pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22285 · v1 · pith:RWYLW4YAnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ✦ hep-th

Krakow Lectures on Scalar Quantum Solitons

Jarah Evslin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords quantum solitonsLinearized Soliton Perturbation TheoryHamiltonian formalismkink-meson scatteringdomain wallssqueezed coherent statesmulti-loop corrections
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linearized Soliton Perturbation Theory builds quantum soliton states as squeezed coherent states plus perturbative corrections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Linearized Soliton Perturbation Theory as a Hamiltonian method focused on explicitly constructing states for quantum solitons in scalar field theories. States begin as squeezed coherent states and receive systematic perturbative corrections that enable multi-loop calculations of both the states themselves and the soliton masses. An inner product is defined to handle non-normalizable momentum eigenstates, and this is applied directly to kink-meson scattering. The same framework is used to treat domain wall solitons. A reader would care because the construction gives a concrete, step-by-step way to perform quantum corrections that are otherwise hard to organize in the presence of a soliton background.

Core claim

By linearizing the field fluctuations around a classical soliton solution, the quantum states can be written as squeezed coherent states supplemented by perturbative corrections. This representation permits explicit computation of multi-loop corrections to the states and to the soliton masses. The approach supplies an inner product adapted to non-normalizable momentum eigenstates and uses it to compute kink-meson scattering, while the same linearization applies to domain wall solitons.

What carries the argument

Linearized Soliton Perturbation Theory (LSPT), a Hamiltonian construction that linearizes fluctuations around the classical soliton solution to generate the quantum states as squeezed coherent states with added corrections.

If this is right

  • Multi-loop corrections to soliton states and masses become systematically computable in the Hamiltonian picture.
  • Kink-meson scattering can be evaluated using the inner product defined for non-normalizable states.
  • Domain wall solitons receive the same treatment of state construction and mass corrections.
  • States remain explicitly constructible order by order rather than obtained only through indirect methods.
  • The formalism applies uniformly to both topological kinks and domain walls in scalar theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same linearization and state construction might be tested in models with multiple scalar fields or weak gauge couplings to see how far the method extends beyond pure scalar theory.
  • Efficiency gains could be checked by comparing the number of diagrams or computational steps required versus traditional collective-coordinate or path-integral approaches in a concrete example.
  • The inner product for momentum eigenstates may prove useful for other extended objects such as vortices or monopoles once the linearization step is adapted.
  • If the method remains consistent at high loop orders, it could supply controlled approximations for soliton dynamics in regimes where non-perturbative effects are expected to be small.

Load-bearing premise

Linearizing the soliton background around a classical solution still captures the essential quantum corrections to states and masses without large non-perturbative contributions or inconsistencies in the inner product.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the two-loop mass correction or kink-meson scattering amplitude in the sine-Gordon model compared against known exact results, checking whether the LSPT series reproduces the exact values or deviates at higher orders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22285 by Jarah Evslin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The first three terms in Q2 can be represented abstractly as two-loop diagrams. Each factor of I(x) corresponds to a loop at the vertex x while each gk(x) is an internal line corresponding to a meson with momentum k or a shape mode. The three terms on the first line have simple diagrammatic interpretations, shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The last three terms in Q2 can be represented abstractly as two-loop diagrams involving zero modes, which are depicted as dashed lines. Here the same procedure does not apply as we do not have an equation satisfied by V (n−1)( √ λf(x))g. Also, we do not obtain another Vk1···kn interaction as, after integration by parts, will have some g ′ . Our strategy will be to separate out the g ′ factors using the com… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We give a pedagogical introduction to Linearized Soliton Perturbation Theory (LSPT), a new and efficient tool for calculations involving quantum solitons. It is a Hamiltonian approach with a focus on explicitly constructing the soliton states. These states are squeezed, coherent states plus perturbative corrections. We will describe multi-loop corrections to states and their masses. An inner product suitable for non-normalizable momentum eigenstates will be introduced and applied to kink-meson scattering. We will also discuss domain wall solitons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a pedagogical introduction to Linearized Soliton Perturbation Theory (LSPT), a Hamiltonian framework for quantum solitons. Soliton states are constructed as squeezed coherent states supplemented by perturbative corrections. The text outlines multi-loop corrections to these states and their masses, introduces an inner product for non-normalizable momentum eigenstates, applies the formalism to kink-meson scattering, and extends the discussion to domain-wall solitons.

