Asymmetric two-photon response of an incoherently driven quantum emitter

Lena M. Hansen; Lennart Jehle; Mathieu Bozzio; Michael Jetter; Patrik I. Sund; Peter Michler; Philip Walther; Raphael Joos; Simone L. Portalupi; Thomas W. Sand{\o}

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Asymmetric two-photon response of an incoherently driven quantum emitter

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read First-photon red-shift exposes the Rabi frequency of a quantum dot.

desk verdict First direct look at re-excitation under phonon-assisted driving, with a plausible Rabi-extraction claim that needs one more calibration step before I'd trust the absolute numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07082 v1 pith:R2DC2GGG submitted 2025-07-09 quant-ph

Lennart Jehle , Lena M. Hansen , Patrik I. Sund , Thomas W. Sand{o} , Raphael Joos , Michael Jetter , Simone L. Portalupi , Mathieu Bozzio

show 2 more authors

Peter Michler Philip Walther

This is my paper

classification quant-ph

keywords quantumdotphonon-assistedexcitationre-excitationsingle-photonpuritydynamicStarkeffectRabifrequencytwo-photonspectrumfiltering

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum dots are promising single-photon sources, but a single laser pulse can re-excite the dot and make it emit two photons, degrading single-photon purity. This paper studies re-excitation under phonon-assisted (incoherent) driving and resolves the temporal and spectral shape of each of the two photons. The key finding is that the first photon is red-shifted by an amount $\delta\omega_{\max} = \delta\omega_L - \sqrt{\Omega_0^2 + \delta\omega_L^2}$, where $\delta\omega_L$ is the laser detuning and $\Omega_0$ is the Rabi frequency, so measuring the shift gives a direct, parameter-free route to the Rabi frequency of an incoherently driven quantum dot. The same spectral asymmetry lets an ordinary frequency filter suppress the re-excitation background, keeping the multiphoton probability $g^{(2)}(0)$ low regardless of laser pulse length. If correct, this strengthens the case for phonon-assisted pumping in quantum cryptography and photonic quantum computing, where pulse-length-insensitive single-photon purity is valuable.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the dressed-state picture of the driven two-level system combined with phonon-assisted pumping. The dressed states are the eigenstates of the atom\u2013laser Hamiltonian in the rotating frame, split by the effective Rabi frequency $\Omega_{\mathrm{eff}}(t) = \sqrt{\Omega(t)^2 + \delta\omega_L^2}$. The time-dependent emission frequency $\omega_{\mathrm{QD}}(t) = \omega_L - \Omega_{\mathrm{eff}}(t)$ is a dynamic Stark shift induced by the excitation laser itself, not by a separate control beam, and Eq. (2) of the paper inverts the measured maximum shift to obtain the Rabi frequency $\Omega_0$. The phonon spectral density evaluated at $\Omega_{\mathrm{eff}}(t)$ governs the excitation efficiency, and the combination of dressing and phonon emission produces the asymmetric two-photon spectrum that is the paper's central observable.

What would settle it

Measure the Rabi frequency of the same quantum dot by an independent method, for example Rabi oscillations under resonant driving or the Mollow-triplet sideband splitting under coherent cw driving, and compare it with the value extracted from the re-excitation red-shift via Eq. (2); if the two disagree beyond the combined filter resolution and pulse-shape uncertainty, the identification of the side-peak maximum with $\delta\omega_{\max}$ fails. Alternatively, time-and-frequency-resolve the first photon and check that its peak frequency at the pulse center matches $\delta\omega_{\max}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under longitudinal-acoustic-phonon-assisted pumping, a quantum dot driven by a blue-detuned laser pulse can emit a first photon while the pulse is still present, and then a second photon after the pulse. Because the first photon is emitted as a transition between laser-dressed states, its frequency follows the instantaneous effective Rabi splitting, $\omega_{\mathrm{QD}}(t) = \omega_L - \Omega_{\mathrm{eff}}(t)$, with $\Omega_{\mathrm{eff}}(t) = \sqrt{\Omega(t)^2 + \delta\omega_L^2}$; the emission is therefore red-shifted from the bare transition $\omega_0$. The maximum shift, $\delta\omega_{\max} = \delta\omega_L - \sqrt{\Omega_0^2 + \delta\omega_L^2}$, occurs when the pulse field peaks and, rearranged as $\Omega_0 = \sqrt{\delta\omega_{\max}(\delta\omega_{\max} - 2\delta\omega_L)}$, yields the Rabi frequency directly from the measured position of the low-frequency side peak in the two-photon spectrum. The second photon, emitted after the pulse has passed, stays at $\omega_0$. The paper verifies that the shift grows with laser power and decreases with detuning as expected, and demonstrates that filtering the emission at $\omega_0$ removes most of the first-photon background, making $g^{(2)}(0)$ nearly independent of pulse length.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the measured side-peak maximum equals the maximum dynamic shift $\delta\omega_{\max}$, because the first photon's emission frequency is taken to track the instantaneous dressed-state splitting and to be emitted mainly near the pulse peak, with no independent calibration of this link against a known Rabi frequency.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The Rabi frequency of an incoherently driven quantum dot can be measured without Rabi oscillations or coherent scattering, using only the spectral position of the re-excitation side peak.
Spectral filtering at the bare emission line suppresses first-photon multiphoton emission so that $g^{(2)}(0)$ stays low even for pulses several times longer than the radiative lifetime.
The dynamic Stark detuning shifts the quantum dot transition away from a narrow cavity mode during the pulse, cancelling Purcell enhancement and further reducing re-excitation in high-Purcell devices.
Shorter pulses produce larger red-shifts, so the filtering benefit grows for fast, high-clock-rate sources, which are otherwise most affected by re-excitation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A calibration-free in situ Rabi-frequency monitor based on Eq. (2) could be used to actively stabilize excitation power in deployed quantum devices, a use the paper does not explicitly propose.
Because the emission frequency is a deterministic function of time during the pulse, a bank of narrowband filters could in principle reconstruct the pump pulse envelope from photon statistics alone, offering a diagnostics channel the paper does not explore.
The same dressed-state logic should hold for other incoherent excitation paths (for example, two-photon or above-band pumping), suggesting that re-excitation spectra could serve as a general probe of effective Rabi splitting whenever the detuning is known.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The useful headline: this is the first experimental study of re-excitation in a quantum dot driven by phonon-assisted (incoherent) pumping, and the core observations look solid. The authors resolve the two photons in time, see a genuinely asymmetric two-photon spectrum, and show that a simple spectral filter kills the multiphoton contribution almost completely for pulse lengths up to ~80 ps. Those results are well supported by the data, and the filtering demonstration is a practical, immediately useful trick. Good citations to the resonant-driving and dressed-state literature as well.

