REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 33 references
This paper claims a nearly charge-neutral ProTα–histone H1 condensate is a fast-exchange viscoelastic fluid: sub-nanosecond electrostatic contacts renormalize chain friction, while whole-chain relaxation takes tens to hundreds of nanosecond
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →
T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash
2026-08-03 02:48 UTC pith:R34EEGFE
load-bearing objection The fast-exchange claim holds up; the universal RDF suppression factor does not, and the high-pressure relaxation times are fitted from runs shorter than the slowest mode. the 3 major comments →
Structure, Diffusion, and Relaxation in a Charge-Neutral ProTalpha-Histone H1 Condensate
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The paper's central discovery is that the ProTα–histone H1 condensate behaves as a fast-exchange, dynamically heterogeneous viscoelastic fluid rather than a cross-linked gel. Across 2–12 bar, the radius of gyration, end-to-end distance, and their ratio stay essentially constant for both proteins, so compression changes packing without altering chain conformations. Translational diffusion falls from about 0.22 to 0.06 nm²/ns for ProTα and 0.12 to 0.05 nm²/ns for Histone, with a subdiffusive exponent near 0.8, and per-chain mobility is as broad as its mean. Chain relaxation is stretched-exponential with β≈0.45–0.70; ProTα follows Rouse scaling while Histone's low Rouse modes are anomalously sl
What carries the argument
The load-bearing identity is the timescale ratio τ_bind/τ_R ≈ 0.01–0.04, where τ_bind is the mean lifetime of inter-chain contacts measured from contact survival probabilities and τ_R is the stretched-exponential relaxation time of the end-to-end vector. The supporting machinery is a single-bead-per-residue coarse-grained model that pairs a hydropathy-based potential for disordered regions with a structure-based native-contact potential for Histone's globular domain, run under NPT conditions with pressure as a thermodynamic handle to vary packing fraction from about 0.06 to 0.14. The ratio does the argument: because contacts rearrange orders of magnitude faster than chains, the model's compl
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that a single 100 ns production run per pressure adequately samples the slowest chain relaxation, even though the slowest fitted relaxation time at 12 bar is 135 ns, meaning the chain's end-to-end correlation has not fully decayed within the simulation window.
What would settle it
Extend the 12 bar simulation to at least ten times the fitted τ_R of 135 ns and recompute both the end-to-end autocorrelation and the contact survival probability; if the converged τ_R is no longer much larger than τ_bind, or if single-molecule FRET shows P–H contacts outlasting chain reconfiguration, the fast-exchange classification fails.
If this is right
- Compression across 2–12 bar changes condensate density without changing chain dimensions, so the condensate's structure is set by sequence and charge architecture rather than by packing fraction in this range.
- Chain mobility and relaxation can be tuned by pressure or crowding while preserving the transport mechanism, since the subdiffusive exponent stays near 0.8 even as diffusion drops about fourfold.
- The Rouse-mode spectrum provides a dynamical fingerprint distinguishing a fully disordered chain from a globular-domain-plus-tail chain, which labeled single-molecule experiments could in principle detect.
- Fast exchange means macroscopic viscoelasticity is governed by collective chain relaxation rather than by bond breaking, so the condensate should flow like a Maxwell fluid at long times.
- Rescaling simulated times by the hydrodynamic-friction factor maps τ_R to 12–40 µs and τ_bind to 400–700 ns, putting the fast-exchange prediction inside the window of single-molecule FRET correlation experiments.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- One consequence left implicit is that the contact excess ratios n_obs/n_rand encode the charge pattern directly, so the same protocol could predict fast-exchange behavior in other charge-complementary IDP pairs by measuring only the contact-lifetime ratio.
- The near-collapse of scaled per-chain diffusion distributions suggests dynamical heterogeneity is set by local density fluctuations; a testable extension would compare per-chain mobility to local Voronoi volume within the condensate.
- If fast exchange survives at physiological ionic strength, the condensate's shear rheology should be controlled by the distribution of Rouse times rather than by a sticky-bond network, so oscillatory shear simulations could look for a single broad relaxation peak instead of a plateau.
