Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Scattering off an ordinary object can turn an unstructured wave packet into a stable spatiotemporal vortex, and a disc-shaped obstacle closes the vortex lines into a ring.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 07:49 UTC pith:RISROESE

load-bearing objection A genuinely new generation mechanism for STVs/STVRs via passive scattering, with a clean analytical core and supporting experiments; the main open question is whether the 'excellent propagation stability' claim survives beyond the paraxial regime. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21322 v1 pith:RISROESE submitted 2026-07-23 physics.class-ph

Spatiotemporal Vortex Rings Induced by Spatiotemporal Coupling

Zhiling Zhou , Wei Zhong , Tong Fu , Wanyue Xiao , Zhongming Gu , Jie Zhu , Shubo Wang This is my paper
classification physics.class-ph
keywords spatiotemporal vortexvortex ringspatiotemporal couplingacoustic wavestopological chargescatteringGouy phaseorbital angular momentum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the mixing of space and time during propagation — usually treated as a nuisance in wave physics — is actually sufficient to create vortices out of structureless wave packets. An incident Gaussian pulse that scatters from a simple hard-edged screen acquires a two-lobe 'dipole' shape, and the spatiotemporal coupling term in the propagation equation then rotates that dipole into a phase singularity. The resulting spatiotemporal vortex carries transverse orbital angular momentum and, unlike earlier designs, does not dissolve after a few Rayleigh lengths because its two constituent dipoles share the same Gouy phase. A theoretical analysis gives the core form [ξ′ + iζ(z)]/D^{3/2}, and experiments on acoustic wave packets confirm the predicted Y-shaped dislocations and closed singular rings.

Core claim

The central claim is that spatiotemporal coupling, rather than specialized wavefront engineering, drives vortex formation. In the co-moving frame the scattered lowest-order field is a spatial dipole ξ0 exp(−ξ0²/σξ² − τ²/στ²). Under the spatiotemporally-coupled propagator H = (1/2keff)∂²/∂ξ² + γ∂²/∂ξ∂τ + (αγ/2)∂²/∂τ², it evolves into the superposition (Eq. 3) of that spatial dipole and a temporal dipole, with a π/2 phase difference; the zero-amplitude line of the superposition is a phase singularity whose core is [ξ′ + iζ(z)]/D^{3/2}. The crucial point is that both dipole terms carry the same Gouy phase in D(z) = 1 − iz/z_R′, so the quadrature relationship — and hence the topological charge —

What carries the argument

The key object is the spatiotemporally-coupled propagator H = (1/2keff)∂²/∂ξ² + γ∂²/∂ξ∂τ + (αγ/2)∂²/∂τ², whose cross-derivative term γ∂²/∂ξ∂τ couples space and time. Applied to the dipole envelope produced by scattering, it generates a second, temporal dipole with a π/2 phase shift; their common Gouy phase, encoded in D(z) = 1 − iz/z_R′, keeps the singularity intact. The vortex core [ξ′ + iζ(z)]/D^{3/2} quantitatively encodes how the ellipticity η = ζ/(c0τ′) grows with propagation distance and tilt angle until a pure vortex appears.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that after scattering the wave packet is well described by the lowest-order spatial dipole alone, so that the parabolic propagator with a single Gouy phase governs the full long-distance evolution; if higher-order lobes or non-paraxial effects dominate, the predicted vortex would not materialize.

