Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 75 references

Uncovering Conspiratorial Narratives within Arabic Online Content

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Arabic online conspiratorial discourse organizes into six narrative categories.

desk verdict Useful exploratory map of conspiratorial themes in a curated Arabic corpus, but the headline generalization about 'Arabic online conspiracism' overreaches what the sampling supports. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14037 v1 pith:QZKZNE52 submitted 2025-04-18 cs.CL cs.CYcs.SI

Djamila Mohdeb , Meriem Laifa , Zineb Guemraoui , Dalila Behih This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.CYcs.SI
keywords ConspiracytheoriesMisinformationArabicNaturalLanguageProcessingTopicModelingNamedEntityRecognitionSocialnetworksDigitalenvironmentonlinecontent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that Arabic-language conspiracy theorizing on blogs and Facebook is structured rather than amorphous, clustering into six recurring narrative categories: gender and feminist plots, geopolitical schemes, government cover-ups, apocalypticism, Judeo-Masonic plots, and geoengineering theories such as HAARP and earthquake manipulation. The claim matters because most computational research on online conspiracy theories has focused on English-language, Western settings, leaving Arabic-speaking digital environments largely unmapped. Using a hand-curated corpus of 1,641 Arabic texts spanning 2010 to 2023, the paper identifies the categories with topic modeling and named-entity extraction and argues that they are shaped by regional history, culture, and contemporary events. If the taxonomy holds, it gives media monitors, fact-checkers, and platform moderators a concrete checklist of conspiratorial narratives to look for in Arabic content.

What carries the argument

The mechanism carrying the argument is a two-stage computational pipeline applied to a corpus the paper calls ArCons: 1,641 Arabic documents collected from one blog and Facebook pages between 2010 and 2023. First, a pre-trained Arabic named-entity recognizer (Marifa NER) extracts persons, locations, organizations, events, jobs, and products, sketching the actors and incidents in the discourse. Second, Top2Vec, a neural topic-modeling algorithm that embeds documents and words in a shared vector space and clusters them into topics, produces eleven topics that the authors consolidate into six narrative categories. NER supplies the actors and events; Top2Vec supplies the thematic structure; together they convert raw Arabic text into the paper's taxonomy of conspiratorial narratives.

What would settle it

Collect an independent, pre-registered sample of Arabic social-media posts using broad conspiratorial and neutral keywords across multiple countries and platforms, apply the same preprocessing, NER, and Top2Vec pipeline, and check whether the same six categories recur; if gender and feminist or geoengineering themes do not appear in the independent sample, the ArCons-based taxonomy is an artifact of corpus selection.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Arabic online conspiracism revolves around six major conspiracy theories: gender and feminist conspiracies, geopolitical conspiracies, government cover-ups, apocalypticism, Judeo-Masonic conspiracies, and geoengineering conspiracies. The paper derives this taxonomy from eleven Top2Vec topics that it consolidates into nine, then six, and corroborates it with named entities extracted from the same corpus, including figures like Hitler, Rothschild, and Putin, organizations like NATO, the Freemasons, and NASA, and events like the Arab Spring, the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake, and the HAARP project. It also claims a temporal shift: from 2010 to 2016 the discourse centered on geopolitics and international actors, whereas from 2017 to 2023 it broadened toward society, gender roles, religion, pseudo-science, and cosmic themes. These patterns, the paper argues, are culturally rooted in the region's colonial history, U.S. involvement, and political instability, while also responding to immediate triggers such as disasters and global media events.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 1,641 documents the authors selected because they already related to conspiracy theories, drawn from one blog and unspecified Facebook pages, are representative enough of Arabic online conspiracism that the six categories and the temporal shift reflect the broader landscape rather than the quirks of that particular selection.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Moderators and fact-checkers can treat the six categories as an initial codebook for tagging Arabic conspiracy content.
  • The temporal shift implies that current Arabic conspiracist discourse leans less on regional geopolitics and more on society, gender, pseudo-science, and cosmic or religious themes.
  • The named-entity watchlists identify concrete anchors, such as Rothschild, NATO, the Freemasons, HAARP, and the Turkey earthquake, around which Arabic conspiracy narratives crystallize.
  • Event-driven spikes, particularly following the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake, suggest that Arabic conspiracy monitoring should activate around disasters and science-related news, not only political events.
  • The combined NER and topic-modeling pipeline can be reused on new Arabic corpora to detect whether the six categories persist or new ones emerge.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The six categories are plausibly transferable as labels for training a supervised Arabic conspiracy-detection model, a step the paper does not itself take.
  • Because the corpus skews toward Algerian and Maghrebi sources and a single blog, the taxonomy likely under-represents Gulf and Levant narrative variants; a balanced multi-country corpus would test this.
  • The prominence of gender and feminist conspiracy themes may reflect platform visibility and algorithmic amplification of Western gender-politics controversies after the Arab Spring, rather than the most widely believed conspiracy theory among offline Arab publics.
  • Applying the same pipeline to newer crises, such as the post-2023 Gaza war or the Sudan conflict, would provide a live test of whether the six categories are exhaustive or whether event-specific categories emerge.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes a curated corpus of 1,641 Arabic texts from Facebook and one blog (the ArCons dataset) to identify conspiratorial narratives. Using the Marifa NER model and Top2Vec topic modeling, with manual interpretation of topics, the authors claim that Arabic online conspiracism revolves around six major categories: gender/feminist, geopolitical, government cover-ups, apocalyptic, Judeo-Masonic, and geoengineering conspiracies. They also describe temporal shifts in frequent terms (2010-2016 vs 2017-2023) and list prominent named entities. The paper situates these findings in the cultural and historical context of the Arab region and discusses theoretical, practical, and policy implications.

