Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 75 references

Defect states in compressible active polar fluids with turnover

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Turnover stabilizes topological defects in compressible active polar fluids.

desk verdict A genuinely new turnover-based mechanism for stabilizing defects in active polar fluids, well-supported by numerics but conditional on the density-polarity coupling chi; deserves referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03795 v1 pith:QRGS5OJO submitted 2025-06-04 physics.bio-ph cond-mat.soft

Ludovic Dumoulin , Carles Blanch-Mercader , Karsten Kruse This is my paper
classification physics.bio-phcond-mat.soft
keywords activepolarfluidturnovertopologicaldefectsdefectstabilizationfoamlatticevortexglassdensity-polaritycoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that continuous assembly and disassembly of a compressible active polar fluid—turnover—keeps topological defects from annihilating, so the fluid can sustain persistent populations of defects instead of relaxing to a uniform state. The mechanism is a density-polarity coupling: where polarity vanishes at a defect core, the equilibrium density is lower, and turnover then drives a radial outflow that pushes neighboring defects apart. The authors derive a velocity balance for a defect pair and confirm by simulation that the outflow defeats the elastic attraction at intermediate separations. If right, this gives a generic, anisotropic-stress-free route for biological matter such as the actin cortex to organize active stress around stable defect arrays, foams, and vortex glasses.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the density-polarity coupling $\chi>0$ in the free energy $f = \frac{a}{4}\rho^4 + \rho^2\left[-\frac{\chi}{2}\frac{\rho}{\rho_0}|p|^2 + \frac{\chi}{4}|p|^4 + \frac{\kappa}{2}(\nabla p)^2\right]$, which sets $|p|^2 = \rho/\rho_0$ in equilibrium so that defect cores ($p=0$) are density-depleted. Around such a core, mass conservation with turnover (source term $-\tau^{-1}(\rho-\rho_0)$) produces a radial outflow; the two-domain core model gives the radial velocity $v(R^-)=\tau^{-1}R\varepsilon/2$ with $\varepsilon = \frac{3\chi\rho_0^2}{3\chi\rho_0^2+12\rho_0^3(a\rho_0-\zeta_\rho)+2\xi\tau^{-1}R\ell}$. This outflow enters the defect-pair force balance $\dot{d}=2v(r=d)-\kappa/(d\bar{\gamma})$, the equation that determines when defects repel rather than annihilate.

What would settle it

A numerical experiment with the same equations but $\chi=0$ should show no defect stabilization: opposite-charge pairs should annihilate for all turnover rates. Equivalently, in a simulation with $\chi>0$, measure the density profile and velocity field around an isolated $+1$ defect: if the claim is correct, the density should dip at the core and the radial velocity should grow with turnover rate roughly as $\tau^{-1}R\varepsilon$, while a defect pair should settle at a finite separation that shrinks as $\chi\to0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that turnover stabilizes topological defect pairs in a compressible polar active fluid, with or without anisotropic active stress. In equilibrium the fluid's polarity magnitude obeys $|p|^2 = \rho/\rho_0$ for $\chi>0$, so a defect core, where $p=0$, is depleted of active fluid. Turnover, modeled by the source term $-\tau^{-1}(\rho-\rho_0)$, then sustains a radial Darcy-like outflow from the core with velocity $v(R^-)=\tau^{-1}R\varepsilon/2$ (Eq. 13), where $\varepsilon$ is the density contrast set by stress balance and mass conservation (Eq. 14). For two opposite-charge defects the separation obeys $\dot{d}=2v(r=d)-\kappa/(d\bar{\gamma})$ (Eq. 18), so the outflow advects each defect away from the other while elastic interactions ($\sim\kappa/d$) pull them together; at intermediate distances the outflow wins, giving a stable nonzero separation. Long-time numerical solutions show that this stabilization organizes defects into active foams, density waves, vortex glasses, and spontaneously forming square or hexagonal defect lattices, with the phase selected by the turnover rate and target density, rationalized by a linear stability analysis of homogeneous states that turns the instability from type II to type I.