The soft spot is the Rabi-frequency extraction. Equation 2 converts the measured position of the red sideband into an absolute Ω0 by assuming the sideband maximum is δω_max, the maximum of ω_L − Ω_eff(t). That identification carries three unvalidated links: the 5.3 GHz filter convolution broadens and possibly shifts the peak, the emission probability is time-weighted so the peak may not sit where the shift is largest, and the authors themselves note in Supp. Note 4 that phonon coupling can be weak near the pulse peak, which would suppress emission exactly at maximum dressing. No independent Rabi measurement on this dot is presented, and the nice linear trend in the inset of Fig. 3b only checks proportionality, not absolute scale. These concerns are real, but they do not sink the paper—they just mean the absolute Ω0 values should be taken as estimates until a deconvolved spectral model or an independent calibration is provided.

I'd also flag the Purcell-cancellation mechanism in the Discussion as speculative; it is not measured, but the authors present it as a suggestion rather than a result, so that is a minor issue.

Who gets value: experimentalists working on QD single-photon sources, especially those using incoherent or phonon-assisted excitation, and people who care about multiphoton suppression. The Rabi-extraction part will interest theorists but needs the calibration caveat.

My recommendation: this deserves a serious referee. The experimental observations and the filtering technique are novel and likely to hold up. I would ask the authors to either provide an independent Rabi-frequency measurement or explicitly calibrate the peak-position-to-δω_max mapping, and to soften the 'direct access' claim until then. Send it to review.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of re-excitation in a single In(Ga)As quantum dot under phonon-assisted (incoherent) excitation, using telecom-wavelength pulses. The authors measure time-resolved histograms of the first and second photons emitted in two-photon events, spectrally resolve the two-photon emission with a scanning etalon, and observe a red-shifted side peak that they attribute to emission from the lower dressed state while the laser pulse is present. From the position of this side peak they extract the Rabi frequency via Eq. (2), and they demonstrate that a narrow spectral filter can suppress the multiphoton contribution to g^(2)(0) over a range of pulse lengths. They argue that these behaviors are unique to phonon-assisted pumping and constitute a direct, parameter-free route to the Rabi frequency of an incoherently driven emitter.

Significance. If the Rabi-frequency extraction is valid, it would be a valuable and non-trivial result: a measurable spectral shift of an incoherently emitted photon providing direct access to a coherent light-matter coupling parameter. The temporal-ordering measurement and the spectral filtering application are also useful, and the filtering demonstration in Fig. 4 is convincing as a proof of principle. The paper is well structured, presents detailed data, and includes consistency checks (e.g., the linear trend in the inset of Fig. 3b) that support the qualitative model. The main weakness is that the central quantitative claim, Eq. (2), rests on an unvalidated identification between the measured side-peak maximum and the maximum instantaneous dressed-state shift, which Supplementary Note 4 itself suggests may be violated.

major comments (3)

