REVIEW 1 cited by
Detecting Deceptive Dark Patterns in E-commerce Platforms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Dark patterns are deceptive user interfaces employed by e-commerce websites to manipulate user's behavior in a way that benefits the website, often unethically. This study investigates the detection of such dark patterns. Existing solutions include UIGuard, which uses computer vision and natural language processing, and approaches that categorize dark patterns based on detectability or utilize machine learning models trained on datasets. We propose combining web scraping techniques with fine-tuned BERT language models and generative capabilities to identify dark patterns, including outliers. The approach scrapes textual content, feeds it into the BERT model for detection, and leverages BERT's bidirectional analysis and generation abilities. The study builds upon research on automatically detecting and explaining dark patterns, aiming to raise awareness and protect consumers.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
EVADE-Bench: Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating and Enhancing Evasive Content Detection
A new benchmark of 2,833 evasive text samples and 13,961 images shows current LLMs and VLMs frequently miss veiled policy violations in Chinese e-commerce ads.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.