Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Distilling foundation models for robust and efficient models in digital pathology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.16239 v3 pith:R7QNICGM submitted 2025-01-27 cs.CV

Distilling foundation models for robust and efficient models in digital pathology

classification cs.CV
keywords modelsmodeldigitalfoundationlargepathologyperformancebenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, the advent of foundation models (FM) for digital pathology has relied heavily on scaling the pre-training datasets and the model size, yielding large and powerful models. While it resulted in improving the performance on diverse downstream tasks, it also introduced increased computational cost and inference time. In this work, we explore the distillation of a large foundation model into a smaller one, reducing the number of parameters by several orders of magnitude. Leveraging distillation techniques, our distilled model, H0-mini, achieves nearly comparable performance to large FMs at a significantly reduced inference cost. It is evaluated on several public benchmarks, achieving 3rd place on the HEST benchmark and 5th place on the EVA benchmark. Additionally, a robustness analysis conducted on the PLISM dataset demonstrates that our distilled model reaches excellent robustness to variations in staining and scanning conditions, significantly outperforming other state-of-the art models. This opens new perspectives to design lightweight and robust models for digital pathology, without compromising on performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Do Foundation Models See Biology? Evaluating Attention Coherence with Spatial Transcriptomics in Glioblastoma

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new evaluation framework aligns attention maps from five pathology foundation models with co-registered Visium spatial transcriptomics in glioblastoma, revealing five-fold stronger coherence with multi-gene pathways...

  2. MOOZY: A Patient-First Foundation Model for Computational Pathology

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Patient-level pretraining with a case transformer and multi-task public supervision yields transferable WSI embeddings that beat larger slide-centric models on held-out pathology tasks.