Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Holography shows that when a confining gauge theory's line of first-order phase transitions ends at a critical point, a light dilaton — a scalar bound state with arbitrarily diallable mass — appears in the spectrum.

desk verdict Useful but self-referential review of the authors' holographic dilaton programme; the central identification of the light scalar as a dilaton rests on a diagnostic that is necessary but not sufficient. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22497 v1 pith:QQX66XQS submitted 2026-07-24 hep-th hep-ph

classification hep-thhep-ph PACS 11.25.Tq
keywords dilatonholographygauge-gravitydualityconfinementphasetransitionscriticalpointbound-statespectraprobeapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Whether a confining gauge theory can host a dilaton — the pseudo-Goldstone boson of approximate scale invariance — with a mass far below the confinement scale is an open question in quantum field theory. This review synthesises a holography-based programme that tests one proposed answer: the dilaton becomes light when the theory sits near a zero-temperature phase transition. Surveying six top-down supergravity constructions and three bottom-up models, the authors compute free energies and bound-state spectra and find a consistent pattern — a parametrically light scalar appears precisely where a line of first-order transitions ends at a critical point, and the probe-approximation test identifies the state as a genuine dilaton. In the two sharpest examples the scalar is exactly massless at the critical point, and its mass can be dialled arbitrarily small by approaching it. The authors are explicit that all known realisations are in fewer than four spacetime dimensions, leaving the four-dimensional question open.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on three tools. First, the gauge-gravity dictionary (Eqs. (1)–(3)): the quantum generating functional of the strongly coupled boundary field theory equals the classical on-shell action of a weakly coupled higher-dimensional gravity theory; the review explicitly postulates this equivalence rather than deriving it. Second, the probe approximation (Section III.D), a diagnostic that recomputes the scalar spectrum while neglecting the fluctuation of the trace of the metric — a light scalar that disappears or shifts grossly under this test is declared a dilaton, since it is sourced by the dilatation operator. Third, holographic renormalisation of the free energy as a function of

What would settle it

Compute or simulate a confining gauge theory whose zero-temperature phase diagram contains a line of first-order transitions ending at a critical point, and measure the lightest scalar-singlet mass as the control parameters approach that point: if the mass does not tend to zero as the free energy becomes continuous with divergent second derivative, the paper's central claim is wrong for that case. The sharpest in-paper target is the Section IV.F construction — the claim predicts an exactly massless scalar at the point where the free energy's second derivative diverges, so recomputing that spec

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in Section VI, is that holography as a calculation technique has provided evidence — "proven explicitly both in top-down and bottom-up holographic constructions" — that if a confining quantum field theory has a line of first-order, zero-temperature phase transitions in its parameter space and that line ends at a critical point, then in close proximity of that point the spectrum of bound states contains a light scalar whose mass can be dialled to be arbitrarily light by choosing the control parameters closer to the critical point. The scalar qualifies as a dilaton because it is sourced by the trace of the energy-momentum tensor: in the probe approximation, which negl

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the gauge-gravity dictionary itself — the postulate that the classical, weakly coupled supergravity saddle point reliably computes the strong-coupling physics of the dual field theory — together with the expectation that the lower-dimensional examples reproduce the physics of a four-dimensional confining gauge theory; the paper states the dictionary as an assumption in Section II, and everything in the review stands or falls on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A light dilaton in a confining theory signals proximity to the critical end point of a first-order transition line, and its mass relative to the confinement scale can be dialled continuously by tuning the control parameters — arbitrarily small near the critical point.
  • The pattern is stable across the nine surveyed examples, which differ in spacetime dimension, field content, and confinement mechanism (shrinking circles vs. magnetic fluxes), so the effect is not an artifact of a single construction.
  • At the critical point itself the dilaton is exactly massless, and it remains a physically realised, stable state as the parameters approach the point along the stable branch.
  • For composite-Higgs model building, the mechanism supplies what dilaton effective field theory cannot: an origin for the small, unprotected quartic coupling and the light mass, tied to proximity to criticality rather than to a tuned potential.
  • The survey sets a concrete agenda — in four-dimensional lattice or field-theory settings, look for a light scalar singlet appearing where a zero-temperature first-order line weakens toward a critical point.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editor's inference: read in reverse, the survey predicts that the natural hunting ground for a light dilaton is not the edge of the conformal window per se but the vicinity of a weak first-order transition; a walking theory with no nearby critical point is the case the mechanism says is unlikely to produce a parametrically light scalar.
  • Editor's inference: the spectra shown imply the dilaton mass should vanish with a definite power of the distance to the critical point; extracting that critical exponent from the plotted data is a direct, doable extension the paper does not perform.
  • Editor's inference: if the mechanism survives the move to four dimensions, the control parameter that tunes the dilaton mass would double as a dial for the electroweak hierarchy — a concrete route from TeV-scale strong dynamics to a 125 GeV scalar without fine-tuning.
  • Editor's inference: the probe-approximation criterion could be translated into a lattice observable — a scalar singlet whose mass responds strongly to the insertion that couples to the trace of the stress tensor — giving a spectroscopy-based test of the mechanism independent of holography.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This is a review of a holographic research programme that asks whether a light dilaton can appear as a dynamical bound state in confining gauge theories, in particular when a line of first-order zero-temperature phase transitions ends at a critical point. The paper assembles the necessary technology (domain-wall/soliton backgrounds, fluctuation spectra, free-energy computation, and a probe approximation intended to detect coupling to the trace of the energy-momentum tensor), then summarizes several top-down and bottom-up examples. The central conclusion, stated most explicitly in Section VI, is that in the two known examples with a critical endpoint the spectrum contains a parametrically light scalar that the authors identify as a dilaton, while acknowledging that all examples have dual QFTs of dimension lower than four and that some branches involve singular or large-curvature solutions.

Significance. The paper is a useful and fairly presented status report. Its strengths are the systematic comparison of different constructions, the explicit documentation of limitations (metastable branches, singular domain-wall solutions, large curvature near some transitions, absence of a four-dimensional example), and the self-contained technology section. If the identification of the light critical-endpoint scalar as a dilaton is accepted, the review provides concrete evidence for a mechanism that is difficult to test by other means and connects holography to the dEFT/lattice literature. However, the central claim rests on a relatively narrow basis: two endpoint examples and a single diagnostic for dilaton nature. The paper would be strengthened by either additional evidence for the Goldstone-boson character of the scalar or a more cautious wording of the conclusion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III.D, Eqs. (59)-(60), and Section VI] The probe approximation identifies a state as a dilaton by the fact that it disappears or changes mass when the metric fluctuation h is neglected. Sections IV.F and V.C use this to call the critical-point scalar 'undoubtedly a dilaton' and 'clear evidence'. Overlap with T^μ_μ is necessary but not sufficient for a pseudo-Goldstone dilaton: at a second-order endpoint a massless scalar is generic from diverging susceptibility, and any holographic scalar can mix with h. The paper reports no independent check such as a decay constant F_d as m_d→0, the m_d^2 F_d^2/trace-anomaly relation, or a dEFT comparison. Since the central conclusion in Section VI depends on identifying the scalar as a dilaton, the authors should supply such evidence or explicitly restrict the claim to 'a light scalar with strong overlap with T^μ_μ'.
  2. [Section VI, first paragraph] The sentence 'if there is a line of first-order phase transitions ... then ... contains a light scalar' is stated as a general result, but the supporting endpoint examples are exactly two, Refs. [253] and [254], both with lower-dimensional dual QFTs. The open questions listed immediately after make clear that this is not a theorem, yet the wording of the central claim does not carry that caveat. I recommend adding an explicit sentence distinguishing the verified lower-dimensional examples from the conjectural generalization to four-dimensional QFT, and noting the absence of independent confirmation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.F] The critical value b_0^CP is quoted as 0.9815 in the text, while the caption of Fig. 7 and the subsequent text give b_0^CP ≃ 0.6815. Please reconcile this numerical inconsistency.
  2. [Section IV.C] The text contains a long unmarked excerpt from Ref. [250], including equations (146)-(148), figure captions, and page numbers. This should be removed or clearly set off as a quotation with attribution; as it stands it disrupts the narrative and raises copyright/permission issues.
  3. [Sections IV.B and IV.C] Minor typos: 'spce' in Section IV.B should be 'space', and 'brunch' in Section IV.C should be 'branch'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Genuine spectral computations, but the identification of the light scalar as a dilaton is fixed by the paper's own probe-approximation criterion rather than independently derived.

