Pith. sign in

REVIEW 41 references

Density effects in precision laser spectroscopy of exotic helium atoms

T0 review · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum scattering maps density shifts for pion and kaon mass measurements

desk verdict Solid benchmark paper: first pressure broadening/shift coefficients for kaonic helium, plus a clean physical argument for n=19 pionic instability. Deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07125 v1 pith:QN3P5HXB submitted 2026-07-08 physics.atom-ph physics.chem-phquant-ph

Hubert J. Jóźwiak , Dimitar Bakalov , Micha{l} Przybytek , Michail Stoilov , Piotr Wcis{l}o This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords heliumatomscollisionaldensityeffectsexoticlasermasses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Exotic helium atoms trap short-lived particles like pions and kaons long enough to measure their properties with lasers. But these measurements happen inside a bath of ordinary helium atoms, which perturb the spectral lines through collisions. This paper computes, from first principles, how much those collisions shift and broaden the laser transition frequencies in pionic, kaonic, and antiprotonic helium. The approach uses an ab initio potential energy surface describing how an exotic helium atom interacts with an ordinary helium atom, then solves the quantum scattering problem with coupled-channel calculations to extract pressure broadening and shift coefficients across the 1-15 K temperature range. A key finding is that some candidate states in pionic helium (the n=19 manifold) are collisionally unstable: the pion's wave function extends so far outward that an incoming helium atom feels an unshielded Coulomb attraction, leading to rapid nuclear capture of the pion within picoseconds. These states must be excluded from spectroscopy. For the remaining states, inelastic quenching is negligible because the energy gaps to neighboring states are enormous compared to thermal collision energies, so the dominant collisional effect is elastic dephasing, the accumulation of phase differences between scattering amplitudes of the initial and final spectroscopic states. The paper provides the first rigorous line-shape parameters for kaonic helium and resolves large discrepancies (up to 80%) among prior calculations for pionic helium.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a three-stage pipeline. First, an ab initio potential energy surface (PES) for the exotic-helium plus ordinary-helium pair, computed at the full configuration interaction level and extrapolated to the complete basis set limit, provides the interaction energy across 26,505 geometries. Second, this PES is projected onto the rovibrational wave functions of each exotic atom to produce state-dependent effective interaction potentials. Third, coupled-channel quantum scattering calculations solve the nuclear motion on these potentials, yielding S-matrices that are combined into generalized spectroscopic cross-sections, which are thermally averaged to produce pressure broadening and

What would settle it

If the Born-Oppenheimer approximation fails for the pionic system, or if non-adiabatic couplings are significant, the transferred PES would produce incorrect effective potentials and hence wrong pressure coefficients. A direct experimental measurement of any pionic or kaonic transition at known density and temperature that disagrees with these predictions beyond the stated theoretical uncertainty would falsify the results.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is a set of pressure broadening and shift coefficients for specific laser transitions in pionic, kaonic, and antiprotonic helium, computed via coupled-channel quantum scattering on an ab initio potential energy surface. The paper discovers that the n=19 manifold in pionic helium is unstable against nuclear capture on picosecond timescales due to the pion's spatially extended wave function exposing an unshielded Coulomb attraction. For all remaining viable states, a universal mechanism governs the line shape: because exotic helium has molecule-like energy spacings far larger than cryogenic collision energies, inelastic quenching is fully suppressed and pressure effects come