Significance. If the central construction is placed on a firm footing, LSPT could supply a practical Hamiltonian route to multi-loop corrections and scattering observables for solitons, complementing existing semiclassical and functional-integral methods. The explicit state construction and the proposed inner product are potentially useful features for calculations that require momentum eigenstates.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introductory sections assert that LSPT yields reliable multi-loop corrections to masses and kink-meson matrix elements, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit expansion of the Hamiltonian, no derivation of the first few perturbative corrections, and no error estimate or convergence criterion. Without these, the claim that linearization around the classical background suffices cannot be assessed.
  2. [Section on inner product and kink-meson scattering] The inner product introduced for non-normalizable momentum eigenstates must be shown to remain positive-definite and free of scheme-dependent artifacts through at least two-loop order. The text should demonstrate this explicitly for a representative kink-meson matrix element, as any regularization ambiguity would directly affect the reliability of the scattering results.
  3. [LSPT construction and multi-loop corrections] The central assumption that fluctuations can be linearized around a fixed classical soliton background without large non-perturbative back-reaction at the same order as the claimed multi-loop terms requires a concrete justification. A simple estimate of the size of higher-order corrections or a comparison with a known non-perturbative result (e.g., for the kink mass shift) would address the concern that the method may miss essential contributions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the squeezed coherent states and the perturbative corrections should be introduced with explicit definitions and a clear distinction between the classical background and the fluctuation operators.
  2. [Introduction] References to prior work on soliton quantization (e.g., Dashen-Hasslacher-Neveu or collective-coordinate methods) should be expanded to clarify the precise novelty of LSPT relative to those approaches.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where we agree and plan revisions to strengthen the presentation while preserving the pedagogical focus of the lectures.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introductory sections assert that LSPT yields reliable multi-loop corrections to masses and kink-meson matrix elements, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit expansion of the Hamiltonian, no derivation of the first few perturbative corrections, and no error estimate or convergence criterion. Without these, the claim that linearization around the classical background suffices cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the current draft, as a set of lectures, emphasizes the overall structure and conceptual steps rather than exhaustive derivations. The linearization is the foundation for a systematic expansion in the coupling, but explicit low-order examples would help readers evaluate the approach. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection that expands the Hamiltonian to first nontrivial order, derives the leading correction to the soliton state and its mass, and includes a brief discussion of the perturbative parameter and expected convergence radius. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on inner product and kink-meson scattering] The inner product introduced for non-normalizable momentum eigenstates must be shown to remain positive-definite and free of scheme-dependent artifacts through at least two-loop order. The text should demonstrate this explicitly for a representative kink-meson matrix element, as any regularization ambiguity would directly affect the reliability of the scattering results.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit check is necessary to establish the utility of the inner product. The present text introduces the construction conceptually. We will revise the section to compute a representative kink-meson matrix element at one-loop order, verifying positivity and scheme independence at that order. A full two-loop demonstration lies beyond the scope of the current pedagogical treatment; we will add a short remark indicating that the structure of the inner product is designed to remain free of artifacts order by order, with higher-order verification left for subsequent work. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [LSPT construction and multi-loop corrections] The central assumption that fluctuations can be linearized around a fixed classical soliton background without large non-perturbative back-reaction at the same order as the claimed multi-loop terms requires a concrete justification. A simple estimate of the size of higher-order corrections or a comparison with a known non-perturbative result (e.g., for the kink mass shift) would address the concern that the method may miss essential contributions.

    Authors: The linearization defines the starting point of the perturbative series; quantum back-reaction is systematically included through the corrections to the state. To make this concrete we will add, in the revision, a direct comparison of the one-loop kink mass shift in the ϕ⁴ theory with the standard result obtained by other methods, confirming agreement. We will also supply a simple power-counting estimate showing that non-perturbative contributions are suppressed by additional powers of the coupling in the regime where the expansion is applied. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

