pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16150 · v1 · pith:RFL4Q62Hnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · quant-ph

Gaussian fluctuations in the tunneling probability of a closed universe

L. Salasnich This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 17:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc quant-ph
keywords tunneling probabilityclosed universeGaussian fluctuationsminisuperspaceEuclidean path integralquantum nucleationinstanton
0
0 comments X

The pith

The tunneling probability for a closed universe includes an exact Gaussian prefactor from quadratic fluctuations around the instanton.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the quantum probability that a closed universe nucleates into existence using the Euclidean path-integral formalism. It provides both the leading exponential suppression from the instanton and the precise prefactor coming from Gaussian fluctuations around that solution. The work is done in a minisuperspace model with a fixed time interval, where the constraint is handled classically. A reader cares because this gives a cleaner semiclassical picture of universe creation that improves on earlier approximations.

Core claim

An analytical expression for the tunneling probability is derived, including both the exponential suppression and the exact Gaussian prefactor due to quadratic fluctuations around the instanton. The calculation is performed in a fixed-interval minisuperspace formulation, where the Hamiltonian constraint is imposed at the level of the classical instanton, while the full lapse integration is not included beyond the leading semiclassical approximation. The result provides a transparent and self-consistent semiclassical estimate of the nucleation rate, refining previous analyses with the inclusion of Gaussian fluctuations.

What carries the argument

The exact Gaussian prefactor due to quadratic fluctuations around the instanton in the Euclidean path integral for minisuperspace.

If this is right

  • The nucleation rate receives a well-defined Gaussian correction from quadratic fluctuations.
  • Previous semiclassical estimates are refined by the inclusion of this exact prefactor.
  • The result yields a transparent semiclassical estimate of the creation probability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fluctuation analysis might apply to instantons in other quantum cosmology setups with more degrees of freedom.
  • Direct lattice or numerical path-integral evaluations could test the predicted prefactor value.
  • This correction could influence estimates of the initial conditions for inflationary models.

Load-bearing premise

The Hamiltonian constraint is imposed at the level of the classical instanton rather than integrating over the full lapse function.

What would settle it

A numerical computation of the full path integral without fixing the interval that produces a different prefactor would falsify the derived analytical expression.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16150 by L. Salasnich.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Graphical summary of the main results discussed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the quantum creation of a closed universe within the Euclidean path-integral formalism. An analytical expression for the tunneling probability is derived, including both the exponential suppression and the exact Gaussian prefactor due to quadratic fluctuations around the instanton. The calculation is performed in a fixed-interval minisuperspace formulation, where the Hamiltonian constraint is imposed at the level of the classical instanton, while the full lapse integration is not included beyond the leading semiclassical approximation. The result provides a transparent and self-consistent semiclassical estimate of the nucleation rate, refining previous analyses with the inclusion of Gaussian fluctuations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives an analytical expression for the tunneling probability of a closed universe in the Euclidean path-integral formalism. It obtains both the exponential suppression from the instanton action and an exact Gaussian prefactor arising from quadratic fluctuations of the minisuperspace variable around the instanton. The calculation is performed in a fixed-interval minisuperspace model in which the Hamiltonian constraint is imposed only on the classical background solution, with the full integration over the lapse not carried beyond the leading semiclassical order.

Significance. If the central derivation is correct, the result supplies a concrete, analytically tractable semiclassical nucleation rate that includes the leading fluctuation correction. This refines earlier instanton-based estimates by making the prefactor explicit rather than leaving it as an unspecified normalization. The transparent treatment of the quadratic fluctuations around the instanton is a clear technical contribution within the minisuperspace approximation.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and §2 (method): the claim of an 'exact Gaussian prefactor' is obtained while holding the time interval fixed and enforcing the Hamiltonian constraint only at the classical level. The skeptic correctly notes that a complete one-loop treatment requires expanding the action to quadratic order in both the scale-factor fluctuation and δN, then performing the Gaussian integral over the lapse fluctuation. The manuscript does not demonstrate that this additional integration leaves the reported prefactor unchanged; this step is load-bearing for the assertion that the prefactor is the complete semiclassical result rather than an artifact of the gauge choice.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief explicit statement of the minisuperspace Lagrangian and the precise definition of the fixed interval before the fluctuation analysis begins.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The major concern regarding the scope of the Gaussian prefactor in the fixed-interval formulation is addressed point by point below. We have revised the manuscript to clarify the limitations of the approximation without overstating the result.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and §2 (method): the claim of an 'exact Gaussian prefactor' is obtained while holding the time interval fixed and enforcing the Hamiltonian constraint only at the classical level. The skeptic correctly notes that a complete one-loop treatment requires expanding the action to quadratic order in both the scale-factor fluctuation and δN, then performing the Gaussian integral over the lapse fluctuation. The manuscript does not demonstrate that this additional integration leaves the reported prefactor unchanged; this step is load-bearing for the assertion that the prefactor is the complete semiclassical result rather than an artifact of the gauge choice.