[Measuring the Rabi frequency / Eq. (2)] The extraction of Ω0 from the measured side-peak position assumes that the maximum of the time-integrated, filter-convolved first-photon spectrum corresponds to δω_max, the maximum of ω_L − Ω_eff(t) at the pulse peak. This requires that the first-photon emission probability is concentrated near the pulse peak and that the 5.3 GHz filter does not bias the peak position. Supplementary Note 4 explicitly states that phonon coupling can be non-monotonic and weak at the peak field amplitude, which would suppress emission exactly at δω_max and pull the observed side peak toward smaller shifts. The authors should either provide a quantitative model of the first-photon spectrum (including the instantaneous emission rate and the filter convolution) or calibrate the peak-to-δω_max mapping against an independent Rabi frequency measurement on the same quantum dot. Without this, Eq. (2) is not a parameter-free extraction but an untested mapping assumption.
[Figure 3b inset / linear-trend verification] The linear trend of the extracted Ω0 versus the applied laser field shows proportionality but does not establish absolute scale. Because Eq. (2) is nonlinear in δω_max, a constant or proportional error in the measured side-peak position does not cancel when solving for Ω0. The inset therefore validates the scaling of the shift but not the absolute values of Ω0. An independent calibration (e.g., Rabi oscillations under resonant driving of the same emitter, or a simulated spectrum using a path-integral or polaron master equation) is needed to support the quantitative claim made in the title and abstract.
[Supplementary Note 4 / relevance to main claim] Supplementary Note 4 contains a statement that the phonon coupling efficiency can be weak at the peak field amplitude, meaning the time-dependent excitation probability may be suppressed exactly when the dressed-state shift is largest. This statement directly undermines the central assumption of the Rabi extraction in the main text, yet it is not connected to the analysis of Fig. 3. The authors should reconcile this with Eq. (2) or provide evidence (e.g., time-resolved filtered traces at the side-peak frequency) that the emission rate at δω_max is not suppressed in the parameter regime of Fig. 3b.

minor comments (5)

[Methods / Fig. 3b] The value of the laser–QD detuning δω_L used for the power scan in Fig. 3b and the inset is not stated in the main text; it appears only in the Supplementary Information (125 GHz). Please specify it in the main text or figure caption.
[Figure 3b inset] The horizontal axis of the inset is labeled 'laser field' but the conversion from measured power to field amplitude is not defined. Please state the calibration (e.g., square-root of power or a fitted field scale).
[Methods / 1st-photon gating] The 350 ps threshold for herald events used to isolate the first-photon spectrum should be justified in relation to the laser pulse length (80 ps) and the system response function (26–29 ps), and the sensitivity of the extracted spectrum to this threshold should be discussed.
[Supplementary Figure 5] The caption states that error bars were omitted for clarity; please state this in the main text when referencing the figure, and consider providing error bars for at least one representative curve.
[Supplementary Note 3] The text refers to 'In Fig. 4, we present the spectra' but the referenced figure is Supplementary Figure 4, not a main-text figure. Please correct the cross-reference for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. 2 is an algebraic inversion of the dressed-state shift relation, and the measured side-peak position is an observable, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central inference is the extraction of Ω0 from a measured spectral red-shift. The derivation starts from the dressed-state expression ω_QD(t) = ω_L − Ω_eff(t) (Eq. 1), giving δω_max = δω_L − sqrt(Ω0^2 + δω_L^2), and Eq. 2 is the exact algebraic rearrangement for Ω0. The input to Eq. 2 is the position of the low-frequency side peak in the two-photon spectrum, which is an independently measured observable; it is not a parameter fitted to the quantity being 'predicted.' The linear trend of the extracted Ω0 with laser field is a consistency check rather than a circular validation. The paper's self-citations (Vyvlecka et al., Bozzio et al., Giorgino et al., Joos et al., Nawrath et al.) support sample preparation, excitation robustness, and background context, but none carries the load of the Rabi-extraction claim. The more substantive scientific concern — whether the observed filter-convolved peak maximum truly equals δω_max in light of the non-monotonic phonon coupling described in Supplementary Note 4 — is an assumption about model validity and measurement systematics, not a logical circularity in the derivation. Thus no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the dressed-state model of the QD as a two-level system, the identification of the side-peak shift with the maximum instantaneous Rabi splitting, and the dominance of the incoherent phonon-assisted emission pathway. No free parameters are introduced: the inputs are the measured detuning, the measured peak shift, and the laser pulse parameters. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The quantum dot transition is modelled as a two-level system with transition frequency ω0 and driven by a laser detuned by δω_L = ω_L - ω0.
Introduced in the dressed-state picture in the Results section and used throughout; it neglects multi-level structure, biexciton states, and phonon-induced modifications beyond the dressing.
domain assumption The time-dependent emission frequency of the QD during the pulse is given by ω_QD(t) = ω_L - Ω_eff(t) with Ω_eff(t) = sqrt(Ω^2(t) + δω_L^2).
This is the key model assumption used to derive Eq. 2 and interpret the side peak; it assumes the first photon is emitted on the transition |β,N> to |α,N-1> at the instantaneous dressed splitting. It is not independently verified.
ad hoc to paper The measured side-peak maximum corresponds to the maximum shift δω_max at the pulse peak.
Used to extract Ω0 in Eq. 2; assumes the emission probability is peaked near the pulse peak and that filter broadening does not move the peak. This is the weakest load-bearing assumption.
domain assumption Phonon-assisted excitation for blue-detuned pulses is dominated by single-phonon emission into the low-frequency side peak, with coherent two-photon scattering negligible.
Supported by the absence of the high-frequency side peak and the low phonon population at 4 K, as argued in Supplementary Note 3.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymmetric two-photon response of an incoherently driven quantum emitter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R2DC2GGG