Load-bearing premise

The whole stabilization mechanism requires that polarity order grows with density (the coupling $\chi>0$), so that a vanishing polarity at a defect core leaves the fluid locally depleted; without that density contrast, turnover produces no outward flow and nothing stops the defects from annihilating.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If turnover stabilizes defects without requiring anisotropic active stress, experimental systems with tunable turnover (reconstituted actomyosin, cell monolayers) should exhibit sustained defect populations controlled by assembly and disassembly rates.
  • Defect lattices in this model move at constant velocity without defect rearrangements, implying a genuinely self-propelled crystalline state of singularities.
  • The linear stability result predicts that turnover changes the onset of pattern formation from a type II to a type I instability, so the characteristic wavelength of the emerging pattern should be set by $\tau$ and by the density diffusion coefficient.
  • Because the mechanism is independent of active stress anisotropy, it applies to both contractile and extensile situations as long as the density-polarity coupling is positive; anisotropic stress and flow alignment then only select defect subtypes or modify the pattern.
  • The phase sequence with increasing target density—foams, waves, vortex glass, lattices, uniform—can serve as a phase diagram for experiments mapping turnover rates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The short-range repulsion between defects could be viewed as an effective defect gas with a repulsive core set by the outflow zone; this suggests that collective defect statistics might follow from an effective interacting-particle model with a single length scale $R$.
  • Since defects are not spontaneously created in the noiseless theory, the model predicts that turnover regulates the fate of pre-existing defect populations; adding noise or defect-pair nucleation could turn it into a full theory of defect number selection.
  • The same density-polarity coupling could stabilize defects in active nematics with turnover if the nematic order parameter is density-dependent, so the mechanism may generalize beyond polar systems.
  • A concrete testable extension: in systems where turnover can be inhibited (e.g., by drug treatment), defect density should drop and pairs should annihilate, while increasing turnover should restore finite defect separations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a hydrodynamic theory of compressible active polar fluids that includes turnover (assembly/disassembly of the active component), density-dependent active stress, and a density-polarity coupling in the free energy. The central claim is that turnover stabilizes topological defects in the polar order field: density depletion at defect cores, combined with turnover-driven radial outflow, repels oppositely charged defects and prevents annihilation. The authors support this claim with long-time numerical solutions in two dimensions, identifying several asymptotic states (active foams, density waves, vortex glasses, and defect lattices) as functions of target density, turnover rate, and activity. They also present a simplified two-domain analytic model of an isolated defect and a defect-pair force balance, along with linear stability analyses of homogeneous polarized and isotropic states. The paper argues that turnover, rather than chaotic active turbulence or suppressed hydrodynamic interactions, is a generic mechanism for organizing defects in biological active matter.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a plausible and previously underappreciated mechanism by which topological defects can be stabilized in biological active matter, with potential relevance to actin-cortex organization and tissue morphogenesis. The strengths of the paper are its extensive numerical parameter sweeps, the explicit derivation of the hydrodynamic model, the transparent stability analysis of homogeneous states, and falsifiable predictions such as the critical activity threshold in Eq. (21) and the dependence of defect density on rho_0, zeta_rho, and tau. However, the significance is moderated by the fact that the stabilization mechanism is conditional on a positive density-polarity coupling chi and by the acknowledged free parameters (defect core radius R and interface thickness l) in the analytic defect-core model. The paper is a solid contribution to active-matter theory if these caveats are made explicit and the analytic model is presented as a scaling argument rather than a closed quantitative theory.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. III.A, Eqs. (13)-(14)] The radial outflow v(R-) = tau^{-1} R epsilon / 2 and the density contrast epsilon both vanish identically when the density-polarity coupling chi = 0, because epsilon in Eq. (14) is proportional to chi. Therefore the stabilization mechanism is not produced by turnover alone but by turnover acting on a density profile that is depleted at defect cores only because the equilibrium relation |p|^2 = rho/rho_0 is imposed by Eq. (1). The abstract's statement that 'turnover readily leads to a stabilization of defects' and the claim in Sec. III that turnover stabilizes defect pairs 'both in the presence or absence of active stress' should be qualified to state explicitly that positive chi is required. The paper would also benefit from a brief discussion of the physical evidence or modeling precedent for the sign and magnitude of chi, since the simulations use only chi = 0.1 (Table I) and the entire mechanism disappears for chi = 0.
  2. [Sec. III.A and Fig. 3] The analytic defect-core calculation neglects the Frank free energy (kappa = 0), leaves the core radius R and the interface thickness l as free parameters, and the authors state that chemical and mechanical balance cannot be enforced simultaneously. As a consequence, Eq. (18) and the stabilization criterion tau^{-1} R^2 epsilon > kappa / bar{gamma} are scaling relations rather than closed quantitative predictions. This becomes load-bearing when Fig. 3 compares the numerical phase boundary to Eq. (21) using the relation a = 4 zeta_c_rho / 3 from Table I; this relation is an ad hoc modeling choice, not a derived or measured parameter. Please state clearly that R, l, and the a-zeta_c_rho relation are adjustable within the analytic model, and provide a sensitivity check showing how the predicted boundary in Fig. 3 changes under reasonable variations of R and l.
  3. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (18)] The defect-pair balance uses the single-defect outflow v(r=d) as if it were the core-boundary value v(R-) = tau^{-1} R epsilon / 2. For the argument to work, the radial outflow must decay over a length comparable to R so that it is significant at d ~ R and negligible at d >> R, but the paper does not provide the radial decay profile or a derivation of v(r) outside the core. Without this profile, the statement that elastic attraction dominates at large d because radial flows are 'localized near the defect center' is only qualitative. A measurement of v(r) from the simulations, or a matched asymptotic solution, would substantially strengthen the analytic mechanism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.B and Ref. [51]] The text says 'The code can be found at [51]', but Ref. [51] states 'Code will be made available upon publication.' Please provide a working repository link or change the wording to reflect the intended availability.
  2. [Sec. V] There is a typo, 'perfromed', in the first paragraph of Sec. V; it should be 'performed'.
  3. [Sec. IV.A and Eq. (21)] The discussion of the critical activity zeta_c_rho and the comparison in Fig. 3 would be easier to follow if the text explicitly stated that Eq. (21) is solved self-consistently when a = 4 zeta_c_rho / 3, and how this affects the shape of the predicted boundary.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption states that each data point comes from a single numerical solution; given the known variability of defect counts, a brief note on the expected statistical error or a representative error bar would help the reader judge the phase boundaries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the turnover-driven defect stabilization is derived from the stated hydrodynamic model, not from its conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The defect-core model in Sec. III starts from the declared free energy and constitutive equations, posits an inner core with depleted density, and derives the radial outflow from Eq. (12) mass balance together with the stress difference (10)-(11), yielding Eqs. (13)-(14). These are not fit to the simulation defect densities; the core radius R and interface thickness ℓ are left as free parameters, and the ratio check (17) uses parameter values from Table I rather than adjusting them to match the numerics. The pair stabilization balance, Eq. (18), combines this computed outflow with the standard elastic attraction κ/(dγbar), and the resulting condition τ^{-1}R^2ε > κ/γbar is a substantive inequality, not an identity. The linear-stability results (Eqs. (19)-(21), (C6)-(C8), (C11)-(C12)) are derived from the same equations and are used to rationalize, not to fit, the phase diagram. The relation a=4/3ζc_rho is a self-consistently chosen modeling convention, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Dependence of the mechanism on the density-polarity coupling χ>0 in Eq. (1) is a stated physical input and a limitation on generality, but it does not make the derivation circular because the conclusion is not equivalent to that input by construction. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [37], [44], [55]) appear only as background modeling context and are not load-bearing for the stabilization claim. No circular step meeting the evidentiary standard was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard active-polar-gel hydrodynamic model (conservation laws plus linear constitutive relations) with three key input assumptions: the density-polarity coupling in the free energy (|p|^2 = rho/rho_0), the linear turnover relaxation to rho_0, and the overdamped Darcy momentum balance. The analytic stabilization argument additionally neglects Frank elasticity and leaves the core radius R as a free parameter. No new physical entities are introduced. The model is deterministic, so defect creation is not addressed.

