Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Noisy Annotations in Semantic Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10891 v3 pith:RPUYSBMN submitted 2024-06-16 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords segmentationannotationannotationsmodelsnoisedifferentinstancelabels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Obtaining accurate labels for instance segmentation is particularly challenging due to the complex nature of the task. Each image necessitates multiple annotations, encompassing not only the object class but also its precise spatial boundaries. These requirements elevate the likelihood of errors and inconsistencies in both manual and automated annotation processes. By simulating different noise conditions, we provide a realistic scenario for assessing the robustness and generalization capabilities of instance segmentation models in different segmentation tasks, introducing COCO-N and Cityscapes-N. We also propose a benchmark for weakly annotation noise, dubbed COCO-WAN, which utilizes foundation models and weak annotations to simulate semi-automated annotation tools and their noisy labels. This study sheds light on the quality of segmentation masks produced by various models and challenges the efficacy of popular methods designed to address learning with label noise.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Novel Method to Evaluate Models on Unreliable, Noisy and Inconsistent Labels: Adaptive Resolution Label Aggregation (ARLA)

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Adaptive Resolution Label Aggregation (ARLA) coarsens label and prediction together at chosen subpatch size and sensitivity so evaluation metrics better reflect true model error on noisy segmentation labels.

  2. CUPID: Evaluating Personalized and Contextualized Alignment of LLMs from Interactions

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The abstract claims that state-of-the-art LLMs fail to infer contextual preferences from multi-turn interactions (under 50% precision, 65% recall), but the body text is an unrelated adversarial-patch paper, leaving th...

Pith tools