Significance. If the central descriptive claim were adequately supported, this paper would fill a genuine gap: most computational conspiracy-theory research targets English-language or Western contexts, while Arabic online content remains understudied. The paper contributes a new Arabic dataset, applies Arabic-specific NLP tools, and proposes a taxonomy that aligns with established qualitative scholarship on Middle Eastern conspiracism. The combination of NER and topic modeling is reasonable, and the cultural contextualization is a strength. However, the empirical evidence is currently weakened by sampling and validation limitations. The paper would be a useful exploratory starting point if the claims are reframed to the corpus and the category induction is made more transparent and reproducible.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.1–3.2 and 4.2] The central claim that 'Arabic online conspiracism revolves around six major conspiracy theories' (Section 4.2) is not supported by the sampling design. The corpus is a curated convenience sample: 1,641 documents selected from one blog (24%) and unspecified Facebook pages, explicitly chosen because they center on conspiracy theories. No search queries, page selection criteria, or inclusion protocol are documented, and Section 3.3 itself concedes that 'our data does not fully depict Arabic conspiracy theorists web interests.' Because the sampling frame constrains the topics that can appear, the six categories cannot be generalized to the broader Arabic online discourse; they are at best descriptive of this particular collected corpus. The authors should either build a more systematically sampled corpus (e.g., random posts from defined public pages with documented keyword discovery) or explicitly restrict all conclusions to the ArCons sample.
  2. [3.5 and 4.1] The reduction from 11 Top2Vec topics to 9 and then to 6 narrative categories is performed manually with no quantitative validation. No topic-coherence metrics (e.g., NPMI, topic coherence), no inter-annotator agreement, and no external benchmark are reported. The mapping of topics to labels such as 'gender/feminist' or 'geoengineering' appears reasonable but may reflect analyst expectations rather than structure intrinsic to the data. To make the central taxonomy credible, the authors should provide a coding protocol, have at least two annotators independently assign topics to categories and report agreement (e.g., Cohen's kappa), and show representative top documents or document-topic distributions for each category.
  3. [3.3] The temporal analysis is descriptive only and does not substantiate the claim of a thematic evolution. The split at 2016/2017 is arbitrary, and the comparison of most frequent terms is presented without statistical testing or topic-proportion analysis over time. The observation that the second period is more 'introspective' and 'contemplative' is based on raw term lists and could be an artifact of corpus composition or preprocessing. The authors should compute topic proportions per year or per period and test for significance, or soften the temporal claim to an explicitly qualitative observation.
minor comments (8)
  1. [3.5] The title of Section 3.5 contains a typo: 'conspirasionist' should be 'conspiracist.'
  2. [4.1.6] The text refers to 'Table 6' when discussing Topic 07, but the paper only presents a single topic table (Table 4); the reference should be corrected.
  3. [3.4] The list of NER categories says 'five distinct categories' but then enumerates seven (locations, nationalities, persons, jobs, organizations, events, and products). Please correct the count or the list.
  4. [3.4] No evaluation or error analysis is provided for the Marifa NER model on this specific corpus, which includes dialectal Arabic. Reporting a sample of manually checked entity extractions would help assess reliability.
  5. [3.1] No data availability statement or link to the ArCons dataset is provided; for reproducibility, the authors should state whether and how the dataset can be accessed.
  6. [2.1 and 3.1] The paper does not discuss ethical considerations or platform terms of service for collecting and publishing Facebook posts; a brief ethical statement would be appropriate.
  7. [Table 2] The Arabic text in Table 2 appears garbled or reversed in several places (e.g., 'ىربك' and 'ﺭالودلﺍ'), making the table difficult to read; the Arabic strings should be proofread.
  8. [Introduction and Keywords] The keyword field contains 'Digital Environement,' which should be 'Digital Environment.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a descriptive, data-driven topic-modeling study with no fitted-input predictions and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular in the sense of using an input as its own output. Top2Vec generates 11 topics from the ArCons corpus; the authors manually merge these into 9 and group them into six narrative categories (Section 4.1), and then present those six categories as findings (Section 4.2). This is an inductive labeling and interpretation step, not a mathematical derivation, and the categories are not used to construct the model that produced them. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then reported as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work; and no self-citation is load-bearing, since the references are all external scholarly sources. The main methodological risk is sampling representativeness: the corpus was curated from one blog and unspecified Facebook pages as a set of documents 'centered around conspiracy theories,' and the paper itself concedes that 'our data does not fully depict Arabic conspiracy theorists web interests' (Section 3.3). That limitation affects external validity and the strength of the general claim, but it is not an equivalence between the paper's inputs and its outputs. The study stays within its evidence base and honestly states the boundary of that evidence, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new theoretical entities; its load comes from modeling choices and data curation assumptions. No fitted constants appear, but manual decisions about topic counts and temporal splits influence the reported taxonomy.

