Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Seeking Specifications: The Case for Neuro-Symbolic Specification Synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.21061 v1 pith:RTVYGATD submitted 2025-04-29 cs.SE

Seeking Specifications: The Case for Neuro-Symbolic Specification Synthesis

classification cs.SE
keywords specificationssymboliclanguagespecificationanalysescodecombinationformal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This work is concerned with the generation of formal specifications from code, using Large Language Models (LLMs) in combination with symbolic methods. Concretely, in our study, the programming language is C, the specification language is ACSL, and the LLM is Deepseek-R1. In this context, we address two research directions, namely the specification of intent vs. implementation on the one hand, and the combination of symbolic analyses with LLMs on the other hand. For the first, we investigate how the absence or presence of bugs in the code impacts the generated specifications, as well as whether and how a user can direct the LLM to specify intent or implementation, respectively. For the second, we investigate the impact of results from symbolic analyses on the specifications generated by the LLM. The LLM prompts are augmented with outputs from two formal methods tools in the Frama-C ecosystem, Pathcrawler and EVA. We demonstrate how the addition of symbolic analysis to the workflow impacts the quality of annotations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AutoACSL: Synthesizing ACSL Specifications by Integrating LLMs with CPG-Based Static Analysis

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AutoACSL integrates CPG-based static analysis into LLM prompts to synthesize ACSL specs for C programs, reporting 98% generation success and 96% full proof ratio with Gemini-3 on 604 programs, with 24.7-51.7% gains ov...