REVIEW 2 cited by
AgreeMate: Teaching LLMs to Haggle
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce AgreeMate, a framework for training Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform strategic price negotiations through natural language. We apply recent advances to a negotiation setting where two agents (i.e. buyer or seller) use natural language to bargain on goods using coarse actions. Specifically, we present the performance of Large Language Models when used as agents within a decoupled (modular) bargaining architecture. We demonstrate that using prompt engineering, fine-tuning, and chain-of-thought prompting enhances model performance, as defined by novel metrics. We use attention probing to show model attention to semantic relationships between tokens during negotiations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
EvoEmo: Towards Evolved Emotional Policies for Adversarial LLM Agents in Multi-Turn Price Negotiation
EvoEmo evolves emotion-transition policies for buyer LLM agents and reports higher savings, success rates, and efficiency than vanilla or fixed-emotion baselines in simulated price negotiations.
-
State-Inference-Based Prompting for Natural Language Trading with Game NPCs
A prompt framework that makes LLM game merchants follow a six-state trading flow achieves over 97% state compliance, over 95% item accuracy, and 99.7% price accuracy in simulated dialogues.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.