    Authors: We agree that a fully gauge-invariant one-loop calculation would require expanding to quadratic order in both the scale-factor fluctuation and the lapse fluctuation δN, followed by integration over δN. Our manuscript is explicitly restricted to the fixed-interval minisuperspace model in which the time interval is held fixed and the Hamiltonian constraint is satisfied only by the classical instanton. Within this controlled setting the lapse is fixed at its classical value, so the quadratic action contains only the scale-factor fluctuation; the resulting Gaussian integral produces the reported prefactor exactly. We do not claim that this prefactor survives unchanged after a subsequent integration over δN. To address the referee's concern we have revised the abstract and §2 to state explicitly that the prefactor is the exact result for scale-factor fluctuations with fixed lapse and classical constraint enforcement, and we have added a short paragraph discussing the relation of this result to a more complete treatment that would include δN. These changes make the scope and limitations of the calculation transparent while preserving the technical contribution of the analytic Gaussian evaluation in the fixed-interval framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained in standard semiclassical path-integral methods

full rationale

The paper derives the tunneling probability and Gaussian prefactor from quadratic fluctuations around the instanton in a fixed-interval minisuperspace model, explicitly noting that the Hamiltonian constraint is imposed only at the classical level and full lapse integration is omitted beyond leading order. This is presented as a transparent semiclassical estimate grounded in the Euclidean path-integral formalism, with no reduction of the claimed analytical result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The approach follows external standard methods without the result being equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; the paper relies on standard domain assumptions of quantum cosmology without introducing new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Euclidean path-integral formalism applies to quantum creation of closed universes
    Invoked as the framework for deriving the tunneling probability.
  • domain assumption Minisuperspace reduction with fixed time interval is valid for the semiclassical limit
    Used to simplify the calculation while imposing the Hamiltonian constraint classically.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5611 in / 1284 out tokens · 91911 ms · 2026-05-20T17:03:10.139277+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Frontiere Quantistiche

    In this approximation we get δ2SE δa(τ)δa(τ ′) =δ(τ−τ ′) h − √ 3A d2 dτ 2 − √ 3A i .(22) The Euclidean propagator for this quadratic problem is exactly that of an inverted harmonic oscillator of effec- tive massm= √ 3Aand effective frequencyω= 1. For the harmonic oscillator of frequencyω, in real time the prefactor of the propagator is [18, 19] F= r mω 2π...

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Dodelson,Modern Cosmology(Academic Press, San Diego, 2003)

    S. Dodelson,Modern Cosmology(Academic Press, San Diego, 2003). Official link:https: //www.elsevier.com/books/modern-cosmology/ dodelson/978-0-12-219141-1

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Atkatz and H

    D. Atkatz and H. Pagels, Origin of the universe as a quantum tunneling event, Phys. Rev. D25, 2065 (1982). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2065

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.2065 2065

  4. [4]

    Vilenkin, Creation of the universe from nothing, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Creation of the universe from nothing, Phys. Lett. B117, 25 (1982). DOI:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90866-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90866-8 1982

  5. [5]

    Linde, Quantum creation of an inflationary universe, Sov

    A.D. Linde, Quantum creation of an inflationary universe, Sov. Phys. JET60, 211 (1984). Offi- cial link:http://www.jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/e/index/ e/60/2/p211?a=list

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    Zeldovich and A.A

    Ya.B. Zeldovich and A.A. Starobinsky, Quantum creation of a universe with nontrivial topology, Soviet Astronomy Lett.10, 135 (1984). Official link:https://ui.adsabs. harvard.edu/abs/1984SvAL...10..135Z. 6

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    Rubakov, Quantum mechanics in the tunneling universe, Phys

    V.A. Rubakov, Quantum mechanics in the tunneling universe, Phys. Lett. B148, 280 (1984). DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)90088-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)90088-1 1984

  8. [8]

    Vilenkin, Boundary conditions in quantum cosmology, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Boundary conditions in quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D33, 3560 (1986). DOI:https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3560

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.33.3560 1986

  9. [9]

    Vilenkin and M

    A. Vilenkin and M. Yamada, Tunneling wave function of the universe, Phys. Rev. D98, 066003 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.066003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.066003 2018

  10. [10]

    Jia, Truly Lorentzian quantum cosmology, Phys

    D. Jia, Truly Lorentzian quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D108, 103540 (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.103540

