REVIEW 2 cited by
Widely Applicable Strong Baseline for Sports Ball Detection and Tracking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this work, we present a novel Sports Ball Detection and Tracking (SBDT) method that can be applied to various sports categories. Our approach is composed of (1) high-resolution feature extraction, (2) position-aware model training, and (3) inference considering temporal consistency, all of which are put together as a new SBDT baseline. Besides, to validate the wide-applicability of our approach, we compare our baseline with 6 state-of-the-art SBDT methods on 5 datasets from different sports categories. We achieve this by newly introducing two SBDT datasets, providing new ball annotations for two datasets, and re-implementing all the methods to ease extensive comparison. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach is substantially superior to existing methods on all the sports categories covered by the datasets. We believe our proposed method can play as a Widely Applicable Strong Baseline (WASB) of SBDT, and our datasets and codebase will promote future SBDT research. Datasets and codes are available at https://github.com/nttcom/WASB-SBDT .
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
TactiPlay: Multi-Granularity Tactical Parsing and Video-Anchored Match Review for Amateur Badminton Players
A taxonomy-guided, rally-level, video-anchored review system elicits more frequent, concrete, actionable, and appropriate tactical reflections from amateur badminton players than a report-and-statistics baseline.
-
Ice Hockey Puck Localization Using Contextual Cues
PLUCC fuses player-segmentation context with multiscale image features to localize the puck, reporting 12.2% higher average precision than the tested baselines and a new rink-space error metric.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.