Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 minor 167 references

DGLAP and BFKL equations in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM: from weak to strong coupling

T0 review · 0 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One universal anomalous dimension ties DGLAP and BFKL in N=4 SYM across all couplings.

desk verdict A solid, honest review of the DGLAP/BFKL story in N=4 SYM with no new results; useful as an orientation, but it carries the Kotikov–Lipatov perspective and some typo-level blemishes. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05113 v1 pith:RB3LWZBY submitted 2019-08-14 hep-th hep-ph

A.V. Kotikov , A.I. Onishchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords DGLAPevolutionBFKLPomeronN=4supersymmetricYang-Millsmaximaltranscendentalityuniversalanomalousdimensioninterceptquantumspectralcurveintegrability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reviews the claim that in planar $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory the two classic evolution equations of QCD—DGLAP, which governs the scale dependence of parton densities, and BFKL, which governs high-energy growth—are two sides of one integrable system. Its central claim is that the universal anomalous dimension $\gamma_{\rm uni}(j)$ and the BFKL Pomeron intercept $\omega_0(n)$ are known from weak to strong coupling: the anomalous dimension is given by the harmonic-sum expressions in Eqs. (3.52)–(3.55), and the intercept by Eqs. (2.13)–(2.14) at weak coupling and Eqs. (2.33)–(2.35) at strong coupling. A sympathetic reader should care because these results unify two calculational traditions—QCD-style splitting functions and Regge theory—through the maximal transcendentality principle (the $\mathcal{N}=4$ answer is the highest-transcendentality part of the QCD answer) and the quantum spectral curve, and they are confirmed by independent integrability-based computations up to seven loops. The review's own contribution is the synthesis: the same numbers emerge from three routes—extraction from QCD, Bethe-ansatz plus wrapping corrections, and the quantum spectral curve—so the coherent weak-to-strong-coupling picture is not a single method's accident.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the universal anomalous dimension $\gamma_{\rm uni}(j)$, built from nested harmonic sums $S_{a,\ldots}(j)$ at each loop order (Eqs. (3.52)–(3.55)), and the BFKL kernel eigenvalue $\omega(n,\gamma)$, whose value at $\gamma=1/2$ gives the Pomeron intercept. They are connected by the relation between BFKL and DGLAP singularities (analytic continuation in the spin $j$), by the hermitian separability of the BFKL kernel, and by the maximal transcendentality principle, which states that $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM answers coincide with the highest-transcendentality parts of the corresponding QCD expressions after a finite coupling renormalization. The tool that makes strong coupling and all-loop statements possible is the quantum spectral curve, a finite system of functional equations (the $P\mu$-system) with Riemann-Hilbert monodromy conditions, which reproduces the same spectrum at weak and strong coupling. Together these carry the argument: maximal transcendentality extracts the first three orders from QCD, Bethe-ansatz and wrapping corrections give the next orders, and the quantum spectral curve supplies both the highest weak-coupling orders and the strong-coupling expansions.

What would settle it

A direct four-loop computation of the universal anomalous dimension in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM by ordinary Feynman-diagram or supergraph methods, without assuming maximal transcendentality, compared with the highest-transcendentality part of the four-loop QCD splitting functions; any discrepancy beyond a finite coupling renormalization would falsify the principle. Independently, the strong-coupling intercept series (2.34)–(2.35) could be tested by evaluating the quantum spectral curve numerically at intermediate 't Hooft coupling and checking whether the expansion extrapolates to those numbers.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central assertion is that the DGLAP and BFKL equations in planar $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM form a single, coupling-independent spectral problem. The universal anomalous dimension of twist-2 operators, written as nested harmonic sums in Eqs. (3.52)–(3.55), and the Pomeron intercept, expressed through binomial harmonic sums at weak coupling and through inverse powers of the 't Hooft coupling at strong coupling, are related by analytic continuation in the spin variable $j$, as established in Ref. [14]. The same functional object is claimed to interpolate smoothly between the three-loop results obtained from QCD by maximal transcendentality, the four- and five-loop results obtained from the asymptotic Bethe ansatz with wrapping corrections, and the six- and seven-loop results obtained from the quantum spectral curve. If this picture is right, every known weak-coupling and strong-coupling result for these quantities is a piece of one exact spectrum, and no separate non-perturbative input beyond integrability is needed.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the maximal transcendentality principle: at each loop order the $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM universal anomalous dimension is exactly the highest-transcendentality part of the QCD result, up to a finite redefinition of the coupling constant, and the paper itself labels this a conjecture; if it fails at four loops or beyond, the QCD-based derivation of Eqs. (3.52)–(3.55) loses its justification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The universal anomalous dimension is fixed to seven loops and can be reconstructed to arbitrary order by combining the quantum spectral curve with the harmonic-sum basis, giving the Pomeron-pole structure at $j=1$ (the $1/\omega^4$ behavior that wrapping corrections are needed to produce).
  • The Pomeron intercept is known as a function of conformal spin $n$ at LO, NLO, and NNLO at weak coupling and to several orders at strong coupling, so the full Regge trajectory of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM is available for comparison with string theory.
  • The strong-coupling intercept and anomalous dimensions match the AdS/CFT graviton Regge trajectory and string energy formulas, meaning the gauge-theory and string-theory sides of the correspondence agree on these quantities.
  • The large-$j$ limit gives a scaling function $a(z)$ whose weak-coupling series and strong-coupling asymptotics are both reproduced, and a simple two-term resummation formula tracks the known coefficients to about ten percent at every coupling.
  • Maximal transcendentality, originally conjectured for these evolution equations, is confirmed by all integrability-based computations up to seven loops, strengthening its use as a shortcut for other $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM quantities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the maximal transcendentality conjecture holds to all orders, every future high-loop QCD splitting-function result becomes, by one finite renormalization, a $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM prediction, making the QCD four-loop anomalous dimensions a direct source of new supersymmetric data.
  • The same identity connecting DGLAP and BFKL could be probed at intermediate coupling, where neither weak- nor strong-coupling expansions converge; the quantum spectral curve is numerically solvable there, so the smooth interpolation asserted by the review is a testable numerical statement.
  • The relation $\nu^2=-(E^2/4+1)$ between Möbius conformal weights and string energies suggests the whole BFKL spectrum, not just the intercept, can be mapped onto the spectrum of string states, giving a Regge-theoretic reading of the quantum spectral curve.
  • The pattern of maximal transcendentality documented here for anomalous dimensions, the BFKL intercept, Wilson coefficients, and form factors hints at an algebraic origin—a transcendentality grading respected by the full $\mathcal{N}=4$ S-matrix—that would explain why the principle keeps working.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 8 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of the DGLAP and BFKL equations in planar N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory. It presents the BFKL Pomeron intercept at weak and strong coupling, the universal anomalous dimensions of twist-2 operators up to three loops together with higher-loop results, and the main methods used: the maximal transcendentality principle, the asymptotic Bethe ansatz with Lüscher corrections, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, and the quantum spectral curve. The central displayed formulas—Eqs. (3.52)–(3.55) for the universal anomalous dimension, Eqs. (2.13)–(2.14) and (2.44) for the weak-coupling BFKL intercept, and Eqs. (2.33)–(2.35) for the strong-coupling intercept—are quoted from previous work rather than derived anew. The review explicitly identifies the maximal transcendentality principle as conjectural and discloses the approximate status of some resummations, notably around Eq. (3.68).

