Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generating Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Transformers in Financial Text Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.12512 v1 pith:RE5ADFNF submitted 2020-10-23 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords explanationscounterfactualhighlyplausibleclassificationcurrentdomainfinancial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&A) account for billions of dollars of investment globally every year, and offer an interesting and challenging domain for artificial intelligence. However, in these highly sensitive domains, it is crucial to not only have a highly robust and accurate model, but be able to generate useful explanations to garner a user's trust in the automated system. Regrettably, the recent research regarding eXplainable AI (XAI) in financial text classification has received little to no attention, and many current methods for generating textual-based explanations result in highly implausible explanations, which damage a user's trust in the system. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel methodology for producing plausible counterfactual explanations, whilst exploring the regularization benefits of adversarial training on language models in the domain of FinTech. Exhaustive quantitative experiments demonstrate that not only does this approach improve the model accuracy when compared to the current state-of-the-art and human performance, but it also generates counterfactual explanations which are significantly more plausible based on human trials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpretable LLMs for Credit Risk: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy

    q-fin.RM 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review and taxonomy that organizes LLM-based credit risk research by model architecture, data modality, explainability mechanism, and application domain.

Pith tools