Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 62 references

The paper argues that the TransPlanckian Censorship Conjecture confines higher-dimensional 'dark dimension' inflation to a narrow one-extra-dimension corner, suppressing primordial gravitational waves below r ~ 10^-19 and effectively exclud

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 04:43 UTC pith:QVLVMBXD

load-bearing objection Higher-dimensional TCC bounds on dark-dimension inflation are derived cleanly but rest at the load-bearing point on an unpublished formula; work is worth refereeing once that is fixed. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22442 v1 pith:QVLVMBXD submitted 2026-07-24 hep-th astro-ph.CO

TransPlanckian Censorship on Dark Dimension Inflation

Luis A. Anchordoqui , Ignatios Antoniadis , Jules Cunat This is my paper
classification hep-th astro-ph.CO
keywords TransPlanckian Censorship Conjecturedark dimensionhigher-dimensional inflationextra dimensionsswamplandtensor-to-scalar ratioreheating temperaturespecies scale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Inflation that simultaneously grows extra dimensions from the fundamental scale to micron size is a single-scale explanation for the weakness of gravity and the largeness of the cosmos. This paper shows that applying the TransPlanckian Censorship Conjecture — the rule that no sub-Planckian fluctuation may be stretched to cosmological size — nearly closes that scenario off: the initial extra-dimension size and the inflationary Hubble rate must both sit far below the fundamental gravity scale, which suppresses tensor perturbations to r ≲ 10^-19. With two extra dimensions, the same constraint forces a reheating temperature below about 0.3 MeV, in conflict with big-bang nucleosynthesis. One extra dimension survives only if a pre-inflationary phase had already enlarged the dimension and lowered the Hubble scale, relaxing the bound to r ≲ 10^-10. A sympathetic reader would take this as a demonstration that a generic quantum-gravity conjecture translates into sharp, quantitative exclusions for realistic extra-dimension models.

Core claim

In (4+d)-dimensional uniform inflation, the TCC takes the simple form H_I ≲ (2/(d+2)) 1/(ε R⊥) with ε = 1/(R0 M*), a direct generalization of the 5D condition a_e/a_0 < M*/H_I. For d=1, combining this with the requirement of a scale-invariant CMB spectrum and the resolution of the horizon problem forces ε ≲ 10^-8 and H_I/M* ≲ 10^-9, implying a tensor-to-scalar ratio r ≲ 10^-19; including a preceding linear-expansion (pre-inflationary) phase relaxes these to r ≲ 10^-10. The inflaton mass is bounded by m ≲ 10^-9 eV (or about 10^-7 eV with a pre-inflationary phase), making the standard coherent-oscillation reheating phase implausible and requiring reheating directly from a w = -1/3 phase. For d

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the higher-dimensional TransPlanckian Censorship inequality, e^N < M*/H_I — i.e., the total expansion of the universe cannot exceed the ratio of the species (fundamental gravity) scale to the inflationary Hubble rate. Expressed in terms of ε = 1/(R0 M*), the ratio of the initial extra-dimension size to the fundamental length, it becomes H_I ≲ 1/(ε R⊥) up to a factor 2/(d+2) from frame conversion. The paper establishes the frame-independence of this bound using the 5D–4D dictionary between the 5D, Jordan, and Einstein frames, showing how the species scale, Planck mass, and Hubble parameter transform, so the constraint is the same in all descriptions. This inequality

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on Eq. (5.1), the higher-dimensional TCC condition a_e/a_0 < M*/H_I, which the authors take from an unpublished companion paper; if the correct cutoff is the 4D Planck mass rather than the species scale, or if the inequality changes under a different frame choice, all the derived limits collapse.

