Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

This paper derives a master relation between spin precession and deflection in strong-deflection scattering around static spherical black holes, gives analytic coefficients for Schwarzschild and Reissner–Nordström, and verifies the universa

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 01:58 UTC pith:QXVYPDDM

load-bearing objection The massive-particle SDL precession relation is a real new result, but the v→1 limit used for massless particles is wrong and the spin-flip 'verification' is circular; the massless section needs rework. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25617 v1 pith:QXVYPDDM submitted 2026-07-28 gr-qc

Spin precession in the strong deflection limit

Jiafei Geng , Yunchuan Xiang , Qingquan Jiang , Xiankai Pang This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords gravitational lensingspin precessionstrong deflection limitglory scatteringSchwarzschild spacetimeReissner–Nordström spacetimeparallel transportblack hole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper supplies the missing strong-deflection-limit treatment of spin precession. For any static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat spacetime, it shows that the spin precession angle diverges logarithmically as the particle approaches the critical orbit, and it establishes a compact master relation, Eq. (3.17), that expresses the precession angle through the deflection angle and two metric-dependent residual integrals. Applied to Schwarzschild, the expansion coefficients are fully analytic; applied to Reissner–Nordström, all coefficients are obtained to order Q². The formulas verify that a massless particle's spin is always flipped after backward scattering, the mechanism that removes the glory spot for spinning massless fields, and they show that black-hole charge leaves massless precession unchanged while imprinting a charge-dependent correction on massive-particle precession. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns a quantity previously accessible mainly through numerical parallel transport into an analytically predictable one in the strong-deflection regime relevant to black-hole shadow and glory observations.

Core claim

For a spacetime of the form ds² = f(r) dt² − f(r)⁻¹ dr² − r²(dθ² + sin²θ dφ²) with f(r)→1 at infinity, the paper derives that in the strong-deflection limit r₀→r_c the precession angle obeys χ₀ = −λ_χ ln δ + ζ_{χ,D} + ζ_{χ,R}, with λ_χ = √(1−v²) f_c λ_φ and ζ_{χ,D} = √(1−v²) f_c ζ_{φ,D}. Combining these gives the master relation χ₀ = √(1−v²) f_c φ₀ − √(1−v²) f_c ζ_{φ,R} + ζ_{χ,R}. In Schwarzschild, λ_χ, ζ_{χ,D}, and ζ_{χ,R} are given in closed analytic form; in Reissner–Nordström, all SDL coefficients are expanded to order h² with h = Q/M. In the massless limit v→1, ζ_{χ,R} tends to π/2, which yields cos ξ = −1 for backward scattering φ₀ = kπ; this is the universal spin flip that explains th

