pith. sign in

arxiv: 1111.4500 · v2 · pith:QQAAXRVInew · submitted 2011-11-18 · 🧮 math.PR · cond-mat.stat-mech· cs.IT· math.IT· nlin.CD· stat.ML

Equivalence of History and Generator Epsilon-Machines

classification 🧮 math.PR cond-mat.stat-mechcs.ITmath.ITnlin.CDstat.ML
keywords epsilon-machinesgeneratorhistorydefinedequivalencehiddenmarkovmodels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Epsilon-machines are minimal, unifilar presentations of stationary stochastic processes. They were originally defined in the history machine sense, as hidden Markov models whose states are the equivalence classes of infinite pasts with the same probability distribution over futures. In analyzing synchronization, though, an alternative generator definition was given: unifilar, edge-emitting hidden Markov models with probabilistically distinct states. The key difference is that history epsilon-machines are defined by a process, whereas generator epsilon-machines define a process. We show here that these two definitions are equivalent in the finite-state case.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.