What would settle it

Publish a first-principles derivation of the higher-dimensional TCC showing that the relevant cutoff is the 4D Planck scale instead of the species scale — for instance, a_e/a_0 < M_p/H_I in the 5D Jordan frame — or observe primordial B-modes with r above about 10^-10, or find a BBN-consistent reheating temperature above about 0.3 MeV in a two-extra-dimension model; any of these would break the paper's central exclusions.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the higher-dimensional TCC holds, one-extra-dimension (dark dimension) inflation is compatible only with ε ≲ 10^-8 and H_I/M* ≲ 10^-9, meaning both the initial compactification scale and the Hubble scale are far below the fundamental gravity scale.
  • Primordial gravitational waves in these models are generically unobservable: r ≲ 10^-19, or r ≲ 10^-10 with a pre-inflationary phase, far below the reach of current or planned CMB B-mode experiments.
  • Two-extra-dimension inflation is effectively excluded by the TCC because it requires a reheating temperature T_r ≲ 0.3 MeV, which conflicts with big-bang nucleosynthesis; only a pre-inflationary phase makes it marginally viable at T_r ~ 1 MeV, H_I ~ 1 MeV, ε ~ 10^-7.
  • The post-inflationary history cannot include a prolonged inflaton-oscillation (matter-like) phase: the TCC forces the inflaton mass below about 10^-9 eV and requires a direct transition from a w = -1/3 phase to reheating.
  • A pre-inflationary linear-expansion phase, such as the linear dilaton background in M-theory, can naturally generate the required initial conditions and softens the most severe bounds, including raising the tensor-to-scalar ratio ceiling to r ~ 10^-10.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the higher-dimensional TCC inequality (5.1) is later derived with the 4D Planck mass as the cutoff instead of the species scale, the quantitative bounds here would shift, although the qualitative message — severe suppression of the parameter space — would likely survive.
  • Beyond the paper: the same frame-dictionary and ε-constrained analysis could be applied to other Swampland conjectures (de Sitter, distance, or refined versions) in higher-dimensional inflation, potentially producing equally sharp cuts on model parameters.
  • Beyond the paper: a detection of primordial B-modes at r ≳ 10^-11 would already falsify the no-pre-inflation window and put strong pressure on the pre-inflationary version; a measured reheating temperature comfortably above 0.3 MeV in a two-extra-dimensional cosmology would count as evidence against this application of the TCC.
  • Beyond the paper: the extreme smallness of ε and H_I at the start of inflation could be read not as fine-tuning but as evidence that the observable inflationary epoch begins after a longer pre-inflationary string/M-theory evolution; the paper's Kasner and linear-dilaton suggestions provide a concrete starting point for constructing such histories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture (TCC) to higher-dimensional 'dark dimension' inflation, in which inflation simultaneously expands three non-compact dimensions and one or two extra dimensions from the species scale to micron size. Using a higher-dimensional TCC inequality (Eq. 5.1) imported from an unpublished companion work [42], together with scale-invariance and horizon-problem constraints from another companion paper [28], it derives strong bounds: for d=1, epsilon = 1/(R0 M*) <= 2.3e-8 and H_I/M* <= 1e-9, implying a tensor-to-scalar ratio r <~ 2e-19 (or <~ 1e-10 if a pre-inflationary linear phase is included); for d=2, it derives T_r <~ 0.3 MeV, in strong tension with BBN. It closes with a heterotic M-theory discussion of the pre-inflationary phase.

Significance. If Eq. (5.1) is correct, the paper produces sharp, falsifiable predictions and a clear discrimination between one- and two-dark-dimension scenarios. The algebraic chain is transparent, and the authors consistently choose the most permissive parameter values (R_perp = 40 micron, T_r = 5 MeV, alpha = 1, w = -1/3), so their bounds are conservative. No parameter is fitted to data, so concerns about fit-driven circularity do not apply. The central weakness is that the paper's quantitative results are not self-contained: they rest on the unproven higher-dimensional TCC formula (5.1) from an in-preparation reference, and on the companion paper [28] for the power spectrum, normalcy temperature, and post-inflationary matching. Until those inputs are available, the main claim is conditional.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5.1, Eq. (5.1)] The entire chain of bounds (5.12)-(5.27), (7.11), and the conclusions (9.1)-(9.3) rests on the higher-dimensional TCC inequality a_hat_e/a_hat_0 < M_*/H_I. This is introduced at Eq. (5.1) with the statement that it is 'addressed in a separate work [42]', and Ref. [42] is listed as 'in preparation' by the same authors. The frame-independence check in Sec. 5.1 only shows that Eq. (5.2) is equivalent to Eq. (5.1) up to a factor 2/3; it does not derive Eq. (5.1) itself. Since an alternative normalization (e.g., using the 4D Planck mass as the cutoff in the Einstein frame) would weaken the bound by roughly 10^4 and erase the main conclusions, Eq. (5.1) must either be derived in this paper or be replaced by a published reference.
  2. [Sec. 7.1, Eq. (7.4)] The translation of the TCC to an arbitrary number of extra dimensions, Eq. (7.4), is obtained by dividing Eq. (5.1) by (d+2)/2 and is again delegated to the unpublished work [42]. Consequently, the d=2 viability bound T_r <~ 0.3 MeV from Eqs. (7.10)-(7.12) and the conclusion that 6D inflation is excluded are not independent of the unverified Eq. (5.1). The caveat stated in the first major comment therefore applies with equal force to the 6D section.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References [28], [42]] The text should state explicitly in the introduction that the main constraints are conditional on an unpublished companion paper [42] and on the companion paper [28]. The reader should not have to infer this from the reference list.
  2. [Sec. 8 heading] The heading 'Comments of M-theory realisation' should read 'Comments on M-theory realisation'.
  3. [Eq. (5.20)] The condition 2 pi^2 R_perp e^{N4+Nr} >= lambda_t is used to express scale invariance, but lambda_t and the wavenumber k are not defined in this paper. Please add definitions or a pointer to [28,30].
  4. [Tables 3 and 4] The column headings could be clearer: w_5 and w_4 columns are useful, but the reader may confuse the w values in the final column (today and reheating) with effective 4D equations of state only. A one-line clarification would help.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Central TCC bound is imported from in-preparation self-citation [42]; the headline form (9.1) is just (5.1) rewritten, so the paper's new quantitative constraints inherit an unverified cutoff choice.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 5.1, Eq. (5.1); Ref. [42]]
    "The TCC for higher dimensional models is addressed in a separate work [42]. In particular, for the 5D case, the TCC is written as a_hat_e/a_hat_0 < M_*/H_I. (5.1) ... [42] L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and A. Bedroya, in preparation."

