Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.09911 v2 pith:RABTI6K6 submitted 2024-04-15 cs.CL

ChatShop: Interactive Information Seeking with Language Agents

classification cs.CL
keywords informationtasklanguageabilityagentagentsseekinghuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The desire and ability to seek new information strategically are fundamental to human learning but often overlooked in current language agent evaluation. We analyze a popular web shopping task designed to test language agents' ability to perform strategic exploration and discover that it can be reformulated and solved as a single-turn retrieval task without the need for interactive information seeking. This finding encourages us to rethink realistic constraints on information access that would necessitate strategic information seeking. We then redesign the task to introduce a notion of task ambiguity and the role of a shopper, serving as a dynamic party with whom the agent strategically interacts in an open-ended conversation to make informed decisions. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed task can effectively evaluate the agent's ability to explore and gradually accumulate information through multi-turn interactions. Additionally, we show that large language model-simulated shoppers serve as a good proxy for real human shoppers, revealing similar error patterns in agents.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $\tau$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains

    cs.AI 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    τ-bench shows state-of-the-art agents like GPT-4o succeed on under 50% of tool-using, rule-following tasks and are inconsistent across repeated trials.

  2. WebRetriever: A Large-Scale Comprehensive Benchmark for Efficient Web Agent Evaluation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    WebRetriever is a benchmark of 800 websites and 1,550 tasks with an automated evaluator (NavEval) achieving ~91–97% human agreement, showing current web agents succeed on only 11–37% of realistic tasks across three ev...

  3. SimGym: A Framework for A/B Test Simulation in E-Commerce with Traffic-Grounded VLM Agents

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SimGym is a browser-based VLM agent framework that simulates A/B test outcomes on e-commerce storefronts with 77% directional agreement on add-to-cart shifts from real buyer traffic.

  4. A Functionality-Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating Web Agents in E-commerce Domains

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper proposes Amazon-Bench, a functionality-grounded benchmark for web agents in e-commerce that generates diverse task queries from webpage elements and evaluates both task performance and safety risks.