Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Symbolic Behaviour in Artificial Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.03406 v2 pith:RJJYJ7S7 submitted 2021-02-05 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords symbolssymbolicbehaviourintelligenceartificialconventionhumaninterpretation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ability to use symbols is the pinnacle of human intelligence, but has yet to be fully replicated in machines. Here we argue that the path towards symbolically fluent artificial intelligence (AI) begins with a reinterpretation of what symbols are, how they come to exist, and how a system behaves when it uses them. We begin by offering an interpretation of symbols as entities whose meaning is established by convention. But crucially, something is a symbol only for those who demonstrably and actively participate in this convention. We then outline how this interpretation thematically unifies the behavioural traits humans exhibit when they use symbols. This motivates our proposal that the field place a greater emphasis on symbolic behaviour rather than particular computational mechanisms inspired by more restrictive interpretations of symbols. Finally, we suggest that AI research explore social and cultural engagement as a tool to develop the cognitive machinery necessary for symbolic behaviour to emerge. This approach will allow for AI to interpret something as symbolic on its own rather than simply manipulate things that are only symbols to human onlookers, and thus will ultimately lead to AI with more human-like symbolic fluency.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Artificial Scientific Discovery

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A thesis arguing that autonomous symbol interpretation is the key missing capability for artificial scientists, demonstrated through Olivaw, Explanatory Learning on Odeen, the training-free ASIF model, and the Symbol ...

Pith tools