Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Persistence Homology of TEDtalk: Do Sentence Embeddings Have a Topological Shape?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.14131 v1 pith:QYFDUCH3 submitted 2021-03-25 cs.LG

Persistence Homology of TEDtalk: Do Sentence Embeddings Have a Topological Shape?

classification cs.LG
keywords topologicalaccuracydataembeddingssentenceemphimprovemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

\emph{Topological data analysis} (TDA) has recently emerged as a new technique to extract meaningful discriminitve features from high dimensional data. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of applying TDA to improve the classification accuracy of public speaking rating. We calculated \emph{persistence image vectors} for the sentence embeddings of TEDtalk data and feed this vectors as additional inputs to our machine learning models. We have found a negative result that this topological information does not improve the model accuracy significantly. In some cases, it makes the accuracy slightly worse than the original one. From our results, we could not conclude that the topological shapes of the sentence embeddings can help us train a better model for public speaking rating.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Topological Data Analysis Applications in Natural Language Processing: A Survey

    cs.CL 2024-11 accept novelty 6.0

    This survey compiles 137 papers on Topological Data Analysis in NLP, categorizing them into theoretical explanations of language and practical integrations into ML systems while noting open challenges.