Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep learning-based classification of breast cancer molecular subtypes from H&E whole-slide images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.09053 v1 pith:QRA77FZD submitted 2024-08-30 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV
keywords molecularbreastcancersubtypingdeepsubtypestumorwsis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Classifying breast cancer molecular subtypes is crucial for tailoring treatment strategies. While immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene expression profiling are standard methods for molecular subtyping, IHC can be subjective, and gene profiling is costly and not widely accessible in many regions. Previous approaches have highlighted the potential application of deep learning models on H&E-stained whole slide images (WSI) for molecular subtyping, but these efforts vary in their methods, datasets, and reported performance. In this work, we investigated whether H&E-stained WSIs could be solely leveraged to predict breast cancer molecular subtypes (luminal A, B, HER2-enriched, and Basal). We used 1,433 WSIs of breast cancer in a two-step pipeline: first, classifying tumor and non-tumor tiles to use only the tumor regions for molecular subtyping; and second, employing a One-vs-Rest (OvR) strategy to train four binary OvR classifiers and aggregating their results using an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. The pipeline was tested on 221 hold-out WSIs, achieving an overall macro F1 score of 0.95 for tumor detection and 0.73 for molecular subtyping. Our findings suggest that, with further validation, supervised deep learning models could serve as supportive tools for molecular subtyping in breast cancer. Our codes are made available to facilitate ongoing research and development.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Computational Methods for Breast Cancer Molecular Profiling through Routine Histopathology: A Review

    q-bio.QM 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A narrative review maps AI approaches for predicting breast cancer biomarkers, including genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiles, from H&E histopathology slides.

Pith tools