    All the quantitative bounds in Secs. 5-7 and the summary Eq. (9.1) follow from this single inequality, but the paper does not derive it; it attributes it to an in-preparation paper by the same authors (Anchordoqui and Antoniadis) plus Bedroya. The crux is the choice of cutoff M_* in place of M_p: replacing M_* by M_p would change the bounds by orders of magnitude and erase the BBN tension for d=2. The present paper therefore contains no independent derivation of its central physical input; it is a load-bearing self-citation that cannot be audited from the text.

  2. self definitional [Sec. 9, Eq. (9.1), using Sec. 5.1, Eq. (5.1)]
    "In higher-dimensional inflation, we showed that TCC takes the simple form H_I <~ 1/(epsilon R_perp) with epsilon = 1/(R_0 M_*), up to an order-one factor of 2/(d+2) when expressed in the 4D Einstein frame."

    This headline 'result' is exactly Eq. (5.1) rewritten. With a_hat_e/a_hat_0 = R_perp/R_0 and epsilon = 1/(R_0 M_*), the assumed inequality a_hat_e/a_hat_0 < M_*/H_I becomes H_I < M_* R_0/R_perp = 1/(epsilon R_perp). The 'showed' in Sec. 9 is therefore a translation of the cited input into new variables; the only new content is the order-one frame factor, not a derivation of the TCC itself.

