Clifford-Appell formulation of a Dirac-type Kronig-Penney model in condensed matter physics

H. Malonek; L. Aceto; P.A. Grassi

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 26 references

Clifford-Appell formulation of a Dirac-type Kronig-Penney model in condensed matter physics

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper identifies the integer triangles of the finite Kronig-Penney transfer matrix as the Appell coefficients of a bivariate Clifford polynomial basis underlying a Dirac-type reformulation of the Schrödinger equation.

desk verdict Nice algebra, broken equivalence: the N-barrier recasting drops a projector term no spinor sector can remove, and the advertised combinatorial payoff is deferred to a companion paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27920 v1 pith:RMNJ4W6I submitted 2026-07-30 math-ph hep-thmath.MP

L. Aceto , P.A. Grassi , H. Malonek This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phhep-thmath.MP MSC 30G3515A6681Q05

keywords CliffordanalysisAppellpolynomialsKronig-PenneymodelDirac-typeequationtransfermatrixHelmholtzhypercomplexvariablesintegertriangles

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the non-symmetric integer triangles that appear in the transfer matrix of a finite Kronig-Penney model (a line of equally spaced delta-function barriers) are not accidental arithmetic coincidences but the visible trace of a hidden Clifford-algebraic structure. To show this, the authors recast the stationary Schrödinger equation as a first-order Dirac-type equation with step potentials, then use generalized Cauchy-Riemann operators to reduce it to two decoupled Helmholtz equations in characteristic hypercomplex variables. They construct explicit solutions in a bivariate Clifford-Appell polynomial basis, and the coefficients of these expansions reproduce the triangular arrays. The proposed framework unifies a one-dimensional quantum scattering problem with higher-dimensional Clifford analysis, giving the combinatorial patterns a physical origin.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the bivariate Clifford-Appell family {P_{l,m}(Z,Ẑ)} satisfying ∂_{Ẑ}P_{l,m}=lP_{l-1,m} and ∂_{Z}P_{l,m}=mP_{l,m-1}, where Z=x+(1/N)ΣΓ_n y_n and Ẑ=x−(1/N)ΣΓ_n y_n are non-commuting characteristic variables built from the anticommuting matrices Γ_n=γ_0γ_n. These polynomials convert the generalized Helmholtz equations into the algebraic recurrence that determines the series coefficients; the projector operators P_n=½(1−iΓ_n) are what make the first-order reduction possible. In short, the machinery is an Appell basis adapted to a pair of conjugate Cauchy-Riemann operators in Clifford analysis.

What would settle it

Check whether the simplification from (4.4) to (4.7) is valid at a delta site for N=2: the dropped term is 2Λ(x)P(x)Ψ with Λ=µ[δ(x−L)+δ(x−2L)] and P(x)=P_1 at x=L, P_2 at x=2L; a nonzero Ψ would need iΓ_1Ψ=Ψ at x=L and iΓ_2Ψ=Ψ at x=2L, which cannot hold simultaneously because Γ_1 and Γ_2 anticommute. If the dropped term does not vanish, equation (4.11) does not reproduce (4.1), and the claimed equivalence fails for multi-barrier systems.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that the integer arrays in Table 1 are the Appell coefficients of a bivariate hypercomplex polynomial basis adapted to the generalized Cauchy-Riemann operators that arise when the Schrödinger equation of the finite Kronig-Penney model is rewritten as a Dirac-type system. With V_n(x)=µ[θ(x−nL)−1/2] and κ=½√(Nµ²+4k²), equation (4.1) becomes (4.11); away from the barriers this decouples into two generalized Helmholtz equations. Expanding the fields in the bivariate Appell basis yields the diagonal recurrence (l+1)(m+1)a_{l+1,m+1}=−κ²a_{l,m}/4, solved by factorial-type coefficients that generate the triangular arrays. The paper concludes these arrays are genuine Clifford-algebr