free parameters (3)
  • Minimum document length for inclusion = 5 words
    Documents with fewer than five words were excluded during curation; this threshold is chosen by hand and affects corpus composition (Section 3.1).
  • Temporal split boundary = 2017
    The dataset is split into 2010-2016 and 2017-2023 for trend analysis; the choice of 2017 is not derived from data (Section 3.3).
  • Number of final narrative categories = 6
    Eleven Top2Vec topics were manually merged into nine, then into six categories; this is a hand-chosen simplification, not an emergent model output (Section 4.1).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Top2Vec produces semantically coherent and interpretable topics for dialectal Arabic text.
    The paper states Top2Vec 'emerged as the most effective' based on qualitative inspection, without quantitative coherence scores (Section 3.5).
  • domain assumption The Marifa NER model correctly recognizes named entities in Modern Standard Arabic and dialectal Arabic content.
    The paper applies the pre-trained model but reports no evaluation on this corpus (Section 3.4).
  • domain assumption The hand-curated selection of 1,641 'conspiracy-centered' documents is representative of Arabic online conspiracist discourse.
    Sampling details are limited to one blog and 'public pages and groups' on Facebook, with no randomization or source balance (Section 3.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uncovering Conspiratorial Narratives within Arabic Online Content." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QZKZNE52

@misc{pith2026250414037,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uncovering Conspiratorial Narratives within Arabic Online Content},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QZKZNE52}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14037}
}
read the original abstract