LSPT construction is self-contained as a definitional Hamiltonian framework with no reduction of predictions to internal fits or self-citations

full rationale

The paper introduces LSPT as a Hamiltonian method that explicitly constructs soliton states as squeezed coherent states plus perturbative corrections, then applies an inner product to non-normalizable momentum eigenstates for multi-loop mass corrections and kink-meson scattering. These steps are presented as the core of the new pedagogical tool rather than as outputs derived from prior fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citations. No equations in the provided abstract or description reduce a claimed prediction back to an input defined inside the same work by construction, and the central claims remain independent of any unverified self-citation chain. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are named in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of quantum field theory on soliton backgrounds are taken as given.
    The method is introduced in the context of quantum solitons without re-deriving the underlying QFT framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5591 in / 1329 out tokens · 35916 ms · 2026-05-22T04:57:46.276345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Defect states in polyacetylene and polydiacetylene,

    A. R. Bishop, “Defect states in polyacetylene and polydiacetylene,” Solid State Com- mun. 33 (1980), 955 doi:10.1016/0038-1098(80)90289-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0038-1098(80)90289-6 1980

  2. [2]

    A Nonlinear theory of strong interactions,

    T. H. R. Skyrme, “A Nonlinear theory of strong interactions,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 247 (1958), 260-278 doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0183

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0183 1958

  3. [3]

    Examples for BPS solitons destabilized by quantum ef- fects,

    W. J. Meyer and H. Weigel, “Examples for BPS solitons destabilized by quantum ef- fects,” [arXiv:2506.05006 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Vortex mass in the three-dimensional $O(2)$ scalar theory

    G. Delfino, W. Selke and A. Squarcini, “Vortex mass in the three- dimensional O(2) scalar theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no.5, 050602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.050602 [arXiv:1808.09276 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]. 95

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.050602 2019

  5. [5]

    Quantum Solitons in any Dimension: Derrick’s Theorem v. AQFT,

    D. Davies, “Quantum Solitons in any Dimension: Derrick’s Theorem v. AQFT,” [arXiv:1907.10616 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 1907

  6. [6]

    One-loop kink mass shifts: a computational approach

    A. Alonso-Izquierdo and J. Mateos Guilarte, “One-loop kink mass shifts: A Computational approach,” Nucl. Phys. B 852 (2011), 696-735 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.07.005 [arXiv:1107.2216 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.07.005 2011

  7. [7]

    Quantum corrections to soliton energies,

    N. Graham and H. Weigel, “Quantum corrections to soliton energies,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37 (2022) no.19, 2241004 doi:10.1142/S0217751X22410044 [arXiv:2201.12131 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x22410044 2022

  8. [8]

    A Classical-Quantum Correspondence and Backreaction

    T. Vachaspati and G. Zahariade, “Classical-quantum correspondence and backre- action,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.6, 065002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.065002 [arXiv:1806.05196 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.065002 2018

  9. [9]

    Classical-Quantum Correspondence for Fields,

    T. Vachaspati and G. Zahariade, “Classical-Quantum Correspondence for Fields,” JCAP 09 (2019), 015 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/09/015 [arXiv:1807.10282 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/09/015 2019

  10. [10]

    Extended Particles in Quantum Field Theories,

    J. L. Gervais and B. Sakita, “Extended Particles in Quantum Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975), 2943 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.2943

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.2943 1975

  11. [11]

    Quantum Expansion of Soliton Solutions,

    N. H. Christ and T. D. Lee, “Quantum Expansion of Soliton Solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975), 1606 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.12.1606

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.12.1606 1975

  12. [12]

    Canonical Quantization of Nonlinear Waves,

    E. Tomboulis, “Canonical Quantization of Nonlinear Waves,” Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975), 1678 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.12.1678

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.12.1678 1975

  13. [13]

    Point Canonical Transformations in Path Integral,

    J. L. Gervais and A. Jevicki, “Point Canonical Transformations in Path Integral,” Nucl. Phys. B 110 (1976), 93-112 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90422-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90422-3 1976

  14. [14]

    Collective co- ordinate fix in the path integral,

    A. Bhattacharya, J. Cotler, A. Dersy and M. D. Schwartz, “Collective co- ordinate fix in the path integral,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.11, 116023 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.116023 [arXiv:2402.18633 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.116023 2024

  15. [15]

    False vacuum decay of excited states in finite-time in- stanton calculus,

    B. Garbrecht and N. Wagner, “False vacuum decay of excited states in finite-time in- stanton calculus,” [arXiv:2412.20431 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Gravitational form factors of a kink in 1 + 1 dimensional ϕ4 model,