What would settle it

Measure the complex field (amplitude and phase) of the scattered acoustic pulse at propagation distances z ≈ 10 and 50 Rayleigh lengths for θ = −25° and a screen width λ_c. If the measured phase profile around the predicted singularity departs from the π/2-quadrature dipole superposition of Eq. (3) — for instance, if the two arms acquire different Gouy phases or higher-order lobes fill in the zero — the topological charge will not survive, and the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A passive screen, not active modulation, is enough to create spatiotemporal vortices and vortex rings.
  • The number of vortex lines and the sign of the topological charge are controllable through screen width and pulse timing.
  • Because spatiotemporal coupling is generic, the same scattering mechanism should produce stable spatiotemporal vortices in electromagnetic and water-wave settings.
  • The shared Gouy phase keeps the vortex intact over distances far beyond a Rayleigh length, solving the usual diffraction-dispersion stability problem.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dipole-scattering logic carries over to electromagnetic pulses, a simple knife-edge or aperture could replace delicate pulse shapers in generating transverse orbital angular momentum beams; this follows from the paper's universality argument, not from a demonstration in the paper.
  • Because the vortex appears only after a propagation distance set by ζ(z), the obstacle geometry could be used to place the vortex at a chosen downstream position, effectively acting as a passive 'spacetime lens' for structured pulses.
  • The stability claim suggests that diffraction-dispersion imbalance is specifically fatal to phase-engineered vortices; one could test this by comparing the measured topological charge of scattered versus engineered vortices at the same propagation distance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that spatiotemporal coupling, usually treated as a deleterious effect, can be used constructively: a Gaussian acoustic wave packet scattered by a hard obstacle develops a spatiotemporal vortex (STV) or vortex ring (STVR). The central analytic result, Eq. (3), is a two-term envelope in the sheared frame: a spatial dipole and a temporal dipole sharing a common Gouy phase through D^{-3/2}(z). The ellipticity η of the two dipoles grows with propagation distance z and with incidence angle θ, so a initially dipole-like packet evolves into a pure vortex at a predicted distance. The authors extend this to 2D plates, showing multiple vortices and charge reversal via temporal pulse shaping, and to 3D discs, where the singular arcs close into a ring. Acoustic experiments with uniform line sources and plane sources reproduce the simulated Y-shaped dislocations and the near-zero-amplitude ring, supporting the theory. The paper argues that the mechanism is universal and can be extended to other classical waves.

Significance. If correct, this is a significant conceptual advance: it replaces complex active wavefront modulation with a passive scattering mechanism that uses spatiotemporal coupling to create topological wave fields. The theory is parameter-free in the sense that the only inputs are the incident pulse parameters and the obstacle geometry; no experimental data are fitted. The authors provide full-wave simulations and two sets of acoustic experiments (2D and 3D) that show the predicted dislocations and ring structure. The claimed propagation stability, however, relies on a common Gouy phase that is derived from a second-order propagator; the quantitative effect of higher-order corrections is not analyzed. For this reason, the stability claim is somewhat ahead of the presented evidence. Still, the core mechanism — dipole-like scattered envelope plus spatiotemporal coupling produces a vortex — is plausible and well supported by the simulations and experiments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Vortex formation mechanism, Eqs. (2)-(3)] The stability claim is tied to the common Gouy phase D^{-3/2}(z) in Eq. (3), obtained from the second-order propagator (2). A fourth-order expansion of k_z = sqrt(k^2 - k_x^2) introduces terms such as ∂^4_ξ and ∂^2_ξ∂^2_τ that, in the sheared frame, do not in general preserve the exact factorization of the envelope into two dipole terms sharing a single D(z). The text gives no estimate of the resulting phase drift, and the 67λ propagation in Fig. 3(d) is described only in terms of charge preservation. Since topological charge can survive an extended dislocation, charge preservation alone does not substantiate 'excellent propagation stability.' I request a next-order estimate of the Gouy-phase difference and/or a phase-resolved comparison between Eq. (3) and the full angular-spectrum simulation.
  2. [Vortex formation mechanism, Fig. 3(a) and Eq. (3)] The analytic envelope starts from the lowest-order dipole ansatz p̃(ξ0,0,τ)=ξ0 exp(-ξ0²/σξ² - τ²/στ²). The angular spectrum in Fig. 3(a), however, shows a series of zeros; the text only discusses the first-order pair. The contribution of higher-order scattered lobes is not assessed. If these lobes are not negligible, the vortex-core expression [ξ′ + iζ(z)]/D^{3/2}(z) is incomplete. Please state the validity condition for the dipole truncation (e.g., screen width small compared with the Rayleigh length, or higher-order nodes being evanescent) and show a quantitative amplitude/phase comparison of Eq. (3) with the full polychromatic angular-spectrum result.
  3. [Propagation-stable STVs and STVRs, Fig. 4(g) and Fig. 5(d)] The STVR is a central novelty, but its 'inherited' propagation stability is asserted rather than demonstrated. Only a single iso-amplitude snapshot and a single experimental frame are shown; no evolution of the ring with z is presented. A closed singular line can bend, expand, or collapse during propagation, so the 2D-to-3D stability argument is not automatic. I ask for a z-evolution of the ring (e.g., at several values of z/z_R') or an explicit statement that the ring stability was verified in the Supplementary Information.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Experimental Verification, Fig. 5(a)] The uniform line source is stated to 'equally realize the phenomenon,' but the theory is derived for a Gaussian packet. Since the experiments are a key piece of evidence, a one-sentence justification or a reference to a Supplementary figure showing the uniform-source spectrum and its nodal structure would be helpful.
  2. [Eq. (3)] The display of the second term is confusing: iζ/(c0τ′) is written before c0τ′E/D^{3/2}, so the τ′ dependence cancels. Rewriting the term as iζ(z) E(ξ′,z,τ′)/D^{3/2}(z) would make the structure clearer.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption/text] The sentence 'The whole evolution process in (c) is provided in Supplementary Video 1' should refer to panel (d), since (c) shows the spectrum and (d) shows the evolution.
  4. [Reference [13]] The Nye and Berry paper 'Dislocations in wave trains' was published in Proc. R. Soc. A 336, 165 (1974), not 1997.
  5. [Fig. 5(d)] The simulation and experiment are shown at different times (t=2.6 ms vs 2.9 ms). Please explain the offset (e.g., trigger delay) or align the times.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the vortex prediction is a parameter-free propagation result, not a fit or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The central derivation starts from a real-valued dipole envelope p̃_E(ξ0,0,τ) = ξ0 exp(−ξ0²/σ_ξ² − τ²/σ_τ²), which contains no phase singularity, and evolves it with the spatiotemporally coupled parabolic propagator Ĥ. Equation (3) is a solution of that initial-value problem, not an ansatz forced by the desired vortex structure: the vortex core [ξ′ + iζ(z)]/D^{3/2} emerges from the dynamics rather than being inserted as an input. The parameters k_eff, γ, and α are defined from θ and the wave-packet widths; no experimental data are used to set them. The claimed propagation stability follows from the fact that, in the sheared frame (ξ′, τ′), the coupling terms cancel and the two dipole components share the same Gouy phase D(z); this is a derived property of the model, not a restatement of the conclusion. Experimental and numerical results are external checks of the model, and the paper explicitly compares simulation to experiment (Fig. 5). The only self-referential element is Ref. [46], the paper's own Supplemental Material, which supplies the algebraic derivation of Eq. (3) and the angular-spectrum calculations; this is internal derivation rather than a load-bearing self-citation to prior work. Possible concerns about non-paraxial corrections are correctness risks, not circularity: they question the accuracy of the parabolic propagator but do not make the prediction equivalent to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no fitted constants; the only quantities set by hand are experimental control parameters (angle θ, obstacle sizes, pulse separation), and the main modeling assumptions are the dipole-truncated scattered field and the parabolic propagator. No new physical entities are posited.