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that a potential energy surface computed for antiprotonic helium can be directly transferred to pionic and kaonic helium via a coordinate transformation, relying on the Born-Oppenheimer separation of electronic and nuclear motion. If this separation breaks down for the lighter pion, the effective interaction potentials and all derived line-shape parameters would be affected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Experiments targeting the pion-to-electron mass ratio can now correct measured transition frequencies for collisional shifts using these theoretical coefficients rather than extrapolating to zero density, preserving signal at higher target densities.
  • The exclusion of the n=19 pionic manifold from spectroscopic candidates prevents wasted experimental effort on states that would decay in picoseconds.
  • The first line-shape parameters for kaonic helium enable the design of upcoming spectroscopy experiments aimed at improving the kaon mass accuracy.
  • The finding that elastic dephasing universally dominates over inelastic broadening simplifies future line-shape modeling for other exotic atoms not yet studied, since only the isotropic part of the interaction needs to be accurately characterized.
  • The order-of-magnitude discrepancy between binary-collision theory and the observed 78 GHz shift in superfluid helium motivates development of dense-medium corrections beyond the impact approximation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The transferability of the Born-Oppenheimer PES from antiprotonic to pionic and kaonic helium via coordinate transformation implicitly assumes that non-adiabatic couplings between electronic and exotic-particle motion are negligible; if the pion's lighter mass introduces significant coupling, the effective potentials and downstream line-shape parameters could shift beyond the stated uncertainty.
  • The hierarchy whereby higher-n states exhibit larger quenching and line-shape parameters suggests that future exotic atoms with even heavier captured particles (such as antiprotonic helium in higher Rydberg states) may show progressively smaller density effects, potentially easing precision requirements.
  • The Langevin capture model applied to the n=19 manifold predicts capture rates independent of the short-range potential details; if this model holds, any exotic atom state whose wave function extends beyond the shielding electron cloud would face the same fate, providing a general selection rule for viable spectroscopic candidates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a rigorous theoretical evaluation of collisional and density effects in pionic (π⁻⁴He⁺), kaonic (K⁻⁴He⁺), and antiprotonic helium-3 (p̄³He⁺) atoms, motivated by upcoming precision laser spectroscopy experiments aimed at determining the pion and kaon masses. Using an ab initio potential energy surface (PES) for the exotic-helium–ordinary-helium system [Ref. 20] and coupled-channel (CC) quantum scattering calculations, the authors (1) assess the collisional stability of candidate metastable states against inelastic quenching and nuclear capture, (2) identify and exclude the pionic n=19 manifold due to barrierless nuclear capture on picosecond timescales, (3) compute pressure broadening and shift coefficients for viable transitions in all three species, and (4) provide the first such theoretical benchmarks for kaonic helium. The methodology is standard and well-implemented, with convergence parameters clearly stated. The central physical mechanism—elastic dephasing dominating over inelastic quenching due to large energy gaps—is consistently identified across all three species.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely and important problem: density-dependent collisional shifts and broadenings are among the dominant systematic effects in precision spectroscopy of exotic helium atoms, and the existing theoretical values for pionic helium diverge by up to 80%. The new ab initio PES and fully quantum CC calculations represent a clear advance over prior semiclassical and sparse-grid approaches. The identification of the n=19 pionic manifold as collisionally unstable against nuclear capture is a concrete, falsifiable prediction with direct experimental consequences. The kaonic helium line-shape parameters are computed for the first time and will be essential for planned experiments. The comparison with prior theoretical results (Obreshkov et al. [25] for pionic, Bakalov et al. [19] for antiprotonic) and experimental data (Hori et al. [40]) provides useful validation. The work is well-suited for the journal's readership in atomic and molecular physics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central results—pressure broadening/shift coefficients and inelastic quenching rates for pionic, kaonic, and antiprotonic helium—are derived from first principles: an ab initio Born–Oppenheimer PES (FCI/CBS extrapolation) combined with coupled-channel quantum scattering equations (Eqs. 5–8). No parameters are fitted to experimental spectral data. The PES from Ref. [20] is a self-citation, but it is an independent ab initio computation, not a fit to the target quantities of this paper. The C₆ coefficient used in the Langevin capture model (Eq. 4) is fitted to the ab initio potential's long-range tail, not to experimental capture rates. The coordinate transformation adapting the antiprotonic-helium PES to pionic/kaonic systems is a standard mass-scaling remapping within the Born–Oppenheimer framework, not a circular redefinition. The single-state basis approximation for line-shape calculations (Appendix A) is justified by the demonstrated smallness of inelastic cross-sections (<10⁻² Ų), making it a physically motivated truncation rather than a circular assumption. The one experimental comparison (pionic helium at liquid density: 161 GHz estimated vs. 78 GHz observed) is explicitly acknowledged as outside the binary collision regime and does not feed back into the gas-phase coefficients. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, and no step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The C6 coefficient is a fitted parameter but only for the auxiliary Langevin capture estimate, not for the main line-shape results which are parameter-free given the PES. The Born–Oppenheimer transferability is the key domain assumption.

