Designing an Optimal Ion Adsorber at the Nanoscale: The Unusual Nucleation of AgNP/Co$^{2+}$ -- Ni$^{2+}$ Binary Mixtures

Barbara Capone; Carlo Meneghini; Chiara Battocchio; Fabio Bruni; Federico Mochi; Iole Venditti; Paolo Prosposito; Pietro Corsi

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 12 references

Designing an Optimal Ion Adsorber at the Nanoscale: The Unusual Nucleation of AgNP/Co$^{2+}$ -- Ni$^{2+}$ Binary Mixtures

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One interaction-strength parameter, not particle size, decides the shape of ion-capturing silver nanoparticle clusters.

desk verdict Solid parameter-scan simulations undercut by a self-contradictory ion-to-λ mapping; the modeling is useful but the headline explanation doesn't hold. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01184 v2 pith:RSYGPGTN submitted 2019-08-03 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mes-hall

Pietro Corsi , Iole Venditti , Chiara Battocchio , Carlo Meneghini , Fabio Bruni , Paolo Prosposito , Federico Mochi , Barbara Capone This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mes-hall

keywords nanoparticlesionadsorptiondrivenself-assemblytransitionmetalionsMonteCarlosimulationstheoreticalpredictionsasymmetricLennard-Jonesbinarymixturesilver

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that, when silver nanoparticles capture Co2+ or Ni2+ from water, the shape of the resulting aggregate is decided mainly by the effective attraction between ion and nanoparticle, not by how the sizes of the two species compare. Using Monte Carlo simulations of an asymmetric Lennard-Jones binary mixture, the authors show that a strong crossed interaction drives ions into the cluster core and arrests growth into compact, micellar aggregates, while a weak crossed interaction leaves ions on the surface and lets elongated, branched structures keep growing. They map these two branches onto the experimental observation that Co2+ gives compact clusters and Ni2+ gives branched ones. If correct, the result gives a design rule: tune the coating of the nanoparticle to control the effective interaction, and you can choose both the size and the internal structure of the adsorber.

What carries the argument

The central object is a two-species attractive Lennard-Jones mixture with pair potential $v(r)=v_0(r)+\lambda_{(i,n)}v_{\mathrm{att}}(r)$, where the dimensionless parameter $\lambda_{(i,n)}$ controls the attraction between ions and nanoparticles, self-interactions are set to zero, $q=R_n/r_i$ sets the size asymmetry, and $\phi$ sets the volume fraction. The segregation parameter $s$, the average distance between the centres of mass of ions and nanoparticles normalized by the cluster radius of gyration, diagnoses whether ions are internal (positive $s$) or exposed on the surface ($s\simeq 0$). The simulations show that $\lambda$ is the switch: weak cross-attraction gives low $s$, metastable elongated structures, and continued growth, while strong cross-attraction gives high $s$, compact segregated clusters, and arrested growth.