- The high-pressure numbers rest on 100 ns production runs while the slowest fitted relaxation time reaches 135 ns, so the pressure trends in relaxation should be revisited with longer production runs before quantitative weight is placed on them.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of a nearly charge-neutral condensate of 50 ProTα and 40 Histone H1 chains, using an HPS-type hydropathy model for disordered regions and a Go-model representation of the Histone globular domain. Under NPT equilibration followed by 100 ns NVT production runs at pressures from 2 to 12 bar, the authors report pressure-insensitive chain dimensions (Rg, end-to-end distance, and their ratio), pressure-dependent translational diffusion, stretched-exponential chain relaxation, Rouse-mode spectra, and sub-nanosecond ProTα–Histone contact lifetimes. The central claim is Eq. (14): τ_bind/τ_R ≈ 0.01–0.04, placing the condensate in a fast-exchange regime in which transient electrostatic contacts renormalize chain friction rather than act as long-lived cross-links.
Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a useful, sequence-aware model of a biologically important IDP condensate and a clear physical criterion — separation of contact lifetimes from chain relaxation times — for classifying condensate viscoelasticity. The main strength is that the fast-exchange ratio compares two independent dynamical observables and does not rely on fitting the central conclusion. The paper also states explicit model limitations, including the absence of counterions and the need for a hydrodynamic rescaling, and it offers falsifiable predictions for smFRET and neutron spin-echo experiments. However, several supporting quantitative claims — the high-pressure relaxation times, the 'universal' RDF peak suppression factor, and the operational definition of contact lifetime — need substantial revision before the results can be taken at face value.
major comments (3)
- [§III A, Table III, Eq. (14)] Production runs are 100 ns per pressure, yet Table III reports relaxation times exceeding the trajectory length: at 12 bar, τ_H_R = 135.5 ns and τ_H_{p=1} = 229.7 ns. Using the reported KWW parameters for Histone at 12 bar, C(100 ns) = exp[-(100/135.5)^0.451] ≈ 0.87, so the end-to-end correlation is barely decayed; the p = 1 Rouse mode is even less constrained. The quoted uncertainties are fit covariances and per-chain standard deviations, which do not capture finite-trajectory sampling or block-to-block variability. Consequently, the specific Table III entries at 8–12 bar, the 'order-of-magnitude increase' of τ_R with pressure in §III I, and the precise numerical range in Eq. (14) are not supported by the produced data. The fast-exchange classification itself is robust — τ_bind ≈ 0.4–0.7 ns is two orders of magnitude below even a generous upward revision of τ_R — but the quantitative pr
- [§III E 1–2, Eq. (10), Tables I and II] The text claims that all five bead-level RDF peaks are suppressed by the same universal factor V(2 bar)/V(12 bar) ≈ 2.26 between 2 and 12 bar, and that this 'universal suppression factor' excludes any selective structural disruption. The paper's own Tables I and II contradict this. For the P–P peaks, g_peak(2)/g_peak(12) = 2.26, 1.69, 1.89, 1.57, 1.28 for the five listed peaks; for H–H the corresponding ratios are 2.26, 2.25, 1.96, 2.00, 1.81. Only the first peak approximates 2.26. Unless an implicit background subtraction is intended but not described, Eq. (10) and the inference drawn from it are not supported by the data. The Rg results still support broad pressure insensitivity, but the 'identical universal factor' claim must be corrected or restricted to the first-shell peak.
- [§III J, Table IV, Eq. (14)] The central fast-exchange conclusion depends entirely on the contact-lifetime definition: contacts are defined by a single center-of-mass cutoff r_c = 2.0 nm, and τ_bind is extracted from exponential fits to the survival probability. With a CM cutoff, τ_bind may reflect the residence time of chain centers within a fluctuating cage rather than the lifetime of a specific electrostatic residue–residue contact. The manuscript should report the sensitivity of τ_bind to the choice of r_c and provide an independent measure, e.g., residue–residue contact lifetimes, or at least demonstrate that the ratio in Eq. (14) is stable under these choices. Without this, the interpretation 'contacts act primarily to renormalize chain friction rather than forming long-lived cross-links' is not uniquely supported.
minor comments (7)
- [§IV (Summary and Conclusions)] The sentence in Section IV stating that Debye screening 'shorten[s] τ_bind further, increasing the ratio τ_bind/τ_R' is internally inconsistent: a shorter τ_bind would decrease the ratio. If the intended meaning is that screening increases the separation of timescales, the wording should be corrected.