What carries the argument

The central object is the precession angle χ, defined by dχ/dφ = √(1−v²) r(φ)² / [(1−v²) r(φ)² + η²], which reduces the spin parallel-transport equation to a harmonic oscillator, d²B/dχ² + B = 0. The load-bearing identity is the ratio of the precession and deflection integrands, giving λ_χ = √(1−v²) f_c λ_φ and ζ_{χ,D} = √(1−v²) f_c ζ_{φ,D}; the remaining regular integrals ζ_{φ,R} and ζ_{χ,R} enter through the master relation (3.17). The technical machinery is the standard strong-deflection variable z = [f(r) − f(r₀)]/[1 − f(r₀)] together with the expansion r₀ = r_c(1+δ), which isolates the logarithmic divergence in both angles.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the massless results are obtained by taking the v→1 limit of a precession equation written for massive particles, whose conserved quantities E = 1/√(1−v²) and L = η/√(1−v²) diverge at v = 1; if that limit does not faithfully reproduce the null-geodesic parallel-transport equations, the extracted massless SDL coefficients and the universal spin-flip conclusion would be affected.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the exact spin parallel-transport equations along null geodesics in a static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat spacetime—say Reissner–Nordström with h = 0.9 or a regular black hole—for backward-scattering orbits φ₀ = π, 3π, 5π, and compare cos ξ with the SDL prediction from Eq. (3.17). If the regular coefficient ζ_{χ,R} evaluated at v = 1 via Eq. (3.19) fails to equal π/2, or if cos ξ ≠ −1 for those orbits, the universal massless spin-flip claim is false.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In any static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat spacetime, the strong-deflection spin precession angle is fully determined by the deflection angle and two regular integrals of the metric function, so no separate numerical parallel-transport integration is needed in the deep strong-deflection regime.
  • In Schwarzschild, every SDL coefficient is analytic; cos ξ for backward scattering with any winding number and any particle speed can be written in closed form and converges to −1 as v→1.
  • In Reissner–Nordström, all SDL coefficients are analytic to order Q²; massless-particle precession is charge-independent to that order, while massive-particle precession carries a charge-dependent correction that distinguishes the charged case from Schwarzschild.
  • The universal spin flip cos ξ = −1 for massless backward scattering quantitatively explains the absence of a glory spot for spinning massless fields in spherically symmetric spacetimes, in line with partial-wave results.
  • The master relation (3.17) lets future strong-lensing computations reuse existing SDL deflection coefficients for any spherically symmetric metric, reducing the precession problem to evaluating one residual integral ζ_{χ,R}.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the universal massless spin flip persists for rotating black holes, the vanishing glory spot would be a generic feature of any spacetime with a photon sphere rather than a special property of spherical symmetry; this can be tested by numerical parallel transport along equatorial and near-equatorial null geodesics in Kerr.
  • Beyond the paper: the v→1 limiting procedure, which the paper uses to extract massless coefficients from massive-particle equations, deserves an independent check that starts directly from null-geodesic parallel transport; such a derivation would either close the gap named in the weakest assumption or reveal corrections to ζ_{χ,R}.
  • Beyond the paper: for regular black holes or metrics with g_tt ≠ −1/g_rr, such as polymerized or loop-quantum-corrected models, the same master relation should apply once the analogous residual integral is computed, offering a shortcut for polarized strong-lensing predictions in modified gravity.
  • Paper-acknowledged caveat, noted editorially: the SDL expansion is asymptotic, and its comparisons with exact results for Δφ = π at low particle speed deviate because the orbit is not deep in the strong-deflection regime (Figs. 3 and 5); this brackets the practical range of validity of Eq. (3.17) rather than undermining the universal massless spin-flip.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives a strong-deflection-limit (SDL) expansion for the spin precession angle chi of particles on equatorial geodesics in static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat spacetimes. The central result, Eq. (3.17), expresses chi_0 as sqrt(1-v^2) f_c phi_0 - sqrt(1-v^2) f_c zeta_{phi,R} + zeta_{chi,R}, linking spin precession to the deflection angle in the SDL. The formalism is applied to Schwarzschild, where analytic SDL coefficients are given, and to Reissner-Nordstroem, where charge corrections to O(Q^2) are presented. The paper further claims to verify the universal spin-flip of massless particles in backward scattering and the charge-independence of massless spin precession.

