Encapsulation-Induced Alignment in Endofullerenes

Jesus Perez-Rios; Jonathan Smucker

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Encapsulation-Induced Alignment in Endofullerenes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The carbon cage of C60 acts as an alignment field: trapped N2 and AlF become strongly aligned while their spectroscopic constants barely change.

desk verdict A testable and honest paper, but the headline alignment numbers rest on a phi-averaged m=0 treatment that is not yet robust. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12534 v2 pith:RHBEQPSW submitted 2025-01-21 physics.chem-ph physics.atm-clus

Jonathan Smucker , Jesus Perez-Rios This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.chem-phphysics.atm-clus

keywords endofullerenesmolecularalignmentorientationC60cagerotationalspectroscopydensityfunctionaltheoryrigidrotorspectroscopicconstants

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a C60 fullerene cage does more than passively trap a small molecule: the cage creates an anisotropic environment that strongly mixes the molecule's rotational states. The authors compute interaction potentials with DFT and solve the rigid-rotor problem inside the cage for N2 and AlF. They find strong encapsulation-induced alignment, reaching 0.82 for N2 and 0.98 (with orientation 0.99) for AlF, while all tested spectroscopic constants stay close to their free-molecule values. If true, endofullerenes offer a way to hold molecules in fixed spatial orientations without external fields while preserving the molecule's gas-phase spectroscopic identity.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through a rigid-rotor Hamiltonian $\hat H = \hat H_{\mathrm{rot}} + \hat H_c$, where $\hat H_c$ is the molecule-cage interaction potential $V(R,\$\theta$)$ expanded in spherical harmonics. The potential is obtained by interpolating a grid of B3LYP-D3 single-point DFT energies, with the azimuthal angle averaged out, so only $m=0$ rotational states mix. Diagonalization gives the perturbed rotational ground state, whose population distribution yields alignment $\langle\$cos^{2}$\$\theta$\rangle$ and orientation $\langle\cos\$\theta$\rangle$. For the vibrational constants, the potential is averaged over a spherical harmonic, fitted to a Morse potential, and standard Morse formulas give $\omega_e$, $\omega_e\chi_e$, $B_e$, and $\alpha_e$.

What would settle it

Compute the full three-dimensional potential $V(R,\$\theta$,\phi)$ and solve the rigid-rotor problem including phi-dependence, or replace the spherical-harmonic average in Eq. (4) with the aligned ground-state angular distribution; either calculation would show whether alignments of 0.82 and 0.98 and the unchanged constants survive. Experimentally, measuring the rotational revival times of N2@C60 and comparing them with free N2 would test whether the rotational constant is truly unshifted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the molecule-cage interaction is highly anisotropic, inducing strong coupling between rotational states of the internal molecule, and that this coupling produces a high degree of alignment: the N2 ground rotational state has alignment $\langle\$cos^{2}$\$\theta$\rangle = 0.82$, while AlF reaches alignment 0.98 and orientation 0.99. In the same calculation, the spectroscopic constants ($R_e$, $\omega_e$, $\omega_e\chi_e$, $B_e$, and $\alpha_e$) remain essentially unchanged from the free molecules, and the AlF dipole moment is slightly enhanced (1.63 D versus 1.53 D). The authors interpret the cage as creating a preferred axis analogous to an external electric field, but without significantly altering the molecule's internal properties.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation treats the interaction potential as independent of the azimuthal angle phi, even though the computed curves vary by up to 10.4% with phi, and it averages the vibrational potential over an unspecified single spherical harmonic instead of the actual aligned ground state; if those choices change the rotational wavefunction, the quoted alignments and near-unchanged constants could shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Encapsulation provides a built-in alignment mechanism: molecules inside C60 are held at a fixed orientation without any external electric or laser field.
The near-unchanged spectroscopic constants imply that endofullerenes can serve as 'nearly free' molecules for precision spectroscopy or quantum applications.
For heteronuclear molecules the cage provides both alignment and orientation, making AlF@C60 a candidate for orientation-dependent measurements.
Laser-induced alignment revivals in an endofullerene should occur at times set by the nearly unchanged rotational constant, so any deviation would signal a cage-induced shift.
The opposite dipole-moment trends of AlF@C60 and HF@C60 indicate that cage effects on the dipole moment depend strongly on the trapped molecule.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the computed potential varies by up to 10.4% with the azimuthal angle, a full three-dimensional treatment that includes m-mixing could shift the quoted alignment values; this is a direct test the authors did not perform.
The vibrational average in Eq. (4) uses a bare spherical harmonic instead of the aligned ground-state angular distribution; using the aligned distribution could alter the Morse fit and hence the predicted spectroscopic constants.
The predicted dipole enhancement for AlF is testable by microwave or Stark spectroscopy on AlF@C60 and would distinguish cage enhancement from the suppression seen in HF@C60.
The same rigid-rotor treatment could be extended to other diatomics, predicting that highly polar or elongated molecules will show even stronger orientation inside the cage.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper gives specific, testable predictions for N2@C60 and AlF@C60 — alignment 0.82 and 0.98/0.99 — and makes the point that strong cage-induced alignment can coexist with almost unchanged spectroscopic constants. That coexistence is the genuinely new observation, and it is worth taking seriously even though the numbers are not final.