- [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) contains a typo in the cutoff condition: 'r_j ≤ 2^{1/6} σ_ij' should presumably read 'r_ij ≤ 2^{1/6} σ_ij'.
- [§III H, Eq. (11)] The effective diffusion coefficient is obtained from MSD(t) = 6Dt^α in a finite window (1–20 ns) with α ≈ 0.8. Since D is not a true Fickian diffusion coefficient, the value and pressure trend may depend on the chosen window. The authors should state this explicitly and report a window-sensitivity check.
- [Table III] Uncertainties are reported for τ_R and β but not for the Rouse-mode times τ_{p=1}. Since the Rouse-mode analysis underpins the ProTα vs. Histone architecture claim, error estimates should be given for these entries as well.
- [General notation] Notation is inconsistent in places: R_N and R_e are both used for the end-to-end distance; D, D_i, and ⟨D⟩ are used without consistent definition; and τ_R is used both for the KWW relaxation time and (in some sentences) for the Rouse time. Please harmonize.
- [§III E 3] In the discussion of the P–H bead-level RDF, the text refers to 'the enlarged insets of Fig. 4,' but the bead-level P–H RDF is shown in Fig. 3(c). Please correct the cross-reference.
- [Data availability] The Data Availability statement says data are available 'upon reasonable request.' For reproducibility, input topologies, simulation scripts, and analysis scripts should be deposited in a public repository.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; the central quantities are independently measured and Eq. (14) compares two separately determined timescales.
full rationale
The paper's load-bearing results come from direct simulation measurements: chain dimensions, diffusion coefficients from MSD fits, end-to-end relaxation times and stretch exponents from KWW fits, and contact lifetimes from survival-probability fits. These are independent observables, not quantities set to match the paper's conclusions. Eq. (14), the central fast-exchange claim, is simply the ratio of a measured contact lifetime to a measured relaxation time; neither quantity is defined in terms of the other. Eq. (10), which accounts for the pressure suppression of bead-level RDF peaks by the volume compression ratio, is a consistency check: the observed peak-height ratios are compared with independently measured box volumes, and the interpretation that short-range like-species RDFs are dominated by intra-chain pairs is supported by pressure-independent Rg and by the P–P CM-RDF depletion, not assumed in the equation. The Rouse-mode analysis compares simulated mode spectra against the textbook Rouse prediction and does not define the data in terms of the conclusion. The only self-citation, Ref. [18], is used to quantify a known limitation of implicit-solvent coarse-grained models; it is not load-bearing for the central derivation. The paper also explicitly flags its own limitations (absence of counterions, lack of hydrodynamic friction, short production runs at high pressure); these are important caveats about accuracy and sampling, not circularity. The under-decorrelation of high-pressure trajectories is a statistical concern that could affect the numerical values of tau_R but does not reduce any claimed derivation to its inputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (4)
- Go-model parameters for Histone H1 globular domain =
not specified
- Contact-lifetime cutoff r_c =
2.0 nm
- Hydrodynamic timescale rescaling factor =
≈10^3
- MSD fit window and effective diffusivity =
α≈0.78–0.82, window 1–20 ns
axioms (5)
- domain assumption HPS/Ashbaugh–Hatch hydropathy model with the Dignon scale describes IDP structure and phase behavior without recalibration
- ad hoc to paper Counter-ion-free, unscreened electrostatics are adequate for the condensate because near-neutrality provides internal screening
- domain assumption The Rouse model is the appropriate null model for ProTα dynamics
- domain assumption A 90-chain, 6–14% volume-fraction box of 17–23 nm represents a protein condensate
- domain assumption The bulk-water temperature-dependent dielectric constant (Eq. 7) applies inside the condensate at all pressures
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Structure, Diffusion, and Relaxation in a Charge-Neutral ProTalpha-Histone H1 Condensate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R34EEGFE
@misc{pith2026260729639,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Structure, Diffusion, and Relaxation in a Charge-Neutral ProTalpha-Histone H1 Condensate},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R34EEGFE}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29639}
