Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian Active Learning for Scanning Probe Microscopy: from Gaussian Processes to Hypothesis Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.15458 v2 pith:QMZXIBBG submitted 2022-05-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LG

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LG
keywords learningmethodsmachinebayesiandiscoverygaussianmicroscopyphysical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent progress in machine learning methods, and the emerging availability of programmable interfaces for scanning probe microscopes (SPMs), have propelled automated and autonomous microscopies to the forefront of attention of the scientific community. However, enabling automated microscopy requires the development of task-specific machine learning methods, understanding the interplay between physics discovery and machine learning, and fully defined discovery workflows. This, in turn, requires balancing the physical intuition and prior knowledge of the domain scientist with rewards that define experimental goals and machine learning algorithms that can translate these to specific experimental protocols. Here, we discuss the basic principles of Bayesian active learning and illustrate its applications for SPM. We progress from the Gaussian Process as a simple data-driven method and Bayesian inference for physical models as an extension of physics-based functional fits to more complex deep kernel learning methods, structured Gaussian Processes, and hypothesis learning. These frameworks allow for the use of prior data, the discovery of specific functionalities as encoded in spectral data, and exploration of physical laws manifesting during the experiment. The discussed framework can be universally applied to all techniques combining imaging and spectroscopy, SPM methods, nanoindentation, electron microscopy and spectroscopy, and chemical imaging methods, and can be particularly impactful for destructive or irreversible measurements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. X-Factor: Quality Is a Dataset-Intrinsic Property

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 2,500 class-balanced MNIST subsets and 10 model architectures, test-error Z-scores correlate strongly across models (mean R2=0.82 excluding GNB), supporting dataset quality as an intrinsic property.

Pith tools