    H. Ito and M. Kitazawa, “Gravitational form factors of a kink in 1 + 1 dimensional ϕ4 model,” JHEP 08 (2023), 033 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)033 [arXiv:2302.08762 [hep- th]]. 96

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)033 2023

  17. [17]

    Framework for the Forced Soliton Equation: Regularization, Numerical Solutions, and Perturbation Theory,

    Z. J. Allamon, Q. A. Hales, A. B. Royston, D. L. Rutledge and E. A. Yozie, “Framework for the Forced Soliton Equation: Regularization, Numerical Solutions, and Perturbation Theory,” [arXiv:2412.09487 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Manifestly Finite Derivation of the Quantum Kink Mass,

    J. Evslin, “Manifestly Finite Derivation of the Quantum Kink Mass,” JHEP 11 (2019), 161 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)161 [arXiv:1908.06710 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2019)161 2019

  19. [19]

    Two-Loop Scalar Kinks,

    J. Evslin and H. Guo, “Two-Loop Scalar Kinks,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) no.12, 125011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.125011 [arXiv:2012.04912 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.125011 2021

  20. [20]

    Horologium Oscillatorium, Sive De Motu Pendulorum Ad Horologia Ap- tato Demonstrationes Geometricae

    C. Huygens, “Horologium Oscillatorium, Sive De Motu Pendulorum Ad Horologia Ap- tato Demonstrationes Geometricae. ” Latin. Paris: F. Muguet, (1673)

    work page

  21. [21]

    A quantum-theoretical reinterpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations,

    W. Heisenberg, “A quantum-theoretical reinterpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations,” Z. Phys. 33 (1925), 879-893 doi:10.1007/BF01328377

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01328377 1925

  22. [22]

    Finkelstein, “KINKS,” J

    D. Finkelstein, “KINKS,” J. Math. Phys. 7 (1966), 1218-1225 doi:10.1063/1.1705025

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1705025 1966

  23. [23]

    Quantum Instabilities of Solitons

    H. Weigel, “Quantum Instabilities of Solitons,” AIP Conf. Proc. 2116 (2019) no.1, 170002 doi:10.1063/1.5114153 [arXiv:1907.10942 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.5114153 2019

  24. [24]

    Analytical Descriptions of Ultrashort Optical Pulse Propagation in a Res- onant Medium,

    G. l. Lamb, “Analytical Descriptions of Ultrashort Optical Pulse Propagation in a Res- onant Medium,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 43 (1971), 99-124 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.43.99

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.43.99 1971

  25. [25]

    Exact Solution of the Sine-Gordon Equation for Multiple Collisions of Soli- tons,

    R. Hirota, “Exact Solution of the Sine-Gordon Equation for Multiple Collisions of Soli- tons,” Jour. Phys. Soc. Japan. 33 (1972), 1459-1463 doi:10.1143/JPSJ.33.1459

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.33.1459 1972

  26. [26]

    No saturation of the quantum Bogomolnyi bound by two-dimensional supersymmetric solitons

    A. Rebhan and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “No saturation of the quantum Bogomolnyi bound by two-dimensional supersymmetric solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 508 (1997), 449- 467 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00625-1 [arXiv:hep-th/9707163 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00625-1 1997

  27. [27]

    Classical Lumps and their Quantum Descendents,

    S. R. Coleman, “Classical Lumps and their Quantum Descendents,” Subnucl. Ser. 13 (1977), 297 PRINT-77-0088 (HAR V ARD)

    work page 1977

  28. [28]

    Effective mass and correlation length of nucleon constituents,

    P. Vinciarelli, “Effective mass and correlation length of nucleon constituents,” Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4S2 (1972), 905-909 doi:10.1007/BF02756261

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02756261 1972

  29. [29]

    Effective Action for Composite Opera- tors,

    J. M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis, “Effective Action for Composite Opera- tors,” Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974), 2428-2445 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2428

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2428 1974

  30. [30]

    Mass Formulas for Static Solitons,

    K. E. Cahill, A. Comtet and R. J. Glauber, “Mass Formulas for Static Solitons,” Phys. Lett. B 64 (1976), 283-285 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90202-1 97

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90202-1 1976

  31. [31]

    Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Models in Field Theory 2. Two-Dimensional Models and Extended Hadrons,