Significance. The massive-particle part of the paper is a useful and largely self-contained formal result: Eq. (3.17) is a compact, parameter-free relation that reduces the SDL spin-precession problem to previously known deflection coefficients and two regular integrals. The Schwarzschild expressions are explicit and the proposed application to charged black holes is natural. However, the massless-sector claims are not currently supported: the v->1 limit of the massive spin-precession equation is not the correct null limit, and the 'verification' of the spin-flip result is circular. Since the abstract and Sec. 4.2 advertise the universal spin-flip and charge-independence conclusions, these issues are load-bearing and require a corrected derivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (3.4) and 'Massless particles'] The v->1 limit used for massless particles is not the null limit of the parallel-transport equation. Eq. (3.4) is written in the massive normalization E=1/sqrt(1-v^2), L=eta/sqrt(1-v^2); its RHS is sqrt(1-v^2) r^2 / [(1-v^2) r^2 + eta^2], which vanishes pointwise as v->1. The null equations use finite E,L with L/E=b and give d chi/d phi = 1/(1+b^2/r^2) != 0. Hence R_chi in Eq. (3.11), and with it lambda_chi and zeta_{chi,D}, vanish in this limit, so the step 'Substituting v=1 into ... (3.17)' is invalid. A null chi_0 is logarithmically divergent, whereas Eq. (3.17) at v=1 returns a finite constant. The massless SDL coefficients and the identification chi_0 = zeta_{chi,R} are therefore unsupported.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (3.18)–(3.19)] The claimed verification of the universal spin flip is circular. The paper uses cos xi = -1 from Refs. [10,16] as an input to infer zeta_{chi,R} = pi/2; it does not compute zeta_{chi,R} independently from the null-geodesic integral. Moreover, the direct v->1 limit of the integral (3.14c) as written gives zeta_{chi,R}->0, because the integrand carries an overall sqrt(1-v^2). Thus Eq. (3.19) is not established. The spin-flip and glory-spot conclusions should be derived from a null-geodesic calculation, not assumed.
  3. [§4.2, Eqs. (4.10)–(4.13) and Fig. 4] The charge-independence claim zeta_{chi,R,1}->0 as v->1 rests on the same flawed massless limit. Additionally, the lengthy coefficient expressions (4.10)–(4.13) are stated without derivation. Without an independent derivation or a direct null-geodesic SDL computation, the RN massless result and the conclusion that massless spin precession is charge-independent are not supported. Please provide the derivation for the stated coefficients or perform the null calculation explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4.6c)] The term sqrt(2-6x) is imaginary for all x>1/3 (except at x=1), so the closed-form expression for zeta_{chi,R} needs a sign/argument check; likely a typo for sqrt(6x-2).
  2. [§4.1/4.2, Figs. 2 and 4] The 'photon' curves are plotted using the assumed values zeta_{chi,R}=pi/2 and zeta_{chi,R,1}=0, not obtained from the integral (3.14c). The captions should make this explicit.
  3. [References] Reference [44] lacks a complete identifier (no 'arXiv:' prefix and no journal reference); please complete it.
  4. [§4.2] The statements that (4.11) and (4.13) 'can be integrated analytically' should be backed by an outline or an appendix; as written these assertions are not verifiable from the text.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central SDL relation (3.17) is self-contained algebra, but the massless spin-flip 'verification' partly reduces to an assumed input (cosξ=-1) used to fix ζχ,R=π/2.

specific steps
  1. other [Sec. 3, 'Massless particles', Eqs. (3.18)-(3.19); cf. Sec. 4.1 after Eq. (4.6c)]
    "Substituting v=1 into the definition (3.9) of ξ and the expansion (3.17) of χ0 yields ξ=2ζχ,R−2φ0+2π. Then cosξ=−1 and φ0=kπ implies ζχ,R=π/2. Recalling that, for v=1, ζχ,R is defined by the integral of ψχ(z,r0,1) in Eq. (3.15), we conclude that lim...=π/2 for any asymptotically flat blackening factor f(r)."

    The universal spin-flip cosξ=-1 is stated as a known fact from [10,16] and is then used to pin the unknown coefficient ζχ,R to π/2 for every f(r). Later sections then present the same limit as a verification: Fig. 2 says 'ζχ,R → π/2 as v→1, consistent with the universal spin flip for massless particles,' and the abstract says the results 'explicitly verify' the spin-flip. For Schwarzschild/RN the analytic integrals do independently give π/2, so the circularity is partial: the general-f claim is enforced by the input, while the concrete examples are genuine consistency checks.

full rationale

The core derivation is not circular. Eq. (3.17) is obtained by taking the difference of the SDL expansions for χ0 and φ0 with coefficients λχ=sqrt(1-v^2)fc λφ and ζχ,D=sqrt(1-v^2)fc ζφ,D, which follow from the explicit ratio Rχ/Rφ in Eq. (3.11). It is an algebraic identity, not a fit. The SDL coefficients for Schwarzschild (4.5)-(4.6) and RN (4.9)-(4.13) are computed from the metric and the integral definitions, not from the target spin-flip. The self-citation [16] supplies the parallel-transport equations and exact numerical comparison data; these are standard and independently reproducible, so they do not make the argument circular. The only circularity found is the massless spin-flip passage: the known result cosξ=-1 is used to conclude ζχ,R=π/2 (Eq. 3.19), and this same conclusion is then advertised as verification of the universal spin-flip. The skeptic's v→1 normalization concern about Eq. (3.4) is a correctness/limit-order issue, not an input-output equivalence, so it is not scored as circularity here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; v and h are physical inputs, and M=1/2 is a coordinate scaling. The derivation relies on standard HJ separability, leading-order WKB parallel transport, the Bozza SDL expansion, and the known spin-flip condition for massless particles. No new entities are introduced.

