Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Coulomb corrections change the ππ threshold cusp by 2–3% in ψ′→J/ψππ, so precision scattering-length fits must include them.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 15:53 UTC pith:QQABKHZQ

load-bearing objection Solid, practical quantification of a 2–3% Coulomb shift on the π⁰π⁰ cusp in ψ′→J/ψππ; ready-to-use NREFT amplitude for BESIII/STCF analyses. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.29208 v1 pith:QQABKHZQ submitted 2026-03-31 hep-ph

Role of electromagnetic corrections in the ππ distributions of psi^prime to J/psi π π

Zhao-Sai Jia , Gang Li , Zhen-Hua Zhang This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords ππ scattering lengthsthreshold cuspCoulomb correctionsnonrelativistic EFTψ′→J/ψππpioniumfinal-state interaction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that electromagnetic (Coulomb) interactions between charged pions visibly reshape the famous cusp that appears in the neutral-pion mass spectrum of the decay ψ′→J/ψπ^{0}π^{0} right at the charged-pion threshold. That cusp is a standard tool for extracting the S-wave ππ scattering lengths; the authors find that turning on Coulomb exchanges makes the cusp 2–3% larger. They supply a ready-to-use non-relativistic coupled-channel amplitude that already contains both the strong and Coulomb final-state interactions, and they demonstrate with Monte-Carlo studies that, once data sets reach the size expected at Super Tau-Charm Facility, omitting the electromagnetic piece can bias the extracted scattering lengths outside their statistical errors. The work therefore converts a previously neglected correction into a necessary ingredient for any high-precision extraction of the ππ scattering lengths from charmonium dipion transitions.

Core claim

When both strong and Coulomb interactions are resummed in a two-channel non-relativistic effective theory, the cusp that appears at the π^{+}π^{-} threshold in the π^{0}π^{0} invariant-mass spectrum of ψ′→J/ψππ is enhanced by about 2–3% relative to the pure-strong case. The same electromagnetic piece also generates a non-zero continuum at the charged-pion threshold through virtual pionium poles.

What carries the argument

The two-potential factorization of the S-wave T-matrix that cleanly separates the infinite Coulomb-photon ladder (T_C and the Coulomb wave-function factor W_C) from the strong-Coulomb amplitude T_SC obtained by solving a Lippmann-Schwinger equation with constant contact potentials; after renormalization the whole amplitude is expressed solely in terms of the isospin scattering lengths a0 and a2.

Load-bearing premise

The short-distance production vertices can be treated as constants (or fixed once by matching to an earlier chiral fit) and the residual J/ψ–pion interaction can be neglected entirely.

What would settle it

A high-statistics fit of the real BESIII or STCF π^{0}π^{0} spectrum in the 270–290 MeV window that returns a statistically significant difference between the scattering lengths extracted with versus without the Coulomb factors supplied in Eqs. (15)–(16).

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any extraction of a0−a2 from ψ′→J/ψπ^{0}π^{0} that aims at better than ~2% precision must include the Coulomb-resummed amplitude.
  • With O(10⁷) events below 290 MeV the bias from omitting Coulomb corrections already exceeds the statistical uncertainty.
  • The same ready-to-use amplitude can be dropped into analyses of other heavy-quarkonium dipion transitions (Υ(3S)→Υ(2S)ππ, etc.).
  • Deviations from the predicted line shape would signal additional dynamics such as Zc exchange or residual J/ψπ final-state interaction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 2–3% electromagnetic shift is comparable in size to the present theoretical uncertainty on a0−a2 itself, so future global fits that combine kaon and charmonium data will need a uniform treatment of Coulomb corrections.
  • Once STCF data arrive, a simultaneous fit of the neutral and charged dipion spectra could isolate the pionium contribution and thereby provide an independent cross-check of the pionium lifetime.
  • The same NREFT machinery can be reused for the cusp in η′→ηπ^{0}π^{0} once electromagnetic corrections are likewise included.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a two-channel nonrelativistic EFT amplitude for ψ′ → J/ψ ππ near the π+π− threshold, incorporating S-wave strong rescattering and Coulomb photon exchanges via the two-potential formalism (Eqs. 1–9). After renormalization, the production amplitudes reduce to cutoff-independent expressions (Eqs. 15–16) matched at threshold to a ChPT short-distance vertex fixed by BESII/ATLAS data. The authors predict the π⁰π⁰ and π+π− lineshapes, show that Coulomb effects enhance the cusp magnitude by ~2–3% (Fig. 4), and use Monte Carlo pseudo-data (Sec. IV, Table I) to quantify the bias incurred when electromagnetic corrections are omitted from fits for a0−a2 and a2. They conclude that EM corrections should be retained for precision extractions at BESIII/STCF statistics.