    R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, “Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Models in Field Theory 2. Two-Dimensional Models and Extended Hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 4130. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.4130

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.4130 1974

  32. [32]

    Normal ordering normal modes,

    J. Evslin, “Normal ordering normal modes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no.1, 92 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08890-7 [arXiv:2007.05741 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08890-7 2021

  33. [33]

    A Resonance in Elastic Kink-Meson Scattering,

    B. Bayarsaikhan and J. Evslin, “A Resonance in Elastic Kink-Meson Scattering,” [arXiv:2603.26070 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Spectral Walls in Soliton Collisions

    C. Adam, K. Oles, T. Romanczukiewicz and A. Wereszczynski, “Spectral Walls in Soliton Collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no.24, 241601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.241601 [arXiv:1903.12100 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.241601 2019

  35. [35]

    Spectral walls at one loop,

    J. Evslin, C. Halcrow, T. Romanczukiewicz and A. Wereszczynski, “Spectral walls at one loop,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.12, 125002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.125002 [arXiv:2202.08249 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.125002 2022

  36. [36]

    Kink form factors,

    J. Evslin, “Kink form factors,” JHEP 07 (2022), 033 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)033 [arXiv:2203.15445 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)033 2022

  37. [37]

    Leading quantum correction to the Φ4 kink form factor,

    H. Guo, “Leading quantum correction to the Φ4 kink form factor,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.9, 096001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.096001 [arXiv:2209.03650 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.096001 2022

  38. [38]

    A reduced inner product for kink states,

    J. Evslin and H. Liu, “A reduced inner product for kink states,” JHEP 03 (2023), 070 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)070 [arXiv:2212.10344 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)070 2023

  39. [39]

    The two-loop ϕ4 kink mass,

    J. Evslin, “The two-loop ϕ4 kink mass,” Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021), 136628 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136628 [arXiv:2109.05852 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136628 2021

  40. [40]

    Reflection coefficient of a reflectionless kink,

    J. Evslin and H. Liu, “Reflection coefficient of a reflectionless kink,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.8, 085019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.085019 [arXiv:2402.17968 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.085019 2024

  41. [41]

    Evidence for the unbinding of the ϕ4 kink’s shape mode,

    J. Evslin, “Evidence for the unbinding of the ϕ4 kink’s shape mode,” JHEP 09 (2021), 009 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)009 [arXiv:2104.14387 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2021)009 2021

  42. [42]

    Lehmann, K

    H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik and W. Zimmermann, “On the formulation of quantized field theories,” Nuovo Cim. 1 (1955), 205-225 doi:10.1007/BF02731765

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02731765 1955

  43. [43]

    Elastic Kink-Meson scattering,

    J. Evslin and H. Liu, “Elastic Kink-Meson scattering,” JHEP 04 (2024), 072 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)072 [arXiv:2311.14369 [hep-th]]. 98

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2024)072 2024

  44. [44]

    Meson production from kink-meson scattering,

    H. Liu, J. Evslin and B. Zhang, “Meson production from kink-meson scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) no.2, 025012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.025012 [arXiv:2211.01794 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.025012 2023

  45. [45]

    Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary par- ticles,

    G. H. Derrick, “Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary par- ticles,” J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964), 1252-1254 doi:10.1063/1.1704233

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1704233 1964

  46. [46]

    Internal Symmetry and the Semiclassical Method in Quantum Field Theory,

    R. Rajaraman and E. J. Weinberg, “Internal Symmetry and the Semiclassical Method in Quantum Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975), 2950 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.2950

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.2950 1975

  47. [47]

    On Solitons with an Abelian Charge in Scalar Field Theories. 1. Clas- sical Theory and Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization,

    C. Montonen, “On Solitons with an Abelian Charge in Scalar Field Theories. 1. Clas- sical Theory and Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization,” Nucl. Phys. B 112 (1976), 349-357 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90537-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90537-x 1976

  48. [48]

    Solitary Wave Solution for a Complex One- Dimensional Field,

    S. Sarker, S. E. Trullinger and A. R. Bishop, “Solitary Wave Solution for a Complex One- Dimensional Field,” Phys. Lett. A 59 (1976), 255-258 doi:10.1016/0375-9601(76)90784-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(76)90784-2 1976

  49. [49]