What is done well: the authors benchmark functionals against known He@C60 behavior and pick B3LYP-D3 with a defensible basis; they use counterpoise corrections; they check both homonuclear and polar diatomic cases. The vibrational analysis is transparent: Morse fit with stated De/a parameters, and they report fit errors. They also flag their own red flags — the free AlF bond length is off by 0.09 Å, so the 'cage stretch' is partly a DFT artifact, and their AlF dipole enhancement contradicts the HF@C60 measurement. That honesty is real and useful.

The soft spots are in the rotational part, and they are not minor. The alignment numbers come from Eq. (3), which drops the phi dependence and restricts to m=0. The paper justifies this by the 10.4% spread in phi cuts, but 10% of an interaction on the order of 10^2 cm^-1 for N2 is comparable to the l=2 spacing (6Be ~ 12 cm^-1). The D5d symmetry couples m and m±5 states, so an m=0-only calculation can miss real mixing. Using V(R,theta,0) rather than the azimuthal average also introduces an arbitrary reference. The stress-test concern lands: the alignment values could shift in a full 3D rigid-rotor calculation. The vibrational averaging in Eq. (4) is also under-specified — one spherical harmonic, not the actual aligned ground state. These are fixable with more computation, but they mean the headline numbers are conditional.

Bottom line: this is a solid, honest paper with a new testable claim and acknowledged limitations. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should ask for a full-dimensional rotational calculation or at least a quantitative estimate of phi-corrugation effects before the alignment numbers are quoted. I'd bring it to reading group as a good example of a paper that separates a robust qualitative point from fragile quantitative detail.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports DFT calculations of the interaction potential between N2 or AlF and the interior of C60, and uses these potentials to predict the rotational alignment/orientation and the spectroscopic constants of the encapsulated molecules. The central claims are that (i) the cage induces strong alignment, with <cos^2θ> = 0.82 for N2@C60 and <cos^2θ> = 0.98 with <cosθ> = 0.99 for AlF@C60, while (ii) the spectroscopic constants of the internal molecule are only weakly perturbed. The authors also report a slight enhancement of the AlF dipole moment inside C60 and propose a laser-alignment experiment based on rotational revival times. The calculations are based on B3LYP-D3 potentials with counterpoise corrections, a rigid-rotor treatment for rotational states, and a Morse-potential fit for vibrational constants.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions are robust, the paper would provide useful guidance for endofullerene spectroscopy and for experiments on laser-induced alignment of encapsulated molecules. The work has clear strengths: ab initio interaction potentials rather than fitted Lennard-Jones forms, a systematic functional comparison, explicit BSSE corrections, and transparent Morse fits with quoted fitting errors. The predicted alignment values and the revival-time proposal are concrete and falsifiable. However, the central quantitative claims depend on two approximations—neglect of the azimuthal dependence of the potential and a spherical-harmonic average for vibration—that are not quantitatively justified in the manuscript. The spectroscopic comparison also mixes levels of theory. These issues must be addressed before the conclusions can be accepted as stated.

major comments (3)