free parameters (1)
  • C6 coefficient (Langevin capture model) = fitted to ab initio v_{λ=0,a,a}(R) for n=19 pionic manifold; yields k_capt ≈ 1.5–2.2×10⁻¹⁰ cm³/s
    Fitted to the ab initio potential energy surface, not to experimental data. Used only for the n=19 instability estimate, not for the main line-shape results.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Born–Oppenheimer approximation: the PES computed for p̄⁴He⁺–⁴He is transferable to π⁻⁴He⁺–⁴He and K⁻⁴He⁺–⁴He via coordinate transformation.
    Stated in §III: 'Because the PES is computed within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, it is universally applicable to systems isoelectronic with the p̄⁴He⁺–⁴He system.' This is the foundational assumption enabling all pionic and kaonic calculations.
  • domain assumption Impact approximation: binary collisions dominate the line shape, valid at sufficiently low density.
    Invoked in §IV via Eq. (8). The authors acknowledge this breaks down at liquid density but still provide order-of-magnitude estimates there.
  • domain assumption Single-state basis suffices for line-shape calculations in pionic and kaonic helium.
    Stated in Appendix A: 'Additional convergence tests revealed that even these nearest neighbors have a negligible impact on the pressure broadening (γ₀) and shift (δ₀) coefficients.' Justified by convergence testing.
  • standard math Shimamura potential energy curve (Ref. [42]) accurately describes the isolated exotic atom.
    Used to generate rovibrational wave functions χ_a(r) in §III. This is an external input from the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Density effects in precision laser spectroscopy of exotic helium atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QN3P5HXB

@misc{pith2026260707125,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Density effects in precision laser spectroscopy of exotic helium atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QN3P5HXB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07125}
}
abstract

Exotic helium atoms act as unique atomic traps for heavy, negatively charged particles, protecting them from nuclear annihilation and nuclear capture on timescales long enough to enable high-precision laser spectroscopy. Such measurements serve as stringent tests of three-body quantum electrodynamics and offer a direct route to determining fundamental particle masses. Motivated by upcoming spectroscopic efforts targeting pionic ($\pi^{-\,4}\mathrm{He}^+$) and kaonic ($K^{-\,4}\mathrm{He}^+$) helium, we present a rigorous theoretical evaluation of the collisional and density effects governing these systems. Using an ab initio potential energy surface and coupled-channel quantum scattering calculations, we study the collisional stability of the candidate metastable states against inelastic quenching in a cryogenic helium buffer gas. Furthermore, we provide theoretical reference values for the pressure broadening and pressure shift coefficients of the targeted transitions. These results establish an essential benchmark for future experiments, paving the way for refined determinations of the pion and kaon masses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07125 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Physical structure, states, and transitions in exotic helium atoms. (a) Schematic representation of an exotic helium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Effective isotropic expansion coefficients, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Leading inelastic quenching cross sections, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: also compares our results with the previous the￾oretical calculations by Obreshkov et al. [25]. To ensure a direct comparison, we plot their calculations derived us￾ing a coupled partial-wave approach on the “HN1” fit of the ab initio points (see Ref. [18] for details)…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: presents the computed pressure broadening and shift coefficients for the 3 favored (∆v = 0, ∆j = −1) [(∆n = ∆l = −1)] and 3 unfavored (∆v = +1, ∆j = −1) [(∆n = 0, ∆l = −1)] transitions in the kaonic helium atom. To our knowledge, these are the first rigorous the￾oretic…
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Because the kaon is significantly heavier than [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Pressure broadening ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Pressure broadening (Re( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Pressure broadening (Re( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    M. Hori, H. Aghai-Khozani, A. S´ ot´ er, A. Dax, and D. Barna, Nature581, 37 (2020), ISSN 1476-4687, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2240-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2240-x 2020

  2. [19]

    Bakalov, B

    D. Bakalov, B. Jeziorski, T. Korona, K. Sza- lewicz, and E. Tchoukova, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2350 (2000), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.84.2350

    work page 2000

  3. [40]

    Stankiewicz, N

    K. Stankiewicz, N. Stolarczyk, H. J´ o´ zwiak, F. Thibault, and P. Wcis lo, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer276, 107911 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [1]

    and (v= 0, j= 17)→(v= 0, j= 16) lines, both rep- resentingn= 18→17 transitions. Because the spatial extent of the exotic particle’s wave function is governed primarily byn, the corresponding differential isotropic potentials are similar, and, consequently, their pressure broadening and shift coefficients closely match. Fig. 4 also compares our results wit...

    work page 2006

  5. [2]