@misc{pith2026250707082,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymmetric two-photon response of an incoherently driven quantum emitter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R2DC2GGG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07082}
}

abstract

Quantum emitters promise to emit exactly one photon with high probability when pumped by a laser pulse. However, even in ideal systems, re-excitation during a laser pulse causes the consecutive emission of two photons, thus limiting the single-photon purity. Although the probability and properties of re-excitation are largely determined by the optical excitation method, until now only resonant driving has been studied. Here, we demonstrate qualitative differences in the process arising from phonon-assisted excitation -- a scheme standing out for its robustness and straightforward spectral suppression of scattered laser light while preserving highly indistinguishable emission. In contrast to previous studies under resonant driving, we measure not only the $g^{(2)}(0)$ as a function of pulse length but also resolve the distinct temporal and spectral shape of each of the photons, report an asymmetric two-photon spectrum and uncover correlations between the emission time and wavelength, which are unique to phonon-assisted pumping. On the fundamental side, we show how the spectrum stemming from re-excitation provides direct access to the Rabi frequency of an incoherently driven quantum dot. On the application side, we use the asymmetric spectral response to selectively suppress multiphoton noise from re-excitation, ensuring a high-single photon purity regardless of the laser pulse length and thus enhancing implementations across quantum cryptography and quantum computing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07082 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** for one exemplary quantum trajectory. Independent of the pumping scheme, when driving the QD with a short laser pulse, there is a chance that it is excited early during the interaction (a) and quickly decays by emitting a 1 st photon (b) such that the QD can be excited again by the same pulse (c) and emit a 2 nd photon at a later time (d). The causality of the process requires that whenever two photons were created… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** b). Instead of performing a standard second-order autocorrelation g (2)(τ ), we check for coincidences between the two optical channels and record the timestamp of the early and late click for each coincidence. Sorting this way, we separate events caused by 1 st photons from those caused by 2 nd photons, allowing us to resolve the dynamics of the two-photon emission individually. The resulting histograms, displayed… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: a compares the zoomed-in, correlated peaks around τ = 0 of a standard g (2)(τ ) for various pulse lengths. The QD signal shown in the left panel is only isolated from broadband background, but for the measurements displayed in the right panel a (6.0 ± 0.3) GHz etalon …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Deterministic Control of Photon-Number Probabilities via Phase-Controlled Quantum Interference
quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

By tuning a pulse area and an interferometer phase, a single-photon emitter's output is reshaped into mixtures with controlled vacuum, one-photon, and two-photon probabilities, demonstrated experimentally and in a dis...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Le Jeannic, A

H. Le Jeannic, A. Tiranov, J. Carolan, T. Ramos, Y. Wang, M. H. Appel, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Lud- wig, N. Rotenberg, L. Midolo, J. J. García-Ripoll, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Dynamical photon–photon in- teraction mediated by a quantum emitter, Nature Physics 18, 1191 (2022)

work page 2022
[2]

Unheralded: no gating, all events detected on the spectrally ﬁltered channel

3) GHz is used to measure the QD spectrum based on diﬀerent gating logics. Unheralded: no gating, all events detected on the spectrally ﬁltered channel. Two-photon: all events on the spectrally ﬁltered channel coinciding with a heralding photon within ∆ τc = 3 ns. 1st photon: the heralding event is used only if it is registered > 350 ps after the laser cl...

work page 2020
[3]

Tiranov, V

A. Tiranov, V. Angelopoulou, C. J. van Diepen, B. Schrin- ski, O. A. D. Sandberg, Y. Wang, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Collective super- and subradiant dynamics between dis- tant optical quantum emitters, Science 379, 389 (2023)

work page 2023
[4]

N. Tomm, S. Mahmoodian, N. O. Antoniadis, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. Javadi, and R. J. Warburton, Photon bound state dynamics from a single artiﬁcial atom, Nature Physics 19, 857 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

Zhang, X

Y. Zhang, X. Ding, Y. Li, L. Zhang, Y.-P. Guo, G.-Q. Wang, Z. Ning, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, J.-Y. Zhao, G.-Y. Zou, H. Wang, Y. Cao, Y.-M. He, C.-Z. Peng, Y.-H. Huo, S.-K. Liao, C.-Y. Lu, F. Xu, and J.-W. Pan, Experimental single-photon quantum key distribution surpassing the fundamental weak coherent-state rate limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 210801 (2025)

work page 2025
[6]

L. M. Hansen, F. Giorgino, L. Jehle, L. Carosini, J. C. L. Carreño, I. Arrazola, P. Walther, and J. C. Loredo, Non-classical excitation of a solid-state quantum emit- ter, arXiv:2407.20936 [quant-ph]

arXiv
[7]

Quantum teleportation with dissimilar quantum dots over a hybrid quantum network

A. Laneve, G. Ronco, M. Beccaceci, P. Barigelli, F. Salusti, N. Claro-Rodriguez, G. D. Pascalis, A. Suprano, L. Chiau- dano, E. Schöll, L. Hanschke, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, S. F. C. da Silva, J. Neuwirth, S. Stroj, S. Höﬂing, T. Huber-Loyola, M. A. U. Castaneda, G. Carvacho, N. Spagnolo, M. B. Rota, F. B. Basset, A. Rastelli, F. Scia- rrino, K. Jöns,...

