REVIEW
Relative accuracy of turbulence simulations using pseudo-spectral and finite difference solvers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Relative accuracy of turbulence simulations using pseudo-spectral and finite difference solvers
read the original abstract
For a single timestep, a spectral solver is known to be more accurate than its finite-difference counterpart. However, as we show in this paper, turbulence simulations using the two methods have nearly the same accuracy. In this paper, we simulate forced hydrodynamic turbulence on a uniform 256$^3$ grid for Reynolds numbers 965, 1231, 1515, and 1994. We show that the two methods yield nearly the same evolution for the total energy and the flow profiles. In addition, the steady-state energy spectrum, energy flux, and probability distribution functions of the velocity and its derivatives are very similar. We argue that within a turbulence attractor, the numerical errors are likely to get cancelled (rather than get added up), which leads to similar results for the finite-difference and spectral methods. These findings are very valuable, considering that a parallel finite-difference simulation is more versatile and efficient (for large grids) than its spectral counterpart.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.