Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 53 references

Spin-Orbital Hall Nano-Oscillators using PtCr/NiFe

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Alloying platinum with chromium lets orbital currents generated by the light element be converted by the heavy element into spin currents, tripling torque efficiency and cutting the oscillation threshold by nearly 60%.

desk verdict Real experimental advance in low-threshold spin-orbit torques; the orbital-mediation claim is plausible but rests on a fitted constant and an unverified neglect of extrinsic scattering. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08504 v1 pith:RK7PKAXA submitted 2026-08-09 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Utkarsh Shashank , Akash Kumar , Daegeun Jo , Thi Ngoc Anh Nguyen , Jong-Guk Choi , Sambit Ghosh , Michal Strach , Lunjie Zeng
show 6 more authors
Andrew B. Yankovich Roman Khymyn Ahmad A. Awad Eva Olsson Peter M. Oppeneer Johan {AA}kerman
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords orbitalHalleffectspinspin-orbittorquenano-oscillatororbitronicsPtCralloyauto-oscillationST-FMR
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single homogeneous alloy layer can perform the job previously requiring multilayer engineering: chromium generates an orbital Hall current, platinum's strong spin-orbit coupling converts part of it into a spin current, and the combined spin-plus-orbital torque drives coherent oscillations in an adjacent nickel-iron layer. The authors report that effective torque efficiency rises from roughly 0.14 in Pt/NiFe to about 0.40 in Pt$_{0.38}$Cr$_{0.62}$/NiFe, while the threshold current density for auto-oscillation in nanoconstriction devices falls from about $1.07\times 10^{12}$ to about $4.4\times 10^{11}$ A m$^{-2}$, a nearly 60% reduction. If correct, this establishes alloy engineering as a scalable route to low-power orbitronic oscillators and extends orbital torque research from switching into nonlinear magnetization dynamics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the composition-dependent torque-efficiency model $\theta_{\rm eff}(x)=\rho_{\rm PtCr}(x)[\sigma_{\rm SH}(x)+\eta_{\rm L-S}\sigma_{\rm OH}(x)]$, where $\rho_{\rm PtCr}(x)$ is the measured alloy resistivity, $\sigma_{\rm SH}$ and $\sigma_{\rm OH}$ are first-principles intrinsic spin and orbital Hall conductivities, and $\eta_{\rm L-S}$ is a fixed orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency. The orbital Hall effect is the generation of a transverse orbital-angular-momentum current by a charge current, which in light metals does not require strong spin-orbit coupling. The argument runs on the contrast between the SHE-only limit ($\eta_{\rm L-S}=0$), which stays flat with composition, and the finite-conversion model, which rises with chromium content and matches the ST-FMR data.