  1. self definitional [Section III.D (probe approximation), applied in Sections IV.F and V.C, and summarized in Section VI]
    "if one finds that the light scalar state mentioned above no longer is present after the approximation has been made, or that its mass is greatly different, one can conclude that the state, computed correctly with the gauge-invariant formalism, is a dilaton, as it is sourced by the dilatation operator. ... This state is undoubtedly a dilaton, as shown by the fact that the probe approximation fails completely to capture its very existence."

    The probe approximation is introduced as the very criterion for being a dilaton: a mode that disappears when the metric fluctuation h is neglected is declared 'sourced by the dilatation operator' and hence a dilaton. The flagship top-down and bottom-up examples then use exactly that criterion as the only evidence that the light state at the critical endpoint is a dilaton. No independent check of dilaton low-energy properties (e.g. a finite decay constant F_d in the m_d -> 0 limit, or a relation m_d^2 F_d^2 to the trace anomaly) is reported. At a second-order critical point a massless scalar is expected on generic grounds, so the non-trivial content is the identification of that scalar as a dilaton; that identification is imposed by the diagnostic itself rather than derived from independent

full rationale

This is a review of a computational programme rather than a new derivation. Within each model, the mass spectra are obtained by solving the linearized gauge-invariant fluctuation equations (Eqs. (55)-(58)) and the free energy from holographic renormalization (Eq. (65)); the phase diagrams are not produced by fitting the dilaton mass. Thus the existence and parametric lightness of a scalar near a critical endpoint is a genuine, calculation-heavy result, and the frequent self-citations to Refs. [248-256] refer to explicit computations rather than to a bare assertion. The circularity is concentrated in the interpretation step: the paper's only operative criterion for 'this light scalar is a dilaton' is the probe approximation of Section III.D, whose diagnostic output (the state is missed when h is neglected) is equated with 'sourced by the dilatation operator' and hence with dilatonhood. The review does not report an independent check of dilaton low-energy theorems, so the central identification reduces to the authors' own diagnostic. The paper itself flags the main caveats: the dual field theories are lower-dimensional, some solutions approach singular or large-curvature regions, and the bottom-up model has no known microscopic origin. Those are limitations on the strength of the evidence, not additional circularity. Overall score 4: substantial independent spectral content, but the load-bearing identification of the scalar as a dilaton is supplied by the paper's own definitional criterion rather than by independent evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and no new parameters; it is a review. The central claim inherits the free parameters and assumptions of the surveyed models, especially the ad hoc superpotentials of the bottom-up constructions and the truncation assumptions of the top-down supergravity reductions. The holographic dictionary itself is the largest unproven input.

free parameters (3)
  • Bottom-up superpotential coefficients (e.g., degree-six polynomial of Model B in [253]; quadratic superpotential in [251
    Chosen by hand to produce the desired AdS vacuum and phase structure. The critical-point coordinates in Ref. [253] are consequences of these choices, so the central result is not parameter-free.
  • Fixed/scanned model parameters in bottom-up Model B [253] = phi_Q = 10 fixed; phi_M^c ~ 1.088, ell_Lambda^c ~ 5.186
    One parameter is held fixed for convenience and the other is scanned; the location of the critical point depends on this choice.
  • Operator scaling dimension Delta in the bottom-up model of [251] = scanned; special value Delta = 5/2 (BF-bound saturation)
    Controls the dimension of the deforming operator; the degree of dilaton-mass suppression along stable branches depends on its value.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Gauge-gravity duality dictionary, Eqs. (1)-(3)
    The review assumes the AdS/CFT correspondence and the classical saddle-point (weak-strong) limit from the outset. This is the computational framework, not derived within the paper.
  • domain assumption Classical supergravity approximation is valid for the dual QFTs of interest
    Spectra and free energies are computed at leading order in the gravity theory. The paper itself requires small curvature and regularity, and flags places where these conditions are violated (singular DW branches, divergent curvature at flux-transition edges).
  • domain assumption Truncation to a few scalar fields captures the relevant light spectrum and phase structure
    Top-down examples reduce maximal/half-maximal supergravities to one-to-seven scalars; Kaluza-Klein towers and other fields are ignored. The review assumes this truncation does not remove the light dilaton or change the phase structure.
  • ad hoc to paper Probe approximation identifies the dilaton
    The diagnostic from Ref. [157] interprets failure of the probe spectrum to reproduce the gauge-invariant scalar mass as evidence of coupling to the trace of the stress tensor. This criterion is central to labeling the light scalar a dilaton and is not independently benchmarked.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QQX66XQS

@misc{pith2026260722497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QQX66XQS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22497}
}
read the original abstract

The dilaton is the hypothetical scalar particle associated with spontaneous breaking of approximate scale invariance. It has been predicted to arise dynamically, as a bound state, in special extensions of the standard model of particle physics based on composite dynamics. In confining gauge theories, generic arguments suggest that the scale of explicit symmetry breaking coincides with the confinement scale, that governs also its spontaneous breaking, by setting the size of all the condensates, as well as the masses of bound states and their excitations. Whether a light dilaton can nevertheless exist in such a context is an open question in quantum field theory, answering which has potentially transformative implications from a conceptual viewpoint, besides having striking phenomenological ramifications. It has been suggested that the mass of the dilaton might be suppressed, in respect to the confinement scale, in the special case in which the underlying strongly coupled dynamics undergoes a zero-temperature (weak) phase transition. Identifying the special conditions under which this happens is the subject of ongoing investigations. A dedicated programme of exploration, carried out within the context of gauge-gravity dualities (holography), has been set up to test the viability of this mechanism. We review the relevant technology within holography, and the status of such a programme, by comparing results obtained in a survey of explicit examples. We do so both within the bottom-up, simplified version of gauge-gravity dualities, but also within the more refined, and complete, top-down approach to holography, in which the gravity theory is known to have a more fundamental origin. We highlight the first examples of confining theories in which a parametrically light holographic dilaton forms as a bound state in a region of parameter space in proximity to a critical point of the field theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22497 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Cartoons illustrating the behaviour of the Van der Waals gas. Left panel: the pressure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The free energy density FIG4: In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: For the theory discussed in Sec. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: In the theory discussed in Sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: In the theory discussed in Sec. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_10.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The phase diagram of model B. The solid curve indicates the critical value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Mass spectrum of spin-zero states as a function of the vacuum expectation value of the operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Krylov Complexity and $c$-function along RG Flows

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Along holographic RG flows, the acceleration of spread complexity and the covariant c-function are algebraically related: inversely in fixed-dimension domain walls and Dp-branes, co-monotonically in twisted compactifications.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 251 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [253]

    Faedo, C

    A.F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, M. Piai, R. Rodgers and J.G. Subils,Light holographic dilatons near critical points,2406.04974

  2. [254]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, M. Piai, R. Rodgers and J.G. Subils,Light dilaton near critical points in top-down holography, 2502.19226

  3. [1]

    Migdal and M.A

    A.A. Migdal and M.A. Shifman,Dilaton Effective Lagrangian in Gluodynamics,Phys. Lett. B114(1982) 445

  4. [2]

    Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K

    S. Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1985), 10.1017/CBO9780511565045

  5. [3]

    Goldberger, B

    W.D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein and W. Skiba,Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 111802 [0708.1463]

  6. [4]

    Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking

    A. Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model,Phys. Rept. 457(2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503172]. 42 [5]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1 [1207.7214]. [6]CMScollaboration,Observation of a Ne...