}
read the original abstract
Condensates formed by oppositely charged intrinsically disordered proteins provide model systems for understanding how transient electrostatic interactions govern structure and dynamics in biomolecular assemblies. Here we investigate a nearly charge-neutral condensate composed of 50 Prothymosin alpha (ProTalpha) and 40 Histone H1 molecules using a single-bead-per-residue coarse-grained model combining the HPS hydropathy model for disordered regions with a Go model for the globular domain of Histone H1 under NPT conditions at pressures from 2 to 12 bar. We find that chain dimensions, including the radius of gyration (Rg), end-to-end distance (Ree), and their ratio R, are insensitive to pressure, indicating that chain conformations remain largely unchanged over the pressure range studied. Histone H1 exhibits systematically larger values of R than ProTalpha because of its globular-core plus disordered-tail architecture. Translational diffusion coefficients decrease monotonically with pressure, from approximately 0.22 to 0.06 nm^2/ns, with substantial chain-to-chain heterogeneity comparable to the mean diffusion coefficient. Chain relaxation follows a stretched exponential with beta less than 1 that decreases with pressure. ProTalpha relaxation times of approximately 12 to 40 ns obey Rouse scaling, whereas Histone H1 deviates because of the internal constraint imposed by its globular domain. ProTalpha-Histone H1 contact lifetimes of approximately 0.43 to 0.56 ns are much shorter than the Rouse relaxation time, placing the system firmly in the fast-exchange regime where transient electrostatic contacts renormalize chain friction rather than acting as permanent cross-links, consistent with the moderate stretching exponent beta of approximately 0.55 to 0.70 observed across all pressures.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
3(a)) exhibits a series of sharp peaks atr= 0.70, 0.90, 1.04, 1.36, and 1.70 nm, whose positions are strictly invariant with pressure across the full range studied
P–P bead-level RDF The bead-levelg P P(r) (Fig. 3(a)) exhibits a series of sharp peaks atr= 0.70, 0.90, 1.04, 1.36, and 1.70 nm, whose positions are strictly invariant with pressure across the full range studied. ProTαis an intrinsically disor- dered protein (IDP) carrying no G¯ o-type native-contact potential in the CG model; its chain is governed by bon...
-
[2]
3(b)) displays peaks at r= 0.54, 0.70, 0.88, 1.02, and 1.36 nm, again with strictly invariant positions
H–H bead-level RDF The bead-levelg HH (r) (Fig. 3(b)) displays peaks at r= 0.54, 0.70, 0.88, 1.02, and 1.36 nm, again with strictly invariant positions. Two distinct contributions are present. The first is the same bonded-geometry ori- gin as in ProTα: backbone bead separations imposed by the CG bond and angle terms. The second, specific to Histone, is th...
-
[3]
3(c)) occupies a quali- tatively distinct category fromg P P(r) andg HH (r) be- cause, by construction, all P–H bead pairs are inter- chain
P–H bead-level RDF The P–H bead-level RDF (Fig. 3(c)) occupies a quali- tatively distinct category fromg P P(r) andg HH (r) be- cause, by construction, all P–H bead pairs are inter- chain. There are no intra-chain P–H pairs, no bonded- geometry peaks, and no G=o-model native-contact peaks to dominate the signal. Consequently,g P H(r) directly probes inter...
-
[4]
P–P CM-RDF:g CM P P(r) The CM-RDFg CM P P(r) for ProTαshows depletion at short distancesr <1 nm due to electrostatic repulsion among ProTαchains, and saturates to unity atr≈6 nm (Fig. 4(a)). This phenomenon is relatively straightfor- ward to understand. The highly negatively charged and fully disordered ProTαchains at low pressure have suf- ficient free v...
-
[5]
H–H CM-RDF:g CM HH (r) gCM HH (r) also shows depletion at short distances, how- ever exhibits a clear peak atr≈1.8 nm, indicating net attractive inter-chain correlations and clustering of His- tone chains (Fig. 4(b)). Unlike ProTα, where the only dominant mechanism is electrostatic interaction among the P-P chains, the H-H clustering is driven by the elec...
-
[6]
P–H CM-RDF:g CM P H(r) In sharp contrast to P–P and H–H RDFs which are depleted,g CM P H(r) overshoots the saturation value unity for short distances. Figure 4 (c) shows high density of P–H pairs at distancesr≈0 reflecting genuine interpen- etration of P and H chains driven by unscreened electro- static attraction between opposite charges. The calcu- lati...