This study investigates the spread of conspiracy theories in Arabic digital spaces through computational analysis of online content. By combining Named Entity Recognition and Topic Modeling techniques, specifically the Top2Vec algorithm, we analyze data from Arabic blogs and Facebook to identify and classify conspiratorial narratives. Our analysis uncovers six distinct categories: gender/feminist, geopolitical, government cover-ups, apocalyptic, Judeo-Masonic, and geoengineering. The research highlights how these narratives are deeply embedded in Arabic social media discourse, shaped by regional historical, cultural, and sociopolitical contexts. By applying advanced Natural Language Processing methods to Arabic content, this study addresses a gap in conspiracy theory research, which has traditionally focused on English-language content or offline data. The findings provide new insights into the manifestation and evolution of conspiracy theories in Arabic digital spaces, enhancing our understanding of their role in shaping public discourse in the Arab world.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14037 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of documents’ lengths in the corpus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    conspiracy, n

    Oxford English Online Dictionary. conspiracy, n. meanings, etymology and more

    work page

  2. [2]

    Douglas, Robbie M

    Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, and Aleksandra Cichocka. The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 26(6):538–542, 2017-12

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Uscinski

    Joseph E. Uscinski. The study of conspiracy theories. Argumenta, 3(2):233–245, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation

    Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Alexandru Davidescu, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Wal- ter Quattrociocchi. Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PLOS ONE , 10(2):e0118093, 2015-02-23

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Gignac, and Klaus Oberauer

    Stephan Lewandowsky, Gilles E. Gignac, and Klaus Oberauer. Correction: The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLOS ONE , 10(8):e0134773, 2015-08-13

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Belief in conspiracy theories and attitudes toward political violence

    Federico Vegetti and Levente Littvay. Belief in conspiracy theories and attitudes toward political violence. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , 52(1):18–32, 2022-03

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Jensen and Sheehan Kane

    Michael A. Jensen and Sheehan Kane. QAnon-inspired violence in the united states: an empirical assessment of a misunderstood threat. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression , 16(1):65–83, 2024-01-02

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Vaccine hesitancy: evidence from an adverse events following immunization database, and the role of cognitive biases

    Hossein Azarpanah, Mohsen Farhadloo, Rustam Vahidov, and Louise Pilote. Vaccine hesitancy: evidence from an adverse events following immunization database, and the role of cognitive biases. BMC Public Health , 21(1):1686, 2021-12

    work page 2021

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations

    Jan-Willem Van Prooijen and Karen M Douglas. Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies , 10(3):323–333, 2017-07

    2017

  2. [10]

    Conspiracy theories in digital environments: Moving the research field forward

    Jing Zeng, Mike S Schäfer, and Thaiane M Oliveira. Conspiracy theories in digital environments: Moving the research field forward. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies , 28(4):929–939, 2022-08

    2022

  3. [11]

    Strategic conspiracy narratives: a semiotic approach

    Mari-Liis Madisson and Andreas Ventsel. Strategic conspiracy narratives: a semiotic approach . Conspiracy theories. Routledge, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Schäfer, and Jing Zeng

    Daniela Mahl, Mike S. Schäfer, and Jing Zeng. Conspiracy theories in online environments: An interdisciplinary literature review and agenda for future research. New Media & Society , 25(7):1781–1801, 2023-07. 14 Conspiratorial Narratives in Arabic Content

    2023

  5. [13]

    Topic modeling: A comprehensive review

    Pooja Kherwa and Poonam Bansal. Topic modeling: A comprehensive review. ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems , 0(0):159623, 2018-07-13

    2018

  6. [14]

    A survey on recent advances in named entity recognition from deep learning models

    Vikas Yadav and Steven Bethard. A survey on recent advances in named entity recognition from deep learning models. arXiv:1910.11470, 2019-10-25

    1910 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Douglas and Robbie M

    Karen M. Douglas and Robbie M. Sutton. What are conspiracy theories? a definitional approach to their correlates, consequences, and communication. Annual Review of Psychology , 74(1):271–298, 2023-01-18