axioms (5)
  • standard math Hamilton-Jacobi separability for static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat spacetimes with metric (2.1).
    Used to derive the orbit equation and deflection angle in Sec. 2.
  • domain assumption At leading WKB order, the spin vector is parallel-transported along the geodesic and lies in the equatorial plane (S^θ=0 is a consistent solution).
    This is the physical framework for the spin precession angle χ in Sec. 3; spin-curvature (MPD) corrections are explicitly excluded.
  • standard math The Bozza-style SDL expansion: φ0 = -λφ lnδ + ζφ,D + ζφ,R, with the change of variable z=(f(r)-f(r0))/(1-f(r0)).
    Inherited from Refs. [28,32] and used to define the SDL coefficients and to derive the corresponding expansion for χ0.
  • domain assumption Known result: a massless particle's spin is always reversed in backward scattering, cosξ=-1.
    Used in Sec. 3 to derive ζχ,R=π/2 for general f(r); this is an input from Refs. [10,16], not independently proven in the paper.
  • domain assumption For Reissner-Nordström, the charge parameter h is small enough that the O(h^2) perturbative expansion converges and captures the physics.
    The paper compares with exact results for h up to 0.6 (Fig. 6) and reports agreement, but the analytic justification for truncation at h^2 is not provided.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15475 in / 42621 out tokens · 366755 ms · 2026-08-01T01:58:27.658387+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The strong deflection limit (SDL) of the deflection angle is well established for general spherically symmetric spacetimes, but a systematic SDL treatment of spin precession has been lacking. We derive the SDL expansion for the spin precession angle of particles propagating along geodesics in static, spherically symmetric, and asymptotically flat spacetimes. The SDL coefficients are obtained, and a simple relation linking the precession angle to the deflection one is established. Applying the formalism to Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstr\"om (RN) spacetimes, we obtain fully analytic SDL coefficients for the former and perturbative charge corrections to $\mathcal{O}(Q^2)$ for the latter. These results explicitly verify the universal spin-flip of massless particles in backward scattering, which is the underlying mechanism governing the absence of the glory spot. While the spin precession of massless particles is charge-independent, massive particles acquire a non-trivial charge dependence that distinguishes the RN case from Schwarzschild.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifschits,The Classical Theory of Fields, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1975)

    1975

  2. [2]

    Straumann,General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1984), 10.1007/978-3-642-84439-3

    N. Straumann,General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1984), 10.1007/978-3-642-84439-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84439-3 1984

  3. [3]

    Stone, V

    M. Stone, V. Dwivedi and T. Zhou,Berry phase, Lorentz covariance, and anomalous velocity for Dirac and Weyl particles,Physical Review D91(2015) 025004

    2015

  4. [4]

    Oancea and A

    M.A. Oancea and A. Kumar,Semiclassical analysis of Dirac fields on curved spacetime, Physical Review D107(2023) 044029 [2212.04414]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Ford and J.A

    K.W. Ford and J.A. Wheeler,Semiclassical description of scattering,Annals of Physics7 (1959) 259

    1959

  6. [6]

    Zhang and C

    T. Zhang and C. DeWitt-Morette,WKB Cross Section for Polarized Glories of Massless Waves in Curved Space-Times,Phys. Rev. Lett.52(1984) 2313

    1984

  7. [7]

    DeWitt-Morette and B.L

    C. DeWitt-Morette and B.L. Nelson,Glories - and other degenerate points of the action, Phys. Rev.D29(1984) 1663

    1984

  8. [8]

    Matzner, C

    R.A. Matzner, C. DeWitte-Morette, B. Nelson and T. Zhang,Glory scattering by black holes, Physical Review D31(1985) 1869

    1985

  9. [9]

    Futterman, F.A

    J.A.H. Futterman, F.A. Handler and R.A. Matzner,Scattering from Black Holes, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (1988), 10.1017/CBO9780511735615

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735615 1988

  10. [10]

    Dolan, C

    S. Dolan, C. Doran and A. Lasenby,Fermion scattering by a Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 064005 [gr-qc/0605031]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [12]

    Crispino, S.R

    L.C.B. Crispino, S.R. Dolan and E.S. Oliveira,Scattering of massless scalar waves by reissner-nordstr ¨ m black holes,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 064022 [0904.0999]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [13]