[Sec. III, Eq. (3)] The replacement of the full potential by V(R,θ,0) and the restriction to m=0 states is not justified by the stated 10.4% maximum variation among φ curves. For N2, the rotational energy spacing between l=0 and l=2 is about 6Be ≈ 12 cm−1, while the θ-anisotropy of the potential is of order 10^2 cm−1; 10% of that anisotropy is therefore comparable to the rotational spacing. Moreover, the D5d symmetry of the optimized geometry implies that the full potential couples m with m±5, so restricting the basis to m=0 excludes couplings that could change the ground-state wavefunction and hence <cos^2θ>. The use of V(R,θ,0) rather than the azimuthal average (the gray curve in Fig. 4) also introduces an arbitrary choice of φ. The quoted alignments (0.82 for N2, 0.98/0.99 for AlF) should be verified by solving the 3D rigid-rotor problem with the full V(R,θ,φ), or by presenting a convergence study in the number of m components and φ grid points.
[Sec. IV, Eq. (4)] The 'rotationally averaged potential' used for the vibrational analysis is defined as the expectation value of V(r,θ,φ) in a single spherical harmonic Y_l^m, but the manuscript does not specify which l and m are used. If l=0 is intended, the average is over all orientations, which is inconsistent with the strongly aligned ground state found in Sec. III; if a higher l is intended, the choice must be justified. The effective vibrational potential should be the expectation value in the actual ground rotational state (or include the rotational-vibrational coupling explicitly). Since the Morse parameters De and a, and hence all spectroscopic constants in Table II, are fit to this averaged potential, the unspecified spherical harmonic is load-bearing for the claim that the cage leaves the spectroscopic constants essentially unchanged.
[Sec. IV, Table II and Sec. II] The comparison of encapsulated spectroscopic constants to 'known values' for free molecules is not like-for-like. For AlF, the text in Sec. II states that the same DFT method predicts a free-molecule bond length of 1.74 Å, whereas Table II lists the free AlF Re as 1.654369 Å (presumably experimental). The cage-induced change at the same level of theory (1.69 Å inside versus 1.74 Å free) is actually a compression, opposite in sign to the 'stretch' narrative, and the DFT error is larger than the reported cage effect. A reliable statement that the cage does not significantly alter the spectroscopic constants requires comparing encapsulated and free values computed at the same level of theory and with a quantified error budget, not comparing DFT-in-cage values to experimental free-molecule values.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (1)] The summation limits in Eq. (1) are written as 'lX m=−l ∞X l', which is malformed; they should read Σ_{l=0}^∞ Σ_{m=-l}^l.
[Sec. IV, text before Eq. (4)] 'rationally averaged potential' appears to be a typo for 'rotationally averaged potential'.
[Fig. 4 caption] The caption says 'The gray lines represents the average of all the angles φ' but the figure appears to show one gray curve; please clarify the wording.
[Sec. II and Table I] The functional is referred to as 'wB97XV' in the text but as 'wB97XD' in Table I and reference [19]; please make the naming consistent.
[Table II] The source of the free-molecule values in Table II should be stated explicitly: are they experimental values from ref. [28], and are the N2 and AlF free-molecule values computed at the same level of theory as the encapsulated ones? This is closely related to major comment 3, but a clarifying footnote would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectroscopic constants and alignment values are derived from ab initio potentials and compared against independent experimental benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The interaction potential V(R,theta,phi) is obtained from a grid of single-point DFT energy calculations (Section II), and the rotational Hamiltonian matrix elements in Eq. (2) are computed from that potential. Diagonalizing Eq. (3) then yields the rotational eigenstates from which the alignment <cos^2(theta)> and orientation <cos(theta)> values are obtained (Section III). The spectroscopic constants in Section IV are derived by fitting the rotationally averaged potential to a Morse potential, Eq. (5), and then applying the standard Morse formulas, Eqs. (6)-(9). No experimental spectroscopic constant of N2 or AlF is used as an input in the fit or in the diagonalization; the experimental values from ref. [28] appear only as a post-hoc comparison in Table II. Although ref. [28] is authored in part by one of the present authors, it is an independent database of measured spectroscopic constants, so it constitutes external evidence rather than a self-fulfilling input. The omission of phi-dependence and the restriction to m=0 states are accuracy approximations, not circular reductions: they may affect robustness of the numerical predictions, but they do not make the output equivalent to the input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on a single DFT potential surface, with several modeling approximations (phi-independence, rigid rotor separation, spherical-harmonic averaging) that are not cross-validated against experiment or full-dimensional calculations.

free parameters (4)

De (Morse dissociation energy) for N2@C60 = not reported explicitly
Fitted to maximize R^2 when the rotationally averaged DFT potential is matched to a Morse potential (Eq. 5, Section IV).
a (Morse range parameter) for N2@C60 = not reported explicitly
Obtained from the same Morse fit; uncertainty propagated into omega_e and alpha_e.
De (Morse dissociation energy) for AlF@C60 = not reported explicitly
Same fit procedure as N2@C60 (Section IV).
a (Morse range parameter) for AlF@C60 = not reported explicitly
Same fit procedure as N2@C60 (Section IV).