work page Pith review arXiv
[8]

Strobel, M

T. Strobel, M. Vyvlecka, I. Neureuther, T. Bauer, M. Schäfer, S. Kazmaier, N. L. Sharma, R. Joos, J. H. Weber, C. Nawrath, W. Nie, G. Bhayani, C. Hopfmann, C. Becher, P. Michler, and S. L. Portalupi, Quantum tele- portation with telecom photons from remote quantum emitters, arXiv:2411.12904 [quant-ph]

arXiv

Show all 63 references

[9]

Y. Yu, S. Liu, C.-M. Lee, P. Michler, S. Reitzenstein, K. Srinivasan, E. Waks, and J. Liu, Telecom-band quan- tum dot technologies for long-distance quantum networks, Nature Nanotechnology 18, 1389 (2023)

2023
[10]

D. A. Vajner, K. Kaymazlar, F. Drauschke, L. Rickert, M. von Helversen, H. Liu, S. Li, H. Ni, Z. Niu, A. Pappa, and T. Heindel, Single-photon advantage in quantum cryptography beyond qkd, arXiv:2412.14993 [quant-ph]
[11]

Cogan, Z.-E

D. Cogan, Z.-E. Su, O. Kenneth, and D. Gershoni, De- terministic generation of indistinguishable photons in a cluster state, Nature Photonics 17, 324 (2023)

2023
[12]

H. Cao, L. M. Hansen, F. Giorgino, L. Carosini, P. Zahálka, F. Zilk, J. C. Loredo, and P. Walther, Photonic source of heralded greenberger-horne-zeilinger states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 130604 (2024)

2024
[13]

R. Uppu, L. Midolo, X. Zhou, J. Carolan, and P. Lodahl, Quantum-dot-based deterministic photon-emitter inter- faces for scalable photonic quantum technology, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 1308 (2021)

2021
[14]

Y. Meng, M. L. Chan, R. B. Nielsen, M. H. Appel, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, N. Bart, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, L. Midolo, A. Tiranov, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Determinis- tic photon source of genuine three-qubit entanglement, Nature Communications 15, 7774 (2024)

2024
[15]

Schweickert, K

L. Schweickert, K. D. Jöns, K. D. Zeuner, S. F. Covre da Silva, H. Huang, T. Lettner, M. Reindl, J. Zichi, R. Trotta, A. Rastelli, and V. Zwiller, On-demand generation of background-free single photons from a solid-state source, Applied Physics Letters 112, 093106 (2018)

2018
[16]

However, except for initial theoretical work that focussed on adiabatic undressing 36, the phenomenon is largely unexplored for phonon-assisted pumping. At the same time, a comprehensive understand- ing of the re-excitation dynamics is becoming increasingly important as recent...

2025 arXiv
[17]

Ding, Y.-P

X. Ding, Y.-P. Guo, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, G.-Y. Zou, J.-Y. Zhao, Z.-X. Ge, Q.-H. Zhang, H.-L. Liu, L.-J. Wang, M.- C. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-M. He, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, High-eﬃciency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for eﬃcient linear optical qua...

2025
[18]

Hanschke, K

L. Hanschke, K. A. Fischer, S. Appel, D. Lukin, J. Wierzbowski, S. Sun, R. Trivedi, J. Vučković, J. J. Fin- ley, and K. Müller, Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability, npj Quantum Information 4, 10.1038/s41534-018-0092-0 (2018)

2018 doi
[19]

N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, M. C. Löbl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, A bright and fast source of coherent single photons, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 399 (2021)

2021
[20]

Hauser, M

N. Hauser, M. Bayerbach, J. Kaupp, Y. Reum, G. Peni- akov, J. Michl, M. Kamp, T. Huber-Loyola, A. T. Pfen- ning, S. Höﬂing, and S. Barz, Deterministic and highly indistinguishable single photons in the telecom c-band, arXiv:2505.09695 [quant-ph]

arXiv
[21]

A. K. Nowak, S. L. Portalupi, V. Giesz, O. Gazzano, C. Dal Savio, P.-F. Braun, K. Karrai, C. Arnold, L. Lanco, I. Sagnes, A. Lemaître, and P. Senellart, Deterministic and electrically tunable bright single-photon source, Nature Communications 5, 3240 (2014)

2014
[22]

A. J. Bennett, R. B. Patel, J. Skiba-Szymanska, C. A. Nicoll, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Giant stark eﬀect in the emission of single semiconductor quan- tum dots, Applied Physics Letters 97, 10.1063/1.3460912 (2010)

2010 doi
[24]

Tighineanu, C

P. Tighineanu, C. L. Dreeßen, C. Flindt, P. Lodahl, and A. S. Sørensen, Phonon decoherence of quantum dots in photonic structures: Broadening of the zero-phonon line and the role of dimensionality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 257401 (2018)

2018
[25]

J. Liu, K. Konthasinghe, M. Davanço, J. Lawall, V. Anant, V. Verma, R. Mirin, S. W. Nam, J. D. Song, B. Ma, Z. S. Chen, H. Q. Ni, Z. C. Niu, and K. Srinivasan, Single self- assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots in photonic nanos- tructures: The role of nanofabrication, Phys. Rev. A...

