REVIEW 4 cited by
Classical mechanics as nonlinear quantum mechanics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
All measurable predictions of classical mechanics can be reproduced from a quantum-like interpretation of a nonlinear Schrodinger equation. The key observation leading to classical physics is the fact that a wave function that satisfies a linear equation is real and positive, rather than complex. This has profound implications on the role of the Bohmian classical-like interpretation of linear quantum mechanics, as well as on the possibilities to find a consistent interpretation of arbitrary nonlinear generalizations of quantum mechanics.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Quantum observables for probabilistic classical particles
Solutions of the Liouville equation can be rewritten as a Schrödinger equation whose observables are non-commuting 'quantum' operators, reproducing the harmonic oscillator and hydrogen atom spectra as special subsystems.
-
Classical probabilistic realisation of quantum double-slit interference
Classical probability distributions over complex scalar fields realize Schrödinger dynamics and double-slit interference for a quantum particle via conserved-charge subsystems.
-
Quantum mechanics for classical transport equations
Classical probabilistic transport equations are reformulated as quantum systems whose wave function obeys Schrödinger evolution and whose observables include non-commuting operators for statistical quantities.
-
Quantum field theory for classical fields
A classical Klein-Gordon field with random initial conditions, described through specially defined fluctuating observables, obeys the functional-integral rules of a quantum field theory.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.