  7. [7]

    Leung, S.T

    C.N. Leung, S.T. Love and W.A. Bardeen,Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Scale Invariant Quantum Electrodynamics,Nucl. Phys. B273(1986) 649

  8. [8]

    Bardeen, C.N

    W.A. Bardeen, C.N. Leung and S.T. Love,The Dilaton and Chiral Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 1230

Show all 300 references
  1. [9]

    Yamawaki, M

    K. Yamawaki, M. Bando and K.-i. Matumoto,Scale Invariant Technicolor Model and a Technidilaton,Phys. Rev. Lett. 56(1986) 1335

  2. [10]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221]

  3. [11]

    Goldberger and M.B

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Modulus stabilization with bulk fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4922 [hep-ph/9907447]

  4. [12]

    DeWolfe, D.Z

    O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser and A. Karch,Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 046008 [hep-th/9909134]

  5. [13]

    Goldberger and M.B

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus,Phys. Lett. B475(2000) 275 [hep-ph/9911457]

  6. [14]

    Csaki, M.L

    C. Csaki, M.L. Graesser and G.D. Kribs,Radion dynamics and electroweak physics,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 065002 [hep-th/0008151]

  7. [15]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati and L. Randall,Holography and phenomenology,JHEP08(2001) 017 [hep-th/0012148]

  8. [16]

    Rattazzi and A

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni,Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model,JHEP04(2001) 021 [hep-th/0012248]

  9. [17]

    Kofman, J

    L. Kofman, J. Martin and M. Peloso,Exact identification of the radion and its coupling to the observable sector,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 085015 [hep-ph/0401189]

  10. [18]

    Hong, S.D.H

    D.K. Hong, S.D.H. Hsu and F. Sannino,Composite Higgs from higher representations,Phys. Lett. B597(2004) 89 [hep-ph/0406200]

  11. [19]

    Dietrich, F

    D.D. Dietrich, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen,Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: Predictions for CERN LHC,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 055001 [hep-ph/0505059]

  12. [20]

    Vecchi,Phenomenology of a light scalar: the dilaton,Phys

    L. Vecchi,Phenomenology of a light scalar: the dilaton,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 076009 [1002.1721]

  13. [21]

    Hashimoto and K

    M. Hashimoto and K. Yamawaki,Techni-dilaton at Conformal Edge,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 015008 [1009.5482]

  14. [22]

    Appelquist and Y

    T. Appelquist and Y. Bai,A Light Dilaton in Walking Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 071701 [1006.4375]

  15. [23]

    Chacko and R.K

    Z. Chacko and R.K. Mishra,Effective Theory of a Light Dilaton,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 115006 [1209.3022]

  16. [24]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning,A Higgslike Dilaton,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2333 [1209.3299]

  17. [25]

    T. Abe, R. Kitano, Y. Konishi, K.-y. Oda, J. Sato and S. Sugiyama,Minimal Dilaton Model,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 115016 [1209.4544]

  18. [26]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Lane and A. Martin,A Higgs Impostor in Low-Scale Technicolor,1210.5462

  19. [27]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,The decay constant of the holographic techni-dilaton and the 125 GeV boson,Nucl. Phys. B 867(2013) 779 [1208.0546]

  20. [28]

    Hernandez-Leon and L

    P. Hernandez-Leon and L. Merlo,Distinguishing A Higgs-Like Dilaton Scenario With A Complete Bosonic Effective Field Theory Basis,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 075008 [1703.02064]

  21. [29]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning,A Naturally Light Dilaton and a Small Cosmological Constant,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2790 [1305.3919]

  22. [30]

    Cacciapaglia, C

    G. Cacciapaglia, C. Pica and F. Sannino,Fundamental Composite Dynamics: A Review,Phys. Rept.877(2020) 1 [2002.04914]

  23. [31]

    Cohen and H

    A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi,Walking Beyond the Rainbow,Nucl. Phys. B314(1989) 7

  24. [32]

    Caswell,Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order,Phys

    W.E. Caswell,Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.33(1974) 244

  25. [33]

    Banks and A

    T. Banks and A. Zaks,On the Phase Structure of Vector-Like Gauge Theories with Massless Fermions,Nucl. Phys. B 196(1982) 189

  26. [34]

    Holdom and J

    B. Holdom and J. Terning,A Light Dilaton in Gauge Theories?,Phys. Lett. B187(1987) 357

  27. [35]

    Holdom and J

    B. Holdom and J. Terning,No Light Dilaton in Gauge Theories,Phys. Lett. B200(1988) 338

  28. [36]

    Grinstein and P

    B. Grinstein and P. Uttayarat,A Very Light Dilaton,JHEP07(2011) 038 [1105.2370]

  29. [37]

    Sannino and K

    F. Sannino and K. Tuominen,Orientifold theory dynamics and symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 051901 43 [hep-ph/0405209]

  30. [38]

    Dietrich and F

    D.D. Dietrich and F. Sannino,Conformal window of SU(N) gauge theories with fermions in higher dimensional representations,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 085018 [hep-ph/0611341]

  31. [39]

    Ryttov and F

    T.A. Ryttov and F. Sannino,Supersymmetry inspired QCD beta function,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 065001 [0711.3745]

  32. [40]

    Pica and F

    C. Pica and F. Sannino,Beta Function and Anomalous Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 116001 [1011.3832]

  33. [41]

    Pica and F

    C. Pica and F. Sannino,UV and IR Zeros of Gauge Theories at The Four Loop Order and Beyond,Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 035013 [1011.5917]

  34. [42]

    Kim, D.K

    B.S. Kim, D.K. Hong and J.-W. Lee,Into the conformal window: Multirepresentation gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 056008 [2001.02690]

  35. [43]

    Lee,Conformal window from conformal expansion,Phys

    J.-W. Lee,Conformal window from conformal expansion,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 076006 [2008.12223]

  36. [44]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Infrared Zero ofβand Value ofγ m for an SU(3) Gauge Theory at the Five-Loop Level, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 105015 [1607.06866]

  37. [45]

    Ryttov,Consistent Perturbative Fixed Point Calculations in QCD and Supersymmetric QCD,Phys

    T.A. Ryttov,Consistent Perturbative Fixed Point Calculations in QCD and Supersymmetric QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 071601 [1604.00687]

  38. [46]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-independent calculation ofγ ¯ψψ,IR for an SU(3) gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 105014 [1608.00068]

  39. [47]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-Independent Series Expansions at an Infrared Zero of the Beta Function in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 125005 [1610.00387]

  40. [48]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Higher-Order Scheme-Independent Calculations of Physical Quantities in the Conformal Phase of a Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 085012 [1701.06083]

  41. [49]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Higher-order scheme-independent series expansions ofγ ¯ψψ,IR andβ ′ IR in conformal field theories,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 105004 [1703.08558]

  42. [50]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Infrared fixed point physics in SO(N c) and Sp(N c) gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 105015 [1709.05358]

  43. [51]

    Gracey, T.A

    J.A. Gracey, T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-Independent Calculations of Anomalous Dimensions of Baryon Operators in Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 116018 [1805.02729]

  44. [52]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-Independent Calculations of Properties at a Conformal Infrared Fixed Point in Gauge Theories with Multiple Fermion Representations,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 096003 [1809.02242]

  45. [53]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Scheme-Independent Series for Anomalous Dimensions of Higher-Spin Operators at an Infrared Fixed Point in a Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 076018 [2002.08979]

  46. [54]

    Ryttov and R

    T.A. Ryttov and R. Shrock,Anomalous dimensions at an infrared fixed point in an SU(Nc) gauge theory with fermions in the fundamental and antisymmetric tensor representations,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 056007 [2307.12426]

  47. [55]

    Chetyrkin,Quark mass anomalous dimension to O (alpha-s**4),Phys

    K.G. Chetyrkin,Quark mass anomalous dimension to O (alpha-s**4),Phys. Lett. B404(1997) 161 [hep-ph/9703278]

  48. [56]

    Vermaseren, S.A

    J.A.M. Vermaseren, S.A. Larin and T. van Ritbergen,The 4-loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass,Phys. Lett. B405(1997) 327 [hep-ph/9703284]

  49. [57]

    Baikov, K.G

    P.A. Baikov, K.G. Chetyrkin and J.H. K¨ uhn,Five-Loop Running of the QCD Coupling Constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 082002 [1606.08659]

  50. [58]

    Herzog, B

    F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J.A.M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt,The five-loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions,JHEP02(2017) 090 [1701.01404]

  51. [59]

    Rummukainen and K

    K. Rummukainen and K. Tuominen,Lattice Computations for Beyond Standard Model Physics,Universe8(2022) 188. [60]LatKMIcollaboration,Light composite scalar in eight-flavor QCD on the lattice,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 111502 [1403.5000]

  52. [61]

    Appelquist et al.,Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC,Phys

    T. Appelquist et al.,Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 114514 [1601.04027]. [62]LatKMIcollaboration,Light flavor-singlet scalars and walking signals inN f = 8QCD on the lattice,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 014508 [1610.07011]

  53. [63]

    Gasbarro and G.T

    A.D. Gasbarro and G.T. Fleming,Examining the Low Energy Dynamics of Walking Gauge Theory,PoS LA TTICE2016(2017) 242 [1702.00480]. [64]Lattice Strong Dynamicscollaboration,Nonperturbative investigations of SU(3) gauge theory with eight dynamical flavors,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 014...