free parameters (3)
  • Defect core radius R = undetermined
    In the two-domain analytic model of Sec. III A, the core radius R is not determined because the Frank free energy is neglected (kappa=0); it is treated as a free parameter despite controlling the magnitude of the radial flow (Eq. 13).
  • Quartic density stiffness a relative to activity zeta_rho = a = 4/3 zeta_rho (Table I)
    The free energy coefficient a is set proportional to the active stress coefficient zeta_rho in simulations and to zeta_c_rho in the theoretical boundary of Fig. 3, a modeling choice that affects the stability threshold Eq. (21).
  • Interface thickness l = assumed proportional to R
    The Darcy-flow estimate v(R-) = Delta_sigma/(l*xi) assumes the interface thickness l scales with the core radius R; no independent value is given.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The free energy density has the form f = a*rho^4/4 + rho^2*(-(chi/2)(rho/rho_0)|p|^2 + (chi/4)|p|^4 + (kappa/2)(nabla p)^2), Eq. (1).
    This Landau-Ginzburg form sets the equilibrium polarity amplitude |p|^2 = rho/rho_0, which is the density-polarity coupling that produces density depletion at defect cores; it is motivated by the actin cortex but is an input assumption.
  • domain assumption Turnover enters as a linear relaxation of density to rho_0, d_t rho + ... = -tau^{-1}(rho-rho_0), Eq. (4).
    Assembly and disassembly are modeled as a single relaxation time tau to a target density rho_0, neglecting details of ATP/ADP dynamics and spatial regulation.
  • domain assumption Momentum balance reduces to a Darcy friction law d_beta sigma_tot = xi v, Eq. (5), with inertia and permeation neglected.
    Low Reynolds number and friction with the environment are standard for cytoskeletal and tissue flows; permeation of the passive component is neglected as in Ref. [37].
  • ad hoc to paper The analytic defect-core calculation neglects the Frank free energy (kappa=0) and does not enforce chemical and mechanical balance simultaneously.
    Stated in Sec. III A: 'we cannot enforce chemical and mechanical balance simultaneously' and R remains undetermined; this approximation is used to derive the stabilization condition.
  • domain assumption The dynamics are deterministic (no noise), so topological defects are only present through initial conditions.
    Explicitly stated in Sec. VII: 'in the absence of fluctuations... topological defects are not created by the dynamics... they are generated through the initial condition.' This limits the claim to stabilization, not creation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Defect states in compressible active polar fluids with turnover." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QRGS5OJO