-
[7]
Why are ”natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions?Proteins:Struct., Funct., Bioinf., 41(3):415–427, 2000
Vladimir N Uversky, Joel R Gillespie, and Anthony L Fink. Why are ”natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions?Proteins:Struct., Funct., Bioinf., 41(3):415–427, 2000
2000
-
[8]
Intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions.Annu
Christopher J Oldfield and A Keith Dunker. Intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions.Annu. Rev. Biochem., 83(1):553–584, 2014
2014
-
[9]
Rules of physical mathematics govern intrinsically disordered proteins.Annu
Kingshuk Ghosh, Jonathan Huihui, Michael Phillips, and Austin Haider. Rules of physical mathematics govern intrinsically disordered proteins.Annu. Rev. Biophys., 51(1):355–376, 2022
2022
-
[10]
https://mobidb.org/
MobiDB: A database of intrinsically disordered proteins. https://mobidb.org/. Accessed: 2025-06-08
2025
-
[11]
Hamilton, Tanguy LeGall, Vladimir Vacic, Marc S
Megan Sickmeier, Justin A. Hamilton, Tanguy LeGall, Vladimir Vacic, Marc S. Cortese, Agnes Tantos, Beata Szabo, Peter Tompa, Jake Chen, Vladimir N. Uversky, Zoran Obradovic, and A. Keith Dunker. DisProt: the database of disordered proteins.Nucleic Acids Res., 35(suppl 1):D786–D793, 12 2006
2006
-
[12]
Extreme disorder in an ultrahigh-affinity protein complex.Nature, 555(7694):61– 66, 2018
Alessandro Borgia, Madeleine B Borgia, Katrine Bugge, Vera M Kissling, P´ etur O Heidarsson, Catarina B Fernandes, Andrea Sottini, Andrea Soranno, Karin J Buholzer, Daniel Nettels, et al. Extreme disorder in an ultrahigh-affinity protein complex.Nature, 555(7694):61– 66, 2018
2018
-
[13]
Driving forces of the com- plex formation between highly charged disordered pro- teins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(41):e2304036120, 2023
Aritra Chowdhury, Alessandro Borgia, Souradeep Ghosh, Andrea Sottini, Soumik Mitra, Rohan S Eapen, Madeleine B Borgia, Tianjin Yang, Nicola Galvanetto, Miloˇ s T Ivanovi´ c, et al. Driving forces of the com- plex formation between highly charged disordered pro- teins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(41):e2304036120, 2023
2023
-
[14]
Behaviour of intrinsically disordered proteins in protein– protein complexes with an emphasis on fuzziness.Cellu- lar and Molecular Life Sciences, 74(17):3175–3183, 2017
Johan G Olsen, Kaare Teilum, and Birthe B Kragelund. Behaviour of intrinsically disordered proteins in protein– protein complexes with an emphasis on fuzziness.Cellu- lar and Molecular Life Sciences, 74(17):3175–3183, 2017
2017
-
[15]
Charge interactions can dominate the dimensions of intrinsically disordered pro- teins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(33):14609–14614, 2010
Sonja M¨ uller-Sp¨ ath, Andrea Soranno, Verena Hirschfeld, Hagen Hofmann, Stefan R¨ uegger, Luc Reymond, Daniel Nettels, and Benjamin Schuler. Charge interactions can dominate the dimensions of intrinsically disordered pro- teins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(33):14609–14614, 2010
2010
-
[16]
Sequence determi- nants of protein phase behavior from a coarse-grained model.PLoS Comput
Gregory L Dignon, Wenwei Zheng, Young C Kim, Robert B Best, and Jeetain Mittal. Sequence determi- nants of protein phase behavior from a coarse-grained model.PLoS Comput. Biol., 14(1):e1005941, 2018
2018
-
[17]
Accurate model of liquid–liquid phase behavior of intrinsically disordered proteins from optimization of single-chain properties.Proc
Giulio Tesei, Thea K Schulze, Ramon Crehuet, and Kresten Lindorff-Larsen. Accurate model of liquid–liquid phase behavior of intrinsically disordered proteins from optimization of single-chain properties.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 118(44):e2111696118, 2021
2021
-
[18]
Theoretical studies of protein folding.An- nual review of biophysics and bioengineering, 12(1):183– 210, 1983