Significance. If the 2–3% shift is robust, the work supplies a concrete, ready-to-use amplitude for experimental analyses of the large BESIII and future STCF ψ′ samples, where statistical precision on a0−a2 can approach the percent level. The calculation is a natural extension of the NREFT framework already applied to K o3π and Υ dipion transitions, and the MC study cleanly demonstrates when the Coulomb bias becomes comparable to the statistical error. The explicit renormalized amplitudes and the tabulated fit results are directly usable by experimental groups.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. IV (and footnote 1): energy resolution is acknowledged as necessary but is never folded into the MC generation or the fits of Table I. At the 0.2–0.5 MeV binning used for the high-statistics samples, a realistic BESIII resolution of a few hundred keV would smear the pionium peaks and the cusp edge; without this convolution it is unclear whether the 1%–5% central-value bias survives and whether the χ²/d.o.f. values remain meaningful. A single resolution-smeared column in Table I would settle the issue.
  2. Eqs. (15)–(16) and the paragraph after Eq. (16): the isospin-limit identification Vc ≃ Vn is imposed by hand after renormalization. Because the Coulomb Green function GC22 already breaks isospin, a residual short-distance isospin-breaking piece of relative size O(α) or O((Mπ+−Mπ⁰)/Mπ) could shift the cusp height at the same 2–3% level claimed for the long-range Coulomb effect. A short estimate of this residual (or an explicit statement that it is absorbed into the free normalization N of the MC fits) is needed to keep the central claim under control.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and throughout: missing spaces in “electromagnetic correctionsare” and “NON-RELA TIVISTIC”; several other compound words lack hyphens or spaces.
  2. Fig. 3 insets: the dense pionium peaks are hard to resolve; a logarithmic vertical scale or a separate zoom panel would help.
  3. Eq. (17): the overall phase of Vn is fixed only up to a sign; a brief remark that only |Vn|² enters the rates would avoid confusion.
  4. Table I caption: clarify that the uncertainties are purely statistical (from the fit) and do not include the input uncertainties on α21 and κ.
  5. Sec. II A: the definition of κ c after Eq. (6) uses the digamma function; a reference or explicit formula for the principal-value part would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: external scattering lengths drive a sensitivity study of Coulomb effects on the cusp; mild self-reference only in the production vertex.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. II.B, Eq. (17) and surrounding text]
    "In Refs. [46, 47], the short-distance vertex for ψ′ o J/ψππ was derived using ChPT [48], and the parameters in the vertex were fixed by fitting to the BESII and ATLAS data [36, 37] for the π+π- spectrum and the helicity angular distribution, with the ππ FSIs included through the Omnès function. By matching the ψ′ o J/ψππ vertex from the LO NREFT to that from ChPT in Refs. [46, 47] at the ππ threshold, one obtains Vn=..."

    The production vertex Vn is taken from prior work by overlapping authors that already fitted the same class of data. Because Vn multiplies the entire amplitude as an overall constant, it does not force the relative 2-3% Coulomb shift that is the paper's central claim; the circularity is therefore only mild and non-load-bearing for the reported electromagnetic correction.

full rationale

The paper takes a0-a2 and a2 as external inputs from ChPT+Roy analyses (Colangelo et al.), constructs the two-potential NREFT T-matrix with Coulomb (Eqs. 1-9), renormalizes the production amplitudes (15-16), and predicts lineshapes. The 2-3% cusp shift (Fig. 4) and the MC bias when Coulomb is omitted (Table I) are genuine consequences of those inputs, not tautologies. The only mild self-reference is matching the short-distance vertex Vn to a ChPT expression previously fitted by overlapping authors (Dong/Wu et al.); that vertex is an overall normalization factor and does not force the reported electromagnetic correction. The exercise is a controlled sensitivity study, not a circular re-derivation of the scattering lengths.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central numerical claim rests on standard NREFT power counting, external scattering-length values, a production vertex matched from an earlier ChPT fit, and the neglect of J/ψπ FSI. No new dynamical entities are introduced; free parameters are taken from the literature rather than floated against the cusp itself.