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The B3LYP-D3/Def2QZV (N2) and Def2TZV (AlF) DFT methods with counterpoise correction accurately describe the molecule-cage interaction potential.
The entire analysis depends on the accuracy of the DFT potential energy surface; selection is justified via a functional comparison for encapsulation energies (Table I) and literature on He@C60 (ref. 22).
ad hoc to paper The interaction potential's phi-dependence can be neglected because the maximum difference among phi curves is 10.4%.
Section III and Fig. 4; this simplification reduces the rotational Hamiltonian to m=0 states only, but its effect on computed alignment/orientation is not quantified.
domain assumption Vibrational and rotational degrees of freedom can be treated separately, with the internal molecule as a rigid rotor during rotation.
Section III: justified by stretch energies being much larger than rotation energies, but no coupled calculation is performed.
ad hoc to paper For vibration, the effective potential is the expectation value of V(r,theta,phi) in a single spherical harmonic Y_l^m (Eq. 4), rather than in the actual aligned ground rotational state.
Section IV; the choice of l,m is not specified, and this averaging is inconsistent with the strong alignment found in the rotational analysis.
domain assumption The rotationally averaged potential is well described by a Morse potential (Eq. 5).
Section IV; R^2 > 0.99 for both systems, so this is a reasonable empirical form.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Encapsulation-Induced Alignment in Endofullerenes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RHBEQPSW

@misc{pith2026250112534,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Encapsulation-Induced Alignment in Endofullerenes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RHBEQPSW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12534}
}

read the original abstract

Methods for creating endofullerenes have been steadily improving since their discovery, allowing for new types of endofullerenes to be created in larger numbers. When a molecule is trapped in a fullerene, the fullerene creates a harmonic trapping potential that leaves most of the fundamental properties of the internal molecule intact. The fullerene cage does create a preferred axis for the internal molecule, which we refer to as the encapsulation-induced alignment of the molecule. We explore the alignment of AlF and N2 inside of C60 by first computing the interaction between the internal molecule and the fullerene cage using ab initio electronic structure methods. Our results show that the internal molecules are found to be strongly aligned despite finding that all the calculated spectroscopic constants are relatively unaffected by the fullerene cage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12534 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. The optimized geometry of N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. The optimized geometry of AlF@C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The energy of N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Mixing of the rotational states of N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Mixing of the rotational states of AlF due to the in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. The potential for the AlF molecule within a fullerene. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

H. W. Kroto, C60: Buckminsterfullerene, the celestial sphere that fell to earth, Angewandte Chemie Interna- tional Edition in English 31, 111 (1992). 8

work page 1992
[2]

X. Lu, L. Feng, T. Akasaka, and S. Nagase, Current status and future developments of endohedral metallo- fullerenes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7723 (2012)

work page 2012
[3]

A. A. Popov, S. Yang, and L. Dunsch, Endohedral fullerenes, Chemical reviews 113, 5989 (2013)

work page 2013
[4]

Y. Chai, T. Guo, C. Jin, R. E. Haufler, L. P. F. Chibante, J. Fure, L. Wang, J. M. Alford, and R. E. Smalley, Fullerenes with metals inside, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 95, 7564 (1991)

work page 1991
[5]

M. H. Levitt, Spectroscopy of light-molecule endo- fullerenes, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 371, 20120429 (2013)

work page 2013
[6]

Harneit, Spin quantum computing with endohedral fullerenes, in Endohedral Fullerenes: Electron Transfer and Spin, edited by A

W. Harneit, Spin quantum computing with endohedral fullerenes, in Endohedral Fullerenes: Electron Transfer and Spin, edited by A. A. Popov (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017) pp. 297–324

work page 2017
[7]

Bloodworth and R

S. Bloodworth and R. J. Whitby, Synthesis of endohedral fullerenes by molecular surgery, Communications Chem- istry 5, 121 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Williams, M

C. Williams, M. Whitehead, and L. Pang, Interaction and dynamics of endohedral gas molecules in fullerene C60 isomers and C70, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 97, 11652 (1993)

work page 1993

Show all 38 references

[9]