2018
[26]

Stockill, C

R. Stockill, C. Le Gall, C. Matthiesen, L. Huthmacher, E. Clarke, M. Hugues, and M. Atatüre, Quantum dot spin coherence governed by a strained nuclear environment, Nature Communications 7, 12745 (2016)

2016
[27]

Yoneda, K

J. Yoneda, K. Takeda, T. Otsuka, T. Nakajima, M. R. Del- becq, G. Allison, T. Honda, T. Kodera, S. Oda, Y. Hoshi, N. Usami, K. M. Itoh, and S. Tarucha, A quantum-dot spin qubit with coherence limited by charge noise and ﬁdelity higher than 99.9%, Nature Nanotechnology 13, 102 (2018)

2018
[28]

Zaporski, N

L. Zaporski, N. Shofer, J. H. Bodey, S. Manna, G. Gillard, M. H. Appel, C. Schimpf, S. F. Da Covre Silva, J. Jarman, G. Delamare, G. Park, U. Haeusler, E. A. Chekhovich, A. Rastelli, D. A. Gangloﬀ, M. Atatüre, and C. Le Gall, Ideal refocusing of an optically active spin qubit ...

2023
[29]

Reindl, J

M. Reindl, J. H. Weber, D. Huber, C. Schimpf, S. F. Covre da Silva, S. L. Portalupi, R. Trotta, P. Michler, and A. Rastelli, Highly indistinguishable single photons from incoherently excited quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 100, 155420 (2019)

2019
[30]

Glässl, A

M. Glässl, A. M. Barth, and V. M. Axt, Proposed robust and high-ﬁdelity preparation of excitons and biexcitons in semiconductor quantum dots making active use of phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 147401 (2013)

2013
[31]

Vyvlecka, L

M. Vyvlecka, L. Jehle, C. Nawrath, F. Giorgino, M. Bozzio, R. Sittig, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, P. Michler, and P. Walther, Robust excitation of C-band quantum dots for quantum communication, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 174001 (2023)

2023
[32]

Laccotripes, J

P. Laccotripes, J. Huang, G. Shooter, A. Barbiero, M. S. Winnel, D. A. Ritchie, A. J. Shields, T. Muller, and R. M. Stevenson, An entangled photon source for the telecom c-band based on a semiconductor-conﬁned spin, arXiv:2507.01648 [quant-ph]

arXiv
[33]

Bozzio, M

M. Bozzio, M. Vyvlecka, M. Cosacchi, C. Nawrath, T. Sei- delmann, J. C. Loredo, S. L. Portalupi, V. M. Axt, P. Mich- ler, and P. Walther, Enhancing quantum cryptography with quantum dot single-photon sources, npj Quantum Information 8, 10.1038/s41534-022-00626-z (2022)

2022 doi
[34]

Margaria, F

N. Margaria, F. Pastier, T. Bennour, M. Billard, E. Ivanov, W. Hease, P. Stepanov, A. F. Adiyatullin, R. Singla, M. Pont, M. Descampeaux, A. Bernard, A. Pishchagin, M. Morassi, A. Lemaître, T. Volz, V. Giesz, N. Somaschi, N. Maring, S. Boissier, T. H. Au, and P. Senellart, Eﬃc...

arXiv
[35]

Coste, D

N. Coste, D. A. Fioretto, N. Belabas, S. C. Wein, P. Hi- laire, R. Frantzeskakis, M. Gundin, B. Goes, N. Somaschi, M. Morassi, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, A. Harouri, S. E. Economou, A. Auﬀeves, O. Krebs, L. Lanco, and P. Senel- lart, High-rate entanglement between a semiconductor...

2023
[36]

Seidelmann, C

T. Seidelmann, C. Schimpf, T. K. Bracht, M. Cosacchi, A. Vagov, A. Rastelli, D. E. Reiter, and V. M. Axt, Two- photon excitation sets limit to entangled photon pair generation from quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 193604 (2022)

2022
[37]

Schöll, L

E. Schöll, L. Schweickert, L. Hanschke, K. D. Zeuner, F. Sbresny, T. Lettner, R. Trivedi, M. Reindl, S. F. Covre da Silva, R. Trotta, J. J. Finley, J. Vučković, K. Müller, A. Rastelli, V. Zwiller, and K. D. Jöns, Crux of using the cascaded emission of a three-level quantum lad...

2020
[38]

Cosacchi, F

M. Cosacchi, F. Ungar, M. Cygorek, A. Vagov, and V. M. Axt, Emission-frequency separated high quality single- photon sources enabled by phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 017403 (2019)

2019
[39]

Rickert, D

L. Rickert, D. A. Vajner, M. von Helversen, J. Schall, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, H. Liu, S. Li, H. Ni, Z. Niu, and T. Heindel, High purcell enhancement in quantum-dot hybrid circular bragg grating cavities for ghz clock rate generation of indistinguishable photons, ACS Photoni...