Load-bearing premise

The whole series construction rests on the unproved existence of a bivariate Clifford-Appell basis P_{l,m}(Z,Ẑ) satisfying (7.1) for non-commuting Z and Ẑ, and on the step that drops the projector term 2Λ(x)P(x)Ψ in reducing (4.4) to (4.7); for N≥2 the projectors P_n cannot all annihilate a nonzero spinor simultaneously.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the identification holds, the triangular integer arrays in the transfer matrix are not combinatorial coincidences but the Appell coefficients of the Dirac-type reformulation, giving them a concrete physical origin.
The transfer matrix of the finite Kronig-Penney model factorizes into local propagators exp((x−x_r)H_r) with H_r=−γ_0(κ1+iM_r), providing an explicit Clifford-valued representation of the full scattering operator.
The solution space of the free propagation problem splits into independent diagonals s=l−m; on each diagonal the coefficients follow the simple factorial law (−κ²/4)^n/(n!(n+s)!), which controls transmission amplitudes.
The gauge reduction from an (N+1)-dimensional free Dirac equation to the one-dimensional scattering problem explains the appearance of bivariate Appell polynomials as a dimensional reduction effect.
The same construction unifies the Helmholtz equations with hypercomplex Appell polynomial theory, offering a template for solving Dirac-type systems in other dimensions by algebraic recurrences.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step, not taken in the paper, is to generate the transfer matrix entries for N=3 and N=4 directly from the Appell coefficients and check them against the known triangles; the N=2 case shown here is only illustrative.
If the triangular entries are literally the Appell coefficients, then the N-dependence of the arrays should be governed by the Clifford dimension d=2^{⌈N/2⌉}; this could be tested by looking at row sums or alternating sums across different N.
Because the local propagators are exponentials of constant Clifford matrices, the whole construction should extend to non-equally spaced barriers and even to smooth multi-layer potentials, where the same Appell basis would still diagonalize the free dynamics.
The diagonal decomposition hints that transmission resonances may be expressible as zeros of combinations of Bessel-type functions in κL, which would give a spectral interpretation of the factorial coefficient law.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the algebraic core is clean, but the central claim does not hold for N≥2. The step from (4.4) to (4.7) quietly drops 2Λ(x)P(x)Ψ. Proposition 2 only shows P is a projector, not that PΨ=0. For N≥2 the Γ_n anticommute, so no nonzero spinor can lie in all kernels P_nΨ=0 simultaneously; there is no spinor sector that removes the matrix-valued delta coupling. The equivalence of the Schrödinger equation with (4.11) is unproven exactly in the multi-barrier case that motivates the paper. Also, the conservation claim in Section 5 is wrong: differentiating ρ=Ψ†γ₀Ψ gives ρ′=2iΨ†MΨ, not zero.

What is genuinely good: the γ-matrix recursion in Section 3 is carefully constructed and the algebraic identities are consistent. The gauge embedding of the (N+1)-dimensional Dirac equation in Section 6 is a neat device, and the Appell coefficient recurrences in Section 7 check out. The observation that the Table 1 triangles are scaled hypercomplex Appell coefficients T^k_s(m) for m=3,5,7 is real and worth stating. The Clifford–Appell machinery for free propagation is a plausible organizing framework.

Soft spots beyond the central one: the bivariate Appell basis P_{l,m}(Z,Ḍ) is asserted with no construction or proof of existence; because Z and Ḍ do not commute, that is a nontrivial gap. The headline result—identifying the integer triangles as Clifford manifestations—is explicitly deferred to an unpublished, self-cited companion [1]; this paper computes no transfer matrix and compares nothing with [19]. As a standalone, it is mostly a scaffold.