@misc{pith2026250603795,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Defect states in compressible active polar fluids with turnover},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QRGS5OJO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03795}
}
read the original abstract

Biological active matter like the cytoskeleton or tissues are characterized by their ability to transform chemical energy into mechanical stress. In addition, it often exhibits orientational order, which is essential for many cellular and morphogenetic processes. Experimental evidence suggests that defects in the orientational order field play an important role in organizing active stress. However, defects tend to annihilate unless the material is in a chaotic state or hydrodynamic interactions are suppressed. Using a hydrodynamic description of compressible active polar fluids, we show that turnover readily leads to a stabilization of defects. Depending on the turnover rate, topological defects arrange in a multitude of different phases, including lattices, active foams, and vortex glasses. Our work suggests that turnover plays a crucial role for organizing biological active matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03795 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Compressible active polar fluids in the presence of turnover. (a) Schematic of the physical processes considered in this [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Number of defects as function of time for dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Linear stability analysis of homogenous states. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: , showing that sufficiently fast turnover is necessary for defect stabilization, which is again consistent with our simplified analysis. 0.4 0.8 1.2 τ = 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.2 τ = 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 τ = 1 τ = 5 τ = 10 τ = 100 0 0 2 2 8 8 12 12 16 16 20 20 Density of defects Acti…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Snapshots of the density (heatmaps) and polarity (black arrows) of asymptotic states of the dynamic equations ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Transition from square to hexagonal defect lattices. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Examples of square and hexagonal defect lattices. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Effect of flow-alignment on +1 topological defects. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Effects of active anisotropic active stress. (a) Con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Snapshots of the density (heatmaps) for different target densities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Example of a square and hexagonal defect lattice. (a,d) Snapshot at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Snapshots of the density (heatmaps) of solutions of the dynamic equations ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    5 and Movie 6, the system spontaneously forms puncta of ele- vated density within a background with a density around ρ0