What would settle it

Re-measure torque efficiency at intermediate compositions (e.g., $x \approx 0.2$, $0.4$, $0.5$) and compare the full curve with Eq. (4) using the linear conductivities; a systematic deviation, or the same enhancement in a Cr/Pt multilayer with identical average composition, would indicate the enhancement is not an intrinsic single-alloy orbital-mediated effect. A direct orbital-pumping measurement that shows the orbital current does not grow with $x$ would also falsify the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the torque in PtCr/NiFe is a mixed spin-orbital torque, not a pure spin Hall torque. As chromium concentration rises, the intrinsic spin Hall conductivity of the alloy decreases while its orbital Hall conductivity increases; a model that includes only the spin Hall term predicts almost no change in torque efficiency, whereas including an orbital contribution with a constant conversion efficiency reproduces the measured monotonic enhancement. The authors demonstrate coherent microwave emission from 120-nm nanoconstriction devices and connect the lower threshold current density to the combination of higher torque efficiency and reduced Gilbert damping. They also report reciprocal spin-orbital pumping signals with the same composition trend, which they take as independent evidence for the orbital channel.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the assumption that disorder scattering adds no significant spin or orbital Hall contribution at the studied chromium concentrations and that the efficiency with which orbital currents become spin currents does not change with composition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • PtCr/NiFe nano-oscillators operate with coherent single-mode emission at current densities roughly 60% lower than Pt/NiFe devices.
  • The same bilayer eliminates the need for a dedicated Pt conversion layer or a high-spin-orbit-coupling ferromagnet, simplifying device stacks.
  • Because damping also falls with chromium concentration, the torque and damping improvements act together to lower the auto-oscillation threshold.
  • The composition trend in reciprocal spin-orbital pumping provides a consistency check that the enhanced torque is not an artifact of interfacial spin-transparency corrections.
  • Alloy engineering of spin and orbital Hall conductivities is presented as a general route to efficient angular-momentum transport in orbitronic devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the orbital-to-spin conversion length is as short as the paper assumes, then other strong-spin-orbit 5d metals alloyed with light 3d orbital generators (e.g., W-Cr or Ta-V) should show similar single-layer torque enhancement; this is a testable prediction the paper does not make.
  • The paper treats $\eta_{\rm L-S}$ as constant in composition; a direct measurement of the conversion efficiency, for instance by inserting thin Pt interlayers of variable thickness between Cr and NiFe, would settle whether composition-dependent conversion changes the quantitative attribution.
  • The reduced threshold and damping also imply that PtCr-based oscillators may synchronize differently in chains and arrays; this paper demonstrates single devices only.
  • The same mixed spin-orbital torque could plausibly lower switching current densities in perpendicular-magnet devices, but the paper demonstrates auto-oscillations rather than switching, so that extension remains open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports PtCr/NiFe heterostructures as spin-orbital Hall nano-oscillators. Using dc-bias ST-FMR, the authors find that the effective torque efficiency increases from ~0.14 in Pt/NiFe to ~0.40 in Pt0.38Cr0.62/NiFe, and that nanoconstriction devices sustain coherent auto-oscillations with a threshold current density reduced by nearly 60% compared to Pt/NiFe. Spin-orbital pumping measurements show a consistent composition trend. First-principles calculations of intrinsic spin and orbital Hall conductivities in ordered fcc supercells are combined with the measured resistivity in Eq. (4), including a phenomenological orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency eta_L-S. The SHE-only limit (eta_L-S = 0) is reported to reproduce neither the magnitude nor the composition dependence of theta_eff, while finite eta_L-S gives agreement. The manuscript concludes that Cr alloying introduces an orbital-mediated torque contribution beyond conventional spin Hall physics.

Significance. If the central mechanism claim is correct, the paper demonstrates a new material platform for orbital-assisted torque generation with a concrete device-level benefit: lower threshold current density for auto-oscillation without engineered multilayer stacks. The experimental dataset is internally consistent: the linewidth modulation, the extracted theta_eff, the reduced damping, and the lowered threshold all trend in mutually supportive directions, and the structural characterization rules out gross phase segregation. The first-principles sigma_SH and sigma_OH calculations are a genuine asset, and the paper is clearly written. However, the mechanism claim depends on a fitted parameter, eta_L-S, and on the neglect of extrinsic spin Hall contributions in concentrated alloys; the manuscript itself lists quantitative disentanglement of spin and orbital currents as an open challenge. The present evidence supports an enhanced torque but does not yet prove that the enhancement requires an orbital-mediated channel.

