Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tabular Data Synthesis with Differential Privacy: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03351 v1 pith:R4VCIUSF submitted 2024-11-04 cs.CR cs.AIcs.DB

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.DB
keywords dataprivacymethodssynthesistabulardatasetsdifferentialgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data sharing is a prerequisite for collaborative innovation, enabling organizations to leverage diverse datasets for deeper insights. In real-world applications like FinTech and Smart Manufacturing, transactional data, often in tabular form, are generated and analyzed for insight generation. However, such datasets typically contain sensitive personal/business information, raising privacy concerns and regulatory risks. Data synthesis tackles this by generating artificial datasets that preserve the statistical characteristics of real data, removing direct links to individuals. However, attackers can still infer sensitive information using background knowledge. Differential privacy offers a solution by providing provable and quantifiable privacy protection. Consequently, differentially private data synthesis has emerged as a promising approach to privacy-aware data sharing. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of existing differentially private tabular data synthesis methods, highlighting the unique challenges of each generation model for generating tabular data under differential privacy constraints. We classify the methods into statistical and deep learning-based approaches based on their generation models, discussing them in both centralized and distributed environments. We evaluate and compare those methods within each category, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in terms of utility, privacy, and computational complexity. Additionally, we present and discuss various evaluation methods for assessing the quality of the synthesized data, identify research gaps in the field and directions for future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is API Access to LLMs Useful for Generating Private Synthetic Tabular Data?

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    API access to Gemini 1.0 Pro does not improve differentially private synthetic tabular data beyond established non-LLM baselines on the tested datasets and workloads.

Pith tools