    Puncta and networks For small target densitiesρ 0,ρ 0 = 0.4 in Fig. 5 and Movie 6, the system spontaneously forms puncta of ele- vated density within a background with a density around ρ0. The majority of these puncta are connected to other puncta by lines of intermediate density that formed the edges of a network with puncta at its vertices. We denote th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    5 and Movie 7

    Active foams With increasing target densityρ 0, the density along the edges increases,ρ 0 = 0.5 in Fig. 5 and Movie 7. The system forms two sorts of cells: One kind contains a single integer topological defect of the polar order field, whereas cells of the other kind do not contain defects. In the latter, the polarity is typically aligned throughout the w...

    work page

  3. [3]

    5 and Movies 2 and 8

    Density waves Asρ 0 is increased further, traveling density waves ap- pear,ρ 0 = 0.6 andρ 0 = 0.65 in Fig. 5 and Movies 2 and 8. At the same time, uniform polar order emerges through- out the whole system. In contrast to lower densities, the cell shapes are elongated in one direction. The direction of elongation is on average perpendicular to the directio...

    work page

  4. [4]

    5 and Movie

    Vortex glass For a target density ofρ 0 = 0.75, topological defects with cores of two different sizes emerge, Fig. 5 and Movie

    work page

  5. [5]

    small” defects flowing between “large

    The state is dynamic with “small” defects flowing between “large” ones. Due to the similarity of this state with states observed in the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, we denote this state as a vortex glass state [52]. Note, however, that the disclination points with charge +1 can also be asters and spirals in addition to vortices, Fig. 5C

    work page

  6. [6]

    For densities around ρ0 = 0.8, locally, regular defect lattices appear sponta- neously, Fig

    Defect lattices As the target density is increased further, the size of defect cores is again monodisperse. For densities around ρ0 = 0.8, locally, regular defect lattices appear sponta- neously, Fig. 5D and Movie 10. The topological defects have charges of±1 and the lattices are either square or hexagonal. We discuss the lattice phase in more detail in S...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Indeed, the critical valueζ c ρ, Eq

    Homogenous uniformly polarized state For target densitiesρ 0 beyond a critical value, the system asymptotically settles into the homogenous state with uniform polarity, Movie 11. Indeed, the critical valueζ c ρ, Eq. (21), increases with the densityρ 0. By increasingρ 0 and keeping all other parameter values con- stant, the homogenous uniformly polarized s...

    work page

  8. [8]

    We setρ=ρ 0 +δρ, p=p 0 +δpwith|p 0|= 1, andv=δv, and derive the dynamic equations to first order in the perturbationsδρ, δp, andδv

    Polarized homogeneous state To study the linear stability of the polarized state, we consider without limiting generality that the polar field is aligned along thex-axis,p 0.ey = 0. We setρ=ρ 0 +δρ, p=p 0 +δpwith|p 0|= 1, andv=δv, and derive the dynamic equations to first order in the perturbationsδρ, δp, andδv. By settingδρ= ˆρ(q x, qy)ei(qxx+qyy) and si...

    work page

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Isotropic homogeneous state In our numerical integration of the equations (1)- (9), we initialize the system in the isotropic state with a small random perturbation. In Sect. IV C, to interpret the states observed in numerics, we use a linear stabil- ity analysis of the isotro...

  2. [10]

    Substituting the expressions above for ˆvx and ˆvy into the linearized equa- tions (1)-(9), we obtain the following dynamical equa- tions for the density and the polarization d dt ˆρ=− 1 τ + 3q2 aρ2 0γ−ρ 0 E 2q2 + 1 ˆρ.(C11) d dt ˆp= ρ2 0 Γ χ−κq 2 ˆp.(C12) As long asχ >0, the ...

