REVIEW 2 cited by
Affinity and Diversity: Quantifying Mechanisms of Data Augmentation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Though data augmentation has become a standard component of deep neural network training, the underlying mechanism behind the effectiveness of these techniques remains poorly understood. In practice, augmentation policies are often chosen using heuristics of either distribution shift or augmentation diversity. Inspired by these, we seek to quantify how data augmentation improves model generalization. To this end, we introduce interpretable and easy-to-compute measures: Affinity and Diversity. We find that augmentation performance is predicted not by either of these alone but by jointly optimizing the two.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Data Can Speak for Itself: Quality-guided Utilization of Wireless Synthetic Data
SynCheck uses margin-based quality metrics and semi-supervised pseudo-labeling to filter and relabel wireless synthetic data, improving task accuracy over naive mixture training.
-
Few-Shot Learning in Video and 3D Object Detection: A Survey
A survey of few-shot learning for video and 3D object detection that reviews architectures, losses, and training strategies, but contains numerous citation errors and unsupported performance claims.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.