Significance. If the quoted formulas are correct, the paper is a useful and honest status report. It does not claim new results; its contribution is to organize known results into a coherent weak-to-strong-coupling picture and to document the main methods. The displayed formulas are consistent with the cited literature and with later quantum-spectral-curve computations, so the risk that the review propagates a wrong central result appears low. The explicit labeling of the maximal transcendentality principle as a conjecture, the admission that the coefficient a12 in Eq. (2.33) was not fixed within that derivation, and the quantitative caveat about the approximately 10% accuracy of the resummation in Eq. (3.68) are commendable features. The main value of the manuscript is pedagogical and bibliographic; no machine-checked proofs or new derivations are provided, which is appropriate for a review.

minor comments (8)
  1. [Eq. (2.18)] Eq. (2.18) is garbled as printed: the symbol δ^(2m)(1/2) is undefined and the second term is difficult to parse. Please check the formula against the original source and reprint the corrected expression, since this equation supports the weak-coupling expansion of the BFKL eigenvalue.
  2. [Eq. (3.57)] Eq. (3.57) is self-referential as it stands: the right-hand side contains the same function S_{-a,b,c,...}(j) as the left-hand side, making the definition vacuous. Please correct the definition and state explicitly which analytic-continuation convention is being used, especially because the argument (n-1)/2 in Eqs. (2.15) and (2.44) is half-integer for general integer n.
  3. [Eqs. (2.33)–(2.35)] Eq. (2.34) contains a double equals sign ('j0 = = 2'). In addition, the text leaves a12 unknown in Eq. (2.33) although the subsequent QSC result in Eqs. (2.34)–(2.35) determines it; please add a cross-reference noting that a12 = -9ζ3/4 - 27/32 follows from the QSC expansion, unless the authors prefer a different form.
  4. [Section 3.2.3, Eq. (3.70)] The sentence claiming that the approximately 10% agreement between the resummation (3.68) and the NNLO result 'means that this extrapolation seems to be good for all values of z' is stronger than the evidence shown; a match of the first strong-coupling coefficient is suggestive but does not by itself establish global accuracy. Please soften the wording.
  5. [Section 3.3.1, Eq. (3.76)] The text refers to the 'r.h.s. of (3.76)' for the four-loop ABA expression, but the number (3.76) is printed after the following display γuni(1+ω) ∼ 1/ω^4. Please fix the equation numbering or the cross-reference.
  6. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical errors, including 'cornestones' in the Abstract, the consistent misspelling 'transcedentality'/'trancedentality', 'Gupser-Klebanov-Polyakov' for Gubser, and 'Now. there are results' in Section 3.2.2. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  7. [Section 2.1, Eqs. (2.15) and (2.44)] The binomial sums in Eq. (2.15) are defined with an integer upper limit j=1,...,M, yet they are evaluated at half-integer arguments such as M=(n-1)/2 in Eqs. (2.13), (2.14), and (2.44). Please add a sentence explaining the analytic continuation or the intended generalization of the binomial coefficients to these arguments.
  8. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.51)] The diagonalized anomalous-dimension matrix is written as DΓD^{-1} without defining Γ in the display; please define Γ (the matrix of eigenvalues) explicitly just below the equation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a review whose central equations are attributed to prior work and are independently supported by QCD, ABA/Lüscher, and QSC checks.

full rationale

This is a review paper, not a paper claiming new derivations. The central displayed results — the universal anomalous dimensions (3.52)–(3.55), the weak-coupling BFKL intercepts (2.13)–(2.14), and the strong-coupling intercept (2.33)–(2.35) — are explicitly attributed to earlier papers, including the authors' own [14], [48], [50], and [96]. No displayed equation is redefined as its input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The maximal transcendentality argument in Section 3.1, which comes from the authors' Ref. [14], is explicitly labeled a conjecture: 'we may conjecture the similar property of maximal transcendentality for anomalous dimensions [14]'. The same results are then checked by independent routes quoted in the text: NLO and NNLO anomalous dimensions by direct calculation and integrability predictions ([96], [64]), four- and five-loop results by ABA with Lüscher wrapping corrections ([97], [98], [99]), and six- and seven-loop results by QSC ([130], [132]). The strong-coupling BFKL expansion is not overclaimed: the text states 'with unknown coefficient a12 in 1/lambda^2 correction in Eq. (2.33)' before quoting the later QSC result, and the approximate resummation in (3.68) is honestly assessed as agreeing 'with the accuracy ∼ 10%'. The heavy self-citation is natural for a review of the authors' own program, but the load-bearing results do not reduce to those self-citations alone: they have external QCD input, independent integrability checks, and QSC computations by other groups. I therefore find no circular step that satisfies the requirement of quoting a specific reduction of a result to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, this ledger captures what the quoted results depend on rather than what this paper newly postulates. The paper introduces no free parameters of its own; the matched coefficients listed are the ones the reviewed strong-coupling derivations rely on. The main nonstandard input is the maximal transcendentality conjecture, which the review itself flags as conjectural in Section 3.1. The invented_entities list is empty because the review only restates prior constructs such as the Pomeron, the reggeized graviton, and QSC Q-functions.

free parameters (3)
  • a11 = 3/16 (1 - zeta3)
    One-loop coefficient of the strong-coupling string energy expansion (Eqs. (2.27)-(2.32)), fixed in Ref. [57] by matching asymptotic regimes to Basso's result; it enters the Pomeron intercept expansion (2.33) reviewed here.
  • a12 = unknown in this review; later fixed by QSC (Eq. (2.34))
    Coefficient of the 1/lambda^2 term in the strong-coupling Pomeron intercept (2.33). The review explicitly leaves it unknown and the later QSC result supplies it, making it a placeholder for a matched quantity.
  • coefficient pi^2/12 in resummation (3.68) = pi^2/12
    Chosen so the small-coupling expansion of the interpolating function a-tilde reproduces the known first two coefficients of a(z). The resulting third coefficient is then compared with the direct NNLO result and agrees to about 10%, a fit-then-compare procedure rather than a parameter-free prediction.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence
    Section 2.2 uses the duality to identify the BFKL Pomeron with the reggeized graviton and to relate anomalous dimensions to string energies (Eqs. (2.24)-(2.26)). The reviewed strong-coupling results are contingent on this correspondence.
  • domain assumption All-loop integrability of planar N=4 SYM
    Sections 2.3 and 3.3 assume the planar spectral problem is integrable, so ABA, TBA, Y-systems, and QSC apply at arbitrary coupling. This is the framework under which the quoted finite- and strong-coupling results are obtained.
  • ad hoc to paper Maximal transcendentality principle
    Section 3.1 states the principle as a conjecture ('we may conjecture the similar property') and uses it to extract N=4 results from QCD anomalous dimensions. It is load-bearing for Eqs. (3.52)-(3.55), and the review acknowledges it is not proven.
  • domain assumption Hermitian separability of the BFKL kernel in N=4 SYM
    Used in Section 2.1 following Ref. [14] to justify rewriting NLO BFKL eigenvalues through the universal function; the review presents it as an established property of the cited works.
  • domain assumption Quantum spectral curve as the correct formulation of the TBA
    Section 3.3.2 presents QSC results as authoritative (e.g., Eqs. (2.34)-(2.35)). The review does not prove the QSC axioms; it relies on Refs. [81-85].
  • standard math Properties of harmonic sums, digamma functions, and SL(2,C) representation theory
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 3 for diagonalization of the anomalous dimension matrix, analytic continuation of harmonic sums (Eqs. (3.56)-(3.57)), and parametrization of conformal weights (Eq. (2.5)).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DGLAP and BFKL equations in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM: from weak to strong coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RB3LWZBY

@misc{pith2026190805113,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DGLAP and BFKL equations in $\mathcalN=4$ SYM: from weak to strong coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RB3LWZBY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05113}
}
abstract