  3. [11]

    Prost, F

    J. Prost, F. J¨ ulicher, and J. F. Joanny, Active gel physics, Nature Physics11, 111 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    A. B. Verkhovsky, T. M. Svitkina, and G. G. Borisy, Self- polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm., Curr. Biol.9, 11 (1999)

    1999

  5. [13]

    A. C. Martin, M. Kaschube, and E. F. Wieschaus, Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical con- striction, Nature457, 495 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    Mayer, M

    M. Mayer, M. Depken, J. S. Bois, F. J¨ ulicher, and S. W. Grill, Anisotropies in cortical tension reveal the physical basis of polarizing cortical flows, Nature467, 617 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    Sanchez, D

    T. Sanchez, D. T. N. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, Spontaneous motion in hierarchically as- sembled active matter, Nature491, 431 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Duclos, S

    G. Duclos, S. Garcia, H. G. Yevick, and P. Silberzan, Perfect nematic order in confined monolayers of spindle- shaped cells, Soft Matter10, 2346 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    N´ ed´ elec, T

    F. N´ ed´ elec, T. Surrey, A. C. Maggs, and S. Leibler, Self- organization of microtubules and motors, Nature389, 305 (1997)

    1997

  10. [18]

    Delarue, J.-F

    M. Delarue, J.-F. Joanny, F. J¨ ulicher, and J. Prost, Stress distributions and cell flows in a growing cell aggregate, Interface focus4, 20140033 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    S. Jain, V. M. Cachoux, G. H. Narayana, S. de Beco, J. D’alessandro, V. Cellerin, T. Chen, M. L. Heuz´ e, P. Marcq, R.-M. M` ege,et al., The role of single-cell me- chanical behaviour and polarity in driving collective cell migration, Nature Physics16, 802 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Armengol-Collado, L

    J.-M. Armengol-Collado, L. N. Carenza, J. Eckert, D. Krommydas, and L. Giomi, Epithelia are multiscale active liquid crystals, Nature Physics19, 1773–1779 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Dedenon and K

    M. Dedenon and K. Kruse, Noise-induced transitions from contractile to extensile active stress in isotropic flu- ids, Physical Review E111, 015426 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    T. B. Saw, A. Doostmohammadi, V. Nier, L. Kocgozlu, 18 S. Thampi, Y. Toyama, P. Marcq, C. T. Lim, J. M. Yeo- mans, and B. Ladoux, Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion, Nature544, 212 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Kawaguchi, R

    K. Kawaguchi, R. Kageyama, and M. Sano, Topological defects control collective dynamics in neural progenitor cell cultures, Nature545, 327 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Maroudas-Sacks, L

    Y. Maroudas-Sacks, L. Garion, L. Shani-Zerbib, A. Livshits, E. Braun, and K. Keren, Topological de- fects in the nematic order of actin fibres as organization centres of Hydra morphogenesis, Nature Physics17, 251 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Guillamat, C

    P. Guillamat, C. Blanch-Mercader, G. Pernollet, K. Kruse, and A. Roux, Integer topological defects or- ganize stresses driving tissue morphogenesis, Nature Ma- terials21, 588 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost,The Physics of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2002)

    2002

  19. [27]

    A. J. Vromans and L. Giomi, Orientational properties of nematic disclinations, Soft Matter12, 6490 (2016), 1507.05588

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Tang and J

    X. Tang and J. V. Selinger, Orientation of topological defects in 2D nematic liquid crystals, Soft Matter13, 5481 (2017), 1706.05065

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    D. J. G. Pearce and K. Kruse, Properties of twisted topo- logical defects in 2D nematic liquid crystals†, Soft Matter 17, 7408 (2021), 2104.11293

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Blanch-Mercader, P

    C. Blanch-Mercader, P. Guillamat, A. Roux, and K. Kruse, Quantifying Material Properties of Cell Mono- layers by Analyzing Integer Topological Defects, Physical Review Letters126, 028101 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Maroudas-Sacks, L

    Y. Maroudas-Sacks, L. Garion, S. Suganthan, M. Popovi´ c, and K. Keren, Confinement Modulates Axial Patterning in Regenerating Hydra, PRX Life2, 043007 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Ravichandran, M