major comments (3)
  1. [First-principles evidence (Eq. (4), Fig. 4c)] The central conclusion that the torque enhancement is not reproducible by the SHE alone is established only through a model with a free parameter, eta_L-S, whose best-fit value, uncertainty, and composition-dependence assumptions are not reported. The SHE-only limit (eta_L-S = 0) is a single point in a one-parameter family; the fact that the full model can match the data is not a quantitative model test unless eta_L-S is constrained independently or its fitted value is compared with a physical estimate. The authors should either report the fitted eta_L-S and its confidence interval, derive it from the spin-orbital pumping data, or show that the observed enhancement is robust for a physically reasonable range of eta_L-S.
  2. [First-principles evidence, Methods (extrinsic contributions)] The claim that extrinsic spin Hall contributions are negligible for the studied compositions is not secure. The manuscript cites Refs. [36,37], which address pure transition metals and dilute alloys (x < 0.05), whereas Pt0.38Cr0.62 is a concentrated alloy with strong Cr scatterers. The text's argument that the PtCr layers remain crystalline does not exclude disorder-driven skew and side-jump scattering, because alloy disorder is itself a source of such scattering even in crystalline lattices; Ref. [31] shows that extrinsic contributions can dominate in crystalline 5d transition-metal alloys. Since the ordered-supercell sigma_SH in Fig. 4b may also be sensitive to the chosen atomic arrangement and does not include chemical-disorder vertex corrections, a total (intrinsic plus extrinsic) sigma_SH that rises with x could reproduce the theta_eff enhancement without any orbital contribution. A CPA or random-supercell calculation of the total spin Hall conductivity at intermediate x would directly address this load-bearing assumption.
  3. [Conclusion (Looking ahead paragraph)] The manuscript's own forward-looking paragraph states that 'quantitative disentanglement of spin and orbital current contributions' and 'accurate determination of orbital transport parameters' remain important challenges. This is a direct acknowledgment that the present measurements do not uniquely separate the spin and orbital channels. The abstract and conclusion nevertheless assert that the orbital-mediated contribution is demonstrated. The authors should either soften the claim or provide quantitative evidence, such as a thickness-dependent study of PtCr alloy layers or an independent determination of eta_L-S, that eliminates the SHE-only explanation to the same degree as the evidence rules out other experimental artifacts.
minor comments (3)
  1. [General editorial] The text contains several formatting and grammatical slips, e.g., 'spin-orbital pumping' appears where 'spin-orbit pumping' or 'spin-orbital pumping' are used inconsistently, and Eq. (3) renders 'Mst' without a subscript separator. The figure labels and axis names should be made uniform throughout.
  2. [Fig. 2h and Fig. 3h] The markers and error bars in Fig. 2h are described in the text but the figure caption does not state which symbols correspond to which field polarity; a brief caption addition would improve readability. Similarly, Fig. 3h would benefit from explicitly stating the averaging procedure over the 'red central line' in the caption, not only in the main text.
  3. [Methods, Eq. (5)] The Kubo formula in Eq. (5) uses a lifetime broadening Gamma = 0.1 eV, but the sensitivity of sigma_SH and sigma_OH to this choice is not discussed. Since Gamma can materially affect the magnitude of intrinsic Hall conductivities in narrow-band systems, a brief convergence test or a statement of robustness would be helpful.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Quantitative support for the orbital-mediated torque reduces to a free fitted η_L-S in Eq. (4); the SHE-only null does not independently prove an orbital contribution.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'First-principles evidence for a mixed spin–orbital torque mechanism', Eq. (4) and Fig. 4c]
    "The effective torque efficiency, including both spin and orbital Hall contributions, is then estimated using [16, 24, 38] θeff(x) = ρPtCr(x) [σSH(x) + ηL−S σOH(x)], (4) ... ηL−S is a phenomenological parameter describing the conversion efficiency of orbital currents into spin currents. ... Because it saturates within approximately 1 nm of Pt [39, 40], ηL−S is treated as a constant independent of x. ... The experimentally observed increase in θeff is reproduced only when the orbital Hall contribution is included."

    The model is validated against the same θeff(x) data that ηL−S is free to match: the paper shows curves for ηL−S = 0, 0.2, and 0.4 and concludes the observed increase is 'reproduced only when the orbital Hall contribution is included.' Because σOH(x) and ρPtCr(x) both increase with x, any sufficiently large positive ηL−S forces a monotone increase in θeff(x) in Eq. (4); the agreement is built into the choice of the free parameter, not a parameter-free first-principles prediction. The flat ηL−S = 0 curve only shows a positive fitted term is needed, not that orbital transport is uniquely responsible.

