REVIEW 1 cited by
Seeking Specifications: The Case for Neuro-Symbolic Specification Synthesis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Seeking Specifications: The Case for Neuro-Symbolic Specification Synthesis
read the original abstract
This work is concerned with the generation of formal specifications from code, using Large Language Models (LLMs) in combination with symbolic methods. Concretely, in our study, the programming language is C, the specification language is ACSL, and the LLM is Deepseek-R1. In this context, we address two research directions, namely the specification of intent vs. implementation on the one hand, and the combination of symbolic analyses with LLMs on the other hand. For the first, we investigate how the absence or presence of bugs in the code impacts the generated specifications, as well as whether and how a user can direct the LLM to specify intent or implementation, respectively. For the second, we investigate the impact of results from symbolic analyses on the specifications generated by the LLM. The LLM prompts are augmented with outputs from two formal methods tools in the Frama-C ecosystem, Pathcrawler and EVA. We demonstrate how the addition of symbolic analysis to the workflow impacts the quality of annotations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
AutoACSL: Synthesizing ACSL Specifications by Integrating LLMs with CPG-Based Static Analysis
AutoACSL integrates CPG-based static analysis into LLM prompts to synthesize ACSL specs for C programs, reporting 98% generation success and 96% full proof ratio with Gemini-3 on 604 programs, with 24.7-51.7% gains ov...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.