DGLAP and BFKL equations are among the cornestones of the contemporary QCD. Moreover, they also played an important role in the recent studies of integrability structure of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM. Here, we review the results obtained along this way together with a brief account of approaches and methods used.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

167 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [60]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,

    N. Beisert et al. , “Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,” Lett. Math. Phys., vol. 99, pp. 3–32, 2012, 1012.3982

    arXiv 2012

  2. [1]

    Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuu m Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    L. N. Lipatov, “Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuu m Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. , vol. 23, pp. 338–345, 1976. [Yad. Fiz.23,642(1976)]

    1976

  3. [2]

    On the Pomeranch uk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories,

    V. S. Fadin, E. A. Kuraev, and L. N. Lipatov, “On the Pomeranch uk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories,” Phys. Lett., vol. 60B, pp. 50–52, 1975

    1975

  4. [3]

    Multi - Reggeon Pr ocesses in the Yang-Mills Theory,

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, “Multi - Reggeon Pr ocesses in the Yang-Mills Theory,” Sov. Phys. JETP , vol. 44, pp. 443–450, 1976. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.71,840(1976)]

    1976

  5. [4]

    The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, “The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Sov. Phys. JETP , vol. 45, pp. 199–204, 1977. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.72,377(1977)]

    1977

  6. [5]

    The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Q uantum Chromodynamics,

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, “The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Q uantum Chromodynamics,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. , vol. 28, pp. 822–829, 1978. [Yad. Fiz.28,1597(1978)]

    1978

  7. [6]

    Calculation of meson meson inter action cross- section in quantum chromodynamics. (in russian),

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, “Calculation of meson meson inter action cross- section in quantum chromodynamics. (in russian),” JETP Lett. , vol. 30, p. 355,

  8. [7]

    e+ e- pair annihilation and deep inela stic e p scattering in perturbation theory,

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, “e+ e- pair annihilation and deep inela stic e p scattering in perturbation theory,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. , vol. 15, pp. 675–684, 1972. [Yad. Fiz.15,1218(1972)]

    1972

Show all 167 references
  1. [8]

    Deep inelastic e p scattering in per turbation theory,

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, “Deep inelastic e p scattering in per turbation theory,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. , vol. 15, pp. 438–450, 1972. [Yad. Fiz.15,781(1972)]

    1972

  2. [9]

    The parton model and perturbation theory,

    L. N. Lipatov, “The parton model and perturbation theory,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. , vol. 20, pp. 94–102, 1975. [Yad. Fiz.20,181(1974)]

    1974

  3. [10]

    Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Langua ge,

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, “Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Langua ge,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B126, pp. 298–318, 1977

    1977

  4. [11]

    Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scatter- ing and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromod ynamics.,

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, “Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scatter- ing and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromod ynamics.,” Sov. Phys. JETP , vol. 46, pp. 641–653, 1977. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.73,1216(1977)]

    1977

  5. [12]

    Supersymmetric Yan g-Mills Theories,

    L. Brink, J. H. Schwarz, and J. Scherk, “Supersymmetric Yan g-Mills Theories,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B121, pp. 77–92, 1977

    1977

  6. [13]

    Supersymmetry, Superg ravity Theories and the Dual Spinor Model,

    F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk, and D. I. Olive, “Supersymmetry, Superg ravity Theories and the Dual Spinor Model,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B122, pp. 253–290, 1977

    1977

  7. [14]

    DGLAP and BFKL equations in th e N = 4 supersymmetric gauge theory,

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, “DGLAP and BFKL equations in th e N = 4 supersymmetric gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B661, pp. 19–61, 2003, hep- ph/0208220. [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B685,405(2004)]

    2004

  8. [15]

    Supersym- metry and anomalous dimensionalities of quasi - parton operators in quantum chromodynamics,

    A. P. Bukhvostov, E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and G. V. Frolo v, “Supersym- metry and anomalous dimensionalities of quasi - parton operators in quantum chromodynamics,” JETP Lett. , vol. 41, pp. 92–95, 1985. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.41,77(1985)]

    1985

  9. [16]

    Evolution Equations for Quasi-Partonic Operators,

    A. P. Bukhvostov, G. V. Frolov, L. N. Lipatov, and E. A. Kurae v, “Evolution Equations for Quasi-Partonic Operators,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B258, pp. 601–646, 1985

    1985

  10. [17]

    Perspectives in Hadronic Physics, in Proc. of th e ICTP conf., World Scientific, Singapore,

    L. N. Lipatov, “Perspectives in Hadronic Physics, in Proc. of th e ICTP conf., World Scientific, Singapore,” 1997

    1997

  11. [18]

    Next-to-leading corrections to the BFKL equa tion and the effec- tive action for high energy processes in QCD,

    L. N. Lipatov, “Next-to-leading corrections to the BFKL equa tion and the effec- tive action for high energy processes in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. , vol. 99A, pp. 175–179, 2001. [,175(2001)]

    2001

  12. [19]

    Integra bility of three particle evolution equations in QCD,

    V. M. Braun, S. E. Derkachov, and A. N. Manashov, “Integra bility of three particle evolution equations in QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 81, pp. 2020–2023, 1998, hep- ph/9805225

    2020

  13. [20]

    Fine structure of spectrum of twist - three op erators in QCD,

    A. V. Belitsky, “Fine structure of spectrum of twist - three op erators in QCD,” Phys. Lett., vol. B453, pp. 59–72, 1999, hep-ph/9902361

    1999 arXiv

  14. [21]

    New integrable struct ures in large-N QCD,

    G. Ferretti, R. Heise, and K. Zarembo, “New integrable struct ures in large-N QCD,” Phys. Rev. , vol. D70, p. 074024, 2004, hep-th/0404187. 25

    2004 arXiv

  15. [22]

    One-loop Q CD spin chain and its spectrum,

    N. Beisert, G. Ferretti, R. Heise, and K. Zarembo, “One-loop Q CD spin chain and its spectrum,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B717, pp. 137–189, 2005, hep-th/0412029

    2005 arXiv

  16. [25]

    The Dilatatio n operator of con- formal N=4 superYang-Mills theory,

    N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen, and M. Staudacher, “The Dilatatio n operator of con- formal N=4 superYang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B664, pp. 131–184, 2003, hep-th/0303060

    2003 arXiv

  17. [26]

    High-Energy Behavior in a Nonabelian Gauge Theory (II),

    J. Bartels, “High-Energy Behavior in a Nonabelian Gauge Theory (II),” Nucl. Phys., vol. B175, pp. 365–401, 1980

    1980

  18. [27]

    Three Gluon Integral Equa tion and Odd c Singlet Regge Singularities in QCD,

    J. Kwiecinski and M. Praszalowicz, “Three Gluon Integral Equa tion and Odd c Singlet Regge Singularities in QCD,” Phys. Lett., vol. 94B, pp. 413–416, 1980

    1980

  19. [28]

    Asymptotic behavior of multicolor QCD at high ene rgies in con- nection with exactly solvable spin models,

    L. N. Lipatov, “Asymptotic behavior of multicolor QCD at high ene rgies in con- nection with exactly solvable spin models,” JETP Lett., vol. 59, pp. 596–599, 1994, hep-th/9311037. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.59,571(1994)]

    1994 arXiv

  20. [29]

    BFKL pomeron in the next-to-lea ding approxima- tion,

    V. S. Fadin and L. N. Lipatov, “BFKL pomeron in the next-to-lea ding approxima- tion,” Phys. Lett., vol. B429, pp. 127–134, 1998, hep-ph/9802290

    1998 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Energy scale(s) and next-to-leadin g BFKL equation,