full rationale

The paper contains genuine first-principles Kubo calculations of intrinsic σSH(x) and σOH(x), and the structural, ST-FMR, and auto-oscillation measurements are independent experimental content. The central mechanistic claim, however, rests on Eq. (4), where ηL−S is a phenomenological constant with no independent determination reported (no best-fit value or uncertainty). Because σOH(x) rises with Cr concentration, adding a positive fitted ηL−SσOH(x) to the SHE-only term guarantees a rising θeff(x); thus the statement that the enhancement is reproduced 'only when orbital transport is included' is a fit, not a falsifiable prediction. The neglect of extrinsic spin Hall contributions in concentrated Pt0.38Cr0.62 is an additional unverified assumption that weakens the uniqueness of the orbital interpretation, but that is a correctness risk rather than a circular step. Self-citations (Refs. 26, 27, 51) are methodological and not load-bearing, so no self-citation circularity is scored. Overall: one central fitted-parameter circularity, with independent first-principles ingredients; score 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main ledger items are the two parameters in the torque model: eta_L-S, the fitted orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency, and Gamma, the lifetime broadening in the Kubo formula. The key assumptions are the dominance of intrinsic Hall conductivities, the neglect of extrinsic scattering except at very dilute Cr, the constancy of eta_L-S with composition, and the fcc supercell model. No new physical entities are introduced; the new term 'SOHNO' is a device acronym.

free parameters (2)
  • eta_L-S (orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency) = not stated explicitly; curves shown for 0.2 and 0.4
    Phenomenological parameter in Eq. (4), treated as constant independent of x, selected to reproduce the measured theta_eff enhancement.
  • Gamma (lifetime broadening) = 0.1 eV
    Set by hand in the Kubo formula Eq. (5); affects computed conductivity magnitudes.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Intrinsic spin and orbital Hall conductivities dominate over extrinsic contributions at room temperature
    Invoked to neglect disorder scattering in PtCr alloys; cited to Mankovsky and Ebert [36].
  • domain assumption Extrinsic spin Hall effect is negligible in alloys except for dilute x < 0.05
    Used to justify the SHE-only baseline in the model; cited to Lowitzer et al. [37].
  • domain assumption Orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency eta_L-S saturates within about 1 nm of Pt and is independent of alloy composition
    Treats eta_L-S as constant in Eq. (4); cited to Ding et al. [39] and Bose et al. [40].
  • domain assumption PtCr alloy layers are modeled as fcc supercells
    Supported by GIXRD and HRTEM showing fcc structure; DFT relaxations assume this lattice.
  • standard math Kubo formula linear-response theory gives the intrinsic Hall conductivities
    Standard first-principles approach for intrinsic spin and orbital Hall effects.
  • domain assumption Parallel-resistor current-shunting model describes current distribution between PtCr and NiFe
    Used to estimate current densities in torque efficiency and threshold extraction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-Orbital Hall Nano-Oscillators using PtCr/NiFe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RK7PKAXA

@misc{pith2026260808504,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-Orbital Hall Nano-Oscillators using PtCr/NiFe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RK7PKAXA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08504}
}
read the original abstract

The orbital Hall effect provides a promising route for generating angular-momentum currents beyond conventional spin Hall physics. PtCr alloys exhibit unusually large current-induced torques, but the contribution of orbital transport and the ability of these torques to sustain coherent nonlinear magnetization dynamics remain unresolved. Here we demonstrate spin-orbital Hall nano-oscillators by exploiting a homogeneous heavy-metal/light-metal alloy in which orbital Hall currents generated by Cr are converted by Pt into spin currents, producing giant spin-orbit torques. Using PtCr/NiFe heterostructures, the effective torque efficiency increases from ~0.14 in Pt/NiFe to ~0.40 in Pt0.38Cr0.62/NiFe despite substantial Pt dilution, enabling coherent auto-oscillations with the threshold current density reduced from ~ 1.07 x 10^12 to ~ 4.4 x 10^11 A m^-2. First-principles calculations show that Cr alloying suppresses the intrinsic spin Hall conductivity while enhancing the orbital Hall conductivity, and reproduce the observed torque enhancement only when orbital transport is included. Our combined experimental and first-principles results show that alloy engineering enables giant spin-orbit torques through an intrinsic orbital-mediated contribution, enabling coherent auto-oscillations without engineered multilayers and establishing a scalable materials platform for low-power nonlinear spintronic and orbitronic devices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Wang, P., Migliorini, A., Yang, S.-H., Jeon, J.-C., Kostanovskiy, I., Mey- erheim, H., Han, H., Deniz, H., Parkin, S.S.: Giant spin Hall effect and spin–orbit torques in 5d transition metal–aluminum alloys from extrinsic scattering. Adv. Mater.34(23), 2109406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/ adma.202109406