  54. [66]

    Hasenfratz,Emergent strongly coupled ultraviolet fixed point in four dimensions with eight K¨ ahler-Dirac fermions, 44 Phys

    A. Hasenfratz,Emergent strongly coupled ultraviolet fixed point in four dimensions with eight K¨ ahler-Dirac fermions, 44 Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014513 [2204.04801]. [67]Lattice Strong Dynamicscollaboration,Light scalar meson and decay constant in SU(3) gauge theory with eight ...

  55. [70]

    Kotov, D

    A.Y. Kotov, D. Nogradi, K.K. Szabo and L. Szikszai,More on the flavor dependence of m ρ/fπ,JHEP07(2021) 202 [2107.05996]

  56. [71]

    Chung and D

    H.S. Chung and D. Nogradi,fϱ/mϱand fπ/mϱratios and the conformal window,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 074039 [2302.06411]

  57. [72]

    Nogradi and H.S

    D. Nogradi and H.S. Chung,Mesonic decay constant and mass ratios and the conformal window,PoSLA TTICE2023 (2024) 084 [2311.08668]

  58. [73]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, C. Schroeder and C.H. Wong,Can the nearly conformal sextet gauge model hide the Higgs impostor?,Phys. Lett. B718(2012) 657 [1209.0391]

  59. [74]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, S. Mondal, D. Nogradi and C.H. Wong,Toward the minimal realization of a light composite Higgs,PoSLA TTICE2014(2015) 244 [1502.00028]

  60. [75]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, S. Mondal, D. Nogradi and C.H. Wong,Status of a minimal composite Higgs theory,PoS LA TTICE2015(2016) 219 [1605.08750]

  61. [76]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi and C.H. Wong,The twelve-flavorβ-function and dilaton tests of the sextet scalar,EPJ Web Conf.175(2018) 08015 [1712.08594]

  62. [77]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti and C.H. Wong,Tantalizing dilaton tests from a near-conformal EFT,PoS LA TTICE2018(2019) 196 [1901.06324]

  63. [78]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti and C.H. Wong,Dilaton EFT from p-regime to RMT in theϵ-regime,PoS LA TTICE2019(2020) 246 [2002.05163]

  64. [79]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner and B. Lucini,Infrared regime of SU(2) with one adjoint Dirac flavor,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 114508 [1412.5994]

  65. [80]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, D. Elander, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Large mass hierarchies from strongly-coupled dynamics,JHEP06(2016) 114 [1605.04258]

  66. [81]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner and B. Lucini,Investigating the conformal behavior of SU(2) with one adjoint Dirac flavor,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 074519 [2103.10485]

  67. [82]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, P. Butti, J. Lenz and B. Lucini,SU(2) gauge theory with one and two adjoint fermions towards the continuum limit,2408.00171

  68. [83]

    Bennett et al.,Symplectic lattice gauge theories in the grid framework: Approaching the conformal window,Phys

    E. Bennett et al.,Symplectic lattice gauge theories in the grid framework: Approaching the conformal window,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 094508 [2306.11649]

  69. [84]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Meson spectroscopy in the Sp(4) gauge theory with three antisymmetric fermions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 074511 [2412.01170]

  70. [85]

    Matsuzaki and K

    S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki,Dilaton Chiral Perturbation Theory: Determining the Mass and Decay Constant of the Technidilaton on the Lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 082002 [1311.3784]

  71. [86]

    Li, Y.-L

    Y.-L. Li, Y.-L. Ma and M. Rho,Chiral-scale effective theory including a dilatonic meson,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 114011 [1609.07014]

  72. [87]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Low-energy effective action for pions and a dilatonic meson,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 054502 [1603.04575]

  73. [88]

    Kasai, K.-i

    A. Kasai, K.-i. Okumura and H. Suzuki,A dilaton-pion mass relation,1609.02264

  74. [89]

    Hansen, K

    M. Hansen, K. Langæble and F. Sannino,Extending Chiral Perturbation Theory with an Isosinglet Scalar,Phys. Rev. D 95(2017) 036005 [1610.02904]

  75. [90]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Effective pion mass term and the trace anomaly,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 016003 [1611.04275]

  76. [91]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton EFT Framework For Lattice Data,JHEP07(2017) 035 [1702.04410]

  77. [92]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Analysis of a Dilaton EFT for Lattice Data,JHEP03(2018) 039 [1711.00067]

  78. [93]

    Cat` a, R.J

    O. Cat` a, R.J. Crewther and L.C. Tunstall,Crawling technicolor,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 095007 [1803.08513]

  79. [94]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Large-mass regime of the dilaton-pion low-energy effective theory,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 056025 [1805.00198]

  80. [95]

    Cat` a and C

    O. Cat` a and C. M¨ uller,Chiral effective theories with a light scalar at one loop,Nucl. Phys. B952(2020) 114938 45 [1906.01879]

  81. [96]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton potential and lattice data,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 075025 [1908.00895]

  82. [97]

    Golterman, E.T

    M. Golterman, E.T. Neil and Y. Shamir,Application of dilaton chiral perturbation theory toN f = 8,SU(3)spectral data,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 034515 [2003.00114]

  83. [98]

    Golterman and Y

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir,Explorations beyond dilaton chiral perturbation theory in the eight-flavor SU(3) gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 114507 [2009.13846]

  84. [99]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Nearly Conformal Composite Higgs Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 191804 [2012.09698]

  85. [100]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Composite two-Higgs doublet model from dilaton effective field theory,Nucl. Phys. B983(2022) 115930 [2205.03320]

  86. [101]

    Zwicky,Dilatons improve (non)-Goldstones,Nucl

    R. Zwicky,Dilatons improve (non)-Goldstones,Nucl. Phys. B1023(2026) 117292 [2306.12914]

  87. [102]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton Effective Field Theory across the Conformal Edge,2512.16863

  88. [103]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton Effective Field Theory,Universe9(2023) 10 [2209.14867]

  89. [104]

    Cacciapaglia, D.Y

    G. Cacciapaglia, D.Y. Cheong, A. Deandrea, W. Isnard and S.C. Park,Composite hybrid inflation: dilaton and waterfall pions,JCAP10(2023) 063 [2307.01852]

  90. [105]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai,Dilaton forbidden dark matter,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 035013 [2404.07601]

  91. [106]

    Bruggisser, B

    S. Bruggisser, B. von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant,Dilaton at the LHC: complementary probe of composite Higgs,JHEP05(2023) 080 [2212.00056]

  92. [107]

    Alonso, S

    R. Alonso, S. Chattopadhyay and J. Ingoldby,The Potential of HEFT and the scale of New Physics,2512.13612

  93. [108]

    Wu and Q.S

    J.E. Wu and Q.S. Yan,Confront a dilaton model with the LHC measurements,2501.07820

  94. [109]

    Cao, J.-N

    Q.-H. Cao, J.-N. Ding, B.-H. Ge, H. Sun and J.-H. Yu,Effective Field Theory Description of Light Dilaton,2601.16534

  95. [110]

    Del Debbio and R

    L. Del Debbio and R. Zwicky,Dilaton and massive hadrons in a conformal phase,JHEP08(2022) 007 [2112.11363]

  96. [111]

    Zwicky,QCD with an infrared fixed point: The pion sector,Phys

    R. Zwicky,QCD with an infrared fixed point: The pion sector,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 034009 [2306.06752]

  97. [112]

    Zwicky,QCD with an infrared fixed point and a dilaton,Phys

    R. Zwicky,QCD with an infrared fixed point and a dilaton,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 014048 [2312.13761]

  98. [113]

    Cresswell-Hogg, D.F

    C. Cresswell-Hogg, D.F. Litim and R. Zwicky,Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom,2502.00107

  99. [114]

    Stegeman and R

    R. Stegeman and R. Zwicky,Gravitational D-form factor: theσ-meson as a dilaton confronted with lattice QCD data I, JHEP03(2026) 184 [2508.18537]

  100. [115]

    Stegeman and R

    R. Stegeman and R. Zwicky,Gluon gravitational D-form factor: theσ-meson as a dilaton confronted with lattice data II, JHEP05(2026) 159 [2512.12315]

  101. [116]

    Weinberg,Pion scattering lengths,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Pion scattering lengths,Phys. Rev. Lett.17(1966) 616

  102. [117]

    Weinberg,Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry,Phys. Rev.166(1968) 1568

  103. [118]

    Dashen,Chiral SU(3) x SU(3) as a symmetry of the strong interactions,Phys

    R.F. Dashen,Chiral SU(3) x SU(3) as a symmetry of the strong interactions,Phys. Rev.183(1969) 1245