free parameters (3)
  • Incident propagation angle θ = -25°
    Tunable control parameter chosen so the vortex-purity parameter η reaches ≈1 at z≈10 z_R′, i.e., within the experimental scan range. It is not fitted to the measured vortex position, but it is a hand-set input.
  • Pulse separation Δt for temporal sculpting = 2.4/f_c (simulation in Fig. 4); 3/f_c (experiment in Fig. 5)
    Hand-set modulation interval used to reverse topological charge and add vortices. The two values are inconsistent between figures in the main text, and the sign-flip mechanism itself is detailed in SI.
  • Obstacle dimensions = plate length 1λ_c or 1.6λ_c; disc diameter 100 mm
    Hand-set to control the number of nodal lines and hence the vortex number; not fitted to data.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Scalar acoustic pressure obeys the linear Helmholtz dispersion k_z = sqrt(k^2 − k_x^2) in air with c0=343 m/s.
    Used to build the sound-cone picture and the parabolic propagator; standard linear acoustics, stated in the dispersion-relation paragraph.
  • domain assumption After scattering, propagation is captured by the parabolic spatiotemporally-coupled propagator H in Eq. (2) (co-moving frame, paraxial/slowly-varying envelope approximation); non-paraxial corrections are negligible over the distances considered.
    All vortex-evolution predictions (Eq. (3), η contours, stability) derive from this parabolic model; the SI is referenced for the derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The lowest-order scattered field from the obstacle is the dipole envelope p̃(ξ0,0,τ)=ξ0 exp(−ξ0²/σξ²−τ²/στ²), and higher-order lobes do not destroy the fundamental vortex.
    Stated in 'Vortex formation mechanism' as 'the lowest order component... has a dipole envelope'; no closed-form scattering solution appears in the main text.
  • ad hoc to paper The uniform line/plane source used in the experiment reproduces the Gaussian-packet phenomenology ('can equally realize the phenomenon').
    Stated without derivation in 'Experimental verification'; the quantitative domain of this equivalence is not given.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9237 in / 20526 out tokens · 222489 ms · 2026-08-01T07:49:34.652808+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Vortices and vortex rings are topological structures that arise in various physical systems. However, the generation of spatiotemporal vortices (STVs) and vortex rings (STVRs) has so far relied on complex, often active wavefront modulation. We theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that spatiotemporal coupling can drive unstructured wave packets to form vortices upon scattering from simple obstacles. The resulting STVs and STVRs possess controllable topological charges and excellent propagation stability. These findings reveal a fundamental mechanism for spatiotemporal singularity formation and provide a universal route to structured-wave generation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21322 by Jie Zhu, Shubo Wang, Tong Fu, Wanyue Xiao, Wei Zhong, Zhiling Zhou, Zhongming Gu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of STVRs induced by spatiotemporal cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Spatiotemporal coupling and vortex formation. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Realization of 2D STVs. (a) Normalized angular spectrum for a Gaussian beam scattered by a screen of length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Manipulation of the topological charges and STVR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimental verification of the STV and STVR generation. (a) Schematic of the 2D experiment platform. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Cummins, M

