Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Identification of Average Causal Effects in Confounded Additive Noise Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10014 v1 pith:RTICXCVB submitted 2024-07-13 stat.ME stat.ML

classification stat.MEstat.ML
keywords causalanmsconfoundeddemonstrateeffectsinterventionsnumbersufficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Additive noise models (ANMs) are an important setting studied in causal inference. Most of the existing works on ANMs assume causal sufficiency, i.e., there are no unobserved confounders. This paper focuses on confounded ANMs, where a set of treatment variables and a target variable are affected by an unobserved confounder that follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution. We introduce a novel approach for estimating the average causal effects (ACEs) of any subset of the treatment variables on the outcome and demonstrate that a small set of interventional distributions is sufficient to estimate all of them. In addition, we propose a randomized algorithm that further reduces the number of required interventions to poly-logarithmic in the number of nodes. Finally, we demonstrate that these interventions are also sufficient to recover the causal structure between the observed variables. This establishes that a poly-logarithmic number of interventions is sufficient to infer the causal effects of any subset of treatments on the outcome in confounded ANMs with high probability, even when the causal structure between treatments is unknown. The simulation results indicate that our method can accurately estimate all ACEs in the finite-sample regime. We also demonstrate the practical significance of our algorithm by evaluating it on semi-synthetic data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Joint Interventional Effects from Single-Variable Interventions in Additive Models

    stat.ML 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under an additive outcome mechanism, the joint interventional effect equals the sum of single-intervention effects minus (K-1) times the observational expectation, so joint interventions are identifiable from single-v...

Pith tools