  104. [119]

    Dashen and M

    R.F. Dashen and M. Weinstein,Soft pions, chiral symmetry, and phenomenological lagrangians,Phys. Rev.183(1969) 1261

  105. [120]

    Dashen,Some features of chiral symmetry breaking,Phys

    R.F. Dashen,Some features of chiral symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 1879

  106. [121]

    Pagels,Departures from Chiral Symmetry: A Review,Phys

    H. Pagels,Departures from Chiral Symmetry: A Review,Phys. Rept.16(1975) 219

  107. [122]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Quark Masses,Phys. Rept.87(1982) 77

  108. [123]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Low-Energy Theorems as Precision Tests of QCD,Phys. Lett. B125(1983) 325

  109. [124]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,Annals Phys.158(1984) 142

  110. [125]

    Appelquist and C.W

    T. Appelquist and C.W. Bernard,Strongly Interacting Higgs Bosons,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 200

  111. [126]

    Longhitano,Heavy Higgs Bosons in the Weinberg-Salam Model,Phys

    A.C. Longhitano,Heavy Higgs Bosons in the Weinberg-Salam Model,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 1166

  112. [127]

    Appelquist and G.-H

    T. Appelquist and G.-H. Wu,The Electroweak chiral Lagrangian and new precision measurements,Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 3235 [hep-ph/9304240]

  113. [128]

    Appelquist and G.-H

    T. Appelquist and G.-H. Wu,The Electroweak chiral Lagrangian and CP violating effects in technicolor theories,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 240 [hep-ph/9406416]

  114. [129]

    Georgi,Generalized dimensional analysis,Phys

    H. Georgi,Generalized dimensional analysis,Phys. Lett. B298(1993) 187 [hep-ph/9207278]

  115. [130]

    Soldate and R

    M. Soldate and R. Sundrum,Z COUPLINGS TO PSEUDOGOLDSTONE BOSONS WITHIN EXTENDED TECHNICOLOR,Nucl. Phys. B340(1990) 1

  116. [131]

    Bijnens and J

    J. Bijnens and J. Lu,Technicolor and other QCD-like theories at next-to-next-to-leading order,JHEP11(2009) 116 [0910.5424]

  117. [132]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]. 46

  118. [133]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B 428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

  119. [134]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

  120. [135]

    Aharony, S.S

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

  121. [136]

    Bianchi, D.Z

    M. Bianchi, D.Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis,Holographic renormalization,Nucl. Phys. B631(2002) 159 [hep-th/0112119]

  122. [137]

    Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

  123. [138]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis,AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry,IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys.8(2005) 73 [hep-th/0404176]

  124. [139]

    Bobev, H

    N. Bobev, H. Elvang, D.Z. Freedman and S.S. Pufu,Holography forN= 2 ∗ onS 4,JHEP07(2014) 001 [1311.1508]

  125. [140]

    Maldacena,Wilson loops in large N field theories,Phys

    J.M. Maldacena,Wilson loops in large N field theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 4859 [hep-th/9803002]

  126. [141]

    Rey and J.-T

    S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee,Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C22(2001) 379 [hep-th/9803001]

  127. [142]

    S.-J. Rey, S. Theisen and J.-T. Yee,Wilson-Polyakov loop at finite temperature in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B527(1998) 171 [hep-th/9803135]

  128. [143]

    Brandhuber, N

    A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Wilson loops in the large N limit at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B434(1998) 36 [hep-th/9803137]

  129. [144]

    Brandhuber, N

    A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Wilson loops, confinement, and phase transitions in large N gauge theories from supergravity,JHEP06(1998) 001 [hep-th/9803263]

  130. [145]

    Gross and H

    D.J. Gross and H. Ooguri,Aspects of large N gauge theory dynamics as seen by string theory,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 106002 [hep-th/9805129]

  131. [146]

    Brandhuber and K

    A. Brandhuber and K. Sfetsos,Wilson loops from multicenter and rotating branes, mass gaps and phase structure in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 851 [hep-th/9906201]

  132. [147]

    Nunez, M

    C. Nunez, M. Piai and A. Rago,Wilson Loops in string duals of Walking and Flavored Systems,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 086001 [0909.0748]

  133. [148]

    Faedo, M

    A.F. Faedo, M. Piai and D. Schofield,On the stability of multiscale models of dynamical symmetry breaking from holography,Nucl. Phys. B880(2014) 504 [1312.2793]

  134. [149]

    Bianchi, M

    M. Bianchi, M. Prisco and W. Mueck,New results on holographic three point functions,JHEP11(2003) 052 [hep-th/0310129]

  135. [150]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and W. Mueck,Bulk dynamics in confining gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B736(2006) 82 [hep-th/0507285]

  136. [151]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and W. Mueck,Glueballs vs. Gluinoballs: Fluctuation Spectra in Non-AdS/Non-CFT,Nucl. Phys. B 789(2008) 1 [hep-th/0612224]

  137. [152]

    Elander,Glueball Spectra of SQCD-like Theories,JHEP03(2010) 114 [0912.1600]

    D. Elander,Glueball Spectra of SQCD-like Theories,JHEP03(2010) 114 [0912.1600]

  138. [153]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Light scalars from a compact fifth dimension,JHEP01(2011) 026 [1010.1964]

  139. [154]

    Elander,Aspects of gauge-gravity duality., Ph.D

    P.A.D. Elander,Aspects of gauge-gravity duality., Ph.D. thesis, Swansea U., 2010.1010.1988

  140. [155]

    Elander,Light scalar from deformations of the Klebanov-Strassler background,Phys

    D. Elander,Light scalar from deformations of the Klebanov-Strassler background,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 126012 [1401.3412]

  141. [156]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Holographic glueballs from the circle reduction of Romans supergravity,JHEP02 (2019) 101 [1811.01010]

  142. [157]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Probing the holographic dilaton,JHEP06(2020) 177 [2004.05656]

  143. [158]

    Arnowitt, S

    R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner,Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity,Phys. Rev.116(1959) 1322

  144. [159]

    Arnowitt, S

    R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner,The Dynamics of general relativity,Gen. Rel. Grav.40(2008) 1997 [gr-qc/0405109]

  145. [160]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 505 [hep-th/9803131]

  146. [161]

    Wen and H.-X

    C.-K. Wen and H.-X. Yang,QCD(4) glueball masses from AdS(6) black hole description,Mod. Phys. Lett. A20(2005) 997 [hep-th/0404152]

  147. [162]

    Kuperstein and J

    S. Kuperstein and J. Sonnenschein,Non-critical, near extremal AdS(6) background as a holographic laboratory of four dimensional YM theory,JHEP11(2004) 026 [hep-th/0411009]

  148. [163]

    Brower, S.D

    R.C. Brower, S.D. Mathur and C.-I. Tan,Glueball spectrum for QCD from AdS supergravity duality,Nucl. Phys. B587 47 (2000) 249 [hep-th/0003115]

  149. [164]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, D. Mateos and M. Piai,Multiscale confining dynamics from holographic RG flows, JHEP05(2014) 003 [1312.7160]

  150. [165]

    Chamseddine and M.S

    A.H. Chamseddine and M.S. Volkov,NonAbelian BPS monopoles in N=4 gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.79 (1997) 3343 [hep-th/9707176]

  151. [166]

    Klebanov and M.J

    I.R. Klebanov and M.J. Strassler,Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities,JHEP08(2000) 052 [hep-th/0007191]

  152. [167]

    Maldacena and C

    J.M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Towards the large N limit of pure N=1 superYang-Mills,Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 588 [hep-th/0008001]

  153. [168]

    Butti, M

    A. Butti, M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Zaffaroni,The Baryonic branch of Klebanov-Strassler solution: A supersymmetric family of SU(3) structure backgrounds,JHEP03(2005) 069 [hep-th/0412187]

  154. [169]

    Dymarsky, I.R

    A. Dymarsky, I.R. Klebanov and N. Seiberg,On the moduli space of the cascading SU(M+p) x SU(p) gauge theory, JHEP01(2006) 155 [hep-th/0511254]

  155. [170]

    Andrews and N

    R.P. Andrews and N. Dorey,Deconstruction of the Maldacena-Nunez compactification,Nucl. Phys. B751(2006) 304 [hep-th/0601098]

  156. [171]

    Hoyos-Badajoz, C

    C. Hoyos-Badajoz, C. Nunez and I. Papadimitriou,Comments on the String dual to N=1 SQCD,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 086005 [0807.3039]

