Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Global AI Governance: Where the Challenge is the Solution- An Interdisciplinary, Multilateral, and Vertically Coordinated Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04766 v1 pith:RLUV35RQ submitted 2025-02-12 cs.CY

Global AI Governance: Where the Challenge is the Solution- An Interdisciplinary, Multilateral, and Vertically Coordinated Approach

classification cs.CY
keywords governanceglobalinterdisciplinarymultilateralprinciplesactionanalysischallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current global AI governance frameworks struggle with fragmented disciplinary collaboration, ineffective multilateral coordination, and disconnects between policy design and grassroots implementation. This study, guided by Integration and Implementation Science (IIS) initiated a structured interdisciplinary dialogue at the UN Science Summit, convening legal, NGO, and HCI experts to tackle those challenges. Drawing on the common ground of the experts: dynamism, experimentation, inclusivity, and paradoxical governance, this study, through thematic analysis and interdisciplinary comparison analysis, identifies four core principles of global AI governance. Furthermore, we translate these abstract principles into concrete action plans leveraging the distinct yet complementary perspectives of each discipline. These principles and action plans are then integrated into a five-phase, time-sequential framework including foundation building, experimental verification, collaborative optimization, global adaptation, and continuous evolution phases. This multilevel framework offers a novel and concrete pathway toward establishing interdisciplinary, multilateral, and vertically coordinated AI governance, transforming global AI governance challenges into opportunities for political actions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SCITUS: A Multi-Jurisdictional Framework for Adapting NIST AI RMF to the Canadian Regulatory Context

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SCITUS maps 127 Canadian federal and provincial AI requirements onto 57 NIST-aligned controls and argues this unified approach beats jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction compliance.