Bottom line: the formal machinery is interesting but the central physical identification is not established. A serious referee could help the authors see the missing projector term, but the paper needs major revision before acceptance. If the N≥2 obstruction is resolved or the claims are reframed, the combinatorial connection might support a proper paper. As it stands, I would not accept it.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Clifford-algebraic reformulation of the one-dimensional finite Kronig-Penney model with N Dirac-delta barriers. The scalar Schrödinger equation is promoted to a Dirac-type first-order system with generators of Cℓ_{0,N}; squaring the system yields a second-order matrix equation. By imposing a matching condition, the authors identify the parameter κ and step potentials V_n, and claim equivalence with the original Schrödinger equation. The Dirac-type system is then embedded in an (N+1)-dimensional Dirac equation via a gauge transformation, reduced to generalized Helmholtz equations with characteristic variables, and solved formally in terms of a bivariate Clifford-Appell basis. The paper claims that the integer triangles observed in transfer-matrix coefficients are manifestations of this Clifford structure.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a novel bridge between Clifford analysis, Appell polynomials, and a concrete scattering problem, connecting combinatorial number triangles to representation-theoretic data. The construction of the γ-matrices, the projector identities (Prop. 1), and the coefficient recurrences of Section 7 are carried out explicitly and check out internally. However, the central equivalence between the Schrödinger equation and the Dirac-type system (4.11) is not established because a matrix-valued projector term is dropped in the reduction. Since this equivalence is the basis for the physical interpretation of the integer arrays, the main claim is currently unsupported.

major comments (4)

[Section 4, Eqs. (4.4)–(4.7)] The simplification of (4.4) to the form used in (4.7) drops the term 2Λ(x)P(x)Ψ. Indeed, Σ_n(2P_n−1)V'_n = 2ΛP − Λ. Proposition 2 only proves P is a projector; it does not imply PΨ=0. For N=1, the condition P_1Ψ=0 is not preserved by the transfer matrices e^{−LH_r}; for N≥2, P_nΨ=0 for all n would require iΓ_nΨ=Ψ for all n, which is impossible by (3.5). Hence (4.11) is not equivalent to (4.1) and the central physical identification is not established.
[Section 4, Eq. (4.5)] P(x)=Λ^{−1}Σ V'_n P_n with V'_n=μδ(x−nL) is not a well-defined distribution: Λ vanishes between barriers and is a delta at the barriers, so the quotient is undefined. The proof of Proposition 2 treats these symbols formally; this does not fix the missing projector term of Comment 1.
[Section 6, Eqs. (6.4)–(6.7)] For Z=x+(1/N)ΣΓ_n y_n and \bar Z=x−(1/N)ΣΓ_n y_n, direct calculation gives D=1/2(∂_x−ΣΓ_n∂_{y_n})=∂_Z and \bar D=∂_{\bar Z}. The text states the opposite. Consequently (6.6) is not the system derived from (6.4), and the Appell recurrences in Section 7 solve a differently labeled system. The explicit series representations are therefore not matched to the free Dirac equation as claimed.
[Section 7, Eq. (7.1)] The bivariate Clifford-Appell basis satisfying ∂_{\bar Z}P_{l,m}=lP_{l−1,m}, ∂_Z P_{l,m}=mP_{l,m−1} is asserted without construction. Since Z and \bar Z are noncommuting (Γ_n anticommute by (3.5)), the existence of such a polynomial basis is nontrivial. No explicit formula or proof is supplied, although all of the Section 7 coefficient expansions depend on it.

minor comments (4)

[Section 7, Remark 1] 'For m=0' is unclear; the parameter m used in Section 2 is not defined in Section 7. Presumably a reduction to the known one-variable Appell system is intended.
[Proposition 2 proof] The proof uses '⊮' for the identity operator, while elsewhere '1' is used; unify the notation.
[Section 5, elementary cases] The derivation assumes the asymptotic form e^{±ikx} and obtains κ²=k²+μ²/4, but does not show that the resulting spinor transmission/reflection coefficients reduce to the scalar Kronig-Penney ones. At minimum, this should be stated as a consequence of the equivalence claimed in Section 4, which is not established.
[Section 6] The sentence 'Restricting equation (6.1) to the intervals ... the singular interactions vanish' is slightly misleading: the gauge transformation removes the deltas from (6.1), but the restriction to intervals is not what removes them; clarify.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Central Clifford–Appell identification is deferred to a self-cited companion paper, and the Dirac reformulation is fixed by requiring its square to equal the Schrödinger equation.