  157. [172]

    Nunez, I

    C. Nunez, I. Papadimitriou and M. Piai,Walking Dynamics from String Duals,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 2837 [0812.3655]

  158. [173]

    Elander, C

    D. Elander, C. Nunez and M. Piai,A Light scalar from walking solutions in gauge-string duality,Phys. Lett. B686 (2010) 64 [0908.2808]

  159. [174]

    Cassani and A.F

    D. Cassani and A.F. Faedo,A Supersymmetric consistent truncation for conifold solutions,Nucl. Phys. B843(2011) 455 [1008.0883]

  160. [175]

    I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Grana, N. Halmagyi and F. Orsi,Supersymmetric Consistent Truncations of IIB onT 1,1,JHEP 04(2011) 021 [1008.0983]

  161. [176]

    Bennett, E

    S. Bennett, E. Caceres, C. Nunez, D. Schofield and S. Young,The Non-SUSY Baryonic Branch: Soft Supersymmetry Breaking of N=1 Gauge Theories,JHEP05(2012) 031 [1111.1727]

  162. [177]

    Dymarsky and S

    A. Dymarsky and S. Kuperstein,Non-supersymmetric Conifold,JHEP08(2012) 033 [1111.1731]

  163. [178]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Martelli,The Unwarped, resolved, deformed conifold: Fivebranes and the baryonic branch of the Klebanov-Strassler theory,JHEP01(2010) 104 [0906.0591]

  164. [179]

    Gaillard, D

    J. Gaillard, D. Martelli, C. Nunez and I. Papadimitriou,The warped, resolved, deformed conifold gets flavoured,Nucl. Phys. B843(2011) 1 [1004.4638]

  165. [180]

    Caceres, C

    E. Caceres, C. Nunez and L.A. Pando-Zayas,Heating up the Baryonic Branch with U-duality: A Unified picture of conifold black holes,JHEP03(2011) 054 [1101.4123]

  166. [181]

    Elander, J

    D. Elander, J. Gaillard, C. Nunez and M. Piai,Towards multi-scale dynamics on the baryonic branch of Klebanov-Strassler,JHEP07(2011) 056 [1104.3963]

  167. [182]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,On the glueball spectrum of walking backgrounds from wrapped-D5 gravity duals,Nucl. Phys. B 871(2013) 164 [1212.2600]

  168. [183]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Glueballs on the Baryonic Branch of Klebanov-Strassler: dimensional deconstruction and a light scalar particle,JHEP06(2017) 003 [1703.10158]

  169. [184]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Calculable mass hierarchies and a light dilaton from gravity duals,Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 110 [1703.09205]

  170. [185]

    Candelas and X.C

    P. Candelas and X.C. de la Ossa,Comments on Conifolds,Nucl. Phys. B342(1990) 246

  171. [186]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity,Nucl. Phys. B 536(1998) 199 [hep-th/9807080]

  172. [187]

    Klebanov and A.A

    I.R. Klebanov and A.A. Tseytlin,Gravity duals of supersymmetric SU(N) x SU(N+M) gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B 578(2000) 123 [hep-th/0002159]

  173. [188]

    Papadopoulos and A.A

    G. Papadopoulos and A.A. Tseytlin,Complex geometry of conifolds and five-brane wrapped on two sphere,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 1333 [hep-th/0012034]

  174. [189]

    Karch and E

    A. Karch and E. Katz,Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,JHEP06(2002) 043 [hep-th/0205236]

  175. [190]

    Babington, J

    J. Babington, J. Erdmenger, N.J. Evans, Z. Guralnik and I. Kirsch,Chiral symmetry breaking and pions in nonsupersymmetric gauge / gravity duals,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 066007 [hep-th/0306018]

  176. [191]

    Kruczenski, D

    M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R.C. Myers and D.J. Winters,Meson spectroscopy in AdS / CFT with flavor,JHEP07 48 (2003) 049 [hep-th/0304032]

  177. [192]

    Nunez, A

    C. Nunez, A. Paredes and A.V. Ramallo,Flavoring the gravity dual of N=1 Yang-Mills with probes,JHEP12(2003) 024 [hep-th/0311201]

  178. [193]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.113(2005) 843 [hep-th/0412141]

  179. [194]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,More on a holographic dual of QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.114(2005) 1083 [hep-th/0507073]

  180. [195]

    Erdmenger, N

    J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch and E. Threlfall,Mesons in Gauge/Gravity Duals - A Review,Eur. Phys. J. A35 (2008) 81 [0711.4467]

  181. [196]

    Leigh,Dirac-Born-Infeld Action from Dirichlet Sigma Model,Mod

    R.G. Leigh,Dirac-Born-Infeld Action from Dirichlet Sigma Model,Mod. Phys. Lett. A4(1989) 2767

  182. [197]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, A.L. Cotrone and A. Paredes,Fate of false vacua in holographic first-order phase transitions, JHEP12(2020) 200 [2008.02579]

  183. [198]

    F.R. Ares, M. Hindmarsh, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,Gravitational waves from a holographic phase transition,JHEP21 (2020) 100 [2011.12878]

  184. [199]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia and M. Zilh˜ ao,Bubble wall velocity from holography,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L121903 [2104.05708]

  185. [200]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, T. Canneti and A.L. Cotrone,Bubble wall velocity at strong coupling,JHEP08(2021) 090 [2104.12817]

  186. [201]

    Henriksson,Black brane evaporation through D-brane bubble nucleation,Phys

    O. Henriksson,Black brane evaporation through D-brane bubble nucleation,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L041901 [2106.13254]

  187. [202]

    F.R. Ares, O. Henriksson, M. Hindmarsh, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,Effective actions and bubble nucleation from holography,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 066020 [2109.13784]

  188. [203]

    F.R. Ares, O. Henriksson, M. Hindmarsh, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,Gravitational Waves at Strong Coupling from an Effective Action,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 131101 [2110.14442]

  189. [204]

    Morgante, N

    E. Morgante, N. Ramberg and P. Schwaller,Gravitational waves from dark SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 036010 [2210.11821]

  190. [205]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, A. Jansen, S. Krippendorf, D. Mateos et al.,Spinodal Gravitational Waves,JHEP11(2025) 093 [2112.15478]

  191. [206]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, A. Jansen, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia et al.,Holographic bubbles with Jecco: expanding, collapsing and critical,JHEP09(2022) 008 [2202.10503]

  192. [207]

    Y. Bea, R. Jimenez, D. Mateos, S. Liu, P. Protopapas, P. Taranc´ on-´Alvarez et al.,Gravitational duals from equations of state,JHEP07(2024) 087 [2403.14763]

  193. [208]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Mateos and M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia,Hydrodynamics of Relativistic Superheated Bubbles,2406.14450

  194. [209]

    Y. Bea, M. Giliberti, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, A. Serantes and M. Zilh˜ ao,Bubble dynamics in a QCD-like phase diagram,2412.09588

  195. [210]

    Casalderrey-Solana, L

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, L. Castells-Tiestos, J. Gon¸ calves and D. Mateos,Self-sustained, out-of-equilibrium inflation, 2512.18079

  196. [211]

    Hoyos, D

    C. Hoyos, D. Mateos, W. van der Schee and J.G. Subils,Microscopic Description of Critical Bubbles,2601.09787

  197. [212]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers,Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 064018 [hep-th/9902170]

  198. [213]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers,Holography, thermodynamics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 104026 [hep-th/9904197]

  199. [214]

    Gubser,Thermodynamics of spinning D3-branes,Nucl

    S.S. Gubser,Thermodynamics of spinning D3-branes,Nucl. Phys. B551(1999) 667 [hep-th/9810225]

  200. [215]

    Cai and K.-S

    R.-G. Cai and K.-S. Soh,Critical behavior in the rotating D-branes,Mod. Phys. Lett. A14(1999) 1895 [hep-th/9812121]

  201. [216]

    Cvetic and S.S

    M. Cvetic and S.S. Gubser,Phases of R charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge theories,JHEP 04(1999) 024 [hep-th/9902195]

  202. [217]

    Cvetic and S.S

    M. Cvetic and S.S. Gubser,Thermodynamic stability and phases of general spinning branes,JHEP07(1999) 010 [hep-th/9903132]

  203. [218]

    Kim, S.-J

    K.-Y. Kim, S.-J. Sin and I. Zahed,Dense hadronic matter in holographic QCD,J. Korean Phys. Soc.63(2013) 1515 [hep-th/0608046]