free parameters (3)
  • α21 (production strength) = 1.18±0.01±0.05 GeV⁻³
    Taken from a prior ChPT fit to BESII/ATLAS π⁺π⁻ spectra; enters the overall normalization of Vn and therefore the absolute height of the predicted spectrum.
  • κ (ChPT low-energy constant in production vertex) = 0.26±0.01±0.01
    Same external fit; multiplies the kinematic factor that sets the energy dependence of the short-distance vertex.
  • (a0−a2)Mπ+ and a2Mπ+ = 0.2640±0.004 and −0.0444±0.0010
    External ChPT+Roy values used as input to generate the ‘true’ lineshape; later floated in the MC fits to quantify bias.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Leading-order NREFT: strong ππ potential is a constant contact term; higher-order range corrections and D-wave contributions are negligible near threshold.
    Stated in Sec. II A; standard for cusp analyses but truncates the effective-range expansion.
  • domain assumption J/ψπ final-state interaction can be neglected (OZI suppression + lattice aJ/ψπ≈0).
    Invoked in the Introduction and after Eq. (16); removes an entire class of diagrams.
  • domain assumption Isospin limit for the linearly divergent pieces of the Green functions so that Vc≃Vn after renormalization.
    Explicitly used to obtain the cutoff-independent amplitudes (15)–(16).
  • domain assumption Isospin-breaking parameter η=(Mπ+²−Mπ0²)/Mπ+² is the only source of isospin violation at LO.
    Eqs. (11)–(12); standard ChPT counting.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 18951 in / 2744 out tokens · 28295 ms · 2026-07-13T15:53:15.005340+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The cusp structure at the $\pi^+\pi^-$ threshold in the $\pi^0\pi^0$ invariant mass spectrum serves as a sensitive probe for extracting the $S$-wave $\pi\pi$ scattering lengths in processes where an $S$-wave $\pi^0\pi^0$ pair is produced in the final states. Within the framework of nonrelativistic effective field theory with coupled channels $\pi^0\pi^0$ and $\pi^+\pi^-$, we revisit the near-threshold structures in the $\pi^0\pi^0$ spectrum of $\psi^\prime \to J/\psi \pi\pi$. Our analysis incorporates the $\pi \pi$ final-state rescattering, including both strong and Coulomb interactions. It turns out that the cusp near the $\pi^+\pi^-$ threshold becomes more prominent when Coulomb interactions are included. The electromagnetic correctionsare found to alter the magnitude of the threshold cusp by about 2%-3%, underscoring the necessity of including these effects in precision determinations of the $\pi\pi$ scattering lengths. The coupled-channel amplitude constructed in this work provides a ready-to-use theoretical framework for experimental analyses of fine structures near $\pi\pi$ thresholds.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 33 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Colangelo, J

    G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, Theππ Swave scattering lengths, Phys. Lett. B488, 261 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0007112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  2. [2]

    Colangelo, J

    G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler,ππscattering, Nucl. Phys. B603, 125 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0103088

    arXiv 2001

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

    S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

    1979

  4. [4]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop, Annals Phys.158, 142 (1984)

    1984

  5. [5]

    S. M. Roy, Exact integral equation for pion pion scattering involving only physical region partial waves, Phys. Lett. B36, 353 (1971)

    1971

  6. [6]

    Garcia-Martin, R

    R. Garcia-Martin, R. Kaminski, J. R. Pelaez, J. Ruiz de Elvira, and F. J. Yndurain, The Pion-pion scattering amplitude. IV: Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV, Phys. Rev. D 83, 074004 (2011), arXiv:1102.2183 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Ananthanarayan, G

    B. Ananthanarayan, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, Roy equation analysis ofππscattering, Phys. Rept.353, 207 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0005297

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Descotes-Genon, N

    S. Descotes-Genon, N. H. Fuchs, L. Girlanda, and J. Stern, Analysis and interpretation of new low-energy ππscattering data, Eur. Phys. J. C24, 469 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0112088

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  9. [9]

    Rosseletet al., Experimental Study of 30,000K e4 Decays, Phys

    L. Rosseletet al., Experimental Study of 30,000K e4 Decays, Phys. Rev. D15, 574 (1977)

    1977

  10. [10]

    Pislaket al., High statistics measurement ofK e4 decay properties, Phys

    S. Pislaket al., High statistics measurement ofK e4 decay properties, Phys. Rev. D67, 072004 (2003), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 119903 (2010)], arXiv:hep-ex/0301040. 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    J. R. Batleyet al.(NA48/2 Collabration), New high statistics measurement ofK e4 decay form factors and ππscattering phase shifts, Eur. Phys. J. C54, 411 (2008)