    C. Cummins, M. Seale, A. Macente, D. Certini, E. Mas- tropaolo, I. M. Viola, and N. Nakayama, A separated vortex ring underlies the flight of the dandelion, Nature 562, 414 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    P. J. Kilner, G.-Z. Yang, A. J. Wilkes, R. H. Mohiaddin, D. N. Firmin, and M. H. Yacoub, Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart, Nature404, 759 (2000)

    2000

  3. [3]

    Akhmetov,Vortex rings(Springer Science & Business Media, 2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    Weiler, T

    C. Weiler, T. Neely, D. Scherer, A. Bradley, M. Davis, and B. Anderson, Spontaneous vortices in the formation of bose-einstein condensates, Nature455, 948 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Mej ´ ıa-L´ opez, D

    J. Mej ´ ıa-L´ opez, D. Altbir, P. Landeros, J. Escrig, A. H. Romero, I. V. Roshchin, C.-P. Li, M. R. Fitzsimmons, X. Batlle, and I. K. Schuller, Development of vortex state in circular magnetic nanodots: Theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. B81, 184417 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Allen, M

    L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes, Phys. Rev. A45, 8185 (1992)

    1992

  7. [7]

    Volke-Sep´ ulveda, A

    K. Volke-Sep´ ulveda, A. O. Santill´ an, and R. R. Boullosa, Transfer of angular momentum to matter from acousti- cal vortices in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 024302 (2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    S. Wang, G. Ma, and C. T. Chan, Topological transport of sound mediated by spin-redirection geometric phase, Sci. Adv.4, eaaq1475 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    S. Fan, Y. Wang, L. Cao, Y. Zhu, A. Chen, B. Vincent, B. Assouar, and Y. Wang, Acoustic vortices with high- order orbital angular momentum by a continuously tun- able metasurface, Appl. Phys. Lett.116, 163504 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    S. Wang, G. Zhang, X. Wang, Q. Tong, J. Li, and G. Ma, Spin-orbit interactions of transverse sound, Nat. Com- mun.12, 6125 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    J. Li, A. Crivoi, X. Peng, L. Shen, Y. Pu, Z. Fan, and S. A. Cummer, Three dimensional acoustic tweezers with vortex streaming, Commun. Phys.4, 113 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    W. Xiao, W. Kuang, S. Huang, S. Liang, D. P. Tsai, and S. Wang, Acoustic pancharatnam–berry geometric phase for structured sound manipulation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.123, e2527851123 (2026)

    2026

  13. [13]

    J. F. Nye and M. V. Berry, Dislocations in wave trains, Proc. R. Soc. Ser. A336, 165 (1997)

    1997

  14. [14]

    Jhajj, I

    N. Jhajj, I. Larkin, E. W. Rosenthal, S. Zahedpour, J. K. Wahlstrand, and H. M. Milchberg, Spatiotemporal opti- cal vortices, Phys. Rev. X6, 031037 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    Huang, J

    J. Huang, J. Zhang, T. Zhu, and Z. Ruan, Spatiotemporal differentiators generating optical vortices with transverse orbital angular momentum and detecting sharp change of pulse envelope, Laser & Photonics Rev.16, 2100357 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    W. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Tang, X. Wang, X. Zhao, L. Shi, 6 J. Zi, and C. T. Chan, Exploiting topological darkness in photonic crystal slabs for spatiotemporal vortex genera- tion, Nano. Lett.24, 943 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Q. Chen, S. Zhang, G. Xian, H. Hu, X. Wu, X. Wu, J. Huang, C. Huang, J. Zhong, Y. Zhang, X. Yuan, C. Min, and Y. Dai, Synthetic spatiotemporal plasmonic vortices on chip, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 256903 (2026)