self citation load bearing [Section 1 (Introduction), statements of the main result and reference [1]]
"The main result of the present approach is the identification of these arrays as genuine manifestations of the hidden Clifford-algebraic structure underlying the Dirac-type formulation, rather than as accidental numerical features of the scattering coefficients. ... While the present paper focuses on the physical and algebraic origin of these structures, the explicit construction of the non-symmetric number triangles arising from the principal transfer matrix, together with their recursive properties and combinatorial interpretation, is presented in a separate contribution [1]."

The paper's central claim—that the integer triangles are Clifford–Appell objects—is not derived in the present text. The only construction connecting the transfer-matrix triangles to the Clifford formalism is deferred to [1], a submitted companion paper by the same authors. Thus the load-bearing identification reduces to a self-citation whose content is not independently verified here.
renaming known result [Section 4, Eqs. (4.7)–(4.12)]
"To reproduce the Schrödinger equation (4.1), we impose the matching condition Σ(V_n²−V'_n)−κ² = −µΣδ(x−nL)−k². ... Consequently, the Schrödinger equation (4.1) is recast as the Dirac-type system (4.11), where V_n(x)=µ[θ(x−nL)−1/2], κ=1/2√(Nµ²+4k²)."

The Dirac operator is constructed by imposing that its square equal the target Schrödinger operator; Eq. (4.7) fixes κ and the integration constants C_n. Therefore the 'reformulation' is a factorization constrained by the input, and any property of the Dirac transfer matrix is the same property of the original scalar problem under a new name. The integer triangles were already known from the scalar transfer matrix ([12,19]); no independent derivation from the Appell basis to those triangles is given, so the claimed 'origin' is a renaming.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not actually produce the integer triangles from the Clifford–Appell machinery. The Dirac-type system is introduced by requiring its square to match the scalar Schrödinger equation, with κ and the potential offsets fixed by the matching condition (4.7)–(4.12); this is a legitimate factorization but it is constructed from the target, so any scattering property inherited by the Dirac system is the original property under a new representation. The advertised identification of the number triangles with Clifford–Appell coefficients is not computed in the text: Section 7 derives Appell series for the free Dirac fields but never connects those series to the transfer-matrix triangles. Instead, the explicit construction is relegated to a separate, submitted paper by the same authors (reference [1]), making the main result load-bearing on a self-citation. There are additional gaps—notably the unproved existence of the bivariate Appell basis for non-commuting characteristic variables and the unjustified simplification that drops the 2Λ(x)P(x)Ψ term—but these are mostly correctness/rigor concerns rather than circularity. The central circularity is that the 'prediction' of Clifford structure in the arrays is neither derived independently nor connected to the input by a nontrivial computation; it is a renamed, self-referenced assertion. This warrants a score of 6 rather than higher, because the Appell expansions and the algebraic framework have independent analytical content; the circularity lies in the specific claim that the arrays are manifestations of that framework.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The construction adds a Dirac-dispersion constant κ and integration constants C_n that are fixed by demanding the square of the new first-order operator equals the target Schrödinger operator — i.e., the reformulation is fitted to its input. The solution section depends on an asserted bivariate Appell basis whose existence is not proven, and the higher-dimensional embedding uses invented auxiliary coordinates. These are the elements the reader 'buys' without independent evidence.

free parameters (3)