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Hirsch, J.E.: Spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.83(9), 1834 (1999). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1834

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1834 1999

  3. [2]

    Dieny, B., Prejbeanu, I.L., Garello, K., Gambardella, P., Freitas, P., Lehndorff, R., Raberg, W., Ebels, U., Demokritov, S.O., Akerman, J., Deac, A., Pirro, P., Adelmann, C., Anane, A., Chumak, A.V., Hiro- hata, A., Mangin, S., Valenzuela, S.O., Onbasli, M.C., d’Aquino, G., Prenat, G., Finocchio, G., Lopez-Diaz, L., Chantrell, R., Chubykalo- Fesenko, O., ...

    2020

  4. [3]

    Science 336, 555 (2012)

    Liu, L., Pai, C.-F., Li, Y., Tseng, H.W., Ralph, D.C., Buhrman, R.A.: Spin- Torque Switching with the Giant Spin Hall Effect of Tantalum. Science 336, 555 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218197

    doi:10.1126/science.1218197 2012

  5. [4]

    Fulara, H., Zahedinejad, M., Khymyn, R., Awad, A., Muralidhar, S., Dvornik, M., Åkerman, J.: Spin-orbit torque–driven propagating spin waves. Sci. Adv.5(9), 8467 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax84 67

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax84 2019

  6. [5]

    Kumar, A., Chaurasiya, A.K., González, V.H., Behera, N., Alemán, A., Khymyn, R., Awad, A.A., Åkerman, J.: Spin-wave-mediated mutual syn- chronization and phase tuning in spin Hall nano-oscillators. Nat. Phys. 21(2), 245–252 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02728-1 16Spin-Orbital Hall Nano-Oscillators using PtCr/NiFe

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02728-1 2025

  7. [6]

    Demidov, V.E., Urazhdin, S., Zholud, A., Sadovnikov, A.V., Demokritov, S.O.: Nanoconstriction-based spin-Hall nano-oscillator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 172410 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4901027

    doi:10.1063/1.4901027 2014

  8. [7]

    Awad, A.A., Dvornik, M., Houshang, A., Åkerman, J.,et al.: Long-range mutual synchronization of spin Hall nano-oscillators. Nat. Phys.13, 292– 299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4022

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4022 2017

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    Emori, S., Bauer, U., Ahn, S.-M., Martinez, E., Beach, G.S.D.: Current- driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls. Nat. Mater.12(7), 611–616 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3675

    2013 doi

  2. [9]

    Bernstein, N., Li, H., Assouline, B., Lau, Y.-C., Rozhansky, I., Wang, W., Capua, A.: Spin-torque skyrmion resonance in a frustrated magnet. Nat. Commun.16(1), 4616 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59899 -5

    2025 doi

  3. [10]

    Liu, L., Moriyama, T., Ralph, D.C., Buhrman, R.A.: Spin-torque fer- romagnetic resonance induced by the spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(3), 036601 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.036601

    2011 doi

  4. [11]

    npj Spintronics2(1), 19 (2024)

    Jo, D., Go, D., Choi, G.-M., Lee, H.-W.: Spintronics meets orbitronics: Emergence of orbital angular momentum in solids. npj Spintronics2(1), 19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44306-024-00023-6

    2024 doi

  5. [12]