    2026

  18. [18]

    P. Huo, W. Chen, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, M. Liu, P. Lin, H. Zhang, Z. Chen, H. Lezec, W. Zhu, A. Agrawal, C. Peng, Y. Lu, and T. Xu, Observation of spatiotem- poral optical vortices enabled by symmetry-breaking slanted nanograting, Nat. Commun.15, 3055 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    S. Liu, H. Ge, X.-Y. Xu, Y. Sun, X.-P. Liu, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Generation of spatiotemporal acoustic vortices with arbitrarily oriented orbital angular momen- tum, Nat. Commun.16, 2823 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    H. Ge, S. Liu, X.-Y. Xu, Z.-W. Long, Y. Tian, X.-P. Liu, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Spatiotemporal acoustic vortex beams with transverse orbital angular momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 014001 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    S. W. Hancock, S. Zahedpour, A. Goffin, and H. M. Milchberg, Free-space propagation of spatiotemporal op- tical vortices, Optica6, 1547 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    C. Wan, Q. Cao, J. Chen, A. Chong, and Q. Zhan, Toroidal vortices of light, Nat. Photonics16, 519 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    X. Liu, N. Zhang, Q. Cao, J. Liu, C. Liang, Q. Zhan, and Y. Cai, Dynamics of photonic toroidal vortices medi- ated by orbital angular momenta, Sci. Adv.11, eadz0843 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    R. Wang, B. Ying, S. Shi, J. Wang, B.-Z. Wang, M. Liang, and Y. Shen, Hybrid electromagnetic toroidal vortices, Sci. Adv.11, eads4797 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Bliokh and F

    K. Bliokh and F. Nori, Spatiotemporal vortex beams and angular momentum, Phys. Rev. A86, 033824 (2012)

    2012

  26. [26]

    Bliokh, Orbital angular momentum of optical, acous- tic, and quantum-mechanical spatiotemporal vortex pulses, Phys

    K. Bliokh, Orbital angular momentum of optical, acous- tic, and quantum-mechanical spatiotemporal vortex pulses, Phys. Rev. A107, L031501 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    K. Y. Bliokh, Spatiotemporal vortex pulses: Angular mo- menta and spin-orbit interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 243601 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    J. Chen, L. Yu, C. Wan, and Q. Zhan, Spin–orbit cou- pling within tightly focused circularly polarized spa- tiotemporal vortex wavepacket, ACS Photonics9, 793 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Z. Wu, J. Cheng, and C. Wan, Optical data encoding through spatiotemporal orbital angular momentum spec- tral engineering, ACS Photonics12, 5017 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    X. Liu, Q. Cao, N. Zhang, A. Chong, Y. Cai, and Q. Zhan, Spatiotemporal optical vortices with control- lable radial and azimuthal quantum numbers, Nat. Com- mun.15, 5435 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Huang, Z

    S. Huang, Z. Li, J. Li, N. Zhang, X. Lu, K. Dorfman, J. Liu, and J. Yao, Spatiotemporal vortex strings, Sci. Adv.10, eadn6206 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Forbes, M

    A. Forbes, M. De Oliveira, and M. R. Dennis, Structured light, Nat. Photonics15, 253 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Wang, P.-Y

    R. Wang, P.-Y. Bao, Z.-Q. Hu, S. Shi, B.-Z. Wang, N. I. Zheludev, and Y. Shen, Observation of resilient propaga- tion and free-space skyrmions in toroidal electromagnetic pulses, Appl. Phys. Rev.11, 031411 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    D. Kim, G. Park, Y.-S. Choi, A. Baucour, J. Hwang, J. Kim, S. Park, H. S. Yun, J. Shin, H. Wang, S. Fan, D. K. Yoon, and M.-K. Seo, Dynamic realization of emer- gent high-dimensional optical vortices, Nat. Commun. 16, 9788 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Zdagkas, C

    A. Zdagkas, C. McDonnell, J. Deng, Y. Shen, G. Li, T. Ellenbogen, N. Papasimakis, and N. I. Zheludev, Ob- servation of toroidal pulses of light, Nat. Photonics16, 523 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Akturk, X