    Y. Ravichandran, M. Vogg, K. Kruse, D. J. G. Pearce, and A. Roux, Topology changes of Hydra define actin ori- entation defects as organizers of morphogenesis, Science Advances11, eadr9855 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    S. P. Thampi, R. Golestanian, and J. M. Yeomans, Veloc- ity Correlations in an Active Nematic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 118101 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    Giomi, Geometry and Topology of Turbulence in Ac- tive Nematics, Physical Review X5, 031003 (2015)

    L. Giomi, Geometry and Topology of Turbulence in Ac- tive Nematics, Physical Review X5, 031003 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Alert, J

    R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Active Tur- bulence, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 143 (2022), 2104.02122

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    D. J. G. Pearce, Activity Driven Orientational Order in Active Nematic Liquid Crystals on an Anisotropic Substrate, Physical Review Letters122, 227801 (2019), 1810.04549

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. J. G. Pearce, Defect order in active nematics on a curved surface, New Journal of Physics22, 063051 (2020), 2002.06364

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Thijssen and A

    K. Thijssen and A. Doostmohammadi, Binding self- propelled topological defects in active turbulence, Phys- ical Review Research2, 042008 (2020), 2007.13443

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    A. U. Oza and J. Dunkel, Antipolar ordering of topo- logical defects in active liquid crystals, New Journal of Physics18, 093006 (2016), 1507.01055

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Doostmohammadi, M

    A. Doostmohammadi, M. F. Adamer, S. P. Thampi, and J. M. Yeomans, Stabilization of active matter by flow- vortex lattices and defect ordering., Nature Communica- tions7, 10557 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Thijssen, M

    K. Thijssen, M. R. Nejad, and J. M. Yeomans, Role of Friction in Multidefect Ordering, Physical Review Letters 125, 218004 (2020), 2005.01164

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Shankar, A

    S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nature Reviews Physics4, 380 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    T. B. Saw, W. Xi, B. Ladoux, and C. T. Lim, Biolog- ical tissues as active nematic liquid crystals, Advanced materials30, 1802579 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Maroudas-Sacks and K

    Y. Maroudas-Sacks and K. Keren, Mechanical pattern- ing in animal morphogenesis, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology37, 469 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    J. F. Joanny, F. J¨ ulicher, K. Kruse, and J. Prost, Hydro- dynamic theory for multi-component active polar gels, New Journal of Physics9, 422 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    A. C. Callan-Jones and F. J¨ ulicher, Hydrodynamics of ac- tive permeating gels, New Journal of Physics13, 093027 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    J. F. Joanny, K. Kruse, J. Prost, and S. Ramaswamy, The actin cortex as an active wetting layer, The Euro- pean Physical Journal E36, 10.1140/epje/i2013-13052-9 (2013)

    2013 doi

  40. [48]

    R. M. Adar and J.-F. Joanny, Active-gel theory for mul- ticellular migration of polar cells in the extra-cellular ma- trix, New Journal of Physics24, 073001 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    de Gennes and J

    P. de Gennes and J. Prost,The Physics of Liquid Crystals, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, 1993)

    1993

  42. [50]

    Kruse, J.-F

    K. Kruse, J.-F. Joanny, F. J¨ ulicher, J. Prost, and K. Seki- moto, Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments., Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 078101 (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    B. I. Shraiman, Mechanical feedback as a possible reg- ulator of tissue growth, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102, 3318 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Basan, T

    M. Basan, T. Risler, J.-F. Joanny, X. Sastre-Garau, and J. Prost, Homeostatic competition drives tumor growth and metastasis nucleation, HFSP journal3, 265 (2009)

    2009

  45. [53]

    S. R. d. Groot and P. Mazur,Non-Equilibrium Ther- modynamics, Dover Publications Inc (Dover Publications Inc, 1985)

    1985

  46. [54]

    Kruse, J.-F

    K. Kruse, J.-F. Joanny, F. J¨ ulicher, J. Prost, and K. Seki- moto, Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics, The European Physical Journal E 16, 5 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    Levernier and K