  204. [219]

    Horigome and Y

    N. Horigome and Y. Tanii,Holographic chiral phase transition with chemical potential,JHEP01(2007) 072 [hep-th/0608198]. 49

  205. [220]

    Kobayashi, D

    S. Kobayashi, D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R.C. Myers and R.M. Thomson,Holographic phase transitions at finite baryon density,JHEP02(2007) 016 [hep-th/0611099]

  206. [221]

    Mateos, S

    D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R.C. Myers and R.M. Thomson,Holographic phase transitions at finite chemical potential, JHEP11(2007) 085 [0709.1225]

  207. [222]

    Nakamura, Y

    S. Nakamura, Y. Seo, S.-J. Sin and K.P. Yogendran,A New Phase at Finite Quark Density from AdS/CFT,J. Korean Phys. Soc.52(2008) 1734 [hep-th/0611021]

  208. [223]

    Karch and A

    A. Karch and A. O’Bannon,Metallic AdS/CFT,JHEP09(2007) 024 [0705.3870]

  209. [224]

    Casalderrey-Solana, H

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal and U.A. Wiedemann,Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions, Cambridge University Press (2014), 10.1017/9781009403504, [1101.0618]

  210. [225]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,A composite light scalar, electro-weak symmetry breaking and the recent LHC searches,Nucl. Phys. B864(2012) 241 [1112.2915]

  211. [226]

    Kutasov, J

    D. Kutasov, J. Lin and A. Parnachev,Holographic Walking from Tachyon DBI,Nucl. Phys. B863(2012) 361 [1201.4123]

  212. [227]

    Lawrance and M

    R. Lawrance and M. Piai,Holographic Technidilaton and LHC searches,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28(2013) 1350081 [1207.0427]

  213. [228]

    Evans and K

    N. Evans and K. Tuominen,Holographic modelling of a light technidilaton,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 086003 [1302.4553]

  214. [229]

    Hoyos, U

    C. Hoyos, U. Kol, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,The holographic dilaton,JHEP10(2013) 181 [1307.2572]

  215. [230]

    Megias and O

    E. Megias and O. Pujolas,Naturally light dilatons from nearly marginal deformations,JHEP08(2014) 081 [1401.4998]

  216. [231]

    Elander, R

    D. Elander, R. Lawrance and M. Piai,Hyperscaling violation and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,Nucl. Phys. B897 (2015) 583 [1504.07949]

  217. [232]

    Megias, O

    E. Megias, O. Pujolas and M. Quiros,On light dilaton extensions of the Standard Model,EPJ Web Conf.126(2016) 05010 [1512.06702]

  218. [233]

    Pomarol, O

    A. Pomarol, O. Pujolas and L. Salas,Holographic conformal transition and light scalars,JHEP10(2019) 202 [1905.02653]

  219. [234]

    Cruz Rojas, D.K

    J. Cruz Rojas, D.K. Hong, S.H. Im and M. J¨ arvinen,Holographic light dilaton at the conformal edge,JHEP05(2023) 204 [2302.08112]

  220. [235]

    Pomarol and L

    A. Pomarol and L. Salas,Exploring the conformal transition from above and below,JHEP08(2024) 149 [2312.08332]

  221. [236]

    Cruz Rojas, D.K

    J. Cruz Rojas, D.K. Hong, S.H. Im and M. J¨ arvinen,Holographic analysis of near-conformal dynamics and light dilaton, 2504.18623

  222. [237]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, D. Mateos, D. Pravos and J.G. Subils,Mass spectrum of gapped, non-confining theories with multi-scale dynamics,JHEP05(2019) 175 [1810.04656]

  223. [238]

    Roughley,Non-perturbative aspects of gauge theories from gauge-gravity dualities, Ph.D

    J. Roughley,Non-perturbative aspects of gauge theories from gauge-gravity dualities, Ph.D. thesis, Swansea U., Swansea U., 2021.2109.11949. 10.23889/SUthesis.58266

  224. [239]

    Kaplan, J.-W

    D.B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,Conformality Lost,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 125005 [0905.4752]

  225. [240]

    Jensen, A

    K. Jensen, A. Karch, D.T. Son and E.G. Thompson,Holographic Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 041601 [1002.3159]

  226. [241]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov and B. Zan,Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs,JHEP10(2018) 108 [1807.11512]

  227. [242]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov and B. Zan,Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model atQ >4,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 050 [1808.04380]

  228. [243]

    Bea and D

    Y. Bea and D. Mateos,Heating up Exotic RG Flows with Holography,JHEP08(2018) 034 [1805.01806]

  229. [244]

    Faedo, C

    A.F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, D. Mateos and J.G. Subils,Holographic Complex Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 161601 [1909.04008]

  230. [245]

    Bea, O.J.C

    Y. Bea, O.J.C. Dias, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, J.E. Santos et al.,Crossing a large-N phase transition at finite volume,JHEP02(2021) 061 [2007.06467]

  231. [246]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia and M. Zilh˜ ao,Domain collisions,JHEP06(2022) 025 [2111.03355]

  232. [247]

    Breitenlohner and D.Z

    P. Breitenlohner and D.Z. Freedman,Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,Annals Phys.144(1982) 249

  233. [248]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Dilatonic states near holographic phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 106018 [2010.04100]

  234. [249]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Light dilaton in a metastable vacuum,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 046009 [2011.07049]

  235. [250]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Coulomb branch of N=4 SYM and dilatonic scions in supergravity,Phys. Rev. D 50 104(2021) 046003 [2103.06721]

  236. [251]

    Elander, A

    D. Elander, A. Fatemiabhari and M. Piai,Phase transitions and light scalars in bottom-up holography,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 015021 [2212.07954]

  237. [252]

    Fatemiabhari, C

    A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez, M. Piai and J. Rucinski,Stability of holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066009 [2411.16854]

  238. [255]

    Piai and J

    M. Piai and J. Rucinski,Light dilaton from top-down holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes,2602.14924

  239. [256]

    Fatemiabhari and M

    A. Fatemiabhari and M. Piai,Bound states and deconfinement from Romans supergravity with magnetic flux, 2605.04586

  240. [257]

    Samtleben,Lectures on Gauged Supergravity and Flux Compactifications,Class

    H. Samtleben,Lectures on Gauged Supergravity and Flux Compactifications,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 214002 [0808.4076]

  241. [258]

    Freedman and A

    D.Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen,Supergravity, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK (5, 2012), 10.1017/CBO9781139026833

  242. [259]

    Pilch, P

    K. Pilch, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and P.K. Townsend,Compactification ofd= 11Supergravity on S(4) (Or 11 = 7 + 4, Too),Nucl. Phys. B242(1984) 377

  243. [260]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Gauged Maximally Extended Supergravity in Seven-dimensions,Phys. Lett. B143(1984) 103

  244. [261]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and N.P. Warner,Noncompact Gaugings and Critical Points of Maximal Supergravity in Seven-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B249(1985) 381

  245. [262]

    Nastase, D

    H. Nastase, D. Vaman and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Consistent nonlinear K K reduction of 11-d supergravity on AdS(7) x S(4) and selfduality in odd dimensions,Phys. Lett. B469(1999) 96 [hep-th/9905075]

  246. [263]

    Cvetic, M.J

    M. Cvetic, M.J. Duff, P. Hoxha, J.T. Liu, H. Lu, J.X. Lu et al.,Embedding AdS black holes in ten-dimensions and eleven-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B558(1999) 96 [hep-th/9903214]

  247. [264]

    Lu and C.N

    H. Lu and C.N. Pope,Exact embedding of N=1, D = 7 gauged supergravity in D = 11,Phys. Lett. B467(1999) 67 [hep-th/9906168]

  248. [265]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C.N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T.A. Tran,S**3 and S**4 reductions of type IIA supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B590(2000) 233 [hep-th/0005137]

  249. [266]

    Campos, G

    V.L. Campos, G. Ferretti, H. Larsson, D. Martelli and B.E.W. Nilsson,A Study of holographic renormalization group flows in D = 6 and D = 3,JHEP06(2000) 023 [hep-th/0003151]

  250. [267]

    Samtleben and M

    H. Samtleben and M. Weidner,The Maximal D=7 supergravities,Nucl. Phys. B725(2005) 383 [hep-th/0506237]

  251. [268]

    Romans,The F(4) Gauged Supergravity in Six-dimensions,Nucl

    L.J. Romans,The F(4) Gauged Supergravity in Six-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B269(1986) 691

