Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unbiased Statistical Estimation and Valid Confidence Intervals Under Differential Privacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.14465 v2 pith:RBNWLKLN submitted 2021-10-27 stat.ME cs.CRmath.STstat.TH

classification stat.MEcs.CRmath.STstat.TH
keywords confidenceintervalsestimatesestimationunbiasedparametersundervalid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a method for producing unbiased parameter estimates and valid confidence intervals under the constraints of differential privacy, a formal framework for limiting individual information leakage from sensitive data. Prior work in this area is limited in that it is tailored to calculating confidence intervals for specific statistical procedures, such as mean estimation or simple linear regression. While other recent work can produce confidence intervals for more general sets of procedures, they either yield only approximately unbiased estimates, are designed for one-dimensional outputs, or assume significant user knowledge about the data-generating distribution. Our method induces distributions of mean and covariance estimates via the bag of little bootstraps (BLB) and uses them to privately estimate the parameters' sampling distribution via a generalized version of the CoinPress estimation algorithm. If the user can bound the parameters of the BLB-induced parameters and provide heavier-tailed families, the algorithm produces unbiased parameter estimates and valid confidence intervals which hold with arbitrarily high probability. These results hold in high dimensions and for any estimation procedure which behaves nicely under the bootstrap.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-dynamics abstention method matches deep ensembles at a fraction of the training cost, and a five-term error budget explains why selective classifiers still fall short of the oracle.

Pith tools