    2023

  8. [16]

    Granados Samayoa, Courtney A

    Javier A. Granados Samayoa, Courtney A. Moore, Benjamin C. Ruisch, Shelby T. Boggs, Jesse T. Ladanyi, and Russell H. Fazio. A gateway conspiracy? belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories prospectively predicts greater conspiracist ideation. PLOS ONE , 17(10):e0275502, 2022-10-26

    2022

  9. [17]

    The hidden hand: Middle East fears of conspiracy

    Daniel Pipes. The hidden hand: Middle East fears of conspiracy . St. Martin’s Griffin, 1998

    1998

  10. [18]

    Marvin Zonis and Craig M. Joseph. Conspiracy thinking in the middle east. Political Psychology, 15(3):443, 1994-09

    1994

  11. [19]

    Explaining conspiracy theories in modern arab middle eastern political discourse: Some problems and limitations of the literature

    Matthew Gray. Explaining conspiracy theories in modern arab middle eastern political discourse: Some problems and limitations of the literature. Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies , 17(2):155–174, 2008-01

    2008

  12. [20]

    Conspiracy Theories in the United States and the Middle East: A Comparative Approach

    Michael Butter and Maurus Reinkowski, editors. Conspiracy Theories in the United States and the Middle East: A Comparative Approach. DE GRUYTER, 2014-02-14

    2014

  13. [21]

    Conspiracy and misperception belief in the middle east and north africa

    Brendan Nyhan and Thomas Zeitzoff. Conspiracy and misperception belief in the middle east and north africa. The Journal of Politics , 80(4):1400–1404, 2018-10

    2018

  14. [22]

    The enemy of my enemy is not my friend: Arabic twitter sentiment toward ISIS and the united states

    David Romney, Amaney A Jamal, Robert O Keohane, and Dustin Tingley. The enemy of my enemy is not my friend: Arabic twitter sentiment toward ISIS and the united states. International Studies Quarterly , 65(4):1176–1184, 2021-12-17

    2021

  15. [23]

    Schweinberger

    Julian Kauk, Helene Kreysa, and Stefan R. Schweinberger. Understanding and countering the spread of conspiracy theories in social networks: Evidence from epidemiological models of twitter data. PLOS ONE , 16(8):e0256179, 2021-08-12

    2021

  16. [24]

    Southern, Sazzad Hossain Khan, S

    Md Saiful Islam, Abu-Hena Mostofa Kamal, Alamgir Kabir, Dorothy L. Southern, Sazzad Hossain Khan, S. M. Murshid Hasan, Tonmoy Sarkar, Shayla Sharmin, Shiuli Das, Tuhin Roy, Md Golam Dostogir Harun, Abrar Ahmad Chughtai, Nusrat Homaira, and Holly Seale. COVID-19 vaccine rumors ...

    2021

  17. [25]

    Investigation of COVID-19 misinformation in arabic on twitter: Content analysis

    Ahmed Al-Rawi, Abdelrahman Fakida, and Kelly Grounds. Investigation of COVID-19 misinformation in arabic on twitter: Content analysis. JMIR Infodemiology, 2(2):e37007, 2022-07-26

    2022

  18. [26]

    The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions

    Carlos Carrasco-Farré. The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 9(1):162, 2022-05-09

    2022

  19. [27]

    Unveiling the formation of conspiracy theory on social media: A discourse analysis

    Boying Li, David Ji, Mengyao Fu, Chee-Wee Tan, Alain Chong, and Eric Tk Lim. Unveiling the formation of conspiracy theory on social media: A discourse analysis. Journal of Information Technology , 39(3):392–416, 2024-09

    2024

  20. [28]

    On the globalization of the QAnon conspiracy theory through telegram

    Mohamad Hoseini, Philipe Melo, Fabricio Benevenuto, Anja Feldmann, and Savvas Zannettou. On the globalization of the QAnon conspiracy theory through telegram. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13020 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Tangherlini, and Vwani Roychowdhury