    M. Ciafaloni and G. Camici, “Energy scale(s) and next-to-leadin g BFKL equation,” Phys. Lett., vol. B430, pp. 349–354, 1998, hep-ph/9803389

    1998 arXiv

  22. [31]

    The Dipole form of the BFKL kernel in su persymmetric Yang-Mills theories,

    V. S. Fadin and R. Fiore, “The Dipole form of the BFKL kernel in su persymmetric Yang-Mills theories,” Phys. Lett., vol. B661, pp. 139–144, 2008, 0712.3901

    2008 arXiv

  23. [32]

    NLO corrections to the BFKL e quation in QCD and in supersymmetric gauge theories,

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, “NLO corrections to the BFKL e quation in QCD and in supersymmetric gauge theories,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B582, pp. 19–43, 2000, hep-ph/0004008

    2000 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Supersymmetric Dimensional Regularization via Dimens ional Reduc- tion,

    W. Siegel, “Supersymmetric Dimensional Regularization via Dimens ional Reduc- tion,” Phys. Lett., vol. 84B, pp. 193–196, 1979

    1979

  25. [34]

    QCD Nonlead ing Corrections to Weak Decays as an Application of Regularization by Dimensional Red uction,

    G. Altarelli, G. Curci, G. Martinelli, and S. Petrarca, “QCD Nonlead ing Corrections to Weak Decays as an Application of Regularization by Dimensional Red uction,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B187, pp. 461–513, 1981

    1981

  26. [35]

    Use of Four- dimensional Spin Methods in the Calculation of Radiative QCD Corrections,

    G. A. Schuler, S. Sakakibara, and J. G. Korner, “Use of Four- dimensional Spin Methods in the Calculation of Radiative QCD Corrections,” Phys. Lett., vol. B194, pp. 125–131, 1987

    1987

  27. [36]

    DGLAP and BFKL evolution equa tions in the N=4 supersymmetric gauge theory,

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, “DGLAP and BFKL evolution equa tions in the N=4 supersymmetric gauge theory,” in 35th Annual Winter School on Nuclear and Particle Physics Repino, Russia, February 19-25, 2001 , 2001, hep-ph/0112346. 26

    2001 arXiv

  28. [37]

    BFKL spectrum of N = 4: non-zero conformal spin,

    M. Alfimov, N. Gromov, and G. Sizov, “BFKL spectrum of N = 4: non-zero conformal spin,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 181, 2018, 1802.06908

    2018 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and int egrals,

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, “Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and int egrals,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. , vol. A14, pp. 2037–2076, 1999, hep-ph/9806280

    1999 arXiv

  30. [39]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theo ries and super- gravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theo ries and super- gravity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. , vol. 38, pp. 1113–1133, 1999, hep-th/9711200. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)]

    1998 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Gauge theo ry correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theo ry correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. , vol. B428, pp. 105–114, 1998, hep- th/9802109

    1998

  32. [41]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , vol. 2, pp. 253–291, 1998, hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Deep inelastic scattering an d gauge / string duality,

    J. Polchinski and M. J. Strassler, “Deep inelastic scattering an d gauge / string duality,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 012, 2003, hep-th/0209211

    2003 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Effective action for the Regge processes in gra vity,

    L. N. Lipatov, “Effective action for the Regge processes in gra vity,” Phys. Part. Nucl., vol. 44, pp. 391–413, 2013, 1105.3127

    2013 arXiv

  35. [44]

    A Semiclassic al limit of the gauge / string correspondence,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “A Semiclassic al limit of the gauge / string correspondence,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B636, pp. 99–114, 2002, hep-th/0204051

    2002 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Semiclassical quantization of rota ting superstring in AdS(5) x S**5,

    S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, “Semiclassical quantization of rota ting superstring in AdS(5) x S**5,” JHEP, vol. 06, p. 007, 2002, hep-th/0204226

    2002 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Two-loop world-sheet c orrections in AdS(5) x S**5 superstring,

    R. Roiban, A. Tirziu, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Two-loop world-sheet c orrections in AdS(5) x S**5 superstring,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 056, 2007, 0704.3638

    2007 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Hard scattering and gauge / string duality,

    J. Polchinski and M. J. Strassler, “Hard scattering and gauge / string duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 88, p. 031601, 2002, hep-th/0109174

    2002 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Three loop universal anomalous dimension of the Wilson operators in N = 4 SUSY Yang-Mills model,

    A. V. Kotikov, L. N. Lipatov, A. I. Onishchenko, and V. N. Velizh anin, “Three loop universal anomalous dimension of the Wilson operators in N = 4 SUSY Yang-Mills model,” Phys. Lett., vol. B595, pp. 521–529, 2004, hep-th/0404092. [Erratum: Phy s. Lett.B632,754(2006)]

    2006 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Th e Pomeron and gauge/string duality,

    R. C. Brower, J. Polchinski, M. J. Strassler, and C.-I. Tan, “Th e Pomeron and gauge/string duality,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 005, 2007, hep-th/0603115

    2007 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Pomeron in the N=4 supersymm etric gauge model at strong couplings,

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, “Pomeron in the N=4 supersymm etric gauge model at strong couplings,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B874, pp. 889–904, 2013, 1301.0882

    2013 arXiv

  42. [51]

    A Resummation of large subleading corrections at s mall x,

    G. P. Salam, “A Resummation of large subleading corrections at s mall x,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 019, 1998, hep-ph/9806482

    1998 arXiv

  43. [52]

    An Introduction to leading and next-to-leading BF KL,

    G. P. Salam, “An Introduction to leading and next-to-leading BF KL,” Acta Phys. Polon., vol. B30, pp. 3679–3705, 1999, hep-ph/9910492. 27

    1999 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Quantu m folded string and integrability: From finite size effects to Konishi dimension,

    N. Gromov, D. Serban, I. Shenderovich, and D. Volin, “Quantu m folded string and integrability: From finite size effects to Konishi dimension,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 046, 2011, 1102.1040

    2011 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Semiclassical string computation o f strong-coupling corrections to dimensions of operators in Konishi multiplet,

    R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, “Semiclassical string computation o f strong-coupling corrections to dimensions of operators in Konishi multiplet,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B848, pp. 251–267, 2011, 1102.1209

    2011 arXiv

  46. [55]

    An exact slope for AdS/CFT,

    B. Basso, “An exact slope for AdS/CFT,” 2011, 1109.3154

    2011 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Scaling dimensions at small spin in N=4 SYM theory,

    B. Basso, “Scaling dimensions at small spin in N=4 SYM theory,” 201 2, 1205.0054

    arXiv

  48. [57]

    Deeper Look into Short Strings,

    N. Gromov and S. Valatka, “Deeper Look into Short Strings,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 058, 2012, 1109.6305

    2012 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Conformal Re gge theory,

    M. S. Costa, V. Goncalves, and J. Penedones, “Conformal Re gge theory,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 091, 2012, 1209.4355

    2012 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Q uantum spectral curve at work: from small spin to strong coupling in N = 4 SYM,

    N. Gromov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, G. Sizov, and S. Valatka, “Q uantum spectral curve at work: from small spin to strong coupling in N = 4 SYM,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 156, 2014, 1402.0871

    2014 arXiv

  51. [61]

    High-energy QCD as a co mpletely integrable model,

    L. D. Faddeev and G. P. Korchemsky, “High-energy QCD as a co mpletely integrable model,” Phys. Lett., vol. B342, pp. 311–322, 1995, hep-th/9404173

    1995 arXiv

  52. [62]

    The Bethe ansatz for N=4 supe rYang-Mills,

    J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo, “The Bethe ansatz for N=4 supe rYang-Mills,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 013, 2003, hep-th/0212208