    2008

  12. [12]

    J. R. Batleyet al.(NA48/2 Collabration), Precise tests of low energy QCD fromK e4 decay properties, Eur. Phys. J. C70, 635 (2010)

    2010

  13. [13]

    T. R. Palfrey and J. L. Uretsky, Photoproduction and detection of the two meson bound state, Phys. Rev. 121, 1798 (1961)

    1961

  14. [14]

    Adevaet al.(DIRAC Collabration), First measurement of theπ +π− atom lifetime, Phys

    B. Adevaet al.(DIRAC Collabration), First measurement of theπ +π− atom lifetime, Phys. Lett. B619, 50 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0504044

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Budini and L

    P. Budini and L. Fonda, Pion-Pion Interaction from Threshold Anomalies inK + Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.6, 419 (1961)

    1961

  16. [16]

    Cabibbo, Determination of thea 0 −a 2 pion scattering length fromK + →π +π0π0 decay, Phys

    N. Cabibbo, Determination of thea 0 −a 2 pion scattering length fromK + →π +π0π0 decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 121801 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0405001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  17. [17]

    Cabibbo and G

    N. Cabibbo and G. Isidori, Pion-pion scattering and theK→3πdecay amplitudes, JHEP03, 021, arXiv:hep- ph/0502130

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    Colangelo, J

    G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, B. Kubis, and A. Rusetsky, Cusps inK→3πdecays, Phys. Lett. B638, 187 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0604084

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    J. R. Batleyet al.(NA48/2 Collabration), Observation of a cusp-like structure in theπ 0π0 invariant mass distribution fromK ± →π ±π0π0 decay and determination of theππscattering lengths, Phys. Lett. B633, 173 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0511056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  20. [20]

    J. R. Batleyet al., Determination of the S-waveππscattering lengths from a study ofK ± →π ±π0π0 decays, Eur. Phys. J. C64, 589 (2009), arXiv:0912.2165 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Gasser, B

    J. Gasser, B. Kubis, and A. Rusetsky, Cusps inK→3πdecays: a theoretical framework, Nucl. Phys. B850, 96 (2011), arXiv:1103.4273 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Gevorkyan, Pion-pion scattering lengths determination from kaon decays, PoSCD12, 066 (2013)

    S. Gevorkyan, Pion-pion scattering lengths determination from kaon decays, PoSCD12, 066 (2013)

    2013

  23. [23]

    Bissegger, A

    M. Bissegger, A. Fuhrer, J. Gasser, B. Kubis, and A. Rusetsky, Cusps inK L →3πdecays, Phys. Lett. B 659, 576 (2008), arXiv:0710.4456 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    Ditsche, B

    C. Ditsche, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Electromagnetic corrections inη→3πdecays, Eur. Phys. J. C60, 83 (2009), arXiv:0812.0344 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  25. [25]

    Kubis and S

    B. Kubis and S. P. Schneider, The Cusp effect inη ′ →ηππdecays, Eur. Phys. J. C62, 511 (2009), arXiv:0904.1320 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    Meißner, G

    U.-G. Meißner, G. Muller, and S. Steininger, Virtual photons in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory and elec- tromagnetic corrections toππscattering, Phys. Lett. B406, 154 (1997), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 407, 454 (1997)], arXiv:hep-ph/9704377

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  27. [27]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, and H.-Q. Jiang, Theππphase shifts fromψ ′ →J/ψπ +π− decays, HEPNP29, 852 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0601082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  29. [29]

    Z. X. Zhang, J. J. Sanz-Cillero, X. Y. Shen, N. Wu, L. Y. Xiao, and H. Q. Zheng, Studies onπ +π− phase motion in theψ ′ →J/ψπ +π− process, Phys. Rev. D78, 076010 (2008), arXiv:0805.2780 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    Chen, Study ofππphase shifts inψ(2S)→π +π−J/ψ, Phys

    H. Chen, Study ofππphase shifts inψ(2S)→π +π−J/ψ, Phys. Rev. D80, 034029 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Liu, F.-K

    X.-H. Liu, F.-K. Guo, and E. Epelbaum, Extractingππ S-wave scattering lengths from cusp effect in heavy quarkonium dipion transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2284 (2013), arXiv:1212.4066 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    Liu, H.-W

