REVIEW 3 cited by
Learning in High Dimension Always Amounts to Extrapolation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The notion of interpolation and extrapolation is fundamental in various fields from deep learning to function approximation. Interpolation occurs for a sample $x$ whenever this sample falls inside or on the boundary of the given dataset's convex hull. Extrapolation occurs when $x$ falls outside of that convex hull. One fundamental (mis)conception is that state-of-the-art algorithms work so well because of their ability to correctly interpolate training data. A second (mis)conception is that interpolation happens throughout tasks and datasets, in fact, many intuitions and theories rely on that assumption. We empirically and theoretically argue against those two points and demonstrate that on any high-dimensional ($>$100) dataset, interpolation almost surely never happens. Those results challenge the validity of our current interpolation/extrapolation definition as an indicator of generalization performances.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
After the Euclidean Highway: Hyperbolic Expert AI as the Next Innovation
Hyperbolic losses at the loss layer alone train stably at 18M-sample scale, while the same geometry inside a trainable adapter is claimed to collapse training.
-
GROOT: Effective Design of Biological Sequences with Limited Experimental Data
GROOT augments scarce labeled protein data with pseudo-labeled latent-space neighbors smoothed by label propagation, and reports state-of-the-art fitness on GFP and AAV optimization benchmarks.
-
How Large Language Models (LLMs) Extrapolate: From Guided Missiles to Guided Prompts
LLM hallucination is reframed as excess extrapolation, with a historical genealogy from Wiener and Kolmogorov's time-series prediction to modern chatbots.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.