    2003 arXiv

  53. [63]

    The N=4 SYM integrable super s pin chain,

    N. Beisert and M. Staudacher, “The N=4 SYM integrable super s pin chain,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B670, pp. 439–463, 2003, hep-th/0307042

    2003 arXiv

  54. [64]

    The Factorized S-matrix of CFT/AdS,

    M. Staudacher, “The Factorized S-matrix of CFT/AdS,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 054, 2005, hep-th/0412188

    2005 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Bethe ansatz for quantum strings,

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, and M. Staudacher, “Bethe ansatz for quantum strings,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 016, 2004, hep-th/0406256

    2004 arXiv

  56. [66]

    The SU (2|2) dynamic S-matrix,

    N. Beisert, “The SU (2|2) dynamic S-matrix,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , vol. 12, pp. 945–979, 2008, hep-th/0511082

    2008 arXiv

  57. [67]

    The Analytic Bethe Ansatz for a Chain with Centrally Extended su(2|2) Symmetry,

    N. Beisert, “The Analytic Bethe Ansatz for a Chain with Centrally Extended su(2|2) Symmetry,” J. Stat. Mech. , vol. 0701, p. P01017, 2007, nlin/0610017

    2007 arXiv

  58. [69]

    The AdS(5) x S**5 superstring worldsheet S-mat rix and crossing symmetry,

    R. A. Janik, “The AdS(5) x S**5 superstring worldsheet S-mat rix and crossing symmetry,” Phys. Rev. , vol. D73, p. 086006, 2006, hep-th/0603038. 28

    2006 arXiv

  59. [70]

    On AdS(5) x S**5 String S-matrix ,

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “On AdS(5) x S**5 String S-matrix ,” Phys. Lett. , vol. B639, pp. 378–382, 2006, hep-th/0604043

    2006 arXiv

  60. [71]

    The Zamolodchikov -Faddeev algebra for AdS(5) x S**5 superstring,

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, and M. Zamaklar, “The Zamolodchikov -Faddeev algebra for AdS(5) x S**5 superstring,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 002, 2007, hep-th/0612229

    2007 arXiv

  61. [72]

    Long-range psu(2, 2|4) Bethe Ansatze for gauge theory and strings,

    N. Beisert and M. Staudacher, “Long-range psu(2, 2|4) Bethe Ansatze for gauge theory and strings,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B727, pp. 1–62, 2005, hep-th/0504190

    2005 arXiv

  62. [73]

    Exact Spectrum of Ano malous Dimensions of Planar N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, and P. Vieira, “Exact Spectrum of Ano malous Dimensions of Planar N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 103, p. 131601, 2009, arXiv:0901.3753

    2009 arXiv

  63. [74]

    Thermodynamic Be the Ansatz for planar AdS/CFT: A Proposal,

    D. Bombardelli, D. Fioravanti, and R. Tateo, “Thermodynamic Be the Ansatz for planar AdS/CFT: A Proposal,” J. Phys. , vol. A42, p. 375401, 2009, arXiv:0902.3930

    2009 arXiv

  64. [75]

    Exact Spect rum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory: TBA and excited states,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, A. Kozak, and P. Vieira, “Exact Spect rum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory: TBA and excited states,” Lett. Math. Phys. , vol. 91, pp. 265–287, 2010, arXiv:0902.4458

    2010 arXiv

  65. [76]

    Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz fo r the AdS(5) x S(5) Mirror Model,

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz fo r the AdS(5) x S(5) Mirror Model,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 068, 2009, arXiv:0903.0141

    2009 arXiv

  66. [77]

    Extended Y-system for the AdS5/CF T4 correspondence,

    A. Cavaglia, D. Fioravanti, and R. Tateo, “Extended Y-system for the AdS5/CF T4 correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B843, pp. 302–343, 2011, arXiv:1005.3016

    2011 arXiv

  67. [78]

    AdS5 × S5 mirror TBA equations from Y-system and discontinuity relations,

    J. Balog and A. Hegedus, “ AdS5 × S5 mirror TBA equations from Y-system and discontinuity relations,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 095, 2011, arXiv:1104.4054

    2011 arXiv

  68. [79]

    Wronskia n Solution for AdS/CFT Y-system,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent, and Z. Tsuboi, “Wronskia n Solution for AdS/CFT Y-system,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 155, 2011, arXiv:1010.2720

    2011 arXiv

  69. [80]

    Solving the A dS/CFT Y- system,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent, and D. Volin, “Solving the A dS/CFT Y- system,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 023, 2012, arXiv:1110.0562

    2012 arXiv

  70. [81]

    Quantum Sp ectral Curve for Planar N = Super-Yang-Mills Theory,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent, and D. Volin, “Quantum Sp ectral Curve for Planar N = Super-Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 112, no. 1, p. 011602, 2014, arXiv:1305.1939

    2014 arXiv

  71. [82]

    Quantum sp ectral curve for arbi- trary state/operator in AdS 5/CFT4,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent, and D. Volin, “Quantum sp ectral curve for arbi- trary state/operator in AdS 5/CFT4,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 187, 2015, arXiv:1405.4857

    2015 arXiv

  72. [83]

    T-system on T-hook: G rassmannian Solution and Twisted Quantum Spectral Curve,

    V. Kazakov, S. Leurent, and D. Volin, “T-system on T-hook: G rassmannian Solution and Twisted Quantum Spectral Curve,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 044, 2016, arXiv:1510.02100

    2016 arXiv

  73. [84]

    The full spectrum of AdS5/CFT4 I: Rep resentation theory and one-loop Q-system,

    C. Marboe and D. Volin, “The full spectrum of AdS5/CFT4 I: Rep resentation theory and one-loop Q-system,” 2017, arXiv:1701.03704

    2017 arXiv

  74. [85]

    The full spectrum of AdS 5/CFT4 II: Weak coupling expansion via the quantum spectral curve,

    C. Marboe and D. Volin, “The full spectrum of AdS 5/CFT4 II: Weak coupling expansion via the quantum spectral curve,” 2018, 1812.09238. 29

    2018 arXiv

  75. [86]

    Quantum Spe ctral Curve and the Numerical Solution of the Spectral Problem in AdS5/CFT4,

    N. Gromov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, and G. Sizov, “Quantum Spe ctral Curve and the Numerical Solution of the Spectral Problem in AdS5/CFT4,” JHEP, vol. 06, p. 036, 2016, arXiv:1504.06640

    2016 arXiv

  76. [87]

    Strong coupling results in the AdS 5 /CF T4 correspon- dence from the numerical solution of the quantum spectral curve ,

    A. Hegedus and J. Konczer, “Strong coupling results in the AdS 5 /CF T4 correspon- dence from the numerical solution of the quantum spectral curve ,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 061, 2016, arXiv:1604.02346

    2016 arXiv

  77. [88]

    Quantum spectral curve as a tool for a perturbative quantum field theory,

    C. Marboe and D. Volin, “Quantum spectral curve as a tool for a perturbative quantum field theory,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B899, pp. 810–847, 2015, arXiv:1411.4758

    2015 arXiv

  78. [89]

    QCD Pomeron from AdS /CFT Quantum Spectral Curve,

    M. Alfimov, N. Gromov, and V. Kazakov, “QCD Pomeron from AdS /CFT Quantum Spectral Curve,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 164, 2015, arXiv:1408.2530

    2015 arXiv

  79. [90]

    Pomeron Eige nvalue at Three Loops in N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

    N. Gromov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, and G. Sizov, “Pomeron Eige nvalue at Three Loops in N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 115, no. 25, p. 251601, 2015, arXiv:1507.04010