    L. Liu, H.-W. Lin, and K. Orginos, Charmed Hadron Interactions, PoSLA TTICE2008, 112 (2008), arXiv:0810.5412 [hep-lat]. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    S. R. Gevorkian, A. V. Tarasov, and O. O. Voskresenskaya, Electromagnetic corrections to final state inter- actions inK→3πdecays, Phys. Lett. B649, 159 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0612129

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  34. [34]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Determination of the number ofψ(3686) events taken at BESIII, Chin

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Determination of the number ofψ(3686) events taken at BESIII, Chin. Phys. C 48, 093001 (2024), arXiv:2403.06766 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Achasovet al., STCF Conceptual Design Report: Volume 1 – Physics & Detector, Front

    M. Achasovet al., STCF Conceptual Design Report: Volume 1 – Physics & Detector, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 19, 14701 (2023), arXiv:2303.15790 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Ablikimet al.(BES Collaboration), Production ofσinψ(2S)→π +π−J/ψ, Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BES Collaboration), Production ofσinψ(2S)→π +π−J/ψ, Phys. Lett. B645, 19 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0610023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Aaboudet al.(ATLAS Collaboration), Measurements ofψ(2S) andX(3872)→J/ψπ +π− production in ppcollisions at √s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP01, 117, arXiv:1610.09303 [hep-ex]

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS Collaboration), Measurements ofψ(2S) andX(3872)→J/ψπ +π− production in ppcollisions at √s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP01, 117, arXiv:1610.09303 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Braaten, E

    E. Braaten, E. Johnson, and H. Zhang, Zero-range effective field theory for resonant wino dark matter. Part II. Coulomb resummation, JHEP02, 150, arXiv:1708.07155 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Shi, Z.-H

    P.-P. Shi, Z.-H. Zhang, F.-K. Guo, and Z. Yang,D +D− hadronic atom and its production inppandp¯p collisions, Phys. Rev. D105, 034024 (2022), arXiv:2111.13496 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Jia, Z.-H

    Z.-S. Jia, Z.-H. Zhang, F.-K. Guo, and G. Li, Coupled-channel analysis of the near-thresholde +e− →N ¯N cross sections, Phys. Rev. D111, 054014 (2025), arXiv:2410.16873 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Kong and F

    X. Kong and F. Ravndal, Coulomb effects in low-energy proton proton scattering, Nucl. Phys. A665, 137 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9903523

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  42. [42]

    K¨ onig, H

    S. K¨ onig, H. W. Grießhammer, H. W. Hammer, and U. van Kolck, Effective theory of 3H and 3He, J. Phys. G43, 055106 (2016), arXiv:1508.05085 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Sakai, F.-K

    S. Sakai, F.-K. Guo, and B. Kubis, Extraction ofN Dscattering lengths from the Λ b →π −pD0 decay and properties of the Σ c(2800)+, Phys. Lett. B808, 135623 (2020), arXiv:2004.09824 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Gasser, On the history of pion-pion scattering, PoSEFT09, 029 (2009)

    J. Gasser, On the history of pion-pion scattering, PoSEFT09, 029 (2009)

    2009

  45. [45]

    Braaten and M

    E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, Factorization in the production and decay of theX(3872), Phys. Rev. D72, 014012 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0506087

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  46. [46]

    X.-K. Dong, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, and B.-S. Zou, Is the existence of aJ/ψJ/ψ bound state plausible?, Sci. Bull.66, 2462 (2021), arXiv:2107.03946 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Wu, X.-K

    B. Wu, X.-K. Dong, M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Deciphering the mechanism ofJ/ψ-nucleon scat- tering, (2024), arXiv:2410.19526 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Mannel and R

    T. Mannel and R. Urech, Hadronic decays of excited heavy quarkonia, Z. Phys. C73, 541 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9510406

    arXiv 1997

  49. [49]

    Brambilla, G

    N. Brambilla, G. a. Krein, J. Tarr´ us Castell` a, and A. Vairo, Long-range properties of 1Sbottomonium states, Phys. Rev. D93, 054002 (2016), arXiv:1510.05895 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    M. B. Voloshin, Charmonium, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.61, 455 (2008), arXiv:0711.4556 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, and R.-G. Ping, Heavy quarkoniumπ +π− transitions and a possible b¯bq¯qstate, Nucl. Phys. A761, 269 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0410204

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005