Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Correlating Radio Astronomy Signals with Many-Core Hardware

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.00844 v1 pith:RKGOE425 submitted 2017-02-02 astro-ph.IM

Correlating Radio Astronomy Signals with Many-Core Hardware

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords correlatorgpusbluecellgenehardwareintensivemany-core
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A recent development in radio astronomy is to replace traditional dishes with many small antennas. The signals are combined to form one large, virtual telescope. The enormous data streams are cross-correlated to filter out noise. This is especially challenging, since the computational demands grow quadratically with the number of data streams. Moreover, the correlator is not only computationally intensive, but also very I/O intensive. The LOFAR telescope, for instance, will produce over 100 terabytes per day. The future SKA telescope will even require in the order of exaflops, and petabits/s of I/O. A recent trend is to correlate in software instead of dedicated hardware, to increase flexibility and to reduce development efforts. We evaluate the correlator algorithm on multi-core CPUs and many-core architectures, such as NVIDIA and ATI GPUs, and the Cell/B.E. The correlator is a streaming, real-time application, and is much more I/O intensive than applications that are typically implemented on many-core hardware today. We compare with the LOFAR production correlator on an IBM Blue Gene/P supercomputer. We investigate performance, power efficiency, and programmability. We identify several important architectural problems which cause architectures to perform suboptimally. Our findings are applicable to data-intensive applications in general. The processing power and memory bandwidth of current GPUs are highly imbalanced for correlation purposes. While the production correlator on the Blue Gene/P achieves a superb 96% of the theoretical peak performance, this is only 16% on ATI GPUs, and 32% on NVIDIA GPUs. The Cell/B.E. processor, in contrast, achieves an excellent 92%. We found that the Cell/B.E. and NVIDIA GPUs are the most energy-efficient solutions, they run the correlator at least 4 times more energy efficiently than the Blue Gene/P.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.