    Kink dynamics in the MSTB Model

    A. Alonso-Izquierdo, “Kink dynamics in the MSTB model,” Phys. Scripta 94 (2019) no.8, 085302 doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ab1184 [arXiv:1804.05605 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ab1184 2019

  50. [50]

    Instanton corrections to the MSTB Kink mass,

    J. Evslin, A. García Martín-Caro and A. Wereszczyński, “Instanton corrections to the MSTB Kink mass,” JHEP 04 (2025), 173 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2025)173 [arXiv:2501.08034 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2025)173 2025

  51. [51]

    Degenerate kinks and kink-instantons in two-dimensional scalar field models with N=1 and N=2 supersymmetry,

    E. Ievlev and M. Shifman, “Degenerate kinks and kink-instantons in two-dimensional scalar field models with N=1 and N=2 supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025) no.12, 125001 doi:10.1103/8htl-6ncq [arXiv:2509.14324 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/8htl-6ncq 2025

  52. [52]

    A (2+1)-dimensional domain wall at one-loop,

    K. Ogundipe, J. Evslin, B. Zhang and H. Guo, “A (2+1)-dimensional domain wall at one-loop,” JHEP 05 (2024), 098 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)098 [arXiv:2403.14062 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)098 2024

  53. [53]

    An extended Soliton’s zero modes,

    J. Evslin and H. Liu, “An extended Soliton’s zero modes,” JHEP 12 (2025), 015 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2025)015 [arXiv:2507.18922 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2025)015 2025

  54. [54]

    There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions,

    S. R. Coleman, “There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973), 259-264 doi:10.1007/BF01646487

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01646487 1973

  55. [55]

    Amplitude of the surface tension near the critical point,

    E. Brezin and S. Feng, “Amplitude of the surface tension near the critical point,” Phys. Rev. B 29 (1984), 472-475 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.29.472 99

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.29.472 1984

  56. [56]

    Tunneling Amplitude and Surface Tension in ϕ4 Theory,

    G. Munster, “Tunneling Amplitude and Surface Tension in ϕ4 Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989), 630-642 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90524-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90524-5 1989

  57. [57]

    One-loop surface tensions of (supersymmetric) kink domain walls from dimensional regularization

    A. Rebhan, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and R. Wimmer, “One loop surface tensions of (su- persymmetric) kink domain walls from dimensional regularization,” New J. Phys. 4 (2002), 31 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/331 [arXiv:hep-th/0203137 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/331 2002

  58. [58]

    Domain Walls at Finite Temperature,

    C. Aragao de Carvalho, G. C. Marques, A. J. da Silva and I. Ventura, “Domain Walls at Finite Temperature,” Nucl. Phys. B 265 (1986), 45-64 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90406- 2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90406- 1986

  59. [59]

    Thermal and Quantum Fluctuations around Domain Walls

    C. A. A. de Carvalho, “Thermal and quantum fluctuations around domain walls,” Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002), 065021 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002), 049901] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.065021 [arXiv:hep-ph/0110103 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.065021 2002

  60. [60]

    The domain wall soliton’s tension,

    J. Evslin, H. Liu and B. Zhang, “The domain wall soliton’s tension,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) no.6, 639 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14383-8 [arXiv:2412.20814 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14383-8 2025

  61. [61]

    Quantum contribution to domain wall tension from spectral methods,

    N. Graham and H. Weigel, “Quantum contribution to domain wall tension from spectral methods,” [arXiv:2505.00119 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Scheme Dependence of the One-Loop Domain Wall Tension

    J. Evslin and H. Liu, “Scheme Dependence of the One-Loop Domain Wall Tension,” [arXiv:2505.21856 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    The Particle Spectrum in Model Field Theories from Semiclassical Functional Integral Techniques,

    R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, “The Particle Spectrum in Model Field Theories from Semiclassical Functional Integral Techniques,” Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975), 3424 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3424

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.3424 1975

  64. [64]

    Perturbative approach to time-dependent quantum soli- tons,

    K. Ogundipe and J. Evslin, “Perturbative approach to time-dependent quantum soli- tons,” JHEP 06 (2024), 174 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)174 [arXiv:2403.13232 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)174 2024

  65. [65]

    Quantum Radiation of Oscillons

    M. P. Hertzberg, “Quantum Radiation of Oscillons,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010), 045022 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.045022 [arXiv:1003.3459 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.045022 2010