    N. Levernier and K. Kruse, Spontaneous formation of chaotic protrusions in a polymerizing active gel layer, New Journal of Physics22, 013003 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Giomi, M

    L. Giomi, M. J. Bowick, X. Ma, and M. C. Marchetti, De- fect Annihilation and Proliferation in Active Nematics, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 228101 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Giomi, M

    L. Giomi, M. J. Bowick, P. Mishra, R. Sknepnek, and M. C. Marchetti, Defect dynamics in active nemat- ics, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a- Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences372, 10.1098/rsta.2013.0365 (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    Shankar, S

    S. Shankar, S. Ramaswamy, M. C. Marchetti, and M. J. Bowick, Defect unbinding in active nematics, Physical review letters121, 108002 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Pattern formation outside of equilibrium, Rev Mod Phys65, 851 (1993)

    1993

  52. [60]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM review59, 65 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Code will be made available upon publication. 19

  54. [62]

    Brito, I

    C. Brito, I. S. Aranson, and H. Chat´ e, Vortex glass and vortex liquid in oscillatory media, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 068301 (2003)

    2003

  55. [63]

    Voituriez, J

    R. Voituriez, J. F. Joanny, and J. Prost, Spontaneous flow transition in active polar gels, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 70, 10.1209/epl/i2004-10501-2 (2007), q-bio/0503022

    2007 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Duclos, C

    G. Duclos, C. Blanch-Mercader, V. Yashunsky, G. Sal- breux, J. F. Joanny, J. Prost, and P. Silberzan, Spon- taneous shear flow in confined cellular nematics, Nature Physics14, 728 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Dedenon, C

    M. Dedenon, C. A. Dessalles, P. Guillamat, A. Roux, K. Kruse, and C. Blanch-Mercader, Density-Polarity Coupling in Confined Active Polar Films: Asters, Spi- rals, and Biphasic Orientational Phases, Physical Review Letters131, 268301 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Chandragiri, A

    S. Chandragiri, A. Doostmohammadi, J. M. Yeomans, and S. P. Thampi, Flow States and Transitions of an Ac- tive Nematic in a Three-Dimensional Channel, Physical Review Letters125, 148002 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    I. Lavi, R. Alert, J.-F. Joanny, and J. Casademunt, Dynamical arrest in active nematic turbulence, arXiv 10.48550/arxiv.2407.15149 (2024), 2407.15149

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    M. F. Staddon, E. M. Munro, and S. Banerjee, Pul- satile contractions and pattern formation in excitable actomyosin cortex, PLoS Computational Biology18, e1009981 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Besse, H

    M. Besse, H. Chat´ e, and A. Solon, Metastability of Constant-Density Flocks, Physical Review Letters129, 268003 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Lemma, N

    B. Lemma, N. P. Mitchell, R. Subramanian, D. J. Needle- man, and Z. Dogic, Active Microphase Separation in Mix- tures of Microtubules and Tip-Accumulating Molecular Motors, Physical Review X12, 031006 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    Rinaldin, A

    M. Rinaldin, A. Kickuth, B. Dalton, Y. Xu, S. D. Talia, and J. Brugu´ es, Robust cytoplasmic partitioning by solving an intrinsic cytoskeletal instability, bioRxiv , 2024.03.12.584684 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    James, D

    M. James, D. A. Suchla, J. Dunkel, and M. Wilczek, Emergence and melting of active vortex crystals, Nature Communications12, 5630 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    D. J. G. Pearce, J. Nambisan, P. W. Ellis, A. Fernandez- Nieves, and L. Giomi, Orientational Correlations in Ac- tive and Passive Nematic Defects, Physical Review Let- ters127, 197801 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    R. R. Keogh, S. Chandragiri, B. Loewe, T. Ala-Nissila, S. P. Thampi, and T. N. Shendruk, Helical flow states in active nematics, Physical Review E106, L012602 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Caballero, Z

    F. Caballero, Z. You, and M. C. Marchetti, Vorticity phase separation and defect lattices in the isotropic phase of active liquid crystals, Soft Matter19, 7828 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.