    Bernevig, B.A., Hughes, T.L., Zhang, S.-C.: Orbitronics: The intrinsic orbital current in p-doped silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett.95(6), 066601 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.066601

    2005 doi

  6. [13]

    Kontani, H., Tanaka, T., Hirashima, D., Yamada, K., Inoue, J.: Giant orbital Hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous Hall effects. Phys. Rev. Lett.102(1), 016601 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1 103/PhysRevLett.102.016601

    2009

  7. [14]

    Go, D., Jo, D., Kim, C., Lee, H.-W.: Intrinsic spin and orbital Hall effects from orbital texture. Phys. Rev. Lett.121(8), 086602 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.086602

    2018 doi

  8. [15]

    Salemi, L., Oppeneer, P.M.: First-principles theory of intrinsic spin and orbital Hall and Nernst effects in metallic monoatomic crystals. Phys. Rev. Mater.6(9), 095001 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6 .095001

    2022 doi

  9. [16]

    Go, D., Lee, H.-W.: Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection. Phys. Rev. Res.2(1), 013177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.2.013177 Spin-Orbital Hall Nano-Oscillators using PtCr/NiFe17

    2020

  10. [17]

    Jo, D., Go, D., Lee, H.-W.: Gigantic intrinsic orbital Hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals. Phys. Rev. B98(21), 214405 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.214405

    2018 doi

  11. [18]

    Nature619(7968), 52–56 (2023)

    Choi, Y.-G., Jo, D., Ko, K.-H., Go, D., Kim, K.-H., Park, H.G., Kim, C., Min, B.-C., Choi, G.-M., Lee, H.-W.: Observation of the orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti. Nature619(7968), 52–56 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06101-9

    2023 doi

  12. [19]

    Lee, S., Kang, M.-G., Go, D., Kim, D., Kang, J.-H., Lee, T., Lee, G.- H., Kang, J., Lee, N.J., Mokrousov, Y., Kim, S., Kim, K.-J., Lee, K.-J., Park, B.-G.: Efficient conversion of orbital Hall current to spin current for spin-orbit torque switching. Commun. Phys.4(1), 234 (202...

    2021 doi

  13. [20]

    Sala, G., Gambardella, P.: Giant orbital Hall effect and orbital-to-spin conversion in 3d, 5d, and 4f metallic heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033037

    2022 doi

  14. [21]

    Gupta, R., Bouard, C., Kammerbauer, F., Ledesma-Martin, J.O., Bose, A., Kononenko, I., Martin, S., Usé, P., Jakob, G., Drouard, M., Kläui, M.: Harnessing orbital Hall effect in spin-orbit torque MRAM. Nat. Commun. 16(1), 130 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55437-x

    2025 doi

  15. [22]

    Lyalin, I., Kawakami, R.K.: Interface transparency to orbital current. Phys. Rev. B110, 104418 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110 .104418

    2024 doi

  16. [23]

    Zhang, W., Han, W., Jiang, X., Yang, S.-H., Parkin, S.S.P.: Role of transparency of Pt–ferromagnet interfaces in determining the intrinsic magnitude of the spin Hall effect. Nat. Phys.11(6), 496–502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3304

    2015 doi

  17. [24]

    Lee, D., Go, D., Park, H.-J., Jeong, W., Ko, H.-W., Yun, D., Jo, D., Lee, S., Go, G., Oh, J.H.,et al.: Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 6710 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26650-9

    2021 doi

  18. [25]

    Hayashi, H., Jo, D., Go, D., Gao, T., Haku, S., Mokrousov, Y., Lee, H.-W., Ando, K.: Observation of long-range orbital transport and giant orbital torque. Commun. Phys.6(1), 32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005 -023-01139-7

    2023 doi

  19. [26]

    ACS Appl

    Shashank, U., Kumar, A., Parvini, T.S., Heyen, H., Zeng, L., Yankovich, A.B., Choi, J.-G., Rajabali, M., Olsson, E., Münzenberg, M.,et al.: Bulk spin–orbit torque-driven spin Hall nano-oscillators using PtBi alloys with engineered crystallinity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (20...