    2015 arXiv

  80. [91]

    The Bare Pomeron in Quantum Chromodynamics,

    L. N. Lipatov, “The Bare Pomeron in Quantum Chromodynamics,” Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 63, pp. 904–912, 1986. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.90,1536(1986)]

    1986

  81. [92]

    BFKL pomeron in the next-to-next-to-leadin g approximation in the planar N=4 SYM theory,

    V. N. Velizhanin, “BFKL pomeron in the next-to-next-to-leadin g approximation in the planar N=4 SYM theory,” 2015, 1508.02857

    2015 arXiv

  82. [93]

    High-energy evolution to th ree loops,

    S. Caron-Huot and M. Herranen, “High-energy evolution to th ree loops,” JHEP, vol. 02, p. 058, 2018, 1604.07417

    2018 arXiv

  83. [94]

    The Three loop sp litting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case,

    S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, “The Three loop sp litting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B688, pp. 101–134, 2004, hep- ph/0403192

    2004

  84. [95]

    The Three-loop s plitting functions in QCD: The Singlet case,

    A. Vogt, S. Moch, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “The Three-loop s plitting functions in QCD: The Singlet case,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B691, pp. 129–181, 2004, hep-ph/0404111

    2004 arXiv

  85. [96]

    Anomalous dim ensions of Wilson operators in N=4 SYM theory,

    A. V. Kotikov, L. N. Lipatov, and V. N. Velizhanin, “Anomalous dim ensions of Wilson operators in N=4 SYM theory,” Phys. Lett. , vol. B557, pp. 114–120, 2003, hep-ph/0301021

    2003 arXiv

  86. [97]

    Dress- ing and wrapping,

    A. V. Kotikov, L. N. Lipatov, A. Rej, M. Staudacher, and V. N. Velizhanin, “Dress- ing and wrapping,” J. Stat. Mech. , vol. 0710, p. P10003, 2007, 0704.3586

    2007 arXiv

  87. [98]

    Four loop twist two, B FKL, wrapping and strings,

    Z. Bajnok, R. A. Janik, and T. Lukowski, “Four loop twist two, B FKL, wrapping and strings,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B816, pp. 376–398, 2009, 0811.4448

    2009 arXiv

  88. [99]

    Five-Loop Anomalous Dimension of Twist-Two Operators,

    T. Lukowski, A. Rej, and V. N. Velizhanin, “Five-Loop Anomalous Dimension of Twist-Two Operators,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B831, pp. 105–132, 2010, 0912.1624

    2010 arXiv

  89. [100]

    Analytic three-loop Solut ions for N=4 SYM Twist Operators,

    A. V. Kotikov, A. Rej, and S. Zieme, “Analytic three-loop Solut ions for N=4 SYM Twist Operators,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B813, pp. 460–483, 2009, 0810.0691

    2009 arXiv

  90. [101]

    Analy tic solution of the multiloop Baxter equation,

    M. Beccaria, A. V. Belitsky, A. V. Kotikov, and S. Zieme, “Analy tic solution of the multiloop Baxter equation,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B827, pp. 565–606, 2010, 0908.0520. 30

    2010 arXiv

  91. [102]

    Analytic two loo p results for selfen- ergy type and vertex type diagrams with one nonzero mass,

    J. Fleischer, A. V. Kotikov, and O. L. Veretin, “Analytic two loo p results for selfen- ergy type and vertex type diagrams with one nonzero mass,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B547, pp. 343–374, 1999, hep-ph/9808242

    1999 arXiv

  92. [103]

    Two-Loop Formfact ors in Theories with Mass Gap and Z-Boson Production,

    A. Kotikov, J. H. Kuhn, and O. Veretin, “Two-Loop Formfact ors in Theories with Mass Gap and Z-Boson Production,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B788, pp. 47–62, 2008, hep- ph/0703013

    2008

  93. [104]

    Knots and numbers in Phi** 4 theory to 7 loops and beyond,

    D. J. Broadhurst and D. Kreimer, “Knots and numbers in Phi** 4 theory to 7 loops and beyond,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. , vol. C6, pp. 519–524, 1995, hep-ph/9504352

    1995 arXiv

  94. [105]

    Association of multiple zeta values with positive knots via Feynman diagrams up to 9 loops,

    D. J. Broadhurst and D. Kreimer, “Association of multiple zeta values with positive knots via Feynman diagrams up to 9 loops,” Phys. Lett. , vol. B393, pp. 403–412, 1997, hep-th/9609128

    1997 arXiv

  95. [106]

    On DIS Wilson coefficient s in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,

    L. Bianchi, V. Forini, and A. V. Kotikov, “On DIS Wilson coefficient s in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,” Phys. Lett., vol. B725, pp. 394–401, 2013, 1304.7252

    2013 arXiv

  96. [107]

    The Third-orde r QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange,

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt, and S. Moch, “The Third-orde r QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B724, pp. 3–182, 2005, hep-ph/0504242

    2005 arXiv

  97. [108]

    The Collinear Limit of the En ergy-Energy Correlator,

    L. J. Dixon, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu, “The Collinear Limit of the En ergy-Energy Correlator,” 2019, 1905.01310

    2019 arXiv

  98. [109]

    The Principle of Maximal Transcendentality and th e Four-Loop Collinear Anomalous Dimension,

    L. J. Dixon, “The Principle of Maximal Transcendentality and th e Four-Loop Collinear Anomalous Dimension,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 075, 2018, 1712.07274

    2018 arXiv

  99. [110]

    Six-Gluon Amplitudes in Planar N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory at Six and Seven Loops,

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLe od, and G. Pap- athanasiou, “Six-Gluon Amplitudes in Planar N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory at Six and Seven Loops,” Submitted to: J. High Energy Phys. , 2019, 1903.10890

    2019 arXiv

  100. [111]

    Two-Loop SL(2 ) Form Factors and Maximal Transcendentality,

    F. Loebbert, C. Sieg, M. Wilhelm, and G. Yang, “Two-Loop SL(2 ) Form Factors and Maximal Transcendentality,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 090, 2016, 1610.06567

    2016 arXiv

  101. [112]

    Total α−s Correction to Deep Inelastic Scat- tering Cross-section Ratio, R = σ−l / σ−t in QCD. Calculation of Longitudi- nal Structure Function,

    D. I. Kazakov and A. V. Kotikov, “Total α−s Correction to Deep Inelastic Scat- tering Cross-section Ratio, R = σ−l / σ−t in QCD. Calculation of Longitudi- nal Structure Function,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B307, p. 721, 1988. [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B345,299(1990)]

    1990

  102. [113]

    Analytic continuation of the Mellin moments of deep inelastic structure functions,

    A. V. Kotikov and V. N. Velizhanin, “Analytic continuation of the Mellin moments of deep inelastic structure functions,” 2005, hep-ph/0501274

    2005 arXiv

  103. [114]

    Gluon distribution for small x,

    A. V. Kotikov, “Gluon distribution for small x,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. , vol. 57, pp. 133– 144, 1994. [Yad. Fiz.57,142(1994)]

    1994

  104. [115]

    Small x phenomenology: Summary and status,

    B. Andersson et al. , “Small x phenomenology: Summary and status,” Eur. Phys. J., vol. C25, pp. 77–101, 2002, hep-ph/0204115

    2002 arXiv

  105. [116]

    Combined Measurement and QCD Analysis of the Inclusive e+- p Scattering Cross Sections at HERA,

    F. D. Aaron et al. , “Combined Measurement and QCD Analysis of the Inclusive e+- p Scattering Cross Sections at HERA,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 109, 2010, 0911.0884. 31