What would settle it

Measure the binding free energy of Co2+ and Ni2+ to the 3-MPS-functionalised silver nanoparticle surface, by isothermal titration calorimetry, surface plasmon resonance, or atomistic simulation, and compare the sign of the difference with the model's assignment; if Ni2+ binds more strongly than Co2+, the claimed mapping to the compact-versus-branched morphologies would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the internal structure of the aggregates is dominated by the crossed ion/nanoparticle interaction strength, while the size ratio between ions and nanoparticles plays only a minor role. In simulations with the same volume fraction and ion count, changing the size ratio q from 5 to 10 has little effect on aggregate morphology, whereas changing the cross-interaction strength from 3 to 5 switches the system from branched, surface-exposed clusters that keep growing to compact, segregated clusters whose growth is arrested. The paper concludes that Co2+ corresponds to the strong-interaction, compact-cluster branch and Ni2+ to the weak-interaction, branched branch, and that this difference ultimately traces to the ions' hydration and water-exchange behavior rather than to ionic radius.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping of Co2+ to strong effective interaction and Ni2+ to weak effective interaction is assumed from water-exchange chemistry rather than measured, and the paper's Discussion contains a sentence attributing the stronger interaction to Ni2+, so if the true ordering of the interaction strengths is reversed the simulations no longer explain the difference between compact and branched aggregates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A 60 percent change in the cross-interaction strength (from 3 to 5) changes the aggregate from branched with exposed ions to compact with segregated ions, so small changes in effective attraction can switch morphology.
Doubling the size ratio q from 5 to 10 changes the mean aggregation number but barely changes the internal arrangement of ions, so nanoparticle size alone cannot explain the Co2+/Ni2+ difference.
Clusters formed under strong interaction grow only weakly when ion concentration increases, matching the compact Co2+ behavior; clusters under weak interaction grow strongly with ion concentration, matching the branched Ni2+ behavior.
Nanoparticle size q and coating-controlled interaction strength give two independent design dials: q controls aggregate size, and the interaction strength controls whether ions are buried and insulated from solution.
Because ions in strong-interaction clusters are fully segregated inside, such nanoparticles act as efficient two-step filters that capture ions and can then be separated together with them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same two-branch behavior would be expected for other divalent metal ions once their effective binding to a given coating is known: weakly binding ions should give branched, surface-exposed aggregates and strongly binding ions compact, ion-insulating clusters.
The energy plots showing metastable elongated structures suggest the branched Ni2+-type aggregates are kinetic traps, so a testable extension is that prolonged annealing or gentle heating should convert them toward the compact morphology without changing the ion.
Varying thiol grafting density to move the effective interaction across the transition region would both test the model and produce a library of coatings tuned to specific ions, turning the two-branch phase behavior into a practical adsorption design map.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing you should know: the simulation result is genuinely informative, but the paper's central explanation of the Co2+/Ni2+ experiments is not supported by its own text. The MC study shows that in this two-component Lennard-Jones mixture, varying the cross-interaction strength λ changes aggregate morphology dramatically, while varying the size ratio q does not. That is a useful, well-illustrated finding. The paper does a good job of isolating the two parameters and introducing a segregation parameter s that captures whether ions are buried or exposed. The parameter scan is systematic and the simulation protocol is standard enough to be reproducible.

Now the problem. To connect the model to the experiments, the paper needs to assign Co2+ to one λ and Ni2+ to the other. The Conclusions state that branched clusters (the Ni2+ case) form when crossed interactions are weak, and compact clusters (the Co2+ case) when they are strong. But the Discussion explicitly says: 'The different water exchange rate appears to be responsible for the induction of a stronger effective interaction between AgNPs and Ni2+.' That is the opposite assignment. So either the sentence is a typo or the mapping is wrong; either way, the claimed explanation is underdetermined. Two different λ values can produce two morphologies, and either ion can be placed in either branch, so the qualitative match to Fig. 1 does not validate the model. λ itself is never measured or computed independently; it is assigned post hoc.

Other soft spots are minor: no error bars on the simulation observables, no code or data, and the comparison with TEM images is by-eye. There is also a small technical slip in the Methods: λ=0 does not recover the full Lennard-Jones potential, it recovers the repulsive WCA part (λ=1 would give the full potential). This doesn't affect the simulations but signals editorial carelessness.

My bottom line: this is a legitimate hypothesis-generating study. The parameter scan is a reasonable starting point for designing nanoparticle adsorbers, and the emphasis on λ as the key knob is worth airing. But the present version does not establish why Co2+ and Ni2+ behave differently. I would send it to peer review with a clear request to fix the internal contradiction, tone down the explanatory claims, and provide code or at least an independent strategy for estimating λ. I would not cite the Co/Ni conclusion until that is done.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a coarse-grained Monte Carlo study of an asymmetric additive Lennard-Jones binary mixture that is intended to mimic silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and divalent metal ions in water. The model has two key parameters: the size ratio q = Rn/ri and the cross-interaction strength λ that tunes the ion-nanoparticle attraction in Eq. (1), while same-species interactions are repulsive. The simulations scan q = 5 and 10, λ = 3 and 5, volume fractions φ ∈ [0.01, 0.1], and ion numbers ni = 600–1500. The central simulation result is that λ, not q, controls the internal structure of the aggregates: weak λ yields clusters with exposed ions and continued growth into branched/metastable structures, while strong λ yields compact clusters with ions encapsulated inside a nanoparticle shell, quantified by a segregation parameter s defined in Eq. (5). The authors compare these two regimes with the experimental TEM observation that AgNP/Co2+ forms compact micellar aggregates whereas AgNP/Ni2+ forms branched aggregates (Fig. 1), and they interpret the difference in terms of the different hydration and water-exchange properties of the two ions. They conclude that tuning λ (e.g., via grafting density) can serve as a design principle for optimal ion adsorbers.

