Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deep Neural Networks via Complex Network Theory: a Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11172 v2 pith:QR6XYHML submitted 2024-04-17 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords metricsnetworksneuraldnnsanalysisdeeptheorytopological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) can be represented as graphs whose links and vertices iteratively process data and solve tasks sub-optimally. Complex Network Theory (CNT), merging statistical physics with graph theory, provides a method for interpreting neural networks by analysing their weights and neuron structures. However, classic works adapt CNT metrics that only permit a topological analysis as they do not account for the effect of the input data. In addition, CNT metrics have been applied to a limited range of architectures, mainly including Fully Connected neural networks. In this work, we extend the existing CNT metrics with measures that sample from the DNNs' training distribution, shifting from a purely topological analysis to one that connects with the interpretability of deep learning. For the novel metrics, in addition to the existing ones, we provide a mathematical formalisation for Fully Connected, AutoEncoder, Convolutional and Recurrent neural networks, of which we vary the activation functions and the number of hidden layers. We show that these metrics differentiate DNNs based on the architecture, the number of hidden layers, and the activation function. Our contribution provides a method rooted in physics for interpreting DNNs that offers insights beyond the traditional input-output relationship and the CNT topological analysis.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Predicting Brain Morphogenesis via Physics-Transfer Learning

    q-bio.NC 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A physics-transfer graph network trained on simulated growth of simple elastic shells predicts curvature and short-term shape change on a fetal brain atlas, but validation is limited to a single population-averaged atlas.

  2. Self-similarity Analysis in Deep Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new regularizer that constrains a distance-based self-similarity score of hidden features improves accuracy on MLP and transformer models by up to 6 points, but the metric itself is not validated.

Pith tools