    S. Akturk, X. Gu, P. Bowlan, and R. Trebino, Spatio- temporal couplings in ultrashort laser pulses, J. Opt.12, 093001 (2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    Pariente, V

    G. Pariente, V. Gallet, A. Borot, O. Gobert, and F. Qu´ er´ e, Space–time characterization of ultra-intense femtosecond laser beams, Nat. Photonics10, 547 (2016)

    2016

  38. [38]

    Brinks, R

    D. Brinks, R. Hildner, F. D. Stefani, and N. F. Van Hulst, Beating spatio-temporal coupling: implications for pulse shaping and coherent control experiments, Opt. Express 19, 26486 (2011)

    2011

  39. [39]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y. Sun, J. Huang, B. Wu, Z. Yang, K. Y. Bliokh, and Z. Ruan, Topologically crafted spatiotempo- ral vortices in acoustics, Nat. Commun.14, 6238 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    G. Gui, N. J. Brooks, H. C. Kapteyn, M. M. Murnane, and C.-T. Liao, Second-harmonic generation and the con- servation of spatiotemporal orbital angular momentum of light, Nat. Photonics15, 608 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Z. Che, W. Liu, J. Ye, L. Shi, C. T. Chan, and J. Zi, Generation of spatiotemporal vortex pulses by resonant diffractive grating, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 044001 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    X. Y. Chen, X. F. Zhu, J. Yao, Q. Wei, and D. J. Wu, Spatiotemporal differentiation and vortex based on an acoustic metagrating, Phys. Rev. Applied25, 014015 (2026)

    2026

  43. [43]

    S. W. Hancock, S. Zahedpour, and H. M. Milchberg, Mode structure and orbital angular momentum of spa- tiotemporal optical vortex pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 243601 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    J. Ye, Z. Che, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, B. Wang, W. Liu, L. Shi, and J. Zi, Propagation-invariant spatiotemporal vortices, Sci. Bull.70, 3758 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Q. Cao, J. Chen, K. Lu, C. Wan, A. Chong, and Q. Zhan, Non-spreading bessel spatiotemporal optical vortices, Sci. Bull.67, 133 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Supplementary information for derivation of the spatiotemporally-coupled wave equation, solutions of the spatiotemporally-coupled wave equation, reversal of the topological charge, modal solutions of the wave equation without spatiotemporal coupling, polychromatic angular spectrum theory, verification of the analytical solution by polychromatic angular sp...

  47. [47]

    Yessenov, L

    M. Yessenov, L. A. Hall, K. L. Schepler, and A. F. Abouraddy, Space-time wave packets, Adv. Opt. Pho- tonics14, 455 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Feng and H

    S. Feng and H. G. Winful, Physical origin of the gouy phase shift, Opt. Lett.26, 485 (2001)

    2001

  49. [49]

    Peng, R.-Y

    J. Peng, R.-Y. Zhang, S. Jia, W. Liu, and S. Wang, Topo- logical near fields generated by topological structures, Sci. Adv.8, eabq0910 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    B. Wang, Z. Che, C. Cheng, C. Tong, L. Shi, Y. Shen, K. Y. Bliokh, and J. Zi, Topological water-wave struc- tures manipulating particles, Nature638, 394 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    W. Xiao, S. Jia, T. Fu, and S. Wang, Water-wave pancharatnam-berry phase induced by 4d spin-orbit state evolution, Adv. Sci.13, e15337 (2026)

    2026

  52. [52]

    Cruz-Delgado, S

    D. Cruz-Delgado, S. Yerolatsitis, N. K. Fontaine, D. N. Christodoulides, R. Amezcua-Correa, and M. A. Ban- dres, Synthesis of ultrafast wavepackets with tailored 7 spatiotemporal properties, Nat. Photonics16, 686–691 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Liao and Y

    L. Liao and Y. Otani, Long-range transport versus local generation in orbitronics, Commun. Phys.9, 48 (2026)

    2026

  54. [54]

    Z. Hu, D. Bongiovanni, Z. Wang, X. Wang, D. Song, J. Xu, R. Morandotti, H. Buljan, and Z. Chen, Topolog- ical orbital angular momentum extraction and twofold protection of vortex transport, Nat. Photonics19, 162 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    Ortega-Chavez, L

    R. Ortega-Chavez, L. Gan, and P. H. Gaskell, Forma- tion and evolution of vortex rings with weak to moderate swirl, J. Fluid Mech.967, A16 (2023)

    2023