.; Peng, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhu, X.; Gokemeijer, N. J.; Hsia, Y.-T.; Ju, G.; Rottmayer, R. E.; Seigler, M. A.; Gage, E. C. Heat-Assisted Magnetic Record ing by a Near -Field Transducer with Efficient Optical Energy Transfe...

    2009

  15. [23]

    W.; Dubi , Y

    Sivan, Y.; Un, I. W.; Dubi , Y. Thermal Effects –An Alternative Mechanism for Plasmonic - Assisted Photo-Catalysis. arXiv preprint, 2019, arXiv:1902.03169 [physics.chem-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Phenomenological Arrhenius Analyses in Plasmon -Enhanced Catalysis

    Jain, P.K. Phenomenological Arrhenius Analyses in Plasmon -Enhanced Catalysis. arXiv preprint, 2019, arXiv:1908.05373 [physics.chem-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    E.; Zhang, D.; Su, N

    Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Reish, M. E.; Zhang, D.; Su, N. Q.; Gutiérrez, Y.; Moreno, F.; Yang, W.; Everitt, H. O.; Liu, J. Plasmon-Enhanced Catalysis: Distinguishing Thermal and Nonthermal Effects. Nano Lett. 2018, 183, 1714–1723

    2018

  18. [26]

    Yu, Y.; Sundaresan , V.; Willets, K. A. Hot Carriers versus Thermal Effects: Resolving the Enhancement Mechanisms for Plasmon -Mediated Photoelectrochemical Reactions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 5040–5048. 11

    2018

  19. [27]

    M.; Koopman, W.; Schuetz, R.; Schmid, T.; Liebig, F.; Koetz, J.; Bargheer, M

    Sarhan, R. M.; Koopman, W.; Schuetz, R.; Schmid, T.; Liebig, F.; Koetz, J.; Bargheer, M. The Importance of Plasmonic Heating for the Plasmon -Driven Photodimerization of 4 - Nitrothiophenol. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3060

    2019

  20. [28]

    F.; Zhang, C.; Robatjazi, H

    Zhou, L.; Swearer, D. F.; Zhang, C.; Robatjazi, H. ; Zhao, H.; Henderson, L.; Dong, L.; Christopher, P.; Carter, E. A.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J. Quantifying Hot Carrier and Thermal Contributions in Plasmonic Photocatalysis. Science 2018, 362, 69–72

    2018

  21. [29]

    Quantifying hot carrier and thermal contributions in plasmonic photocatalysis

    Sivan, Y.; Baraban, J.; Un, I. W.; Dubi, Y. Comment on “Quantifying hot carrier and thermal contributions in plasmonic photocatalysis” Science 2019, 364, eaaw9367

    2019

  22. [30]

    Quantifying Hot Carrier and Thermal Contributions in Plasmonic Photocatalysis

    Zhou, L.; Swearer, D. F.; Robatjazi, H.; Alabastri, A.; Christopher, P.; Carter, E. A.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J. Response on Comment to “Quantifying Hot Carrier and Thermal Contributions in Plasmonic Photocatalysis” Science 2019, 364, 69–72

    2019

  23. [31]

    S.; Day, J.; Lal, S.; Nordlander, P

    Neumann, O.; Urban, A. S.; Day, J.; Lal, S.; Nordlander, P. J.; Halas, N. J. Solar Vapor Generation Enabled by Nanoparticles. ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 42–49

    2013

  24. [32]

    Q.; Yang, W.; Everitt, H

    Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, D.; Su, N. Q.; Yang, W.; Everitt, H. O.; Liu, J. Product Selectivity in Plasmonic Photocatalysis for Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14542

    2017

  25. [33]

    S.; Wilson, A

    Yu. S.; Wilson, A. J.; Heo, J.; Jain, P.K. Plasmonic Control of Multi-Electron Transfer and C– C Coupling in Visible -Light-Driven CO 2 Reduction on Au Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 2189–2194

    2018

  26. [34]

    S.; Jain, P.K

    Yu. S.; Jain, P.K. Plasmonic Photosynthesis of C 1–C3 Hydrocarbons from Carbon Dioxide Assisted by an Ionic Liquid. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2022

    2019

  27. [35]

    G.; Bodapati , A.; Sullivan, C

    Keblinski, P.; Cahill, D. G.; Bodapati , A.; Sullivan, C. R.; Taton, T. A. Limits of Localized Heating by Electromagnetically Excited Nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 054305

    2006

  28. [36]

    Incropera, F. P. and de Witt, D. O. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer; John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 1990

    1990

  29. [37]

    Shah, Y. T. Thermal Energy: Sources, Recovery, and Applications , CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Kim, Y.; Dumett Torres, D.; Jain, P. K. Activation Energies of Plasmonic Catalysts. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3399–3407

    2016

  31. [39]

    J.; Jain, P

    Kim, Y.; Wilson, A. J.; Jain, P. K. The Nature of Plasmonically Assisted Hot-Electron Transfer in a Donor-Bridge-Acceptor Complex. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 4360–4365

    2017

  32. [40]

    G.; Jain, P

    Kim, Y.; Smith, J. G.; Jain, P. K. Harvesting Multiple Electron–Hole Pairs Generated Through Plasmonic Excitation of Au Nanoparticles. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 763–769. 12

    2018

  33. [41]

    O.; Liu, J

    Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Everitt , H. O.; Liu, J. Light -Induced Thermal Gradients in Ruthenium Catalysts Significantly Enhance Ammonia Production. Nano Lett. 2019, 193, 1706–1711

    2019

  34. [42]

    Zhai, Y. et al. Polyvinylpyrrolidone -Induced Anisotropic Growth of Gold Nanoprisms in Plasmon-Driven Synthesis. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 889–895

    2016

  35. [43]

    Negative Entropy and Photosynthesis

    Brittin, W.; Gamow, G. Negative Entropy and Photosynthesis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1961, 59, 724–727

    1961

  36. [44]

    Photosynthesis and negative entropy production

    Lavergne, J. Commentary on: “Photosynthesis and negative entropy production” by Jennings and coworkers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Bioenerg. 2006, 1757, 1453–1459

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.