Integration constants C_n = C_n = −μ/2
Chosen by hand in Eq. (4.9) so the θ(x−nL)-terms in the matching condition (4.7) cancel; the whole 'recasting' hinges on this cancellation.
Dirac-type eigenvalue κ = κ = ½√(Nμ² + 4k²)
Fixed algebraically by the imposed matching condition (4.7)/(4.10) so that the square of the Dirac-type operator reproduces the Schrödinger operator; the N-dependent 'mass' is a consistency condition of the constructed model, not an independent prediction.
Normalization 1/N in characteristic variables = Z = x + (1/N)Σ_n Γ_n y_n
Chosen so that D = ∂_{Z̄} and D̄ = ∂_Z (Section 6); conventional but arbitrary, and it affects the algebraic form of the Appell basis.

assumptions (4)

standard math Anti-Euclidean Clifford relations {γ_r,γ_s} = −2δ_rs 1 with skew-Hermitian γ_0; the recursive γ-matrices of Section 3 satisfy them for every N
A modeling choice inherited from the Clifford-analysis literature; the recursion is asserted to satisfy (3.3) for all N and the anti-commutation is used in (4.3) and (6.3).
ad hoc to paper Existence of bivariate Clifford-Appell polynomials P_{l,m}(Z,Ẑ) satisfying (7.1)
Section 7 asserts the Appell-type relations (7.1) without construction or existence proof. Since [Z,Ẑ] ≠ 0 for N ≥ 2 this is a nontrivial claim; Remark 1 reduces only the (·,0)-case to the univariate polynomials of [18,23,25]. The explicit solution representation depends on it.
domain assumption Orthogonality-like condition (4.6), Σ_{r≠s} V′_r V′_s = 0, and Λ(x) = ΣV′_n ≠ 0 on the support
Hypothesis of Proposition 2 used to make P(x) a projector and to simplify (4.4); it holds for the chosen disjoint delta potentials (4.8) but is never justified as a physical condition; division by the distribution Λ is formal.
standard math Hypercomplex Appell coefficients T^s_k(m) of (2.6)-(2.7) from [16,24] with the partition-of-unity property (2.8)
Imported from the cited Clifford-analysis literature; taken as given, not re-derived.

invented entities (2)

Auxiliary transverse coordinates y_1,…,y_N
purpose: Embed the 1D Dirac-type equation into a free Dirac equation in N+1 dimensions (Eq. (6.1)); the gauge transformation (6.2) absorbs them, so they carry no residual physics.
Explicitly 'auxiliary' in the paper; a mathematical device with no observable consequences and no falsifiable handle.
Spinor-valued wavefunction Ψ(x) on C^d (d = 2^{⌈N/2⌉})
purpose: Promote the scalar ψ to a Clifford-representation spinor to enable the first-order formulation; the physical sector (which components encode ψ and ψ′ and under what matching) is never specified.
A re-indexing of the known wavefunction; the paper does not state how ψ is recovered from Ψ or how unitarity of the original problem is preserved (the naive current is not conserved).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Clifford-Appell formulation of a Dirac-type Kronig-Penney model in condensed matter physics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RMNJ4W6I

@misc{pith2026260727920,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Clifford-Appell formulation of a Dirac-type Kronig-Penney model in condensed matter physics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RMNJ4W6I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27920}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the stationary Dirac equation associated with a generalized Kronig-Penney model in (N+1)-dimensional Clifford analysis. Away from the interaction sites, the free Dirac system is reformulated by introducing suitable generalized Cauchy-Riemann operators, leading to a coupled first-order system for two Clifford-valued fields. By means of characteristic hypercomplex variables, this system is reduced to a pair of decoupled generalized Helmholtz equations. To construct explicit solutions, we introduce a bivariate Clifford-Appell polynomial basis adapted to the generalized Cauchy-Riemann operators. The Appell expansions transform the differential problem into an algebraic recurrence for the expansion coefficients, yielding explicit series representations of the solutions. The proposed framework provides a unified Clifford-analytic formulation of the free propagation problem and establishes an explicit connection between generalized Helmholtz equations, and Appell polynomial systems in hypercomplex function theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references

[1]

Aceto, L., Grassi, P.A., Malonek, H.R.. 2026. Wigner numbers and combinatorial struc- tures of the transfer matrix in multiple Dirac delta scattering, submitted. 21