    Shadi Shahsavari, Pavan Holur, Tianyi Wang, Timothy R. Tangherlini, and Vwani Roychowdhury. Conspiracy in the time of corona: automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. Journal of Computational Social Science , 3(2):279–317, 2020-11

    2020

  22. [30]

    Essam, Mostafa M

    Bacem A. Essam, Mostafa M. Aref, and Fayrouz Fouad. When folkloric geopolitical concerns prompt a conspiratorial ideation: the case of egyptian tweeters. GeoJournal, 84(1):121–133, 2019-02

    2019

  23. [31]

    Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine engagement in algeria: A population-based study with systematic review of studies from arab countries of the MENA region

    Salah Eddine Oussama Kacimi, Selma Nihel Klouche-Djedid, Omar Riffi, Hadj Ahmed Belaouni, Farah Yasmin, Mohammad Yasir Essar, Fatma Asma Taouza, Yasmine Belakhdar, Saliha Chiboub Fellah, Amira Yasmine Benmelouka, Shoaib Ahmed, Mohammad Aloulou, Abdellah Bendelhoum, Hafida Merz...

    2022

  24. [32]

    Landrum and Alex Olshansky

    Asheley R. Landrum and Alex Olshansky. The role of conspiracy mentality in denial of science and susceptibility to viral deception about science. Politics and the Life Sciences , 38(2):193–209, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Bruce L. Miller. Science denial and COVID conspiracy theories: Potential neurological mechanisms and possible responses. JAMA, 324(22):2255, 2020-12-08

    2020

  26. [34]

    What is hiding behind the rainbow plot? the gender ideology and LGBTQ + lobby conspiracies

    Marco Salvati, Valerio Pellegrini, Valeria De Cristofaro, and Mauro Giacomantonio. What is hiding behind the rainbow plot? the gender ideology and LGBTQ + lobby conspiracies. British Journal of Social Psychology , 63(1):295–318, 2024-01. 15 Conspiratorial Narratives in Arabic Content

    2024

  27. [35]

    Blei, Andrew Y

    David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Jan):993–1022, 2003

    2003

  28. [36]

    Lee and H

    Daniel D. Lee and H. Sebastian Seung. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401(6755):788–791, 1999

    1999

  29. [37]

    Dumais, George W

    Scott Deerwester, Susan T. Dumais, George W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer, and Richard Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 41(6):391–407, 1990

    1990

  30. [38]

    Bertopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based tf-idf procedure

    Maarten Grootendorst. Bertopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based tf-idf procedure. arXiv preprint , 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Top2vec: Distributed representations of topics

    Dimo Angelov. Top2vec: Distributed representations of topics. arXiv preprint , 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Pre-training is a hot topic: Contextualized document embeddings improve topic coherence

    Federico Bianchi, Silvia Terragni, and Dirk Hovy. Pre-training is a hot topic: Contextualized document embeddings improve topic coherence. arXiv preprint , 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    In search of an imaginary enemy: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs

    Marta Marchlewska, Aleksandra Cichocka, Filip Łozowski, Paulina Górska, and Mikołaj Winiewski. In search of an imaginary enemy: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs. The Journal of Social Psychology , 159(6):766–779, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Abdul Hamid, Abdul Basid, and Isma Nida Aulia

    M. Abdul Hamid, Abdul Basid, and Isma Nida Aulia. The reconstruction of arab women role in media: a critical discourse analysis. Social Network Analysis and Mining , 11(1):101, 2021-12

    2021

  35. [43]

    The rise of fourth‐wave feminism in the arab region? Cyberfeminism and Women ’s Activism at the Crossroads of the Arab Spring

    Maha Tazi and Kenza Oumlil. The rise of fourth‐wave feminism in the arab region? Cyberfeminism and Women ’s Activism at the Crossroads of the Arab Spring . CyberOrient, 14(1):44–71, 2020-01

    2020

  36. [44]

    Ramy Magdy, Maries Mikhael, and Yassmine G. Hussein. Imported feminism: problematizing the westernized image of the feminist in arab social media. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences , 4(4):324–337, 2022-08-09