2025
[41]

Kupko, M

T. Kupko, M. von Helversen, L. Rickert, J.-H. Schulze, A. Strittmatter, M. Gschrey, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, and T. Heindel, Tools for the performance optimization of single-photon quantum key distribution, npj Quantum Information 6, 10.1038/s41534-020-0262-8 (2020)

2020 doi
[42]

Giorgino, P

F. Giorgino, P. Zahálka, L. Jehle, L. Carosini, L. M. Hansen, J. C. Loredo, and P. Walther, Multi-photon emission from a resonantly pumped quantum dot, arXiv:2507.04843 [quant-ph]

arXiv
[43]

Cohen-Tannoudji and S

C. Cohen-Tannoudji and S. Reynaud, Dressed-atom de- scription of resonance ﬂuorescence and absorption spectra of a multi-level atom in an intense laser beam, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 10, 345 (1977)

1977
[44]

J. H. Quilter, A. J. Brash, F. Liu, M. Glässl, A. M. Barth, V. M. Axt, A. J. Ramsay, M. S. Skolncik, and A. M. Fox, Phonon-assisted population inversion of a single ingaas/gaas quantum dot by pulsed laser excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015)

2015
[45]

Unold, K

T. Unold, K. Mueller, C. Lienau, T. Elsaesser, and A. D. Wieck, Optical stark eﬀect in a quantum dot: Ultrafast control of single exciton polarizations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 157401 (2004)

2004
[46]

Muller, W

A. Muller, W. Fang, J. Lawall, and G. S. Solomon, Emis- sion spectrum of a dressed exciton-biexciton complex in a semiconductor quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 027401 (2008)

2008
[47]

Muller, W

A. Muller, W. Fang, J. Lawall, and G. S. Solomon, Creat- ing polarization-entangled photon pairs from a semicon- ductor quantum dot using the optical stark eﬀect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 217402 (2009)

2009
[48]

R. Joos, S. Bauer, C. Rupp, S. Kolatschek, W. Fis- cher, C. Nawrath, P. Vijayan, R. Sittig, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Coherently and incoherently pumped telecom c-band single-photon source with high brightness and indistinguishability, Nano Letters 24, 8626 (2024)

2024
[49]

K. A. Fischer, L. Hanschke, J. Wierzbowski, T. Simmet, C. Dory, J. J. Finley, J. Vučković, and K. Müller, Sig- natures of two-photon pulses from a quantum two-level system, Nature Physics 13, 649 (2017)

2017
[50]

B. R. Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two- level systems, Physical Review Letters 188 (1969)

1969
[51]

K. Boos, S. K. Kim, T. Bracht, F. Sbresny, J. M. Kas- 10 pari, M. Cygorek, H. Riedl, F. W. Bopp, W. Rauhaus, C. Calcagno, J. J. Finley, D. E. Reiter, and K. Müller, Signatures of dynamically dressed states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 053602 (2024)

2024
[52]

S. Liu, C. Gustin, H. Liu, X. Li, Y. Yu, H. Ni, Z. Niu, S. Hughes, X. Wang, and J. Liu, Dynamic resonance ﬂuo- rescence in solid-state cavity quantum electrodynamics, Nature Photonics 18, 318 (2024)

2024
[53]

Olbrich, J

F. Olbrich, J. Kettler, M. Bayerbach, M. Paul, J. Höschele, S. L. Portalupi, M. Jetter, and P. Michler, Temperature- dependent properties of single long-wavelength ingaas quantum dots embedded in a strain reducing layer, Journal of Applied Physics 121, 10.1063/1.4983362 (2017)

2017 doi
[54]

Ripin, R

A. Ripin, R. Peng, X. Zhang, S. Chakravarthi, M. He, X. Xu, K.-M. Fu, T. Cao, and M. Li, Tunable phononic coupling in excitonic quantum emitters, Nature Nanotech- nology 18, 1020 (2023)

2023
[55]

Sbresny, C

F. Sbresny, C. Calcagno, S. K. Kim, K. Boos, W. Rauhaus, F. Bopp, H. Riedl, J. J. Finley, E. Z. Casalengua, and K. Müller, Selective ﬁltering of multi-photon events from a single-photon emitter, arXiv:2506.22378 [quant-ph]

arXiv
[56]

Sittig, C

R. Sittig, C. Nawrath, S. Kolatschek, S. Bauer, R. Schaber, J. Huang, P. Vijayan, P. Pruy, S. L. Portalupi, M. Jetter, and P. Michler, Thin-ﬁlm InGaAs metamorphic buﬀer for telecom C-band InAs quantum dots and optical resonators on GaAs platform, Nanophotonics 11, 1109 (2022)

2022
[57]

Asymmetric two-photon response of an incoherently driven quantum emitter1 Lennart Jehle, 1, 2, ∗ Lena M

Cornelius Nawrath, Raphael Joos, Sascha Kolatschek, Stephanie Bauer, Pascal Pruy, Florian Hornung, Julius Fischer, Jiasheng Huang, Ponraj Vijayan, Robert Sit- tig, Michael Jetter, Simone Luca Portalupi, and Peter Michler, Bright source of purcell-enhanced, triggered, sin- gle ...

2023
[58]

In ﬁrst approximation, the coupling eﬃciency of the exciton to the phonon bath can be estimated by evaluating J[Ω eﬀ (t)]

However, some intuition about the excitation probability can be gained from considering the phonon spectral density J(ω )6,7, which varies between materials and QD sizes but always features a single maximum. In ﬁrst approximation, the coupling eﬃciency of the exciton to the ph...

