REVIEW 3 cited by
FACT-AUDIT: An Adaptive Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic Fact-Checking Evaluation of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the fact-checking studies. However, existing automated fact-checking evaluation methods rely on static datasets and classification metrics, which fail to automatically evaluate the justification production and uncover the nuanced limitations of LLMs in fact-checking. In this work, we introduce FACT-AUDIT, an agent-driven framework that adaptively and dynamically assesses LLMs' fact-checking capabilities. Leveraging importance sampling principles and multi-agent collaboration, FACT-AUDIT generates adaptive and scalable datasets, performs iterative model-centric evaluations, and updates assessments based on model-specific responses. By incorporating justification production alongside verdict prediction, this framework provides a comprehensive and evolving audit of LLMs' factual reasoning capabilities, to investigate their trustworthiness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FACT-AUDIT effectively differentiates among state-of-the-art LLMs, providing valuable insights into model strengths and limitations in model-centric fact-checking analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond a Joke: Multi-Angle Reasoning for Detecting and Explaining Harmful Humor in Memes
MAR-12 improves humor and hate detection in memes by prompting a VLM through twelve reasoning perspectives, attention-weighting them, and generating explanations from the weighted evidence.
-
AdamMeme: Adaptively Probe the Reasoning Capacity of Multimodal Large Language Models on Harmfulness
AdamMeme is an adaptive, agent-based evaluation framework that iteratively refines meme text to expose model-specific weaknesses in multimodal models' understanding of meme harmfulness.
-
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
A new 6K-claim benchmark evaluates LLMs and multimodal LLMs on real-world fact-checking with an explicit 'unknown' option and shows web search and multimodal input improve performance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.