full rationale

No fitted parameter is called a prediction and the TCC is an external conjecture, so there is no fit-driven circularity; the internal algebra from (5.1) to (5.13), (5.24), (7.11), and the r and T_r bounds is consistent. The BBN tension for d=2 follows straightforwardly once (5.1) is granted, and the power spectra and Planck normalisation are taken from published, externally checkable work. The circularity concern is confined to the higher-dimensional TCC input itself: Eq. (5.1) is imported from [42], an in-preparation paper by the same authors and Bedroya, and the headline form (9.1) is that same equation restated using epsilon. If the correct higher-dimensional TCC used the 4D Planck mass (or a different frame) as cutoff, the constraints would change by orders of magnitude. The companion self-citation [28] supplies scale-invariance and normalcy-temperature conditions, but those are auxiliary and largely separable; for the d=2 conclusion they are not even needed, since (7.11) already forces T_r <~ 0.3 MeV. I therefore assign score 4: there is genuinely load-bearing self-citation and one summary result that reduces by construction, but the main quantitative constraints still involve independent additional work, so the paper is not wholly circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The only external benchmark is the TCC conjecture and standard 4D cosmology; everything specific to the model—the 5D TCC form, power-spectrum matching, normalcy temperature, and post-inflationary evolution—is imported from the authors' own prior or in-preparation papers. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • epsilon = 1/(R_0 M_*) = constrained to <~ 10^-8 for d=1; not fitted
    Initial compactification radius at the start of 5D inflation relative to the fundamental scale. It is an initial condition, not fit to data, but the TCC, horizon, and scale-invariance constraints force it small.
  • R_perp (final extra-dimension radius) = d=1: 40 micron; d=2: 1 micron
    Chosen at the most favorable experimental upper bounds (inverse-square-law tests for d=1; collider M_* >= 10 TeV for d=2) to maximize the allowed parameter space.
  • T_r (reheating temperature) = 5 MeV for d=1; ~1-4 MeV for d=2
    Set to the minimum allowed by BBN or normalcy temperature to maximize post-inflationary e-folds; the d=2 viability conclusion depends on this choice.
  • alpha = R_e/R_perp = alpha = 1 in the maximal parameter-space case
    Ratio of the radius at the end of inflation to the final stabilized radius; the authors set it to 1 to give the model its best chance.
  • w (post-inflationary equation-of-state) = w = -1/3 (linear expansion)
    Chosen as the most favorable value to maximize the number of e-folds between inflation and reheating; justified by the linear-dilaton string solution in Sec. 8.1.
  • beta (pre-inflationary initial condition parameter) = beta ~ 10 (order one to ten)
    Introduced in Sec. 6 through R_i^-1 = beta H_i; beta about 10 makes epsilon ~ 10^-8 'natural' initial conditions.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The TransPlanckian Censorship Conjecture holds (Eq. 1.1).
    The paper's constraints are conditional on the TCC, an unproven swampland conjecture; no derivation from quantum gravity is supplied.
  • ad hoc to paper The TCC in 5D/arbitrary higher-dimensional uniform inflation takes the form a_e/a_0 < M_*/H_I (Eq. 5.1).
    Assigned to ref. [42], marked 'in preparation' by the same authors; not derived in this paper, yet it is the load-bearing input for all bounds.
  • domain assumption The species scale M_* is the relevant quantum-gravity cutoff in the TCC for large extra dimensions (Eq. 3.3).
    Used to replace the 4D Planck mass in Eq. (2.1) with M_*; standard in the dark-dimension literature but not proved from the original TCC statement.
  • ad hoc to paper The scale-invariance transition, horizon condition, and normalcy temperature from companion paper [28] are correct.
    Equations (5.5)-(5.10), the CMB transition at ell < 3.23, and T_N are imported from the authors' own companion paper; only summaries appear here.
  • ad hoc to paper A linear-expansion phase with w = -1/3 can be inserted after inflation and persist until reheating.
    Chosen to maximize the parameter space; motivated by the linear-dilaton solution in Sec. 8.1 but not derived from the model's inflaton potential.
  • domain assumption Only d = 1 and d = 2 micron-sized extra dimensions are phenomenologically viable.
    Taken from previous collider/astrophysics constraints and the dark-dimension scenario; not re-derived here.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22872 in / 18289 out tokens · 197417 ms · 2026-08-01T04:43:56.373309+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

It was proposed that extra dimensions can acquire large size by higher dimensional inflation connecting two large hierarchies in particle physics and cosmology, namely the weakness of the actual gravitational force to the largeness of the observable Universe, in terms of one fundamental scale. This proposal is consistent with the observed approximate scale invariant power spectrum of primordial density perturbations only for one or two extra dimensions of around the micron size. While a cosmological history connecting the period of higher dimensional inflation to the beginning of the standard cosmology has recently been studied, we investigate here the TransPlanckian Censorship Conjecture in that context and show that it drastically constrains the parameter space of the model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 49 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys

    A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

    1981

  2. [2]

    Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99

    1980

  3. [3]

    Linde,Chaotic Inflation,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Chaotic Inflation,Phys. Lett. B129(1983) 177

    1983

  4. [4]

    Martin and R.H

    J. Martin and R.H. Brandenberger,The TransPlanckian problem of inflationary cosmology, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 123501 [hep-th/0005209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    Bedroya and C

    A. Bedroya and C. Vafa,Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,JHEP09(2020) 123 [1909.11063]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1 [2102.01111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Agmon, A

    N.B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M.J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Bedroya, R

    A. Bedroya, R. Brandenberger, M. Loverde and C. Vafa,Trans-Planckian Censorship and Inflationary Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103502 [1909.11106]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Brandenberger,Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture and Early Universe Cosmology, LHEP2021(2021) 198 [2102.09641]

    R. Brandenberger,Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture and Early Universe Cosmology, LHEP2021(2021) 198 [2102.09641]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Bedroya, Q