    Macedo, E.S

    C.F.B. Macedo, E.S. de Oliveira and L.C.B. Crispino,Scattering by regular black holes: Planar massless scalar waves impinging upon a Bardeen black hole,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 024012 [1505.07014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [14]

    Huang and H

    Y. Huang and H. Zhang,Scattering of massless scalar field by charged dilatonic black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 654 [2006.01388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  14. [15]

    Crispino, S.R

    L.C.B. Crispino, S.R. Dolan and E.S. Oliveira,Electromagnetic wave scattering by Schwarzschild black holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 231103 [0905.3339]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  15. [16]

    X. Pang, Q. Jiang, Y. Xiang and G. Deng,The precession of particle spin in spherical symmetric spacetimes,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 193 [2410.04323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [17]

    Kubiznak, V.P

    D. Kubiznak, V.P. Frolov, P. Krtous and P. Connell,Parallel-propagated frame along null geodesics in higher-dimensional black hole spacetimes,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 024018 [0811.0012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [18]

    Connell, V.P

    P. Connell, V.P. Frolov and D. Kubiznak,Solving parallel transport equations in the higher-dimensional Kerr-NUT-(A)dS spacetimes,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 024042 [0803.3259]. – 19 – [19]LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102 [1602.03837]. [20]LIGO Scientific, Virgo...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [21]

    Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama et al.,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole,Astrophys. J.875(2019) L4. [22]Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) L1 [1906.11238]. [23]Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration,First...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [25]

    Darwin,The gravity field of a particle,Proc

    C.G. Darwin,The gravity field of a particle,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A(1959) 180

    1959

  20. [26]

    Virbhadra and G.F.R

    K.S. Virbhadra and G.F.R. Ellis,Schwarzschild black hole lensing,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 084003 [astro-ph/9904193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  21. [27]

    Claudel, K.S

    C.-M. Claudel, K.S. Virbhadra and G.F.R. Ellis,The Geometry of photon surfaces,J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 818 [gr-qc/0005050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [28]

    Bozza,Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit,Phys

    V. Bozza,Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 103001 [gr-qc/0208075]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  23. [29]

    Iyer and A.O

    S.V. Iyer and A.O. Petters,Light’s bending angle due to black holes: From the photon sphere to infinity,General Relativity and Gravitation39(2007) 1563 [gr-qc/0611086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [30]

    Tsupko,Unbound motion of massive particles in the Schwarzschild metric: Analytical description in case of strong deflection,Phys

    O.r.Y. Tsupko,Unbound motion of massive particles in the Schwarzschild metric: Analytical description in case of strong deflection,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 084075 [1505.06481]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [31]

    Pang and J

    X. Pang and J. Jia,Gravitational lensing of massive particles in Reissner– Nordstr¨ om black hole spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 065012 [1806.04719]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [32]

    Feleppa, V

    F. Feleppa, V. Bozza and O.Y. Tsupko,Strong deflection of massive particles in spherically symmetric spacetimes,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 044018 [2412.16712]

    arXiv 2025

  27. [33]

    Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1972)

    S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1972)

    1972

  28. [34]

    Khriplovich,Spinning relativistic particles in external fields, Jan., 2008

    I.B. Khriplovich,Spinning relativistic particles in external fields, Jan., 2008

    2008

  29. [35]

    Dolan,Geometrical optics for scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational waves in curved spacetime,Int

    S.R. Dolan,Geometrical optics for scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational waves in curved spacetime,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27(2018) 1843010 [1806.08617]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [36]

    Mathisson,Republication of: New mechanics of material systems,Gen

    M. Mathisson,Republication of: New mechanics of material systems,Gen. Rel. Grav.42 (2010) 1011

    2010

  31. [37]

    Papapetrou,Spinning test particles in general relativity

    A. Papapetrou,Spinning test particles in general relativity. 1.,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A209 (1951) 248

    1951

  32. [38]

    Rudiger,The Dirac equation and spinning particles in general relativity,Proc

    R. Rudiger,The Dirac equation and spinning particles in general relativity,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A377(1981) 417

    1981

  33. [39]

    Mohseni,Stability of circular orbits of spinning particles in Schwarzschild-like space-times,Gen

    M. Mohseni,Stability of circular orbits of spinning particles in Schwarzschild-like space-times,Gen. Rel. Grav.42(2010) 2477 [1005.3110]. – 20 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [40]