Significance. If the central claim is sustained, the paper provides a simple and potentially useful design principle: the effective cross-interaction between nanoparticles and ions, rather than the size ratio, determines whether ions are exposed or encapsulated in self-assembled aggregates. The simulation study itself is systematic and internally consistent: the authors scan a reasonable parameter range, introduce a scalar segregation parameter to characterize morphology, and the dominant role of λ over q is clearly demonstrated within the model. The design prediction that λ can be controlled through nanoparticle functionalization is falsifiable and could guide future experiments. However, the explanatory step connecting the model to Co2+ and Ni2+ is not established: λ is not measured or independently computed for these ions, and the manuscript contains a sentence in the Discussion that directly contradicts the required assignment. As it stands, the simulations are hypothesis-generating: they show that different λ values produce the two observed morphologies, but they do not demonstrate that Co2+ and Ni2+ realize the corresponding λ values.

major comments (3)

[Discussion] The sentence "The different water exchange rate appears to be responsible for the induction of a stronger effective interaction between AgNPs and Ni2+" directly contradicts the Conclusions, where "Branched clusters are formed by binary mixtures where the crossed interactions are weak" is applied to the experimental Ni2+ case. Since the experimental AgNP/Ni2+ system produces branched clusters (Fig. 1), the simulation-to-experiment mapping requires Ni2+ to be the weak-λ ion, not the strong-λ ion. This contradiction is load-bearing because the entire explanation of Fig. 1 rests on the direction of the λ assignment. Please correct the sentence or provide a consistent mapping, and state explicitly which ion is assigned to the strong-λ and weak-λ regimes.
[Methods/Results] The parameter λ is a free parameter; the values λ = 3 and 5 are scanned but never connected to measurable properties of Co2+ or Ni2+ or to the functionalized AgNP surface. Without an independent estimate of λ for each ion, the comparison with experiment is a by-eye morphological match, and the claim that the simulations explain the experimental difference is underdetermined because either ion could be assigned to either λ regime. Please provide an order-of-magnitude estimate of λ from atomistic calculations, binding experiments, or a physical argument linking λ to water-exchange rates and surface chemistry.
[Discussion] The comparison between simulation and experiment is only qualitative. The experimental data in Fig. 2 (plasmon shift Δλ and FWHM broadening vs ion concentration) are never quantitatively compared with simulation outputs such as mean aggregation number or cluster-size growth with ni. The text states only that the simulation trends are "similar" to the experimental ones. A quantitative comparison, for example the slope of aggregation number vs ni or a shape metric such as aspect ratio or fractal dimension of the simulated clusters, would be needed to substantiate the claim that the model reproduces the distinct growth behaviors of the Co2+ and Ni2+ systems.

minor comments (6)

[Methods, Eq. (5)] The definition of the segregation parameter s is garbled. Please rewrite the expression with explicit sums, averages, and clear definitions of P(x), rn, ri, and Rc_g.
[Methods, after Eq. (4)] The statement "for λ=0 we recover the full, generalised Lennard-Jones potential" appears to be the opposite of the model: with λ=0, v(r)=v0(r), which is the purely repulsive Weeks-Chandler-Andersen part, not the full LJ potential. If the full attractive potential is recovered at λ=1, please correct the statement.
[Results/Discussion] The manuscript states that the hydrated radii of Co2+ and Ni2+ differ by about 20%, while the simulations compare q=5 and q=10, a factor of two. Please clarify how the simulated q range relates to the experimental q (approximately 12, given Rn~1.2 nm and ri~0.1 nm).
[Figures 3 and 4] No error bars or independent runs are reported. Single-run data with spline interpolation cannot support the quantitative claims as strongly as they appear; please report statistical uncertainties or at least state the run-to-run variability.
[Conclusions] The statement that "λ can be as well controlled by the grafting density of thiols onto the AgNPs" is presented without evidence. If this is speculative, please mark it as such or provide a supporting reference.
[Figure 4 caption] The panel labels "(c), (e)" are repeated in the caption; please check the panel lettering and make the caption consistent with the figure panels.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The simulation scan of λ and q is internally independent, but the paper's explanation of the Co2+/Ni2+ experimental difference rests on a post-hoc, internally contradicted assignment of ions to λ values.