2024
[59]

S. Liu, C. Gustin, H. Liu, X. Li, Y. Yu, H. Ni, Z. Niu, S. Hughes, X. Wang, and J. Liu, Dynamic resonance ﬂuorescence in solid-state cavity quantum electrodynamics, Nature Photonics 18, 318 (2024)

2024
[60]

B. R. Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two-level systems, Physical Review Letters 188 (1969)

1969
[61]

The dressed atom approach, in Atom—Photon Interactions (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1998) Chap. 6, pp. 407–514

1998
[62]

Vagov, M

A. Vagov, M. D. Croitoru, M. Glässl, V. M. Axt, and T. Kuhn, Real-time path integrals for quantum dots: Quantum dissipative dynamics with superohmic environment coupling, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011)

2011
[63]

Gustin and S

C. Gustin and S. Hughes, Eﬃcient pulse–excitation techniques for single photon sources from quantum dots in optical cavities, Advanced Quantum Technologies 3, 1900073 (2019)

2019
[64]

A. M. Barth, S. Lüker, A. Vagov, D. E. Reiter, T. Kuhn, and V. M. Axt, Fast and selective phonon-assisted state preparation of a quantum dot by adiabatic undressing, Phys. Rev. B 94, 045306 (2016)

2016
[65]

Hanschke, T

L. Hanschke, T. K. Bracht, E. Schöll, D. Bauch, E. Berger, P. Kallert, M. Peter, A. J. G. Jr., S. F. C. da Silva, S. Manna, A. Rastelli, S. Schumacher, D. E. Reiter, and K. D. Jöns, Experimental measurement of the reappearance of rabi rotations in semiconductor quantum dots, a...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Le Jeannic, A

H. Le Jeannic, A. Tiranov, J. Carolan, T. Ramos, Y. Wang, M. H. Appel, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Lud- wig, N. Rotenberg, L. Midolo, J. J. García-Ripoll, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Dynamical photon–photon in- teraction mediated by a quantum emitter, Nature Physics 18, 1191 (2022)

work page 2022

[2] [2]

Unheralded: no gating, all events detected on the spectrally ﬁltered channel

3) GHz is used to measure the QD spectrum based on diﬀerent gating logics. Unheralded: no gating, all events detected on the spectrally ﬁltered channel. Two-photon: all events on the spectrally ﬁltered channel coinciding with a heralding photon within ∆ τc = 3 ns. 1st photon: the heralding event is used only if it is registered > 350 ps after the laser cl...

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Tiranov, V

A. Tiranov, V. Angelopoulou, C. J. van Diepen, B. Schrin- ski, O. A. D. Sandberg, Y. Wang, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Collective super- and subradiant dynamics between dis- tant optical quantum emitters, Science 379, 389 (2023)

work page 2023

[4] [4]

N. Tomm, S. Mahmoodian, N. O. Antoniadis, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. Javadi, and R. J. Warburton, Photon bound state dynamics from a single artiﬁcial atom, Nature Physics 19, 857 (2023)

work page 2023

[5] [5]

Zhang, X

Y. Zhang, X. Ding, Y. Li, L. Zhang, Y.-P. Guo, G.-Q. Wang, Z. Ning, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, J.-Y. Zhao, G.-Y. Zou, H. Wang, Y. Cao, Y.-M. He, C.-Z. Peng, Y.-H. Huo, S.-K. Liao, C.-Y. Lu, F. Xu, and J.-W. Pan, Experimental single-photon quantum key distribution surpassing the fundamental weak coherent-state rate limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 210801 (2025)

work page 2025

[6] [6]

L. M. Hansen, F. Giorgino, L. Jehle, L. Carosini, J. C. L. Carreño, I. Arrazola, P. Walther, and J. C. Loredo, Non-classical excitation of a solid-state quantum emit- ter, arXiv:2407.20936 [quant-ph]

arXiv

[7] [7]

Quantum teleportation with dissimilar quantum dots over a hybrid quantum network

A. Laneve, G. Ronco, M. Beccaceci, P. Barigelli, F. Salusti, N. Claro-Rodriguez, G. D. Pascalis, A. Suprano, L. Chiau- dano, E. Schöll, L. Hanschke, T. M. Krieger, Q. Buchinger, S. F. C. da Silva, J. Neuwirth, S. Stroj, S. Höﬂing, T. Huber-Loyola, M. A. U. Castaneda, G. Carvacho, N. Spagnolo, M. B. Rota, F. B. Basset, A. Rastelli, F. Scia- rrino, K. Jöns,...

work page Pith review arXiv

[8] [8]

Strobel, M

T. Strobel, M. Vyvlecka, I. Neureuther, T. Bauer, M. Schäfer, S. Kazmaier, N. L. Sharma, R. Joos, J. H. Weber, C. Nawrath, W. Nie, G. Bhayani, C. Hopfmann, C. Becher, P. Michler, and S. L. Portalupi, Quantum tele- portation with telecom photons from remote quantum emitters, arXiv:2411.12904 [quant-ph]

arXiv