2026
[19]

D., 2025

Figueroa, J., Gonzalez, I., Salinas-Arizmendi. D., 2025. A novel transfer matrix framework for multiple Dirac delta potentials. Phys. Lett. A,555:Paper No. 130785, 7

2025
[2]

Wigner numbers

Allen, W.D., 2019. Wigner numbers. J. Chem. Phys.151, 244122

2019
[3]

Wigner numbers

´Arend´ as, P., Cs´ asz´ ar, A.G., 2021. Comment on “Wigner numbers”. J. Chem. Phys.154, 087101

2021
[4]

On Monogenic Series Expansions with Applications to Linear Elasticity Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 24, 931–943

Bock, S., 2014. On Monogenic Series Expansions with Applications to Linear Elasticity Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 24, 931–943

2014
[5]

Clifford analysis

Brackx, F., Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., 1982. Clifford analysis. Pitman, Boston-London- Melbourne

1982
[6]

Brackx, F., De Schepper, H., L´ aviˇ cka, R. et al. 2015. Embedding Factors for Branching in Hermitian Clifford Analysis. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 9, 355–378

2015
[7]

On generalized Vietoris’ number sequences

Ca¸ cao, I., Falc˜ ao, M.I., Malonek, H.R., 2019. On generalized Vietoris’ number sequences. Discrete Appl. Math.269, 77–85

2019

Show all 26 references

[8]

On the construction of special monogenic polynomials, Int

Ca¸ c˜ ao, I., Falc˜ ao, M.L., Malonek, H.R., 2008. On the construction of special monogenic polynomials, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.,2008, Art. ID 240267, 10 pp

2008
[9]

A Sturm-Liouville equation on the crossroads of continuous and discrete hypercomplex analysis

Ca¸ cao, I., Falc˜ ao, M.I., Malonek, H.R., Tomaz G., 2024. A Sturm-Liouville equation on the crossroads of continuous and discrete hypercomplex analysis. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 47, 7962–7987

2024
[10]

Pascal Trapezoids as Wigner Numbers and Some Combinatorial Properties

Ca¸ c˜ ao, I., Falc˜ ao, M.I., Malonek, H.R., Tomaz, G., 2026. Pascal Trapezoids as Wigner Numbers and Some Combinatorial Properties. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Sci- ence and Its Applications – ICCSA 2025 Workshops. ICCSA 2025. Lecture Notes in Com- puter Science, v...

2026
[11]

Ca¸ c˜ ao, I., Malonek, H.R., Falc˜ ao, M.I., Tomaz, G. , 2018. Combinatorial identities as- sociated with a multidimensional polynomial sequence. J. Integer Sequences21, Article 18.7.4

2018
[12]

Intrinsic properties of a non- symmetric number triangle

Ca¸ c˜ ao, I., Malonek, H.R., Falc˜ ao, M.I., Tomaz, G., 2023. Intrinsic properties of a non- symmetric number triangle. J. Integer Seq.,26(4): Art. 23.4.8, 12

2023
[13]

U., 2001

Cooper, F.A., Khare, A., Sukhatme. U., 2001. Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics. World Scientific Publishing Company

2001
[14]

Cruz, C., Falc˜ ao, M.I., Malonek, H.R. et al. 2025. On the Pascal simplex with hypercomplex entries. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 19, 186

2025
[15]

Monogenic Appell Sets as Representations of the Heisenberg Algebra

Eelbode, D., 2012. Monogenic Appell Sets as Representations of the Heisenberg Algebra. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 22, 1009–1023. 22

2012
[16]

Remarks on the generation of monogenic functions, In: K

Falc˜ ao, M.I., Cruz, J., Malonek, H.R., 2006. Remarks on the generation of monogenic functions, In: K. G¨ urlebeck and C. K¨ onke, (eds.), Proc. of the 17-th Inter. Conf. on the Application of Computer Science and Mathematics in Architecture and Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-Uni...

