Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Knowledge Augmented Complex Problem Solving with Large Language Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.03418 v1 pith:R4GCNQOT submitted 2025-05-06 cs.LG

Knowledge Augmented Complex Problem Solving with Large Language Models: A Survey

classification cs.LG
keywords reasoningcomplexknowledgellmscomputationaldomainsproblem-solvingverification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Problem-solving has been a fundamental driver of human progress in numerous domains. With advancements in artificial intelligence, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools capable of tackling complex problems across diverse domains. Unlike traditional computational systems, LLMs combine raw computational power with an approximation of human reasoning, allowing them to generate solutions, make inferences, and even leverage external computational tools. However, applying LLMs to real-world problem-solving presents significant challenges, including multi-step reasoning, domain knowledge integration, and result verification. This survey explores the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in complex problem-solving, examining techniques including Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, knowledge augmentation, and various LLM-based and tool-based verification techniques. Additionally, we highlight domain-specific challenges in various domains, such as software engineering, mathematical reasoning and proving, data analysis and modeling, and scientific research. The paper further discusses the fundamental limitations of the current LLM solutions and the future directions of LLM-based complex problems solving from the perspective of multi-step reasoning, domain knowledge integration and result verification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. See Further, Think Deeper: Advancing VLM's Reasoning Ability with Low-level Visual Cues and Reflection

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ForeSight lets VLMs use low-level visual cues and mask-based visual feedback within an RL loop to reason more accurately, with the 7B model beating same-scale peers and some closed-source SOTA on a new benchmark.

  2. AInstein: Can LLMs Solve Research Problems From Parametric Memory Alone?

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs generate valid solutions to over 70% of AI research problems from parametric memory alone but rediscover the exact published approach less than 19% of the time, with performance limited by cross-domain analogical...