    2026 doi

  20. [27]

    NPG Asia Mater.17(1), 15 (2025)

    Shashank, U., Tomoda, T., Mathew, A.J., Vashisht, G., Imai, K., Kusaba, Y., Dong, C.-L., Chen, C.-L., Horibe, Y., Ishimaru, M., Awano, H., Asada, H., Fukuma, Y.: Giant spin-orbit torque induced by spin Hall effect in amorphous Pt(P) alloys. NPG Asia Mater.17(1), 15 (2025). htt...

    2025 doi

  21. [28]

    Hayashi, H., Go, D., Haku, S., Mokrousov, Y., Ando, K.: Observation of orbital pumping. Nat. Electron.7(8), 646–652 (2024). https://doi.org/10 .1038/s41928-024-01193-1

    2024

  22. [29]

    Nano Letters25(36), 13462–13467 (2025)

    Keller, N., Bose, A., Soya, N., Hauth, E., Kammerbauer, F., Gupta, R., Hayashi, H., Kashiki, H., Jakob, G., Krishnia, S., Ando, K., Kläui, M.: Identification of orbital pumping from spin pumping and rectification effects. Nano Letters25(36), 13462–13467 (2025). https://doi.org...

    2025

  23. [30]

    Sagasta, E., Omori, Y., Isasa, M., Gradhand, M., Hueso, L.E., Niimi, Y., Otani, Y., Casanova, F.: Tuning the spin Hall effect of Pt from the moderately dirty to the superclean regime. Phys. Rev. B94, 060412 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.060412

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    Tserkovnyak, Y., Brataas, A., Bauer, G.E.W.: Enhanced Gilbert damping in thin ferromagnetic films. Phys. Rev. Lett.88(11), 117601 (2002). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.117601

    2002 doi

  25. [33]

    Shashank, U., Nakamura, Y., Kusaba, Y., Tomoda, T., Nongjai, R., Kandasami, A., Medwal, R., Rawat, R.S., Asada, H., Gupta, S., Fukuma, Y.: Disentanglement of intrinsic and extrinsic side-jump scattering induced spin Hall effect in N-implanted Pt. Phys. Rev. B107(6), 064402 (20...

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Houshang, A., Iacocca, E., Dürrenfeld, P., Sani, S.R., Åkerman, J., Dumas, R.K.: Spin-wave-beam driven synchronization of nanocontact spin-torque oscillators. Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 280–286 (2016). https://doi.org/10.103 8/nnano.2015.280

    2016

  27. [35]

    Behera, N., Chaurasiya, A.K., Kumar, A., Khymyn, R., Litvinenko, A., Bainsla, L., Awad, A.A., Åkerman, J.: Nanosecond phase ordering in ultra- large spin Hall nano-oscillator lattices for unconventional computing. Nat. Nanotechnol., 1–8 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-0...

    2026 doi

  28. [36]

    Mankovsky, S., Ebert, H.: Spin and orbital Hall effect in nonmagnetic transition metals: Extrinsic versus intrinsic contributions. Phys. Rev. B 110(18), 184417 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.184417

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Lowitzer, S., Gradhand, M., Ködderitzsch, D., Fedorov, D.V., Mertig, I., Ebert, H.: Extrinsic and intrinsic contributions to the spin Hall effect of alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett.106(5), 056601 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.106.056601

    2011

  30. [38]

    Nano Lett

    Bai, Y., Cai, W., Chen, Z., Zhu, D., Lu, S., Li, J., Du, A., Cao, K., Yang, G., Liu, H., Shi, K., Zhao, W.: Ru/IrMn interfacial orbital-to-spin conversion for antiferromagnetic switching in magnetic tunnel junctions. Nano Lett. 25, 14843–14849 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1021/a...

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    Ding, S., Ross, A., Go, D., Baldrati, L., Ren, Z., Freimuth, F., Becker, S., Kammerbauer, F., Yang, J., Jakob, G.,et al.: Harnessing orbital-to-spin conversion of interfacial orbital currents for efficient spin-orbit torques. Phys. Rev. Lett.125(17), 177201 (2020). https://doi...

