Trustworthy AI for Medicine: Continuous Hallucination Detection and Elimination with CHECK
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) show promise in healthcare, but hallucinations remain a major barrier to clinical use. We present CHECK, a continuous-learning framework that integrates structured clinical databases with a classifier grounded in information theory to detect both factual and reasoning-based hallucinations. Evaluated on 1500 questions from 100 pivotal clinical trials, CHECK reduced LLama3.3-70B-Instruct hallucination rates from 31% to 0.3% - making an open source model state of the art. Its classifier generalized across medical benchmarks, achieving AUCs of 0.95-0.96, including on the MedQA (USMLE) benchmark and HealthBench realistic multi-turn medical questioning. By leveraging hallucination probabilities to guide GPT-4o's refinement and judiciously escalate compute, CHECK boosted its USMLE passing rate by 5 percentage points, achieving a state-of-the-art 92.1%. By suppressing hallucinations below accepted clinical error thresholds, CHECK offers a scalable foundation for safe LLM deployment in medicine and other high-stakes domains.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Multi-Stage Validation Framework for Trustworthy Large-scale Clinical Information Extraction using Large Language Models
A multi-stage framework with prompt calibration, rule-based filtering, semantic checks, judge LLM review, and predictive validation enables trustworthy LLM extraction of substance use disorder diagnoses from nearly 92...
-
Clinical Reasoning AI for Oncology Treatment Planning: A Multi-Specialty Case-Based Evaluation
OncoBrain produced oncology treatment plans rated as guideline-concordant and safe by clinicians across five cancer specialties in a 173-case vignette evaluation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.