fitted input called prediction [Discussion, first paragraph; Conclusions, final paragraph]
"By comparing computational and experimental results, we can make a few hypotheses on what are the key parameters influencing the two different aggregation paths seen in Figure 1. ... The different water exchange rate appears to be responsible for the induction of a stronger effective interaction between AgNPs and Ni2+. ... Branched clusters are formed by binary mixtures where the crossed interactions are weak, so that ions remain on the surface of the clusters and do not get completely adsorbed by the nanoparticles."

The simulations show that λ=3 yields weak-segregation/branched clusters and λ=5 yields compact/segregated clusters. To claim these results explain the experiment, the paper must identify Co2+ with the strong-λ outcome and Ni2+ with the weak-λ outcome. That identification is not measured or computed; it is made after the experimental morphologies are known, so the 'computational predictions compared to experiments' is a post-hoc labeling rather than an independent test. The Discussion's own sentence assigning a stronger effective interaction to Ni2+ contradicts this required labeling, since branched Ni2+ clusters are elsewhere assigned to weak crossed interactions.

full rationale

The Monte Carlo scan is not circular by itself: q and λ are varied over a grid, not fitted to the target morphologies, and the finding that λ affects cluster internal structure more than q is a legitimate emergent result of the model. The circularity enters only in the explanatory step that maps the real ions onto the simulation parameters. The paper never independently determines whether Co2+ or Ni2+ corresponds to the strong or weak λ; the mapping is inferred after seeing that strong λ gives compact clusters and weak λ gives branched clusters, matching the known experimental morphologies. This is further undermined by the Discussion's explicit statement that Ni2+ induces a stronger effective interaction, which contradicts the Conclusions' assignment of branched Ni2+ clusters to weak crossed interactions. Therefore the claimed prediction of the Co2+/Ni2+ morphological difference reduces to a post-hoc assignment, even though the underlying simulation study has independent content. The circularity score is accordingly moderate: the simulation is self-contained, but the central comparative claim is partly constructed to match the experimental outcome.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has two main tunable parameters (lambda and q) plus scan parameters (phi, ni). The central claim that lambda controls aggregate morphology is a property of the model; the application to Co2+/Ni2+ rests on a hypothesized, unmeasured mapping from water exchange rates to lambda. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)

lambda (cross interaction strength) = 3 and 5 (scanned)
The central control parameter. Two values are chosen to represent weak and strong ion-nanoparticle attraction; the conclusion that lambda drives the morphology switch depends on this choice.
q (size ratio Rn/ri) = 5 and 10 (scanned)
Size ratio between nanoparticles and ions. The paper argues that doubling q has a weak effect on morphology; the chosen values are based on hydrated ion radii estimates, but the NP radius used (1.2 nm) conflicts with the 8.5 nm diameter stated earlier.
volume fraction phi = 0.01 to 0.1 (scanned)
Total volume fraction of ions and nanoparticles; scanned over five values to cover a dilute regime. Not fitted to data, but a free choice of the simulation.
ion count ni = 600, 900, 1200, 1500
Number of ions for a fixed Nn=300 nanoparticles; scanned to study the effect of ion concentration. A free choice of the simulation grid.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The experimental AgNP/ion mixtures can be represented as additive asymmetric Lennard-Jones binary mixtures with isotropic, pairwise additive interactions and implicit solvent.
This coarse-graining ignores charge, hydration structure, thiol functionalization details, pH, and many-body effects. It is introduced in Methods (Eqs 1-3) and is the foundation of the whole analysis; if it does not preserve the relevant physics, the conclusions do not transfer to the real system.
domain assumption Cross-species attraction is the only attractive channel; identical species interact purely repulsively (lambda_ii = lambda_nn = 0).
Stated in Methods after Eq 4. Assumes ions do not attract each other and nanoparticles do not attract each other directly, which may be unrealistic for charged ions and thiol-coated NPs.
ad hoc to paper Differences in water exchange rates between Co2+ and Ni2+ map to a difference in the effective cross-interaction lambda in the direction assumed.
This is the key interpretive step in the Discussion. No quantitative relation or measurement is given; the paper itself contains a sentence assigning the stronger interaction to Ni2+, which would predict the wrong morphology.
domain assumption Hydrated ionic radii differ by about 20%, captured by q=5 versus q=10.
Used in Methods and Discussion to argue that size ratio alone cannot explain the morphology difference. The mapping from hydrated radii to the q values is approximate.
domain assumption NVT Monte Carlo with Nn=300 and ni up to 1500 and the chosen number of MC steps yields equilibrium aggregates representative of the experimental process.
No convergence analysis or finite-size scaling is shown; equilibration is illustrated with a single energy trace (Figure 5). The cluster definitions and averaging procedures are not fully specified.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Designing an Optimal Ion Adsorber at the Nanoscale: The Unusual Nucleation of AgNP/Co$^{2+}$ -- Ni$^{2+}$ Binary Mixtures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RSYGPGTN