    Yamazaki, N

    T. Yamazaki, N. Morita, R. S. Hayano, E. Wid- mann, and J. Eades, Phys. Rep.366, 183 (2002), ISSN 0370-1573, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ s0370-1573(01)00082-5

    work page 2002

  6. [3]

    Hori, Int

    M. Hori, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024), ISSN 1793-656X, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142/ s0217751x24430024

    work page 2024

  7. [4]

    R. S. Hayano, Hyperfine Interact.209, 9 (2012), ISSN 1572-9540, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10751-011-0527-x

    work page 2012

  8. [5]

    G. T. Condo, Phys. Lett.9, 65 (1964), ISSN 0031-9163, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(64) 90216-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64 1964

Show all 41 references
  1. [6]

    J. E. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 63 (1969), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.63

    1969 doi

  2. [7]

    Yamazaki, E

    T. Yamazaki, E. Widmann, R. S. Hayano, M. Iwasaki, S. N. Nakamura, K. Shigaki, F. J. Hartmann, H. Daniel, T. von Egidy, P. Hofmann, et al., Nature361, 238 (1993), ISSN 1476-4687, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/361238a0

    1993

  3. [8]

    V. I. Korobov, D. Bakalov, and H. J. Monkhorst, Phys. Rev. A59, R919(R) (1999), URLhttps://link.aps. 14 10−2 10−1 100 101 Ekin (K) 101 102 Re(σκ) ( ˚A2) 10−2 10−1 100 101 Ekin (K) −400 −200 0 200 400 Im(σκ) ( ˚A2) FIG. 8: Pressure broadening (Re(σ κ)) and pressure shift (Im(σ ...

    1999 doi

  4. [9]

    V. I. Korobov and Z.-X. Zhong, Hyperfine Interact.194, 15 (2009), ISSN 1572-9540, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10751-009-0024-7

    2009 doi

  5. [10]

    V. I. Korobov, L. Hilico, and J.-P. Karr, Phys. Rev. A89, 032511 (2014), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.032511

    2014 doi

  6. [12]

    M. Hori, H. Aghai-Khozani, A. S´ ot´ er, D. Barna, A. Dax, R. Hayano, T. Kobayashi, Y. Murakami, K. Todor- oki, H. Yamada, et al., Science354, 610 (2016), ISSN 1095-9203, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. aaf6702

    2016 doi

  7. [13]

    Wcis lo, F

    P. Wcis lo, F. Thibault, M. Zaborowski, S. W´ ojtewicz, A. Cygan, G. Kowzan, P. Mas lowski, J. Komasa, M. Puchalski, K. Pachucki, et al., J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer213, 41 (2018), ISSN 0022-4073, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.04.011

    2018 doi

  8. [14]

    Zaborowski, M

    M. Zaborowski, M. S lowi´ nski, K. Stankiewicz, F. Thibault, A. Cygan, H. J´ o´ zwiak, G. Kowzan, P. Mas lowski, A. Nishiyama, N. Stolarczyk, et al., Opt. Lett.45, 1603 (2020), ISSN 1539-4794, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ol.389268

    2020 doi

  9. [16]

    Lamperti, L

    M. Lamperti, L. Rutkowski, D. Ronchetti, D. Gatti, R. Gotti, G. Cerullo, F. Thibault, H. J´ o´ zwiak, S. W´ ojtewicz, P. Mas lowski, et al., Commun. Phys.6 (2023), ISSN 2399-3650, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s42005-023-01187-z

    2023

  10. [17]

    Cygan, S

    A. Cygan, S. W´ ojtewicz, H. J´ o´ zwiak, G. Kowzan, N. Sto- larczyk, K. Bielska, P. Wcis lo, R. Ciury lo, and D. Lisak, Sci. Adv.11(2025), ISSN 2375-2548, URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adp8556

    2025 doi

  11. [18]

    Stankiewicz, M

    K. Stankiewicz, M. Makowski, M. S lowi´ nski, K. L. So ltys, B. Bednarski, H. J. J´ o´ zwiak, N. Stolarczyk, M. Naro˙ znik, D. Kierski, S. W´ ojtewicz, et al., Nat. Phys.22, 637 (2026), ISSN 1745-2481, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s41567-026-03204-8

    2026

  12. [20]

    Bakalov, Hyperfine Interact.209, 25 (2012), ISSN 1572-9540, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10751-011-0526-y