    2010 arXiv

  106. [117]

    Anomalous Supersymmetry Transformation of So me Composite Op- erators in SQCD,

    K. Konishi, “Anomalous Supersymmetry Transformation of So me Composite Op- erators in SQCD,” Phys. Lett., vol. 135B, pp. 439–444, 1984

    1984

  107. [118]

    E xceptional nonrenormal- ization properties and OPE analysis of chiral four point functions in N =4 SYM(4),

    G. Arutyunov, B. Eden, A. C. Petkou, and E. Sokatchev, “E xceptional nonrenormal- ization properties and OPE analysis of chiral four point functions in N =4 SYM(4),” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B620, pp. 380–404, 2002, hep-th/0103230

    2002 arXiv

  108. [119]

    Op erator mixing in N = 4 SYM: The Konishi anomaly revisited,

    B. Eden, C. Jarczak, E. Sokatchev, and Ya. S. Stanev, “Op erator mixing in N = 4 SYM: The Konishi anomaly revisited,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B722, pp. 119–148, 2005, hep-th/0501077

    2005 arXiv

  109. [120]

    A Two-loop test for the factorised S-matrix of plan ar N = 4,

    B. Eden, “A Two-loop test for the factorised S-matrix of plan ar N = 4,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B738, pp. 409–424, 2006, hep-th/0501234

    2006 arXiv

  110. [121]

    A Three-loop test of the dilatation operator in N = 4 SYM,

    B. Eden, C. Jarczak, and E. Sokatchev, “A Three-loop test of the dilatation operator in N = 4 SYM,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B712, pp. 157–195, 2005, hep-th/0409009

    2005 arXiv

  111. [122]

    Four-loop perturbative Konishi f rom strings and finite size effects for multiparticle states,

    Z. Bajnok and R. A. Janik, “Four-loop perturbative Konishi f rom strings and finite size effects for multiparticle states,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B807, pp. 625–650, 2009, 0807.0399

    2009 arXiv

  112. [123]

    Wrapp ing at four loops in N=4 SYM,

    F. Fiamberti, A. Santambrogio, C. Sieg, and D. Zanon, “Wrapp ing at four loops in N=4 SYM,” Phys. Lett., vol. B666, pp. 100–105, 2008, 0712.3522

    2008 arXiv

  113. [124]

    The four-loop anomalous dimension of the Kon ishi operator in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,

    V. N. Velizhanin, “The four-loop anomalous dimension of the Kon ishi operator in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” JETP Lett. , vol. 89, pp. 6–9, 2009, 0808.3832

    2009 arXiv

  114. [125]

    Five loo p Konishi from AdS/CFT,

    Z. Bajnok, A. Hegedus, R. A. Janik, and T. Lukowski, “Five loo p Konishi from AdS/CFT,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B827, pp. 426–456, 2010, 0906.4062

    2010 arXiv

  115. [126]

    Five-loop Konishi fr om the Mirror TBA,

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, and R. Suzuki, “Five-loop Konishi fr om the Mirror TBA,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 069, 2010, 1002.1711

    2010 arXiv

  116. [127]

    5-loop Konishi from linearized TBA an d the XXX mag- net,

    J. Balog and A. Hegedus, “5-loop Konishi from linearized TBA an d the XXX mag- net,” JHEP, vol. 06, p. 080, 2010, 1002.4142

    2010 arXiv

  117. [128]

    Five-loop Konishi in N=4 SYM,

    B. Eden, P. Heslop, G. P. Korchemsky, V. A. Smirnov, and E. S okatchev, “Five-loop Konishi in N=4 SYM,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B862, pp. 123–166, 2012, 1202.5733

    2012 arXiv

  118. [129]

    Six-loop Konishi anomalo us dimension from the Y-system,

    S. Leurent, D. Serban, and D. Volin, “Six-loop Konishi anomalo us dimension from the Y-system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 109, p. 241601, 2012, 1209.0749

    2012 arXiv

  119. [130]

    Six-loop anomalous dimen sion of twist-two operators in planar N = 4 SYM theory,

    C. Marboe, V. Velizhanin, and D. Volin, “Six-loop anomalous dimen sion of twist-two operators in planar N = 4 SYM theory,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 084, 2015, 1412.4762

    2015 arXiv

  120. [131]

    Six and seven loop Konishi from Lus cher corrections,

    Z. Bajnok and R. A. Janik, “Six and seven loop Konishi from Lus cher corrections,” JHEP, vol. 11, p. 002, 2012, 1209.0791

    2012 arXiv

  121. [132]

    Twist-2 at seven loops in planar N = 4 SYM theory: full result and analytic properties,

    C. Marboe and V. Velizhanin, “Twist-2 at seven loops in planar N = 4 SYM theory: full result and analytic properties,” JHEP, vol. 11, p. 013, 2016, 1607.06047. 32

    2016 arXiv

  122. [133]

    Exact Spectrum of Pla nar N = 4 Super- symmetric Yang-Mills Theory: Konishi Dimension at Any Coupling,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, and P. Vieira, “Exact Spectrum of Pla nar N = 4 Super- symmetric Yang-Mills Theory: Konishi Dimension at Any Coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, p. 211601, 2010, 0906.4240

    2010 arXiv

  123. [134]

    Konishi operator at intermediate coupling,

    S. Frolov, “Konishi operator at intermediate coupling,” J. Phys., vol. A44, p. 065401, 2011, 1006.5032

    2011 arXiv

  124. [135]

    A Note on twist two operators in N=4 SYM and W ilson loops in Minkowski signature,

    M. Kruczenski, “A Note on twist two operators in N=4 SYM and W ilson loops in Minkowski signature,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 024, 2002, hep-th/0210115

    2002 arXiv

  125. [136]

    Light cone Wilson loops and the string / gauge co rrespondence,

    Y. Makeenko, “Light cone Wilson loops and the string / gauge co rrespondence,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 007, 2003, hep-th/0210256

    2003 arXiv

  126. [137]

    Scaling violations in Yang-Mills the- ories and strings in AdS(5),

    M. Axenides, E. Floratos, and A. Kehagias, “Scaling violations in Yang-Mills the- ories and strings in AdS(5),” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B662, pp. 170–184, 2003, hep- th/0210091

    2003

  127. [138]

    The Four- Loop Planar Amplitude and Cusp Anomalous Dimension in Maximally Supers ym- metric Yang-Mills Theory,

    Z. Bern, M. Czakon, L. J. Dixon, D. A. Kosower, and V. A. Smir nov, “The Four- Loop Planar Amplitude and Cusp Anomalous Dimension in Maximally Supers ym- metric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev., vol. D75, p. 085010, 2007, hep-th/0610248

    2007 arXiv

  128. [139]

    Transcendentalit y and Crossing,

    N. Beisert, B. Eden, and M. Staudacher, “Transcendentalit y and Crossing,” J. Stat. Mech., vol. 0701, p. P01021, 2007, hep-th/0610251

    2007 arXiv

  129. [140]

    Maximally su- persymmetric planar Yang-Mills amplitudes at five loops,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, H. Johansson, and D. A. Kosowe r, “Maximally su- persymmetric planar Yang-Mills amplitudes at five loops,” Phys. Rev. , vol. D76, p. 125020, 2007, 0705.1864

    2007 arXiv

  130. [141]

    A Test of the AdS/CFT correspondence using high-spin operators,

    M. K. Benna, S. Benvenuti, I. R. Klebanov, and A. Scardicchio , “A Test of the AdS/CFT correspondence using high-spin operators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 98, p. 131603, 2007, hep-th/0611135