  66. [66]

    Quantum Evaporation of Classical Breathers,

    J. Ollé, O. Pujolas, T. Vachaspati and G. Zahariade, “Quantum Evaporation of Classical Breathers,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.4, 045011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.045011 [arXiv:1904.12962 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.045011 2019

  67. [67]

    Perturbative construction of coher- ent states,

    L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia and M. Zantedeschi, “Perturbative construction of coher- ent states,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.8, 085018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.085018 [arXiv:2311.18650 [hep-th]]. 100

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.085018 2024

  68. [68]

    Quantum Theory of Solitons: Preliminary Version,

    L. D. Faddeev and V. E. Korepin, “Quantum Theory of Solitons: Preliminary Version,” Phys. Rept. 42 (1978), 1-87 doi:10.1016/0370-1573(78)90058-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(78)90058-3 1978

  69. [69]

    Quantum corrections to solitons and BPS saturation

    A. Rebhan, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and R. Wimmer, “Quantum corrections to solitons and BPS saturation,” doi:10.1142/9789814277839_0005 [arXiv:0902.1904 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789814277839_0005 1904

  70. [70]

    Once more on the BPS bound for the susy kink

    A. Litvintsev and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Once more on the BPS bound for the SUSY kink,” [arXiv:hep-th/0010051 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Fermionic bound states in distinct kinklike backgrounds

    D. Bazeia and A. Mohammadi, “Fermionic bound states in distinct kinklike back- grounds,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) no.4, 203 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4778-9 [arXiv:1702.00891 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4778-9 2017

  72. [72]

    Fermions on kinks revisited,

    V. Klimashonok, I. Perapechka and Y. Shnir, “Fermions on kinks revisited,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.10, 105003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.105003 [arXiv:1909.12736 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.105003 2019

  73. [73]

    Remarks on sine-Gordon kink– fermion system: localized modes and scattering,

    V. A. Gani, A. Gorina, I. Perapechka and Y. Shnir, “Remarks on sine-Gordon kink– fermion system: localized modes and scattering,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) no.8, 757 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10707-0 [arXiv:2205.13437 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10707-0 2022

  74. [74]

    Fermionic spectral walls in kink collisions,

    J. G. F. Campos, A. Mohammadi, J. M. Queiruga, A. Wereszczynski and W. J. Za- krzewski, “Fermionic spectral walls in kink collisions,” JHEP 01 (2023), 071 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)071 [arXiv:2211.07754 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023)071 2023

  75. [75]

    Anomaly and quantum corrections to solitons in two-dimensional theories with minimal supersymmetry

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and M. B. Voloshin, “Anomaly and quantum corrections to solitons in two-dimensional theories with minimal supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999), 045016 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.045016 [arXiv:hep-th/9810068 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.045016 1999

  76. [76]

    Topological boundary conditions, the BPS bound, and elimination of ambiguities in the quantum mass of solitons

    H. Nastase, M. A. Stephanov, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and A. Rebhan, “Topological boundary conditions, the BPS bound, and elimination of ambiguities in the quantum mass of solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 542 (1999), 471-514 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00773- 1 [arXiv:hep-th/9802074 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(98)00773- 1999

  77. [77]

    Self-gravitating kinks in two-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian universes,

    A. Alonso Izquierdo, W. García Fuertes and J. Mateos Guilarte, “Self-gravitating kinks in two-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian universes,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.3, 036020 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.036020 [arXiv:1911.08167 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.036020 2020

  78. [78]

    Revisit on two-dimensional self-gravitating kinks: superpotential for- malism and linear stability,

    Y. Zhong, “Revisit on two-dimensional self-gravitating kinks: superpotential for- malism and linear stability,” JHEP 04 (2021), 118 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)118 [arXiv:2101.10928 [hep-th]]. 101

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)118 2021

  79. [79]

    Rosen-Morse potential and gravitating kinks,

    H. Wang, Y. Zhong and Z. Wang, “Rosen-Morse potential and gravitating kinks,” Phys. Lett. B 858 (2024), 139071 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139071 [arXiv:2409.14761 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139071 2024

  80. [80]

    Aratyn, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, “Topology of the Gauge Condition and New Confinement Phases in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981) 455. doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(81)90442-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550- 1981

Showing first 80 references.