Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Correlated Multi-armed Bandits with a Latent Random Source

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.05904 v2 pith:QYVNFUAY submitted 2018-08-17 stat.ML cs.LG

Correlated Multi-armed Bandits with a Latent Random Source

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords armsregretmathcalalgorithmbanditmulti-armedrandomachieves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider a novel multi-armed bandit framework where the rewards obtained by pulling the arms are functions of a common latent random variable. The correlation between arms due to the common random source can be used to design a generalized upper-confidence-bound (UCB) algorithm that identifies certain arms as $non-competitive$, and avoids exploring them. As a result, we reduce a $K$-armed bandit problem to a $C+1$-armed problem, where $C+1$ includes the best arm and $C$ $competitive$ arms. Our regret analysis shows that the competitive arms need to be pulled $\mathcal{O}(\log T)$ times, while the non-competitive arms are pulled only $\mathcal{O}(1)$ times. As a result, there are regimes where our algorithm achieves a $\mathcal{O}(1)$ regret as opposed to the typical logarithmic regret scaling of multi-armed bandit algorithms. We also evaluate lower bounds on the expected regret and prove that our correlated-UCB algorithm achieves $\mathcal{O}(1)$ regret whenever possible.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. One Human, $N$ Agents: Audit-Budget Allocation for LLM Agent Fleets under Miscalibrated, Correlated Confidence

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Past a budget-dependent miscalibration threshold δ* that rises as B/N shrinks, confidence-ranked auditing of LLM agent fleets is worse than random; open-weight models land near the flip while shared difficulty dominat...