Jafari, G

T. Jafari, G. Razvan Bacanu, A. Shugai, U. Nagel, M. Walkey, G. Hoffman, M. H. Levitt, R. J. Whitby, and T. R˜ o˜ om, Terahertz spectroscopy of the helium end- ofullerene He@C 60, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 9943 (2022)

2022
[10]

S. Ye, M. Xu, Z. Baˇ ci´ c, R. Lawler, and N. J. Turro, Quantum dynamics of a hydrogen molecule inside an anisotropic open-cage fullerene: Coupled translation- rotation eigenstates and comparison with inelastic neu- tron scattering spectroscopy, The Journal of Physical Chemist...

2010
[11]

M. Xu, F. Sebastianelli, B. R. Gibbons, Z. Baˇ ci´ c, R. Lawler, and N. J. Turro, Coupled translation-rotation eigenstates of H2 in C60 and C70 on the spectroscop- ically optimized interaction potential: Effects of cage anisotropy on the energy level structure and assignments,...

2009
[12]

P. M. Felker and Z. Baˇ ci´ c, Translation-rotation states of H2 in C60: New insights from a perturbation-theory treatment, The Journal of Chemical Physics 145, 084310 (2016)

2016
[13]

M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scal- mani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, X. Li, M. Caricato, A. V. Marenich, J. Bloino, B. G. Janesko, R. Gomperts, B. Mennucci, H. P. Hratchian, J. V. Or- tiz, A. F. Izmay...

2016
[14]

A. D. Becke, Density-functional thermochemistry. iii. the role of exact exchange, The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 5648 (1993), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/98/7/5648/19277469/5648 1 online.pdf

1993
[15]

Ernzerhof and J

M. Ernzerhof and J. P. Perdew, Generalized gradi- ent approximation to the angle- and system-averaged exchange hole, The Journal of Chemical Physics 109, 3313 (1998), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/109/9/3313/19115007/3313 1 online.pdf

1998
[16]

H. S. Yu, X. He, S. L. Li, and D. G. Truhlar, Mn15: A kohn–sham global-hybrid exchange–correlation den- sity functional with broad accuracy for multi-reference and single-reference systems and noncovalent interac- tions, Chem. Sci. 7, 5032 (2016)

2016
[17]

Zhao and D

Y. Zhao and D. G. Truhlar, Design of density function- als that are broadly accurate for thermochemistry, ther- mochemical kinetics, and nonbonded interactions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 109, 5656 (2005)

2005
[18]

Austin, G

A. Austin, G. A. Petersson, M. J. Frisch, F. J. Dobek, G. Scalmani, and K. Throssell, A density functional with spherical atom dispersion terms, Journal of Chem- ical Theory and Computation 8, 4989 (2012), pMID: 26593191, https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300778e

2012 doi
[19]

Chai and M

J.-D. Chai and M. Head-Gordon, Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dis- persion corrections, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 6615 (2008)

2008
[20]

Slanina, P

Z. Slanina, P. Pulay, and S. Nagase, H 2, Ne, and N2 energies of encapsulation into C 60 evaluated with the mpwb1k functional, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2, 782 (2006), pMID: 26626683, https://doi.org/10.1021/ct0503320

2006 doi
[21]

Yanai, D

T. Yanai, D. P. Tew, and N. C. Handy, A new hy- brid exchange–correlation functional using the coulomb- attenuating method (cam-b3lyp), Chemical Physics Let- ters 393, 51 (2004)

2004
[22]

G. R. Bacanu, T. Jafari, M. Aouane, J. Ranta- harju, M. Walkey, G. Hoffman, A. Shugai, U. Nagel, M. Jim´ enez-Ruiz, A. J. Horsewill, S. Rols, T. R˜ o˜ om, R. J. Whitby, and M. H. Levitt, Experimental determination of the interaction potential between a helium atom and the inte...