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    Bose, A., Kammerbauer, F., Gupta, R., Go, D., Mokrousov, Y., Jakob, G., Kläui, M.: Detection of long-range orbital-Hall torques. Phys. Rev. B 107(13), 134423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.134423

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    ACS Appl

    Hu, C.-Y., Chiu, Y.-F., Tsai, C.-C., Huang, C.-C., Chen, K.-H., Peng, C.-W., Lee, C.-M., Song, M.-Y., Huang, Y.-L., Lin, S.-J., Pai, C.-F.: Toward 100% spin-orbit torque efficiency with high spin-orbital Hall conductivity Pt-Cr alloys. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.4(3), 1099–1108...

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Liu, Q., Li, J., Zhu, L., Lin, X., Xie, X., Zhu, L.: Strong spin-orbit torque induced by the intrinsic spin Hall effect in Cr1−xPtx. Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 054079 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.054079

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Seki, T., Lau, Y.-C., Iihama, S., Takanashi, K.: Spin-orbit torque in a Ni-Fe single layer. Phys. Rev. B104(9), 094430 (2021). https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094430

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    Fukami, S., Lee, K.-J., Kläui, M.: Challenges and opportunities in orbi- tronics. Nat. Phys., 1–7 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-031 43-w

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    Giannozzi, P., Baroni, S., Bonini, N., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Chiarotti, G.L., Cococcioni, M., Dabo, I., Dal Corso, A., de Gironcoli, S., Fabris, S., Fratesi, G., Gebauer, R., Gerstmann, U., Gougoussis, C., Kokalj, A., Lazzeri, M., Martin-Samos, L....

    2009

  38. [46]

    Perdew, J.P., Burke, K., Ernzerhof, M.: Generalized gradient approxi- mation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett.77(18), 3865–3868 (1996). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  39. [47]

    Kresse, G., Joubert, D.: From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B59(3), 1758–1775 (1999). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    Dal Corso, A.: Pseudopotentials periodic table: From h to pu. Comput. Mater. Sci.95, 337–350 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.20 14.07.043

    2014 doi

  41. [49]

    Souza, I., Marzari, N., Vanderbilt, D.: Maximally localized wannier func- tions for entangled energy bands. Phys. Rev. B65(3), 035109 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035109

    2001 doi

  42. [50]

    Pizzi, G., Vitale, V., Arita, R., Blügel, S., Freimuth, F., Géranton, G., Gibertini, M., Gresch, D., Johnson, C., Koretsune, T., Ibañez-Azpiroz, J., Lee,H.,Lihm,J.-M.,Marchand,D.,Marrazzo,A.,Mokrousov,Y.,Mustafa, J.I., Nohara, Y., Nomura, Y., Paulatto, L., Poncé, S., Ponweiser...

    2020

  43. [51]

    Shashank, U., Medwal, R., Shibata, T., Nongjai, R., Vas, J.V., Duchamp, M., Asokan, K., Rawat, R.S., Asada, H., Gupta, S., Fukuma, Y.: Enhanced spin Hall effect in S-Implanted Pt. Adv. Quantum Technol.4(1), 2000112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202000112

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    Nano Lett.23(14), 6720 (2023)

    Kumar, A., Fulara, H., Khymyn, R., Litvinenko, A., Zahedinejad, M., Rajabali, M., Zhao, X., Behera, N., Houshang, A., Awad, A.A.,et al.: Robust mutual synchronization in long spin Hall nano-oscillator chains. Nano Lett.23(14), 6720 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0 2036

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    Zahedinejad, M., Awad, A.A., Muralidhar, S., Khymyn, R., Fulara, H., Mazraati, H., Dvornik, M., Åkerman, J.: Two-dimensional mutually syn- chronized spin Hall nano-oscillator arrays for neuromorphic computing. Nat. Nanotechnol.15(1), 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-0...

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.