Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Comparative Analysis of Instruction Fine-Tuning LLMs for Financial Text Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02476 v1 pith:RK3SED2A submitted 2024-11-04 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords classificationfinancialtasksllmsmodelmodelsfine-tuningperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across diverse Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, including language understanding, reasoning, and generation. However, general-domain LLMs often struggle with financial tasks due to the technical and specialized nature of financial texts. This study investigates the efficacy of instruction fine-tuning smaller-scale LLMs, including Mistral-7B, Llama3-8B, and Phi3-mini, to enhance their performance in financial text classification tasks. We fine-tuned both instruction-tuned and base models across four financial classification tasks, achieving significant improvements in task-specific performance. Furthermore, we evaluated the zero-shot capabilities of these fine-tuned models on three unseen complex financial tasks, including argument classification, deal completeness classification, and causal classification. Our results indicate while base model fine-tuning led to greater degradation, instruction-tuned models maintained more robust performance. To address this degradation, we employed model merging techniques, integrating single-task domain-specific fine-tuned models with the base model. Using this merging method resulted in significant enhancements in zero-shot performance, even exceeding the original model's accuracy on certain datasets. Our findings underscore the effectiveness of instruction fine-tuning and model merging for adapting LLMs to specialized financial text classification tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fine-Tuning Causal LLMs for Text Classification: Embedding-Based vs. Instruction-Based Approaches

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Embedding-based QLoRA fine-tuning of causal LLMs matches BERT on single-label patent classification with 10–30x fewer trainable parameters, while instruction-tuning wins on multi-label classification only with ≥100M t...

  2. Interpretable LLMs for Credit Risk: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy

    q-fin.RM 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review and taxonomy that organizes LLM-based credit risk research by model architecture, data modality, explainability mechanism, and application domain.

Pith tools