    2007 arXiv

  131. [142]

    On the highest transcenden tality in N=4 SUSY,

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, “On the highest transcenden tality in N=4 SUSY,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B769, pp. 217–255, 2007, hep-th/0611204

    2007 arXiv

  132. [143]

    On the Strong Coupling Scaling Dimension of High Spin Operators,

    L. F. Alday, G. Arutyunov, M. K. Benna, B. Eden, and I. R. Kle banov, “On the Strong Coupling Scaling Dimension of High Spin Operators,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 082, 2007, hep-th/0702028

    2007 arXiv

  133. [144]

    Strong coupling limit of Bet he ansatz equa- tions,

    I. Kostov, D. Serban, and D. Volin, “Strong coupling limit of Bet he ansatz equa- tions,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B789, pp. 413–451, 2008, hep-th/0703031

    2008 arXiv

  134. [145]

    The Scaling functio n at strong coupling from the quantum string Bethe equations,

    M. Beccaria, G. F. De Angelis, and V. Forini, “The Scaling functio n at strong coupling from the quantum string Bethe equations,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 066, 2007, hep-th/0703131

    2007 arXiv

  135. [146]

    The Strong Coupling Limit of the Scaling Func- tion from the Quantum String Bethe Ansatz,

    P. Y. Casteill and C. Kristjansen, “The Strong Coupling Limit of the Scaling Func- tion from the Quantum String Bethe Ansatz,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B785, pp. 1–18, 2007, 0705.0890. 33

    2007 arXiv

  136. [147]

    Cusp anomalo us dimension in max- imally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at strong coupling,

    B. Basso, G. P. Korchemsky, and J. Kotanski, “Cusp anomalo us dimension in max- imally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at strong coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 100, p. 091601, 2008, 0708.3933

    2008 arXiv

  137. [148]

    Functional BES equation ,

    I. Kostov, D. Serban, and D. Volin, “Functional BES equation ,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 101, 2008, 0801.2542

    2008 arXiv

  138. [149]

    The complete one loop dilatation operator of N=4 s uperYang-Mills theory,

    N. Beisert, “The complete one loop dilatation operator of N=4 s uperYang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B676, pp. 3–42, 2004, hep-th/0307015

    2004 arXiv

  139. [150]

    Integrable Models of Quantum One-dimen sional Magnets With O(N) and Sp(2k) Symmetry,

    N. Yu. Reshetikhin, “Integrable Models of Quantum One-dimen sional Magnets With O(N) and Sp(2k) Symmetry,” Theor. Math. Phys., vol. 63, pp. 555–569, 1985. [Teor. Mat. Fiz.63,347(1985)]

    1985

  140. [151]

    Factorized S Matrix and the B ethe Ansatz for Simple Lie Groups,

    E. Ogievetsky and P. Wiegmann, “Factorized S Matrix and the B ethe Ansatz for Simple Lie Groups,” Phys. Lett., vol. 168B, pp. 360–366, 1986

    1986

  141. [152]

    The Continuum limit of sl(N/K) integrable superspin c hains,

    H. Saleur, “The Continuum limit of sl(N/K) integrable superspin c hains,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B578, pp. 552–576, 2000, solv-int/9905007

    2000 arXiv

  142. [153]

    Integrability and transcenden tality,

    B. Eden and M. Staudacher, “Integrability and transcenden tality,” J. Stat. Mech. , vol. 0611, p. P11014, 2006, hep-th/0603157

    2006 arXiv

  143. [154]

    Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in M assive Quantum Field Theories. 1. Stable Particle States,

    M. Luscher, “Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in M assive Quantum Field Theories. 1. Stable Particle States,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 104, p. 177, 1986

    1986

  144. [155]

    N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills: thr ee loops made simple(r),

    Yu. L. Dokshitzer and G. Marchesini, “N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills: thr ee loops made simple(r),” Phys. Lett., vol. B646, pp. 189–201, 2007, hep-th/0612248

    2007 arXiv

  145. [156]

    Anomalous dimensions of high -spin operators beyond the leading order,

    B. Basso and G. P. Korchemsky, “Anomalous dimensions of high -spin operators beyond the leading order,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B775, pp. 1–30, 2007, hep-th/0612247

    2007 arXiv

  146. [157]

    Three loop anomalous dimensions of twist-3 gaug e operators in N=4 SYM,

    M. Beccaria, “Three loop anomalous dimensions of twist-3 gaug e operators in N=4 SYM,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 023, 2007, 0707.1574

    2007 arXiv

  147. [158]

    Four loop reciprocity of twist two op erators in N=4 SYM,

    M. Beccaria and V. Forini, “Four loop reciprocity of twist two op erators in N=4 SYM,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 111, 2009, 0901.1256

    2009 arXiv

  148. [159]

    Twist-thre e at five loops, Bethe Ansatz and wrapping,

    M. Beccaria, V. Forini, T. Lukowski, and S. Zieme, “Twist-thre e at five loops, Bethe Ansatz and wrapping,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 129, 2009, 0901.4864

    2009 arXiv

  149. [160]

    Generalized Gribov-Lip atov Reciprocity and AdS/CFT,

    M. Beccaria, V. Forini, and G. Macorini, “Generalized Gribov-Lip atov Reciprocity and AdS/CFT,” Adv. High Energy Phys. , vol. 2010, p. 753248, 2010, 1002.2363

    2010 arXiv

  150. [161]

    Wrapping inter actions and a new source of corrections to the spin-chain/string duality,

    J. Ambjorn, R. A. Janik, and C. Kristjansen, “Wrapping inter actions and a new source of corrections to the spin-chain/string duality,” Nucl. Phys. , vol. B736, pp. 288–301, 2006, hep-th/0510171

    2006 arXiv

  151. [162]

    On String S-matrix, Bound Stat es and TBA,

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “On String S-matrix, Bound Stat es and TBA,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 024, 2007, 0710.1568. 34

    2007 arXiv

  152. [163]

    Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1999

    Takahashi, Thermodynamics of one-dimensional solvable models . Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1999

    1999

  153. [164]

    Essler, H.Frahm, F.G¨ ohmann, A

    F.H.L. Essler, H.Frahm, F.G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper and V. Korep in, The one- dimensional Hubbard model . Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  154. [165]

    String hypothesis for the AdS( 5) x S**5 mirror,

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “String hypothesis for the AdS( 5) x S**5 mirror,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 152, 2009, 0901.1417

    2009 arXiv

  155. [166]

    Quantum Spectral Cu rve for a cusped Wilson line in N = 4 SYM,

    N. Gromov and F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, “Quantum Spectral Cu rve for a cusped Wilson line in N = 4 SYM,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 134, 2016, arXiv:1510.02098

    2016 arXiv

  156. [167]

    Quark-anti-quark po tential in N = 4 SYM,

    N. Gromov and F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, “Quark-anti-quark po tential in N = 4 SYM,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 122, 2016, arXiv:1601.05679

    2016 arXiv

  157. [168]

    Quantu m Spectral Curve and Structure Constants in N=4 SYM: Cusps in the Ladder Limit,

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, and F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, “Quantu m Spectral Curve and Structure Constants in N=4 SYM: Cusps in the Ladder Limit,” 201 8, arXiv:1802.04237

    arXiv

  158. [169]

    The fate of the Konishi multiplet in th e β-deformed Quantum Spectral Curve,

    C. Marboe and E. Wid´ en, “The fate of the Konishi multiplet in th e β-deformed Quantum Spectral Curve,” 2019, 1902.01248. 35

    2019 arXiv

  159. [1979]

    [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.30,383(1979)]. 24

    1979

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.