2021
[23]

Boys and F

S. Boys and F. Bernardi, The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of sep- arate total energies. some procedures with re- duced errors, Molecular Physics 19, 553 (1970), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977000101561

1970 doi
[24]

Simon, M

S. Simon, M. Duran, and J. J. Dannenberg, How does basis set superposition error change the potential surfaces for hydrogen-bonded dimers?, The Journal of Chemical Physics 105, 11024 (1996), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/105/24/11024/19073012/11024 1 online.pdf

1996
[25]

Slanina and S

Z. Slanina and S. Nagase, A computational characteri- zation of N 2@C60, Molecular Physics 104, 3167 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970601041131

2006 doi
[26]

Akasaka and S

T. Akasaka and S. Nagase, Endofullerenes: a new family of carbon clusters, Vol. 3 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2002)

2002
[27]

M. D. Hanwell, D. E. Curtis, D. C. Lonie, T. Van- dermeersch, E. Zurek, and G. R. Hutchison, Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, 9 and analysis platform, Journal of Cheminformatics 4, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 (2012)

2012 doi
[28]

Y. Wang, D. Julian, M. A. Ibrahim, C. Chin, S. Bhat- tiprolu, E. Franco, and J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, The database of spectroscopic constants of diatomic molecules (DSCDM): A dynamic and user-friendly interface for molecular physics and spectroscopy, Journal of Molecular Spec- tros...

2023
[29]

Gerhard Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure (Springer, 1950)

F. Gerhard Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure (Springer, 1950)

1950
[30]

Demtr¨ oder,Molecular physics: theoretical principles and experimental methods(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

W. Demtr¨ oder,Molecular physics: theoretical principles and experimental methods(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

2008
[31]

Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure

G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. I. Spectra of Diatomic Molecules(Van Nostrand Rein- hold Company, 1950)

1950
[32]

Krachmalnicoff, R

A. Krachmalnicoff, R. Bounds, S. Mamone, S. Alom, M. Concistre, B. Meier, K. Kouˇ ril, M. E. Light, M. R. Johnson, S. Rols, et al. , The dipolar endofullerene HF@C60, Nature chemistry 8, 953 (2016)

2016
[33]

F. J. Lovas, E. Tiemann, J. S. Coursey, S. A. Ko- tochigova, K. O. J. Chang, and R. A. Dragoset,
[34]

D. S. Sabirov, Polarizability as a landmark property for fullerene chemistry and materials science, RSC Adv. 4, 44996 (2014)

2014
[35]

Seideman, Revival structure of aligned rotational wave packets, Phys

T. Seideman, Revival structure of aligned rotational wave packets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4971 (1999)

1999
[36]

Yu, T.-S

H. Yu, T.-S. Ho, and H. Rabitz, Optimal control of ori- entation and entanglement for two dipole–dipole coupled quantum planar rotors, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 13008 (2018)

2018
[37]

M. J. J. Vrakking, D. M. Villeneuve, and A. Stolow, Observation of fractional revivals of a molecular wave packet, Phys. Rev. A 54, R37 (1996)

1996
[38]

Stapelfeldt and T

H. Stapelfeldt and T. Seideman, Colloquium: Aligning molecules with strong laser pulses, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 543 (2003)

2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

H. W. Kroto, C60: Buckminsterfullerene, the celestial sphere that fell to earth, Angewandte Chemie Interna- tional Edition in English 31, 111 (1992). 8

work page 1992

[2] [2]

X. Lu, L. Feng, T. Akasaka, and S. Nagase, Current status and future developments of endohedral metallo- fullerenes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7723 (2012)

work page 2012

[3] [3]

A. A. Popov, S. Yang, and L. Dunsch, Endohedral fullerenes, Chemical reviews 113, 5989 (2013)

work page 2013

[4] [4]

Y. Chai, T. Guo, C. Jin, R. E. Haufler, L. P. F. Chibante, J. Fure, L. Wang, J. M. Alford, and R. E. Smalley, Fullerenes with metals inside, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 95, 7564 (1991)

work page 1991

[5] [5]

M. H. Levitt, Spectroscopy of light-molecule endo- fullerenes, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 371, 20120429 (2013)

work page 2013

[6] [6]

Harneit, Spin quantum computing with endohedral fullerenes, in Endohedral Fullerenes: Electron Transfer and Spin, edited by A

W. Harneit, Spin quantum computing with endohedral fullerenes, in Endohedral Fullerenes: Electron Transfer and Spin, edited by A. A. Popov (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017) pp. 297–324

work page 2017

[7] [7]

Bloodworth and R

S. Bloodworth and R. J. Whitby, Synthesis of endohedral fullerenes by molecular surgery, Communications Chem- istry 5, 121 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Williams, M

C. Williams, M. Whitehead, and L. Pang, Interaction and dynamics of endohedral gas molecules in fullerene C60 isomers and C70, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 97, 11652 (1993)

work page 1993