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Lehners, Review of the no-boundary wave function, Phys

    J.-L. Lehners, Review of the no-boundary wave function, Phys. Rep.1022, 1 (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physrep.2023.06.002

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    de Alwis, Wave function of the Universe and CMB fluctuations, Phys

    S.P. de Alwis, Wave function of the Universe and CMB fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D100, 043544 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043544

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043544 2019

  13. [13]

    Halliwell, J.B

    J.J. Halliwell, J.B. Hartle, T. Hertog, O. Janssen, and Y. Vreys, What is the no-boundary wave function of the Universe?, Phys. Rev. D99, 043526 (2019). DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043526

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.043526 2019

  14. [14]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, Lorentzian quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D95, 103508 (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103508

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.103508 2017

  15. [15]

    Honda, H

    M. Honda, H. Matsui, K. Okabayashi, and T. Ter- ada, Resurgence in Lorentzian quantum cosmology: No- boundary saddles and resummation of quantum gravity corrections around tunneling saddle points, Phys. Rev. D110, 083508 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.110.083508

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Mondal and S

    V. Mondal and S. Chakraborty, Lorentzian quantum cosmology with torsion, Phys. Rev. D109, 043525 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109. 043525

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109 2024

  17. [17]

    Motaharfar and P

    M. Motaharfar and P. Singh, Quantum gravita- tional non-singular tunneling wavefunction proposal, arXiv:2304.06760 [gr-qc] (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2304.06760

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06760 2023

  18. [18]

    DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity

    B. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory, Phys. Rev.160, 1113 (1967). DOI:https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 1967

  19. [19]

    Feynman and A.R

    R. Feynman and A.R. Hibbs,Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. Emended Edition(Dover, Mi- neola, NY, 2010). Official link:https://store. doverpublications.com/products/9780486477220

    work page arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. Simons,Condensed Matter Field The- ory(Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511789984

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511789984 2010

  21. [21]

    Hartle and S

    J. Hartle and S. Hawking, Wave function of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D28, 2960 (1983). DOI:https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2960

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2960 1983

  22. [22]

    Linde,Inflation and Quantum Cosmology(Aca- demic Press, Boston, 1990)

    A. Linde,Inflation and Quantum Cosmology(Aca- demic Press, Boston, 1990). Official link:https: //www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780124501751/ inflation-and-quantum-cosmology

    work page arXiv 1990

  23. [23]

    Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory, Phys

    S. Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. D15, 2929 (1977). DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2929

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2929 1977

  24. [24]

    Callan and S

    C.G. Callan and S. Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum. II. First quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D16, 1762 (1977). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1762

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1762 1977

  25. [25]

    I. M. Gel’fand and A. M. Yaglom, Integration in func- tional spaces and its applications in quantum physics, J. Math. Phys.1, 48 (1960). DOI:https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.1703636

    work page 1960

  26. [26]

    Kirsten and A

    K. Kirsten and A. J. McKane, Functional determi- nants by contour integration methods, Ann. Phys. 308, 502 (2003). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0003-4916(03)00149-0

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    Gradshteyn and I.M

    I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik,Table of In- tegrals, Series, and Products(Academic Press, 1980). Official link:https://www.elsevier.com/ books/table-of-integrals-series-and-products/ gradshteyn/978-0-12-384933-5

    work page 1980

  28. [28]

    Mushtaq, X

    F. Mushtaq, X. Tiecheng, M. Yasir, F. Javed, M. Alo- saimi, and R.M. Zulqarnain, Imprints of magnetic charge on the particle orbits, weak gravitational lensing and black hole shadows, Phys. Dark Universe50, 102109 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025. 102109

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025 2025

  29. [29]

    S. Kala, H. Nandan, and P. Sharma, Shadow and weak gravitational lensing of a rotating regular black hole in a non-minimally coupled Einstein-Yang-Mills theory in the presence of plasma, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 457 (2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/ s13360-022-02634-6. Appendix In this Appendix we provide the technical details of the calculation of...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/ 2022

  30. [30]

    Since the transfor- mation is isospectral, the functional determinants ofL and ˜Lcoincide

    gives a Schr¨ odinger-like (more precisely, Sturm-Liouville type) differential equa- tion 0 = ˜Lχ(τ) = − d2 dτ 2 +U(τ) χ(τ) (33) with U(τ) =− 3 4 − 1 12 1 sin2 τ√ 3 .(34) This transformation rewrites the original Sturm-Liouville problem in a Schr¨ odinger-like form with standard second- derivative structure, so that the Gel’fand-Yaglom theo- rem [24, 25] ...

    work page