@misc{pith2026190801184,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Designing an Optimal Ion Adsorber at the Nanoscale: The Unusual Nucleation of AgNP/Co$^2+$ -- Ni$^2+$ Binary Mixtures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RSYGPGTN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01184}
}

abstract

Selective removal of heavy metals from water is a complex topic. We present a theoretical computational approach, supported by experimental evidences, to design a functionalized nanomaterial that is able to selectively capture metallic ions from water in a self-assembling process. A theoretical model is used to map an experimental mixture of Ag nanoparticles and either Co$^{2+}$ or Ni$^{2+}$ onto an additive highly asymmetric attractive Lennard Jones binary mixture. Extensive NVT (constant number of particles, volume, and temperature) Monte Carlo simulations are performed to derive a set of parameters that first induce aggregation among the two species in solution and then affect the morphology of the aggregates. The computational predictions are thus compared with the experimental results. The gathered insights can be used as guidelines for the prediction of an optimal design of a new generation of selective nanoparticles to be used for metallic ion adsorption and hence for maximizing the trapping of ions in an aqueous solution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01184 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Self-assembled structures from TEM (Trasmission Electron Microscope). Top panels show self-assembled structures of the AgNPs/Co2+ nanocomposite where 1 ppm of Co2+ has been dispersed in solution. Bottom panels show self-assembled structures of the AgNPs/Ni2+ nanocomposite at the same ion concentration. It is noteworthy that all AgNPs, whose morphologies are reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Shift ∆λ, and broadening ∆FWMH of the plasmonic bands as a function of increasing density of ions for solutions of AgNPs nanoparticles in the presence of Co2+ (black circles) and Ni2+ (red squares). The dashed line is a guide to the eye. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Mean nanoparticles aggregation number for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Two typical conformations of clusters presenting ions on the outside - panel (a) - [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Subset of the equilibration energy showing the change in shape of the aggregates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[1]

Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil, Water and Fodder and their Presence in Livestock and Products : A Review

(1) Rajaganapathy, V.; Xavier, F.; Sreekumar, D.; Mandal, P. Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil, Water and Fodder and their Presence in Livestock and Products : A Review. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2011, 4, 234–249. (2) Jarup, L. Impact of environmental pollution on health: balancing risk. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 167–182. (3) Pedrero,...

work page 2011
[5]

Gibbs free energy of hydration at 298.15 K. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1991, 87, 2995–2999. (26) Huissmann, S.; Blaak, R.; Likos, C. N. Star Polymers in Solvents of Varying Quality. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 2806–2816. (27) Tang, J.; Wu, P.; Hou, X.; Xu, K. Modiﬁcation-free and N-acetyl-L-cysteine-induced colorimetric response of AuNPs: A mechanistic st...

work page 1991
[190]