2006
[17]

A note on a one-parameter family of non-symmetric number triangles

Falc˜ ao, M.I., Malonek., H.R., 2012. A note on a one-parameter family of non-symmetric number triangles. Opuscula Math.,32(4): 661–673

2012
[18]

Generalized exponentials through Appell sets inR n+1 and Bessel functions, in: T

Falc˜ ao, M.I., Malonek, H.R., 2007. Generalized exponentials through Appell sets inR n+1 and Bessel functions, in: T. E. Simos, G. Psihoyios, C. Tsitouras (eds.), Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 936, American Institute of Physics, ...

2007
[20]

A hypercomplex derivative of monogenic functions inR n+1 and its applications

G¨ urlebeck, K., Malonek, H.R., 1999. A hypercomplex derivative of monogenic functions inR n+1 and its applications. Complex Variables Theory Appl.39, 199–228

1999
[21]

Multivector and multivector matrix inverses in real Clifford algebras, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol

Hitzer, E., Sangwine, St., 2017. Multivector and multivector matrix inverses in real Clifford algebras, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 311, 375–389

2017
[22]

Clifford Algebras and Spinors, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 286

Lounesto P., 2001. Clifford Algebras and Spinors, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 286. Cambridge University Press

2001
[23]

A new hypercomplex structure of the Euclidean spaceR m+1 and the concept of hypercomplex differentiability, Complex Variables14, 25–33

Malonek, H.R., 1990. A new hypercomplex structure of the Euclidean spaceR m+1 and the concept of hypercomplex differentiability, Complex Variables14, 25–33

1990
[24]

3D-mappings using monogenic functions, [in:] Th.E

Malonek, H.R., Falc˜ ao, M.I., 2006. 3D-mappings using monogenic functions, [in:] Th.E. Simos et al., eds, ICNAAM-2006 Conference Proceedings, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006, 615—619

2006
[25]

Special monogenic polynomials–properties and appli- cations, in: T

Malonek, H.R., Falc˜ ao, M.I., 2007. Special monogenic polynomials–properties and appli- cations, in: T. E. Simos, G. Psihoyios, C. Tsitouras (eds.), Numerical Analysis and Ap- plied Mathematics, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 936, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY...

2007
[26]

The Dirac Equation

Thaller, B., 1992. The Dirac Equation. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 23

1992

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Aceto, L., Grassi, P.A., Malonek, H.R.. 2026. Wigner numbers and combinatorial struc- tures of the transfer matrix in multiple Dirac delta scattering, submitted. 21

2026

[2] [19]

D., 2025

Figueroa, J., Gonzalez, I., Salinas-Arizmendi. D., 2025. A novel transfer matrix framework for multiple Dirac delta potentials. Phys. Lett. A,555:Paper No. 130785, 7

2025

[3] [2]

Wigner numbers

Allen, W.D., 2019. Wigner numbers. J. Chem. Phys.151, 244122

2019

[4] [3]

Wigner numbers

´Arend´ as, P., Cs´ asz´ ar, A.G., 2021. Comment on “Wigner numbers”. J. Chem. Phys.154, 087101

2021

[5] [4]

On Monogenic Series Expansions with Applications to Linear Elasticity Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 24, 931–943

Bock, S., 2014. On Monogenic Series Expansions with Applications to Linear Elasticity Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 24, 931–943

2014

[6] [5]

Clifford analysis

Brackx, F., Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., 1982. Clifford analysis. Pitman, Boston-London- Melbourne

1982

[7] [6]

Brackx, F., De Schepper, H., L´ aviˇ cka, R. et al. 2015. Embedding Factors for Branching in Hermitian Clifford Analysis. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 9, 355–378

2015

[8] [7]

On generalized Vietoris’ number sequences

Ca¸ cao, I., Falc˜ ao, M.I., Malonek, H.R., 2019. On generalized Vietoris’ number sequences. Discrete Appl. Math.269, 77–85

2019