  252. [269]

    DeWitt and P

    B.S. DeWitt and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Explicit Construction of the Exceptional Superalgebras F(4) andG(3),J. Math. Phys.23(1982) 1953

  253. [270]

    Giani, M

    F. Giani, M. Pernici and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,GAUGED N=4 d = 6 SUPERGRA VITY,Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 1680

  254. [271]

    Romans,Massive N=2a Supergravity in Ten-Dimensions,Phys

    L.J. Romans,Massive N=2a Supergravity in Ten-Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B169(1986) 374

  255. [272]

    Ferrara, A

    S. Ferrara, A. Kehagias, H. Partouche and A. Zaffaroni,AdS(6) interpretation of 5-D superconformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B431(1998) 57 [hep-th/9804006]

  256. [273]

    Brandhuber and Y

    A. Brandhuber and Y. Oz,The D-4 - D-8 brane system and five-dimensional fixed points,Phys. Lett. B460(1999) 307 [hep-th/9905148]

  257. [274]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C.N. Pope,Gauged six-dimensional supergravity from massive type IIA,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 5226 [hep-th/9906221]

  258. [275]

    Legramandi and C

    A. Legramandi and C. Nunez,Holographic description of SCFT 5 compactifications,JHEP02(2022) 010 [2109.11554]

  259. [276]

    Hong, J.T

    J. Hong, J.T. Liu and D.R. Mayerson,Gauged Six-Dimensional Supergravity from Warped IIB Reductions,JHEP09 (2018) 140 [1808.04301]

  260. [277]

    Jeong, O

    J. Jeong, O. Kelekci and E. O Colgain,An alternative IIB embedding of F(4) gauged supergravity,JHEP05(2013) 079 [1302.2105]

  261. [278]

    D’Auria, S

    R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara and S. Vaula,Matter coupled F(4) supergravity and the AdS(6) / CFT(5) correspondence,JHEP 10(2000) 013 [hep-th/0006107]

  262. [279]

    Andrianopoli, R

    L. Andrianopoli, R. D’Auria and S. Vaula,Matter coupled F(4) gauged supergravity Lagrangian,JHEP05(2001) 065 [hep-th/0104155]

  263. [280]

    Nishimura,Conformal supergravity from the AdS / CFT correspondence,Nucl

    M. Nishimura,Conformal supergravity from the AdS / CFT correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B588(2000) 471 51 [hep-th/0004179]

  264. [281]

    Gursoy, C

    U. Gursoy, C. Nunez and M. Schvellinger,RG flows from spin(7), CY 4 fold and HK manifolds to AdS, Penrose limits and pp waves,JHEP06(2002) 015 [hep-th/0203124]

  265. [282]

    Nunez, I.Y

    C. Nunez, I.Y. Park, M. Schvellinger and T.A. Tran,Supergravity duals of gauge theories from F(4) gauged supergravity in six-dimensions,JHEP04(2001) 025 [hep-th/0103080]

  266. [283]

    Karndumri,Holographic RG flows in six dimensional F(4) gauged supergravity,JHEP01(2013) 134 [1210.8064]

    P. Karndumri,Holographic RG flows in six dimensional F(4) gauged supergravity,JHEP01(2013) 134 [1210.8064]

  267. [284]

    Lozano, E

    Y. Lozano, E. ´O Colg´ ain, D. Rodriguez-Gomez and K. Sfetsos,SupersymmetricAdS 6 via T Duality,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 231601 [1212.1043]

  268. [285]

    Karndumri,Gravity duals of 5DN= 2SYM theory fromF(4)gauged supergravity,Phys

    P. Karndumri,Gravity duals of 5DN= 2SYM theory fromF(4)gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 086009 [1403.1150]

  269. [286]

    Chang, M

    C.-M. Chang, M. Fluder, Y.-H. Lin and Y. Wang,Romans Supergravity from Five-Dimensional Holograms,JHEP05 (2018) 039 [1712.10313]

  270. [287]

    Gutperle, J

    M. Gutperle, J. Kaidi and H. Raj,Mass deformations of 5d SCFTs via holography,JHEP02(2018) 165 [1801.00730]

  271. [288]

    Suh,Supersymmetric AdS 6 black holes from F(4) gauged supergravity,JHEP01(2019) 035 [1809.03517]

    M. Suh,Supersymmetric AdS 6 black holes from F(4) gauged supergravity,JHEP01(2019) 035 [1809.03517]

  272. [289]

    Suh,SupersymmetricAdS 6 black holes from matter coupledF(4)gauged supergravity,JHEP02(2019) 108 [1810.00675]

    M. Suh,SupersymmetricAdS 6 black holes from matter coupledF(4)gauged supergravity,JHEP02(2019) 108 [1810.00675]

  273. [290]

    Kim and M

    N. Kim and M. Shim,Wrapped Brane Solutions in RomansF(4)Gauged Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B951(2020) 114882 [1909.01534]

  274. [291]

    Chen and M

    K. Chen and M. Gutperle,Holographic line defects in F(4) gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 126015 [1909.11127]

  275. [292]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Gauged N=8 D=5 Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B259(1985) 460

  276. [293]

    Gunaydin, L.J

    M. Gunaydin, L.J. Romans and N.P. Warner,Gauged N=8 Supergravity in Five-Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B154(1985) 268

  277. [294]

    Gunaydin, L.J

    M. Gunaydin, L.J. Romans and N.P. Warner,Compact and Noncompact Gauged Supergravity Theories in Five-Dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B272(1986) 598

  278. [295]

    Gunaydin and N

    M. Gunaydin and N. Marcus,The Spectrum of the s**5 Compactification of the Chiral N=2, D=10 Supergravity and the Unitary Supermultiplets of U(2, 2/4),Class. Quant. Grav.2(1985) L11

  279. [296]

    Kim, L.J

    H.J. Kim, L.J. Romans and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,The Mass Spectrum of Chiral N=2 D=10 Supergravity on S**5, Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 389

  280. [297]

    K. Lee, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram,Spheres, generalised parallelisability and consistent truncations, Fortsch. Phys.65(2017) 1700048 [1401.3360]

  281. [298]

    Baguet, O

    A. Baguet, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Consistent Type IIB Reductions to Maximal 5D Supergravity,Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 065004 [1506.01385]

  282. [299]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Exceptional Field Theory I:E 6(6) covariant Form of M-Theory and Type IIB,Phys. Rev. D 89(2014) 066016 [1312.0614]

  283. [300]

    Baguet, O

    A. Baguet, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,E 6(6) Exceptional Field Theory: Review and Embedding of Type IIB,PoS CORFU2014(2015) 133 [1506.01065]

  284. [301]

    Distler and F

    J. Distler and F. Zamora,Nonsupersymmetric conformal field theories from stable anti-de Sitter spaces,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1999) 1405 [hep-th/9810206]

  285. [302]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C.N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T.A. Tran,Consistent SO(6) reduction of type IIB supergravity on S**5,Nucl. Phys. B586(2000) 275 [hep-th/0003103]

  286. [303]

    Bakas and K

    I. Bakas and K. Sfetsos,States and curves of five-dimensional gauged supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B573(2000) 768 [hep-th/9909041]

  287. [304]

    Freedman, S.S

    D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N.P. Warner,Continuous distributions of D3-branes and gauged supergravity, JHEP07(2000) 038 [hep-th/9906194]

  288. [305]

    Kraus, F

    P. Kraus, F. Larsen and S.P. Trivedi,The Coulomb branch of gauge theory from rotating branes,JHEP03(1999) 003 [hep-th/9811120]

  289. [306]

    Cvetic, S.S

    M. Cvetic, S.S. Gubser, H. Lu and C.N. Pope,Symmetric potentials of gauged supergravities in diverse dimensions and Coulomb branch of gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 086003 [hep-th/9909121]

  290. [307]

    Hernandez, K

    R. Hernandez, K. Sfetsos and D. Zoakos,Gravity duals for the Coulomb branch of marginally deformed N=4 Yang-Mills, JHEP03(2006) 069 [hep-th/0510132]

  291. [308]

    Pilch and N.P

    K. Pilch and N.P. Warner,N=2 supersymmetric RG flows and the IIB dilaton,Nucl. Phys. B594(2001) 209 [hep-th/0004063]. 52

  292. [309]

    Pilch and N.P

    K. Pilch and N.P. Warner,N=1 supersymmetric renormalization group flows from IIB supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2002) 627 [hep-th/0006066]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.