17 (14) Ramezanzadeh, M.; Asghari, M.; Ramezanzadeh, B.; Bahlakeh, G. Fabrication of an eﬃcient system for Zn ions removal from industrial wastewater based on graphene oxide nanosheets decorated with highly crystalline polyaniline nanoﬁbers (GO-PANI): Exper- imental and ab initio quantum mechanics approaches. Chemical Engineering Journal 2018, 337, 385 –

work page 2018
[302]

Blue-to-Red Colorimetric Sensing Strategy for Hg2+ and Ag + via Redox-Regulated Surface Chemistry of Gold Nanoparticles

(10) Lou, T.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L. Blue-to-Red Colorimetric Sensing Strategy for Hg2+ and Ag + via Redox-Regulated Surface Chemistry of Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2011, 3, 1568–1573, PMID: 21469714. (11) Fu, X.; Lou, T.; Chen, Z.; Lin, M.; Feng, W.; Chen, L. “Turn-on” Fluorescence Detec- tion of Lead Ions Based on Accel...

work page 2011
[306]

Plas- monic Sensor Based on Interaction between Silver Nanoparticles and Ni 2+ or Co 2+ in Water

18 (22) Mochi, F.; Burratti, L.; Fratoddi, I.; Venditti, I.; Battocchio, C.; Carlini, L.; Iucci, G.; Casalboni, M.; De Matteis, F.; Casciardi, S.; Nappini, S.; Pis, I.; Prosposito, P. Plas- monic Sensor Based on Interaction between Silver Nanoparticles and Ni 2+ or Co 2+ in Water. Nanomaterials 2018, 8,

work page 2018
[397]

Highly Sensitive and Selective Colorimetric Sens- ing of Hg 2+ Based on the Morphology Transition of Silver Nanoprisms

(15) Chen, L.; Fu, X.; Lu, W.; Chen, L. Highly Sensitive and Selective Colorimetric Sens- ing of Hg 2+ Based on the Morphology Transition of Silver Nanoprisms. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2013, 5, 284–290, PMID: 23237272. (16) Ratnarathorn, N.; Chailapakul, O.; Dungchai, W. Highly sensitive colorimetric detec- tion of lead using maleic acid functio...

work page 2013
[488]

Hydrophilic silver nanoparticles with tunable op- tical properties: application for the detection of heavy metals in water

(23) Prosposito, P.; Mochi, F.; Ciotta, E.; Casalboni, M.; De Matteis, F.; Venditti, I.; Fontana, L.; Testa, G.; Fratoddi, I. Hydrophilic silver nanoparticles with tunable op- tical properties: application for the detection of heavy metals in water. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7,

work page 2016
[618]

Fenton-like Reaction-Mediated Etching of Gold Nanorods for Visual Detection of Co2+

(17) Zhang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Pan, D.; Chen, L. Fenton-like Reaction-Mediated Etching of Gold Nanorods for Visual Detection of Co2+. Langmuir 2015, 31, 643–650, PMID: 25486441. (18) Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Lou, T.; Pan, D.; Chen, L.; Qu, C.; Chen, Z. Label-free colori- metric sensing of cobalt(ii) based on inducing aggregation of thiosulfate stabilized gold nan...

work page 2015

Show all 12 references

[1654]

(24) Shannon, R. D. Revised eﬀective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic dis- tances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst. 1976, A32,

1976
[1901]

(32) Flett, D. S. Cobalt-Nickel Separation in Hydrometallurgy: a Review. Chemistry for Sustainable Development 2004, 12,

2004
[2614]

(8) Priyadarshini, E.; Pradhan, Gold nanoparticles as eﬃcient sensors in colorimetric de- tection of toxic metal ions: A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 238, 888–902. (9) Dinh, V.-P.; Le, N.-C.; Tuyen, L. A.; Hung, N. Q.; Nguyen, V.-D.; Nguyen, N.-T. Insight into adsorpt...

2017
[8982]

K.; Polley, N.; Chakrabarti, S.; Lemmens, P.; Pal, S

(20) Sarkar, P. K.; Polley, N.; Chakrabarti, S.; Lemmens, P.; Pal, S. K. Nanosurface Energy Transfer Based Highly Selective and Ultrasensitive ‘‘Turn on” Fluorescence Mercury Sensor. ACS Sensors 2016, 1, 789–797. (21) Feng, J.; Jin, W.; Huang, P.; Wu, F. Highly selective color...