    A. Bedroya, Q. Lu and P.J. Steinhardt,TCC in the interior of moduli space and its implications for the string landscape and cosmology,JHEP08(2025) 007 [2407.08793]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Bedroya, H

    A. Bedroya, H. Lee and P. Steinhardt,A species scale-driven breakdown of effective field theory in time-dependent string backgrounds,2504.13260

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Anchordoqui and D

    L.A. Anchordoqui and D. L¨ ust,Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal,Universe12(2026) 216 [2605.10476]. [15]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]. – 31 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [16]

    Mizuno, S

    S. Mizuno, S. Mukohyama, S. Pi and Y.-L. Zhang,Universal Upper Bound on the Inflationary Energy Scale from the Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 021301 [1910.02979]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [17]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G.R. Dvali,The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter,Phys. Lett. B429(1998) 263 [hep-ph/9803315]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  17. [18]

    Antoniadis, N

    I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G.R. Dvali,New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV,Phys. Lett. B436(1998) 257 [hep-ph/9804398]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  18. [19]

    Dvali and S.H.H

    G.R. Dvali and S.H.H. Tye,Brane inflation,Phys. Lett. B450(1999) 72 [hep-ph/9812483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  19. [20]

    Montero, C

    M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela,The dark dimension and the Swampland,JHEP02 (2023) 022 [2205.12293]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [21]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust,Two Micron-Size Dark Dimensions,Fortsch. Phys.73(2025) e70015 [2501.11690]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [22]

    Hannestad,Strong constraint on large extra dimensions from cosmology,Phys

    S. Hannestad,Strong constraint on large extra dimensions from cosmology,Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 023515 [hep-ph/0102290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [23]

    L¨ ust, E

    D. L¨ ust, E. Palti and C. Vafa,AdS and the Swampland,Phys. Lett. B797(2019) 134867 [1906.05225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [24]

    Higuchi,Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,Nucl

    A. Higuchi,Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,Nucl. Phys. B282(1987) 397

    1987

  24. [25]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust,Aspects of the dark dimension in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 083530 [2212.08527]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [26]

    Anchordoqui and I

    L.A. Anchordoqui and I. Antoniadis,Large extra dimensions from higher-dimensional inflation, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 103508 [2310.20282]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [27]

    Ratra,Restoration of Spontaneously Broken Continuous Symmetries in de Sitter Space-Time,Phys

    B. Ratra,Restoration of Spontaneously Broken Continuous Symmetries in de Sitter Space-Time,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 1931

    1985

  27. [28]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and J. Cunat,Cosmological history after higher dimensional inflation,2606.20486. [29]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [30]

    Petretti, M

    C. Petretti, M. Braglia, X. Chen, D. Kumar Hazra and S. Paban,Investigating the origin of CMB large-scale features using LiteBIRD and CMB-S4,JCAP06(2025) 035 [2411.03459]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [31]

    Kreling,The number of e-foldings of the radiation dominated epoch and the effect of cosmic transitions,Bachelor Thesis, Bielefeld University, Germany(2017)

    P. Kreling,The number of e-foldings of the radiation dominated epoch and the effect of cosmic transitions,Bachelor Thesis, Bielefeld University, Germany(2017)

    2017

  30. [32]

    German,Measuring the expansion of the universe,2005.02278

    G. German,Measuring the expansion of the universe,2005.02278

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [33]

    Husdal,On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe,Galaxies4(2016) 78 [1609.04979]

    L. Husdal,On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe,Galaxies4(2016) 78 [1609.04979]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [34]

    Hasegawa, N

    T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R.S.L. Hansen, T. Tram and S. Hannestad,MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles,JCAP12(2019) 012 [1908.10189]. – 32 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [35]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama,MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 023506 [astro-ph/0002127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  34. [36]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama,Cosmological constraints on late time entropy production,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 4168 [astro-ph/9811437]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  35. [37]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G.R. Dvali,Phenomenology, astrophysics and cosmology of theories with submillimeter dimensions and TeV scale quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 086004 [hep-ph/9807344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  36. [38]

    Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch

    G. Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch. Phys. 58(2010) 528 [0706.2050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [39]

    Dvali and M

    G. Dvali and M. Redi,Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 045027 [0710.4344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [40]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D.H. Wu,Moduli-dependent species scale,Beijing J. Pure Appl. Math.1(2024) 1 [2212.06841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [41]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. L¨ ust and G. Staudt,Black hole entropy and moduli-dependent species scale, Phys. Lett. B844(2023) 138113 [2212.10286]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [42]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and A. Bedroya, in preparation

