REVIEW 2 cited by
Model Balancing Helps Low-data Training and Fine-tuning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Model Balancing Helps Low-data Training and Fine-tuning
read the original abstract
Recent advances in foundation models have emphasized the need to align pre-trained models with specialized domains using small, curated datasets. Studies on these foundation models underscore the importance of low-data training and fine-tuning. This topic, well-known in natural language processing (NLP), has also gained increasing attention in the emerging field of scientific machine learning (SciML). To address the limitations of low-data training and fine-tuning, we draw inspiration from Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) theory, analyzing the shape of empirical spectral densities (ESDs) and revealing an imbalance in training quality across different model layers. To mitigate this issue, we adapt a recently proposed layer-wise learning rate scheduler, TempBalance, which effectively balances training quality across layers and enhances low-data training and fine-tuning for both NLP and SciML tasks. Notably, TempBalance demonstrates increasing performance gains as the amount of available tuning data decreases. Comparative analyses further highlight the effectiveness of TempBalance and its adaptability as an "add-on" method for improving model performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
One LR Doesn't Fit All: Heavy-Tail Guided Layerwise Learning Rates for LLMs
Heavy-tail guided layerwise learning rates improve LLM convergence speed and generalization across LLaMA, GPT variants, AdamW and Muon optimizers from 60M to 1B parameters.
-
One LR Doesn't Fit All: Heavy-Tail Guided Layerwise Learning Rates for LLMs
LLR uses heavy-tailed self-regularization theory to set per-layer learning rates in Transformers, yielding faster convergence and higher zero-shot accuracy than uniform rates across model scales.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.