    D. Bakalov, Hyperfine Interact.209, 25 (2012), ISSN 1572-9540, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10751-011-0526-y

    2012

  13. [21]

    H. J. J´ o´ zwiak, D. Bakalov, M. Przybytek, M. Stoilov, and P. Wcis lo, J. Chem. Theory Comput.22, 488 (2025), ISSN 1549-9626, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1021/acs.jctc.5c01636

    2025

  14. [22]

    Particle Data Group, R. L. Workman, and and others, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    M. Hori, A. S´ ot´ er, and V. I. Korobov, Phys. Rev. A 89, 042515 (2014), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.042515

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    Z.-D. Bai, V. I. Korobov, Z.-C. Yan, T.-Y. Shi, and Z.-X. Zhong, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 183001 (2022), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 128.183001

    2022 doi

  17. [26]

    Obreshkov and D

    B. Obreshkov and D. Bakalov, Phys. Rev. A93, 062505 (2016), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.93.062505

    2016

  18. [27]

    Yamazaki, M

    T. Yamazaki, M. Aoki, M. Iwasaki, R. S. Hayano, T. Ishikawa, H. Outa, E. Takada, H. Tamura, and A. Sak- aguchi, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1590 (1989), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1590

    1989 doi

  19. [28]

    D. T. Aznabayev, A. K. Bekbaev, and V. I. Korobov, Few-Body Syst.66(2025), ISSN 1432-5411, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00601-025-01987-9

    2025 doi

  20. [29]

    S´ ot´ er, H

    A. S´ ot´ er, H. Aghai-Khozani, D. Barna, A. Dax, L. Venturelli, and M. Hori, Nature603, 411 (2022), ISSN 1476-4687, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04440-7

    2022

  21. [30]

    Hori, private communication

    M. Hori, private communication. 15

  22. [31]

    B. D. Obreshkov, D. D. Bakalov, B. Lepetit, and K. Sza- lewicz, Phys. Rev. A69, 042701 (2004), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.042701

    2004 doi

  23. [32]

    D. C. Clary, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.41, 61 (1990), ISSN 1545-1593, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. pc.41.100190.000425

    1990 doi

  24. [33]

    G. C. Groenenboom and L. M. C. Janssen,Cold and Ultracold Collisions(The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2010), pp. 392–441, ISBN 9781839168734, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1039/bk9780854041589-00392

    2010 doi

  25. [34]

    B. R. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys.69, 4678 (1978), URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.436421

    1978 doi

  26. [35]

    J´ o´ zwiak, F

    H. J´ o´ zwiak, F. Thibault, A. Viel, P. Wcis lo, and F. Lique, A&A685, A113 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    J´ o´ zwiak,The SCATTERING code adjusted for diatom-atom calculations:https: // github

    H. J´ o´ zwiak,The SCATTERING code adjusted for diatom-atom calculations:https: // github. com/ hjozwiak-umk/ bigos_ h2he(2024), URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10776728

    2024 doi

  28. [37]

    Ben-Reuven, Phys

    A. Ben-Reuven, Phys. Rev.141, 34 (1966), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.141.34

    1966 doi

  29. [38]

    Shafer and R

    R. Shafer and R. G. Gordon, J. Chem. Phys.58, 5422 (1973), ISSN 1089-7690, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1063/1.1679162

    1973

  30. [39]

    Wcis lo, F

    P. Wcis lo, F. Thibault, N. Stolarczyk, H. J´ o´ zwiak, M. S lowi´ nski, M. Gancewski, K. Stankiewicz, M. Konefa l, S. Kassi, A. Campargue, et al., J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra- diat. Transf.260, 107477 (2021)

    2021

  31. [41]

    M. Hori, A. Dax, J. Eades, K. Gomikawa, R. S. Hayano, N. Ono, W. Pirkl, E. Widmann, H. A. Torii, B. Juh´ asz, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 243401 (2006), URLhttps:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.243401

    2006 doi

  32. [42]

    H. J. J´ o´ zwiak, D. Bakalov, M. Przybytek, M. Stoilov, and P. Wcis lo,Supplementary Material for the manuscript entitled Density effects in precision laser spectroscopy of exotic helium atoms(2026), URLhttps://doi.org/10. 18150/MCDX4H

    2026

  33. [43]

    Shimamura, Phys

    I. Shimamura, Phys. Rev. A46, 3776 (1992), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 46.3776

    1992 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.