Nobuhiro Go. Theoretical studies of protein folding.An- nual review of biophysics and bioengineering, 12(1):183– 210, 1983
1983
-
[19]
Muthukumar
M. Muthukumar. Theory of counter-ion condensation on flexible polyelectrolytes: Adsorption mechanism.J. Chem. Phys., 120:9343–9350, 2004
2004
-
[20]
Muthukumar
M. Muthukumar. 50th anniversary perspective: A per- spective on polyelectrolyte solutions.Macromolecules, 50:9528–9560, 2017
2017
-
[21]
Natively unfolded protein stability as a coil-to-globule transi- tion in charge/hydropathy space.J
Henry S Ashbaugh and Harold W Hatch. Natively unfolded protein stability as a coil-to-globule transi- tion in charge/hydropathy space.J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130(29):9536–9542, 2008. 15
2008
-
[22]
Academic press, 2011
Jacob N Israelachvili.Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic press, 2011
2011
-
[23]
The dielectric constant of water at high temperatures and in equilibrium with its vapor.Journal of the American Chemical Society, 72(7):2844–2847, 1950
GC Akerlof and HI Oshry. The dielectric constant of water at high temperatures and in equilibrium with its vapor.Journal of the American Chemical Society, 72(7):2844–2847, 1950
1950
-
[24]
Fine structures of intrinsically disordered pro- teins.J
Swarnadeep Seth, Brandon Stine, and Aniket Bhat- tacharya. Fine structures of intrinsically disordered pro- teins.J. Chem. Phys., 160(1), 2024
2024
-
[25]
Vmd: visual molecular dynamics.Journal of molecular graphics, 14(1):33–38, 1996
William Humphrey, Andrew Dalke, and Klaus Schulten. Vmd: visual molecular dynamics.Journal of molecular graphics, 14(1):33–38, 1996
1996
-
[26]
Oxford university press, 2003
Michael Rubinstein and Ralph H Colby.Polymer physics. Oxford university press, 2003
2003
-
[27]
Diffusion of intrinsically disordered proteins within protein condensates.Physical Review Research, 7(4):043117, 2025
Fuga Watanabe, Takuma Akimoto, Robert B Best, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Ralf Metzler, and Eiji Ya- mamoto. Diffusion of intrinsically disordered proteins within protein condensates.Physical Review Research, 7(4):043117, 2025
2025
-
[28]
Ralf Metzler, Jae-Hyung Jeon, Andrey G Cherstvy, and Eli Barkai. Anomalous diffusion models and their prop- erties: non-stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 16(44):24128–24164, 2014
2014
-
[29]
Protein condensates as aging maxwell fluids.Science, 370:1317–1323, 2020
Louise Jawerth et al. Protein condensates as aging maxwell fluids.Science, 370:1317–1323, 2020
2020
-
[30]
Heterogeneous slowdown of dynamics in the condensate of an intrinsically disordered protein.J
Anton Abyzov, Martin Blackledge, and Markus Zweck- stetter. Heterogeneous slowdown of dynamics in the condensate of an intrinsically disordered protein.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 15:9027–9035, 2024. ReportsD= 0.26×10 −3 nm2/ns for FUS-LCD in condensate
2024
-
[31]
Burke, Abigail M
Kathleen A. Burke, Abigail M. Janke, Christy L. Rhine, and Nicolas L. Fawzi. Residue-by-residue view of In Vitro FUS granules that bind the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.Mol. Cell, 60(2):231–241, 2015. NMR dif- fusometry: D = 0.17±0.02 um 2/s in FUS LC condensate
2015
-
[32]
Single-molecule FRET spectroscopy and the polymer physics of unfolded and intrinsically dis- ordered proteins.Annu
Benjamin Schuler, Andrea Soranno, Hagen Hofmann, and Daniel Nettels. Single-molecule FRET spectroscopy and the polymer physics of unfolded and intrinsically dis- ordered proteins.Annu. Rev. Biophys., 45:207–231, 2016
2016
-
[33]
Limiting laws and counterion con- densation in polyelectrolyte solutions i
Gerald S Manning. Limiting laws and counterion con- densation in polyelectrolyte solutions i. colligative prop- erties.The journal of chemical Physics, 51(3):924–933, 1969
1969
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.