    2022

  37. [45]

    Audacity in adversity: LGBT activism in the middle east and north africa | HR W

    Human Rights Watch report. Audacity in adversity: LGBT activism in the middle east and north africa | HR W

  38. [46]

    LGBT+ rights and issues in the middle east

    House of Commons Library. LGBT+ rights and issues in the middle east

  39. [47]

    The history of feminism in the arab world

    Ahmed Saeed Ahmed Mocbil. The history of feminism in the arab world. Journal of Social Studies , 28(4):82–91, 2023-02-16

    2023

  40. [48]

    Theory, ‘truthers’, and transparency: Reflecting on knowledge in the twenty-first century

    Matthew Fluck. Theory, ‘truthers’, and transparency: Reflecting on knowledge in the twenty-first century. Review of International Studies , 42(1):48–73, 2016-01

    2016

  41. [49]

    Jamal, Robert O

    Amaney A. Jamal, Robert O. Keohane, David Romney, and Dustin Tingley. Anti-americanism and anti- interventionism in arabic twitter discourses. Perspectives on Politics , 13(1):55–73, 2015-03

    2015

  42. [50]

    Searching for sectarianism in the arab spring: Colonial conspiracy or indigenous instinct? The Muslim World, 106(1):8–61, 2016-01

    Mark Farha. Searching for sectarianism in the arab spring: Colonial conspiracy or indigenous instinct? The Muslim World, 106(1):8–61, 2016-01

    2016

  43. [51]

    Key challenges and policy reforms in the MENA region: An economic perspective

    Mohamed Sami Ben Ali. Key challenges and policy reforms in the MENA region: An economic perspective. In Perspectives on Development in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region . Springer International Publishing, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Alien demonology: The christian roots of the malevolent extraterrestrial in UFO religions and abduction spiritualities

    Christopher Partridge. Alien demonology: The christian roots of the malevolent extraterrestrial in UFO religions and abduction spiritualities. Religion, 34(3):163–189, 2004-07

    2004

  45. [53]

    Alexander C.T. Geppert. Extraterrestrial encounters: UFOs, science and the quest for transcendence, 1947–1972. History and Technology , 28(3):335–362, 2012-09

    1947

  46. [54]

    Phil Stewart and Ali Idrees. U.s. shoots down mysterious object near canadian border | reuters

  47. [55]

    Conspiracy theorizing and religious motivated reasoning: Why the earth ‘must’be flat

    Alex Olshansky. Conspiracy theorizing and religious motivated reasoning: Why the earth ‘must’be flat . Thesis, Texas Tech University, 2018

    2018

  48. [56]

    The public discussion on flat earth movement: An analysis based on the esperantist‑epideictic discourse

    Cristiano Mattos, Felipe Sanches Lopez, José Luis Ortega, and André Rodrigues. The public discussion on flat earth movement: An analysis based on the esperantist‑epideictic discourse. Science & Education , 31(5):1339–1361, 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    Peaslee, and Asheley R

    Alex Olshansky, Robert M. Peaslee, and Asheley R. Landrum. Flat-smacked! converting to flat eartherism. Journal of Media and Religion , 19(2):46–59, 2020-04-02

    2020

  50. [58]

    Paolillo

    John C. Paolillo. The flat earth phenomenon on YouTube. First Monday , 2018-12-01

    2018

  51. [59]

    Disinformation and echo chambers: how disinformation circulates on social media through identity-driven controversies

    Carlos Diaz Ruiz and Tomas Nilsson. Disinformation and echo chambers: how disinformation circulates on social media through identity-driven controversies. Journal of Public Policy Marketing , 42(1):18–35, 2022-05-16

    2022

  52. [60]

    Majmu Fatawa Shaykh al-Islam Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah , volume 1382

    I Taymiyyah. Majmu Fatawa Shaykh al-Islam Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah , volume 1382. Riyad: Matabe’al-Riyad, 1963

    1963

  53. [61]

