REVIEW 1 cited by
Loop-corrected Higgs Masses in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this study, we work in the framework of the Next-to-Minimal extension of the Standard Model (NMSSM) extended by six singlet leptonic superfields. Through the mixing with the three doublet leptonic superfields, the non-zero tiny neutrino masses can be generated through the inverse seesaw mechanism. While $R$-parity is conserved in this model lepton number is explicitly violated. We quantify the impact of the extended neutrino sector on the NMSSM Higgs sector by computing the complete one-loop corrections with full momentum dependence to the Higgs boson masses in a mixed on-shell-$\overline{\mbox{DR}}$ renormalization scheme, with and without the inclusion of CP violation. The results are consistently combined with the dominant two-loop corrections at ${\cal O}(\alpha_t(\alpha_s+\alpha_t))$ to improve the predictions for the Higgs mixing and the loop-corrected masses. In our numerical study we include the constraints from the Higgs data, the neutrino oscillation data, the charged lepton flavor-violating decays $l_i \to l_j + \gamma$, and the new physics constraints from the oblique parameters $S,T,U$. We present in this context the one-loop decay width for $l_i \to l_j + \gamma$. The loop-corrected Higgs boson masses are included in the Fortran code NMSSMCALC-nuSS.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Loop-corrected Trilinear Higgs Self-Couplings in the NMSSM with Inverse Seesaw Mechanism
Loop corrections from inverse-seesaw neutrinos and sneutrinos can change the SM-like Higgs self-coupling by up to 10.5% and the SM-like Higgs mass by up to 4.5% in the NMSSM with inverse seesaw.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.