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil, Water and Fodder and their Presence in Livestock and Products : A Review

(1) Rajaganapathy, V.; Xavier, F.; Sreekumar, D.; Mandal, P. Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil, Water and Fodder and their Presence in Livestock and Products : A Review. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2011, 4, 234–249. (2) Jarup, L. Impact of environmental pollution on health: balancing risk. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 167–182. (3) Pedrero,...

work page 2011

[2] [5]

Gibbs free energy of hydration at 298.15 K. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1991, 87, 2995–2999. (26) Huissmann, S.; Blaak, R.; Likos, C. N. Star Polymers in Solvents of Varying Quality. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 2806–2816. (27) Tang, J.; Wu, P.; Hou, X.; Xu, K. Modiﬁcation-free and N-acetyl-L-cysteine-induced colorimetric response of AuNPs: A mechanistic st...

work page 1991

[3] [190]

17 (14) Ramezanzadeh, M.; Asghari, M.; Ramezanzadeh, B.; Bahlakeh, G. Fabrication of an eﬃcient system for Zn ions removal from industrial wastewater based on graphene oxide nanosheets decorated with highly crystalline polyaniline nanoﬁbers (GO-PANI): Exper- imental and ab initio quantum mechanics approaches. Chemical Engineering Journal 2018, 337, 385 –

work page 2018

[4] [302]

Blue-to-Red Colorimetric Sensing Strategy for Hg2+ and Ag + via Redox-Regulated Surface Chemistry of Gold Nanoparticles

(10) Lou, T.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L. Blue-to-Red Colorimetric Sensing Strategy for Hg2+ and Ag + via Redox-Regulated Surface Chemistry of Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2011, 3, 1568–1573, PMID: 21469714. (11) Fu, X.; Lou, T.; Chen, Z.; Lin, M.; Feng, W.; Chen, L. “Turn-on” Fluorescence Detec- tion of Lead Ions Based on Accel...

work page 2011

[5] [306]

Plas- monic Sensor Based on Interaction between Silver Nanoparticles and Ni 2+ or Co 2+ in Water

18 (22) Mochi, F.; Burratti, L.; Fratoddi, I.; Venditti, I.; Battocchio, C.; Carlini, L.; Iucci, G.; Casalboni, M.; De Matteis, F.; Casciardi, S.; Nappini, S.; Pis, I.; Prosposito, P. Plas- monic Sensor Based on Interaction between Silver Nanoparticles and Ni 2+ or Co 2+ in Water. Nanomaterials 2018, 8,

work page 2018

[6] [397]

Highly Sensitive and Selective Colorimetric Sens- ing of Hg 2+ Based on the Morphology Transition of Silver Nanoprisms

(15) Chen, L.; Fu, X.; Lu, W.; Chen, L. Highly Sensitive and Selective Colorimetric Sens- ing of Hg 2+ Based on the Morphology Transition of Silver Nanoprisms. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2013, 5, 284–290, PMID: 23237272. (16) Ratnarathorn, N.; Chailapakul, O.; Dungchai, W. Highly sensitive colorimetric detec- tion of lead using maleic acid functio...

work page 2013

[7] [488]

Hydrophilic silver nanoparticles with tunable op- tical properties: application for the detection of heavy metals in water

(23) Prosposito, P.; Mochi, F.; Ciotta, E.; Casalboni, M.; De Matteis, F.; Venditti, I.; Fontana, L.; Testa, G.; Fratoddi, I. Hydrophilic silver nanoparticles with tunable op- tical properties: application for the detection of heavy metals in water. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7,

work page 2016

[8] [618]

Fenton-like Reaction-Mediated Etching of Gold Nanorods for Visual Detection of Co2+

(17) Zhang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Pan, D.; Chen, L. Fenton-like Reaction-Mediated Etching of Gold Nanorods for Visual Detection of Co2+. Langmuir 2015, 31, 643–650, PMID: 25486441. (18) Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Lou, T.; Pan, D.; Chen, L.; Qu, C.; Chen, Z. Label-free colori- metric sensing of cobalt(ii) based on inducing aggregation of thiosulfate stabilized gold nan...

work page 2015