Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Gradient Flow in Sparse Neural Networks and How Lottery Tickets Win

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.03533 v2 pith:QSP6I4HL submitted 2020-10-07 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords sparsetrainingflowgradientinitializationnetworksduringexceptions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sparse Neural Networks (NNs) can match the generalization of dense NNs using a fraction of the compute/storage for inference, and also have the potential to enable efficient training. However, naively training unstructured sparse NNs from random initialization results in significantly worse generalization, with the notable exceptions of Lottery Tickets (LTs) and Dynamic Sparse Training (DST). Through our analysis of gradient flow during training we attempt to answer: (1) why training unstructured sparse networks from random initialization performs poorly and; (2) what makes LTs and DST the exceptions? We show that sparse NNs have poor gradient flow at initialization and demonstrate the importance of using sparsity-aware initialization. Furthermore, we find that DST methods significantly improve gradient flow during training over traditional sparse training methods. Finally, we show that LTs do not improve gradient flow, rather their success lies in re-learning the pruning solution they are derived from - however, this comes at the cost of learning novel solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NeuroTrails: Training with Dynamic Sparse Heads as the Key to Effective Ensembling

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dynamic sparse training of multiple heads on a shared backbone outperforms full dense ensembles on ImageNet and C4 while using less compute.

Pith tools