  41. [43]

    Antoniadis, J

    I. Antoniadis, J. Cunat and A. Guillen,Cosmological perturbations from five-dimensional inflation,JHEP05(2024) 290 [2311.17680]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [44]

    Antoniadis, A

    I. Antoniadis, A. Chatrabhuti, J. Cunat and H. Isono,Bispectrum from five-dimensional inflation,JHEP08(2025) 163 [2505.14225]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [45]

    Hirose,Analysis of inflationary models in higher-dimensional uniform inflation,JHEP04 (2025) 077 [2501.13581]

    T. Hirose,Analysis of inflationary models in higher-dimensional uniform inflation,JHEP04 (2025) 077 [2501.13581]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [46]

    Lee, E.G

    J.G. Lee, E.G. Adelberger, T.S. Cook, S.M. Fleischer and B.R. Heckel,New Test of the Gravitational1/r 2 Law at Separations down to 52µm,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 101101 [2002.11761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [47]

    Tan et al.,Improvement for Testing the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range,Phys

    W.-H. Tan et al.,Improvement for Testing the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 051301

    2020

  46. [48]

    Schwarz,Comments concerning a hypothetical mesoscopic dark dimension,Int

    J.H. Schwarz,Comments concerning a hypothetical mesoscopic dark dimension,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2447010 [2403.12899]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [49]

    Felder, L

    G.N. Felder, L. Kofman and A.D. Linde,Inflation and preheating in NO models,Phys. Rev. D 60(1999) 103505 [hep-ph/9903350]. [50]BICEP, Keckcollaboration,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 151301 [2110.00483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  48. [51]

    Tristram et al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data, Phys

    M. Tristram et al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 083524 [2112.07961]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [52]

    Yamada,Curvature-Assisted Dynamical Compactification in a Pre-Inflationary Higher-Dimensional Universe,2604.25569

    Y. Yamada,Curvature-Assisted Dynamical Compactification in a Pre-Inflationary Higher-Dimensional Universe,2604.25569. – 33 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [53]

    Horava and E

    P. Horava and E. Witten,Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 506 [hep-th/9510209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  51. [54]

    Witten,Strong coupling expansion of Calabi-Yau compactification,Nucl

    E. Witten,Strong coupling expansion of Calabi-Yau compactification,Nucl. Phys. B471(1996) 135 [hep-th/9602070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  52. [55]

    Banks and M

    T. Banks and M. Dine,Couplings and scales in strongly coupled heterotic string theory,Nucl. Phys. B479(1996) 173 [hep-th/9605136]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  53. [56]

    Reig and I

    M. Reig and I. Ruiz,The dark dimension, proton decay, and the length of the M-theory interval, JHEP05(2026) 293 [2510.25832]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [57]

    Blumenhagen and A

    R. Blumenhagen and A. Paraskevopoulou,Towards the Realization of the Dark Dimension Scenario in Hoˇ rava-Witten Theory,2605.11068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [58]

    Antoniadis and C

    I. Antoniadis and C. Bachas,Branes and the gauge hierarchy,Phys. Lett. B450(1999) 83 [hep-th/9812093]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  56. [59]

    Caceres, V.S

    E. Caceres, V.S. Kaplunovsky and I.M. Mandelberg,Large volume string compactifications, revisited,Nucl. Phys. B493(1997) 73 [hep-th/9606036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  57. [60]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust,Landscape, Swampland, and Extra Dimensions, PoSCORFU2023(2024) 215 [2405.04427]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  58. [61]

    Kasner,Conformality in connection with functions of two complex variables,Trans

    E. Kasner,Conformality in connection with functions of two complex variables,Trans. Am. Math. Soc.48(1940) 50

    1940

  59. [62]

    Myers,New Dimensions for Old Strings,Phys

    R.C. Myers,New Dimensions for Old Strings,Phys. Lett. B199(1987) 371

    1987

  60. [63]

    Antoniadis, C

    I. Antoniadis, C. Bachas, J.R. Ellis and D.V. Nanopoulos,Cosmological String Theories and Discrete Inflation,Phys. Lett. B211(1988) 393

    1988

  61. [64]

    Antoniadis, C

    I. Antoniadis, C. Bachas, J.R. Ellis and D.V. Nanopoulos,An Expanding Universe in String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B328(1989) 117

    1989

  62. [65]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,JHEP12(2022) 114 [2206.04063]. – 34 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022