    Zhang, S.-W

    Y.-P. Zhang, S.-W. Wei, W.-D. Guo, T.-T. Sui and Y.-X. Liu,Innermost stable circular orbit of spinning particle in charged spinning black hole background,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 084056 [1711.09361]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [41]

    Iorio,General relativistic spin-orbit and spin-spin effects on the motion of rotating particles in an external gravitational field,Gen

    L. Iorio,General relativistic spin-orbit and spin-spin effects on the motion of rotating particles in an external gravitational field,Gen. Rel. Grav.44(2012) 719 [1012.5622]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [42]

    Chakraborty, M

    C. Chakraborty, M. Patil, P. Kocherlakota, S. Bhattacharyya, P.S. Joshi and A. Kr´ o lak, Distinguishing Kerr naked singularities and black holes using the spin precession of a test gyro in strong gravitational fields,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 084024 [1611.08808]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [43]

    Witzany and G.A

    V. Witzany and G.A. Piovano,Analytic Solutions for the Motion of Spinning Particles near Spherically Symmetric Black Holes and Exotic Compact Objects,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 171401 [2308.00021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [44]

    Witzany and V

    V. Witzany and V. Skoup´ y,Separability of the motion of spinning test particles in curved space-time,2606.25792

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [45]

    Frolov, P

    V.P. Frolov, P. Krtous and D. Kubiznak,Black holes, hidden symmetries, and complete integrability,Living Rev. Rel.20(2017) 6 [1705.05482]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [46]

    Poisson, A

    E. Poisson, A. Pound and I. Vega,The motion of point particles in curved spacetime,Living Rev. Rel.14(2011) 7 [1102.0529]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  41. [47]

    Duval and T

    C. Duval and T. Schucker,Gravitational birefringence of light in Robertson-Walker cosmologies,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 043517 [1610.00555]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [48]

    Frolov,Maxwell equations in a curved spacetime: Spin optics approximation,Phys

    V.P. Frolov,Maxwell equations in a curved spacetime: Spin optics approximation,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 084013 [2007.03743]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [49]

    Shoom,Gravitational Faraday and spin-Hall effects of light,Phys

    A.A. Shoom,Gravitational Faraday and spin-Hall effects of light,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 084007 [2006.10077]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [50]

    Frolov,Spinoptics in a curved spacetime,Phys

    V.P. Frolov,Spinoptics in a curved spacetime,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 064020 [2405.01777]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [51]

    Takeuchi and T

    T. Takeuchi and T. Kobayashi,Spinoptics in the presence of axion-like particles in curved spacetime,2607.11134

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [52]

    Andersson, J

    L. Andersson, J. Joudioux, M.A. Oancea and A. Raj,Propagation of polarized gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 044053 [2012.08363]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [53]

    Frolov and A.A

    V.P. Frolov and A.A. Shoom,Gravitational spinoptics in a curved space-time,JCAP10 (2024) 039 [2406.17905]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [54]

    Harte,Gravitational lensing beyond geometric optics: I

    A.I. Harte,Gravitational lensing beyond geometric optics: I. Formalism and observables, Gen. Rel. Grav.51(2019) 14 [1808.06203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [55]

    Oancea, J

    M.A. Oancea, J. Joudioux, I.Y. Dodin, D.E. Ruiz, C.F. Paganini and L. Andersson, Gravitational spin Hall effect of light,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 024075 [2003.04553]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  50. [56]

    Oancea and T

    M.A. Oancea and T. Harko,Weyl geometric effects on the propagation of light in gravitational fields,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 064020 [2305.01313]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [57]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshits,Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1969)

    1969

  52. [58]

    X. Liu, N. Yang and J. Jia,Gravitational lensing of massive particles in Schwarzschild gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 175014 [1512.04037]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [59]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma and J. Yang,Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L081504 [2407.10168]. – 21 –

    arXiv 2025

  54. [60]

    Frolov and D

    V.P. Frolov and D. Kubiznak,‘Hidden’ Symmetries of Higher Dimensional Rotating Black Holes,Physical Review Letters98(2007) 011101 [gr-qc/0605058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  55. [61]

    Frolov and D

    V.P. Frolov and D. Kubiznak,Higher-Dimensional Black Holes: Hidden Symmetries and Separation of Variables,Classical and Quantum Gravity25(2008) 154005 [0802.0322]. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008