    Christian identity: the apocalyptic style, political religion, palingenesis and neo‐fascism

    Chip Berlet. Christian identity: the apocalyptic style, political religion, palingenesis and neo‐fascism. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions , 5(3):469–506, 2004-01

    2004

  54. [62]

    Brexit, prophecy, and conspiracy

    Steve Knowles. Brexit, prophecy, and conspiracy. Nova Religio , 21(3):7–28, 2018-02-01. 16 Conspiratorial Narratives in Arabic Content

    2018

  55. [63]

    A longitudinal analysis of YouTube’s promotion of conspiracy videos

    Marc Faddoul, Guillaume Chaslot, and Hany Farid. A longitudinal analysis of YouTube’s promotion of conspiracy videos. arXiv:2003.03318, 2020-03-06

    2003 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Embracing doomsday: Faith, fatalism, and apocalyptic beliefs in the nuclear age

    Daniel Wojcik. Embracing doomsday: Faith, fatalism, and apocalyptic beliefs in the nuclear age. Western Folklore, 55(4):297, 1996

    1996

  57. [65]

    Hanebrink

    Paul A. Hanebrink. A specter haunting Europe: the myth of Judeo-Bolshevism . The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2018

    2018

  58. [66]

    From Sayyid Qutb to Hamas: The Middle East Conflict and the Islamization of Antisemitism

    Bassam Tibi. From Sayyid Qutb to Hamas: The Middle East Conflict and the Islamization of Antisemitism . Volume 5 of Working paper series (Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Antisemitism). Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Antisemitism, 2010

    2010

  59. [67]

    Benedetta De Poli. 218 jesuit fathers, maronites, muslim ʿulamāʾ, and islamists: The role of religious institutions and organisations in the spread of the judeo-masonic conspiracy myth in the middle east. In Religious Dimensions of Conspiracy Theories: Comparing and Connecting...

    2023

  60. [68]

    Reiner, Benjamin K

    Ramit Debnath, David M. Reiner, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Finn Müller-Hansen, Tim Repke, R. Michael Alvarez, and Shaun D. Fitzgerald. Conspiracy spillovers and geoengineering. iScience, 26(3):106166, 2023-03-17

    2023

  61. [69]

    Conspiracy theories and climate change: A systematic review

    Kim-Pong Tam and Hoi-Wing Chan. Conspiracy theories and climate change: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91:102129, 2023-11

    2023

  62. [70]

    Climate of conspiracy: A meta-analysis of the consequences of belief in conspiracy theories about climate change

    Mikey Biddlestone, Flavio Azevedo, and Sander Van Der Linden. Climate of conspiracy: A meta-analysis of the consequences of belief in conspiracy theories about climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology , 46:101390, 2022-08

    2022

  63. [71]

    The role of bots in spreading conspiracies: Case study of discourse about earthquakes on twitter

    Dmitry Erokhin and Nadejda Komendantova. The role of bots in spreading conspiracies: Case study of discourse about earthquakes on twitter. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction , 92:103740, 2023-06

    2023

  64. [72]

    Climates of suspicion: ’chemtrail’ conspiracy narratives and the international politics of geoengineering

    Rose CAIRNS. Climates of suspicion: ’chemtrail’ conspiracy narratives and the international politics of geoengineering. The Geographical Journal , 182(1):70–84, 2016

    2016

  65. [73]

    HAARP conspiracy theory ’weather super-weapon’ program shuts down

    Benjamin Radford. HAARP conspiracy theory ’weather super-weapon’ program shuts down. Skeptical Inquirer, 38(5):7–9, 2014-09-01

    2014

  66. [74]

    Mitchell

    Scott S.D. Mitchell. Population control, deadly vaccines, and mutant mosquitoes: The construction and circulation of zika virus conspiracy theories online. Canadian Journal of Communication , 44(2):211–237, 2019-06-27

    2019

  67. [75]

    A mysterious american weapon or a russian submarine? | aljazeera.net

    AbulGhit A. A mysterious american weapon or a russian submarine? | aljazeera.net. 17

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.